Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the current market situation where the Shanghai Composite Index has reached a 10-year high, emphasizing the challenges ordinary investors face in timing the market and selecting stocks effectively [1] Industry Performance Summary - In recent years, the performance of various sectors in the A-share market has shown significant variability, with energy achieving double-digit growth even during the bear market of 2022, while real estate declined nearly 10% during the bull market of 2020 [1] - The annual performance of different sectors from 2019 to 2024 indicates that sectors like daily consumption and information technology have fluctuated significantly, with some years showing strong growth while others faced declines [3] Fund Manager Insights - Professional fund managers are better equipped to navigate market risks and opportunities, with several actively managed funds achieving positive returns and annualized rates above 16% since January 1, 2022 [4] - Specific fund managers, such as Shen Li, Zhang Chengyuan, and Hu Zhongyuan, have demonstrated effective strategies in managing their funds, focusing on growth, flexibility, and stable returns respectively [6][13][19] Investment Strategy Recommendations - Ordinary investors are advised to focus on finding suitable professional management tools that align with their risk preferences rather than getting caught up in short-term market fluctuations [25] - The article suggests that long-term investment strategies, rather than precise timing, are key to asset appreciation over time [25]

Core Insights - Since the "9·24" market rally began, small-cap funds have averaged a return of over 84%, with more than half of these products now subject to purchase restrictions [1][4]. Performance Summary - The A-share market has seen a strong upward trend, with the Shanghai Composite Index surpassing the previous high of 3674 points set on October 8 last year, marking a nearly four-year high since December 14, 2021 [2]. - The micro-cap index has surged by 120.96% since September 24 last year, with a year-to-date increase of 55.71%. The ChiNext small-cap index and the Guozheng 2000 index have risen by 83% and 68%, respectively, ranking among the top two of 20 Guozheng scale indices [2]. - As of August 15, 39 small-cap funds have achieved an average return of 84.6%, with 12 funds seeing net value increases exceeding 100% [2]. Fund Restrictions - Currently, 21 small-cap funds are either suspended from new subscriptions or large subscriptions, accounting for nearly 54% of the total [4]. - The average fund size of small-cap funds is relatively small, with most below 4 billion yuan, and 32 funds having sizes under 1 billion yuan [4]. Market Dynamics - The strong performance of small-cap stocks is attributed to policy support, liquidity easing, valuation recovery, and capital speculation [3]. - Despite a recent pullback in June, small-cap stocks have continued to perform well due to policy dividends and liquidity support [3]. - There are differing opinions on the future performance of small-cap stocks, with some believing that the small-cap style will continue to dominate due to market sentiment and favorable liquidity conditions [4]. Valuation Concerns - Some analysts express skepticism about the sustainability of small-cap stock gains, citing high price-to-earnings ratios and a lack of earnings support for micro-cap stocks [5]. - The rise in small-cap stocks is primarily driven by liquidity rather than substantial earnings growth, raising concerns about potential valuation bubbles [6].

Core Viewpoint - Since the "9·24" market rally, small-cap funds have seen an average return of over 84%, with more than half of the products now subject to purchase restrictions [2][6]. Performance Summary - The A-share market has shown strong upward movement, with the Shanghai Composite Index surpassing the previous high of 3674 points set on October 8 last year, reaching a nearly four-year high since December 14, 2021 [4]. - The Wind data indicates that since September 24 last year, the Wind Micro-Cap Index has surged by 120.96%, with a year-to-date increase of 55.71%. The ChiNext Small Cap Index and the CSI 2000 Index have risen by 83% and 68%, respectively, ranking among the top two in performance among 20 national indices [4]. - As of August 15, 39 small-cap funds have achieved an average return of 84.6%, with 12 funds exceeding a 100% increase in net value [4]. Fund Purchase Restrictions - With rising net values, the number of small-cap funds imposing purchase restrictions has increased. Currently, 21 small-cap funds are either suspended from new subscriptions or large subscriptions, accounting for nearly 54% [7]. - The average fund size of small-cap funds is relatively small, with most below 4 billion yuan, and 32 funds having sizes under 1 billion yuan [8]. Market Dynamics and Future Outlook - The underlying logic for the excess returns of small-cap stocks is attributed to policy catalysts, liquidity easing, valuation recovery, and capital speculation. In a weak economic recovery environment, small and medium-sized enterprises are seen as innovation carriers [5]. - There are differing opinions on the future performance of small-cap stocks. Some believe that small-cap styles will continue to outperform due to market sentiment, liquidity environment, industry trends, and policy benefits [8]. - However, skepticism exists regarding the sustainability of small-cap stock gains, with concerns about high price-to-earnings ratios and the reliance on liquidity rather than earnings growth [9].

Core Insights - The public fund industry is undergoing a mid-to-long-term performance review as of mid-2025, with notable achievements from Huaxia Fund across various categories [1] - Huaxia Fund has demonstrated strong investment capabilities, particularly in equity markets and cyclical manufacturing sectors, achieving significant returns for investors [1] Group 1: Performance Highlights - Huaxia Fund's product "Huaxia Beijing Stock Exchange Innovation Small and Medium Enterprises Selected Two-Year Open" delivered a remarkable 175.64% return over the past three years, winning titles in both "Mixed Equity Fund" and "Cyclical Manufacturing Fund" categories [1] - Huaxia Pantai A and Huaxia New Brocade A secured the first and second positions in the "Mixed Bond Fund" and "Flexible Allocation Fund" categories, showcasing the fund's long-term stable returns and excellent risk control [1] Group 2: QDII and FOF Performance - In the QDII sector, Huaxia Fund's "Huaxia Nasdaq 100 ETF" and "Huaxia Global Technology Pioneer A" ranked second and twelfth among QDII equity funds, while "Huaxia Greater China Credit Selected A," "Huaxia Overseas Income A," and "Huaxia Overseas Aggregation A" claimed the top three spots in QDII bond funds [1] - Huaxia Conservative Pension A achieved eighth place in the FOF fund performance rankings, providing investors with an important tool for asset allocation [2] Group 3: Passive Investment and Research Team - Huaxia Fund's passive investment products also performed well, with "Huaxia CSI Cloud Computing and Big Data Theme ETF" ranking eleventh in growth funds, and "Huaxia CSI Financial Technology Theme ETF" and "Huaxia CSI Animation Game ETF" placing fifth and twelfth in technology funds respectively [2] - The "Huaxia Hang Seng China Enterprises High Dividend ETF" consistently ranked in the top 20 of the "Dividend Fund" category over the past three years, offering investors a high-dividend asset allocation option [2] - The company is committed to enhancing its research and investment team, with Zhang Chengyuan and Mao Ying securing the top two positions in the "Mixed Bond Fund Manager" rankings, reflecting the strength of the company's research system and talent pool [2]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the introduction of a new policy by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) aimed at enhancing the long-term performance of public fund managers by linking their compensation to the performance of their funds relative to benchmarks [2][3] - The policy targets fund managers whose products have underperformed their benchmarks by more than 10 percentage points over three years, leading to a significant reduction in their performance-based compensation [2][3] - The initiative is expected to align the interests of fund managers with those of investors, encouraging a shift away from short-term speculation towards a focus on long-term investment capabilities [2][3] Group 2 - As of May 21, 2023, there are 5,898 public funds managed by fund managers with over three years of experience, with 1,341 funds underperforming their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points [3][4] - Among these, 31 funds have underperformed their benchmarks by more than 50 percentage points, including notable funds managed by well-known managers such as Zheng Chengran from GF Fund and Yao Zhipeng from Harvest Fund [3][4][5] - The worst-performing fund, Morgan Small Cap A, managed by Guo Chen, has a cumulative return of -23.03% over three years, underperforming its benchmark by 127.69 percentage points [4][5] Group 3 - Conversely, there are 543 funds that have outperformed their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points, with 33 funds exceeding their benchmarks by more than 50 percentage points [7][9] - The top-performing fund, Huaxia North Exchange Innovation Small and Medium Enterprises Selected Fund, managed by Gu Xin Feng, achieved a cumulative return of 194.13%, surpassing its benchmark by 175.89 percentage points [9][10] - The North Exchange theme funds have emerged as a significant area for excess returns, with several funds exceeding their benchmarks by over 60 percentage points [10] Group 4 - In response to the new policy, many fund companies are adjusting their performance benchmarks to better reflect the risk-return characteristics of their funds [11][12] - Recent adjustments include changes to benchmarks for various funds, such as the adjustment of the performance benchmark for the浦银安盛稳健增利债券 from "CSI All Bond Index" to a more complex composite benchmark [11][12] - The trend of benchmark adjustments is expected to continue as fund companies seek to align their performance metrics with regulatory expectations and improve their competitive positioning [13][14]