Core Viewpoint - The A-share market reached a nearly 10-year high on August 18, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising 0.85% to close at 3728.03 points, and the total market capitalization of A-shares exceeding 100 trillion yuan for the first time in history [1][2]. Market Performance - Multiple indices hit recent highs, including the North Star 50 and the Shenzhen Component Index, which surpassed their previous peaks from October 8 of the previous year [2]. - As of August 18, 1154 active equity funds that have been established for over 10 years were analyzed, with 280 funds (approximately 24%) achieving a net value increase of over 100% in the past decade [2][6]. Fund Performance - Three funds reported returns exceeding 400% over the past ten years: Huashang New Trend Preferred (471.24%), Jiao Yin Trend Priority A (432.28%), and Huashang Advantage Industry (430.82%) [2][5]. - Additionally, 11 funds returned over 300%, 49 funds over 200%, and 272 funds doubled their net value [1][2]. Fund Management Insights - The two top-performing funds, Huashang New Trend Preferred and Huashang Advantage Industry, were previously managed by renowned fund manager Zhou Haidong, indicating a legacy of strong performance [4]. - Jiao Yin Trend Priority A has been managed by five different fund managers since its inception, with the current manager, Yang Jinjing, achieving a return of 186.78% since May 2020 [5]. Performance Disparity - Despite the strong performance of many funds, there is a notable disparity, with 96 funds (about 10%) experiencing losses over the past decade, including three funds with losses exceeding 50% [6][9]. - The fund with the largest loss, Founder Fubon Innovation Power A, has seen a decline of 60% since its inception, reflecting the challenges faced by some funds in the market [9].

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has released an "Action Plan for Promoting the High-Quality Development of Public Funds," which links fund managers' compensation to long-term performance, addressing the industry's focus on scale over returns [2] Group 1: Fund Manager Compensation - Fund managers with products underperforming their benchmarks by more than 10 percentage points over three years will see a significant decrease in their performance-based compensation [2] - Conversely, fund managers whose performance significantly exceeds benchmarks may see reasonable increases in their compensation [2] Group 2: Underperforming Funds - As of May 21, nearly 6000 public funds have been managed for over three years, with 1341 funds underperforming their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points, involving 735 fund managers [3] - Among these, 31 funds have underperformed their benchmarks by over 50 percentage points, including notable managers like Yao Zhipeng from Harvest Fund and Shi Cheng from Guotai Junan [3] - The worst performer is Morgan Fund's Guo Chen, whose fund has a cumulative return of -23.03%, lagging behind the benchmark by 128 percentage points [3] Group 3: High-Performing Funds - There are 543 funds that have outperformed their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points, with 33 funds exceeding benchmarks by over 50 percentage points [6] - Notable high performers include the Huaxia North Exchange Innovation Small and Medium Enterprises Fund, managed by Guo Xin, which achieved a cumulative return of 194%, surpassing its benchmark by 176 percentage points [6][7] - The North Exchange theme funds have emerged as a concentrated area of excess returns, with several funds exceeding their benchmarks by over 60 percentage points [7] Group 4: Adjustments to Performance Benchmarks - In response to the new action plan, many fund companies have begun to adjust their performance benchmarks, with over 100 funds changing their benchmarks by May 26 [8][10] - Adjustments are made to ensure benchmarks accurately reflect the risk-return characteristics of the funds, addressing previous inadequacies in benchmark design [10][11] - The CSRC emphasizes the need for strict regulation of benchmark selection and modification to ensure alignment with investment strategies and product positioning [11]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the introduction of a new policy by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) aimed at enhancing the long-term performance of public fund managers by linking their compensation to the performance of their funds relative to benchmarks [2][3] - The policy targets fund managers whose products have underperformed their benchmarks by more than 10 percentage points over three years, leading to a significant reduction in their performance-based compensation [2][3] - The initiative is expected to align the interests of fund managers with those of investors, encouraging a shift away from short-term speculation towards a focus on long-term investment capabilities [2][3] Group 2 - As of May 21, 2023, there are 5,898 public funds managed by fund managers with over three years of experience, with 1,341 funds underperforming their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points [3][4] - Among these, 31 funds have underperformed their benchmarks by more than 50 percentage points, including notable funds managed by well-known managers such as Zheng Chengran from GF Fund and Yao Zhipeng from Harvest Fund [3][4][5] - The worst-performing fund, Morgan Small Cap A, managed by Guo Chen, has a cumulative return of -23.03% over three years, underperforming its benchmark by 127.69 percentage points [4][5] Group 3 - Conversely, there are 543 funds that have outperformed their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points, with 33 funds exceeding their benchmarks by more than 50 percentage points [7][9] - The top-performing fund, Huaxia North Exchange Innovation Small and Medium Enterprises Selected Fund, managed by Gu Xin Feng, achieved a cumulative return of 194.13%, surpassing its benchmark by 175.89 percentage points [9][10] - The North Exchange theme funds have emerged as a significant area for excess returns, with several funds exceeding their benchmarks by over 60 percentage points [10] Group 4 - In response to the new policy, many fund companies are adjusting their performance benchmarks to better reflect the risk-return characteristics of their funds [11][12] - Recent adjustments include changes to benchmarks for various funds, such as the adjustment of the performance benchmark for the浦银安盛稳健增利债券 from "CSI All Bond Index" to a more complex composite benchmark [11][12] - The trend of benchmark adjustments is expected to continue as fund companies seek to align their performance metrics with regulatory expectations and improve their competitive positioning [13][14]

- The report provides an overview of the major asset markets, including equities, bonds, commodities, and foreign exchange markets[4][9][10][26][27][32][33][39] - The report highlights the performance of various indices in the A-share market, such as the Shanghai Composite Index, Shenzhen Component Index, and others, with their respective percentage changes[9][11][12][13][15] - The report also covers the performance of the Hong Kong stock market, including the Hang Seng Index and the Hang Seng China Enterprises Index, along with their percentage changes[10][18][19][22] - The report includes the performance of the US stock market, with indices like the Dow Jones Industrial Average, Nasdaq Index, and S&P 500, along with their percentage changes[10][24][25] - The bond market section discusses the yield changes of various government and corporate bonds, including the yield spread between different maturities[26][27][28][29][30][31] - The commodities market section provides the weekly percentage changes of various commodities such as crude oil, gold, copper, aluminum, and others[32][33][34][35][36][37][38] - The foreign exchange market section details the exchange rate changes of major currencies against the Chinese Yuan[39][41][42][43] - The report summarizes the newly established funds for the week, including their types, sizes, and fund managers[44][46] - The report provides an overview of the total number and scale of open-end public funds in China, categorized by different types of funds[47][48][49][50] - The performance of different types of funds over the past week, month, year, and year-to-date is compared, highlighting the best and worst performers[51][52][54][55][56][57][59]