Core Viewpoint - The recent debate in the medical beauty industry regarding "recombinant collagen" has led to significant stock price fluctuations for leading companies, particularly Huaxi Biological and Juzhi Biological, with Huaxi denying any "business war" motives behind its actions [1][5]. Group 1: Market Reactions and Company Performance - From May 24 to June 18, Huaxi Biological's stock price increased by 23.65%, while Juzhi Biological's stock price fell by over 31% during the same period [1]. - As of June 18, Juzhi Biological's market capitalization was approximately 514 billion RMB, while Huaxi Biological's market capitalization was 245 billion RMB, less than half of Juzhi's [1]. Group 2: Opposition to "Name Games" - Huaxi Biological firmly opposes the "name game" in ingredient labeling, arguing that the capital market's concept switching has led to misunderstandings about hyaluronic acid and recombinant collagen, affecting the business environment and causing resource misallocation [2][3]. - The company emphasizes that recombinant collagen is only a small part of collagen research and that the leading edge of protein research remains with life science institutions and pharmaceutical companies [3]. Group 3: Industry Standards and Scientific Communication - Huaxi Biological highlights that no medical beauty Class III device certificates based on recombinant collagen have been approved internationally, indicating that this field requires more time for practical observation [3]. - The company plans to enhance professional communication with the capital market, noting that many analysts lack a biological background and often misinterpret the relationship between hyaluronic acid and collagen [4]. Group 4: Denial of Business War Claims - Huaxi Biological denies rumors that its recent actions are motivated by a "business war" due to pressure on its hyaluronic acid business and competition losses in recombinant collagen [5][6]. - The company asserts that its business has not been under pressure as claimed, with hyaluronic acid business growing over 10% annually and medical-grade hyaluronic acid growing over 20% [6]. Group 5: Consumer Trust and Market Integrity - Huaxi Biological argues that consumer trust in domestic brands should not be built on the misuse of academic concepts and misleading marketing practices, which could distort the business ecosystem and lead to resource misallocation [7]. - The company calls for industry-wide participation in product testing and standard discussions to enhance understanding and eliminate industry bubbles and misconceptions [7]. Group 6: Timeline of Events - The controversy began in mid-May when Huaxi Biological questioned several brokerage reports that promoted recombinant collagen and criticized hyaluronic acid [8]. - On May 24, beauty blogger "Big Mouth Doctor" Hao Yu publicly questioned the collagen content in Juzhi Biological's products, leading to further disputes [9][10].

华熙生物的下场无疑将"战况"再度升级，叠加此前，华熙生物炮轰"玻尿酸过时论"，华熙生物的此番下场战队，也被市场解读为是护肤成分市场中玻尿酸与 重组胶原蛋的路线之争。 出品｜搜狐财经 作者｜冯圆圆 端午假期期间，巨子生物产品造假风波再度升级。 6月1日晚间，华熙生物发文表示支持大嘴博士维护消费者权益；同时，已对大嘴博士发来的相关资料进行评估和第三方测试，且已得到结果。并表示，在其 公布结果之前，希望相关企业主动面对问题。 另一方面，巨子生物也在3小时后，发布了机构的道歉声明，同时表示对某上市公司的发言感到震惊又痛心。 一来一往，双方的发言均将矛头指向了对方。 可复美造假事件再升级 6月2日，知名大V大嘴博士再度发文"炮轰"巨子生物，剑指巨子生物对其合作的检测机构施压；同时表示，自己已联系不到当时负责检测的负责人。 （图片来源：大嘴博士颜究所） 大嘴博士的此番言论，再度将双方的"骂战"升级。 回顾时间线，5月24日，知名大V大嘴博士在微博发布了一则8分钟的视频，直指巨子生物旗下大单品可复美胶原蛋白精华的胶原蛋白含量造假。 （图片来源：大嘴博士微博） 据大嘴博士表示，巨子生物大单品可复美胶原蛋白精华中重组胶原蛋白的 ...