近日，小编刷到一位网友发文讲述自己"赣州的房子卖不掉也租不出去"的经历，引起了广泛的关注和热议，也折射出当前赣州房地产市场的现状。 在楼市发展的浪潮中，总有人在高歌猛进，也有人在黯然神伤。 文章中，该网友讲述自己于2010年在赣州买了一套建筑面积138㎡的楼梯房，当时总价60几万，加上装修后70多万，本打算作为养老之所。 然而随着时间推移，考虑到楼梯房上下楼不方便，便打算将其出售，换购成电梯房。 但现实却给他浇了一盆冷水，中介公司给出的报价竟只有60几万，这让他十分生气：房子在历经15年后，不仅没增值，还倒赔了几万块，若算上利息，亏 损更为惨重。 面对卖房无果的局面，该网友决定退而求其次，打算将房子出租回点血。 起初挂牌月租1600元，可2个月过去无人问津，无奈降至1200元，仍没惹租出去。前来询问的租客，要么嫌弃装修老旧，要么对楼梯房嗤之以鼻。 房子卖不掉、租不出去，每月还有物业费的支出，让该网友郁闷不已，遂在网上发文泣问，赣州的房地产市场真的这么惨吗？ 网友普遍认为当前三四线城市房价呈下行趋势，部分区域"跌回10年前价格"，很多城市二手房"有价无市"，业主"找个出价的都难"，甚至"亏30-40万仍难 出手 ...

Group 1 - The enthusiasm of Chinese citizens for real estate is well-known, with many eager to purchase homes as soon as they save enough for a down payment, linking homeownership to residency, education, and marriage [1] - The future value retention potential of stairway apartments versus elevator apartments should be analyzed from multiple aspects, including location advantages, higher usable area in stairway apartments, and lower shared costs [3][5] - Recent discussions have emerged regarding which type of apartment will retain value better in the coming years, with some industry insiders predicting that elevator apartments may have an advantage due to their convenience, especially for families with elderly members [4] Group 2 - Stairway apartments typically have a lower shared area percentage (around 15%) compared to elevator apartments, which can be as high as 25% or more, leading to higher costs for elevator apartment owners [3][5] - Although elevator apartments offer convenience, they may have longer wait times during peak hours, and in emergencies like earthquakes or fires, stairway apartments provide safer and quicker escape routes [7] - The difficulty of demolition is higher for elevator apartments due to their greater height, making stairway apartments easier to manage in terms of future maintenance and potential demolition costs [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the economic pressures faced by homebuyers due to high property prices and emphasizes the importance of housing in various life aspects, predicting that "staircase houses" may have greater appreciation potential compared to "elevator houses" in the long term [1]. Group 1: Advantages of Staircase Houses - Public area advantage: Staircase houses typically have a public area ratio of only 10-15%, significantly lower than elevator houses, which can reach up to 40%, leading to substantial savings on public area costs and monthly property fees [3]. - Safety and emergency response: While staircase houses may be less convenient for daily use, they offer better safety during emergencies like fires or earthquakes, allowing residents to escape directly without relying on potentially malfunctioning elevators [3]. - Old renovation potential and location advantage: Staircase houses over 20 years old are likely to undergo significant renovations, enhancing their appeal and value, especially given their advantageous central locations [5]. Group 2: Cost and Future Potential - Property fee cost advantage: The property fees for staircase houses are generally lower than those for elevator houses due to the maintenance costs associated with elevators, making staircase houses more financially attractive [5]. - Possibility of demolition: Staircase houses have a higher likelihood of undergoing renovations compared to elevator houses, which are less likely to be demolished due to high costs associated with their dense occupancy, thus presenting better future appreciation potential [7]. - Long-term investment value: Despite the current advantages of elevator houses in terms of convenience and community environment, staircase houses exhibit more significant long-term investment value due to their advantages in public area ratios, safety, renovation potential, property fees, and demolition likelihood [7].