然而，这场资本盛宴的膨胀速度与随后的市场收缩同样迅猛。社区团购的迅猛发展引发了监管关注。2020年12月，国家市场监管总局联合商务部推出"九 个不得"新规，明确要求互联网平台企业不得通过低价倾销、达成垄断协议、掠夺性定价等危害公平竞争市场。 这一监管重拳成为行业转折点。 自2021年起，泡沫开始破裂，倒闭潮席卷而来：同程生活申请破产，食享会转型零食赛道，橙心优选收缩关城，京喜拼拼与十荟团也大幅缩减业务。在随 后的两年内，行业洗牌以惊人的速度完成：滴滴橙心优选率先全面退出，京东的京喜拼拼逐渐边缘化，阿里淘菜菜与美团优选大幅收缩区域布局，众多创 业公司则被迫停止全国扩张，回归区域经营或黯然离场。 为什么不行了？ 事实上，社区团购自诞生以来，其商业模式就面临盈利困难的根本性质疑。在行业初期，互联网巨头依赖"大量烧钱"和"不计成本地补贴"来抢占市场，通 过"一分钱秒杀"等低于成本价的倾销行为培养用户习惯，但这种"赔本赚吆喝"的模式始终无法解决盈利问题。尤其是生鲜品类作为主营，其高损耗、低毛 利的特点进一步加剧了盈利压力。当资本补贴退潮后，平台难以找到可持续的盈利模式，导致长期亏损，最终被验证为"无法带来预期的增长和利 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the decline of community group buying in China, highlighting the shift in consumer demand from low-cost options to instant retail services that offer speed, reliability, and quality [5][7][30]. Group 1: Historical Context - In 2020, the pandemic-driven "stay-at-home economy" propelled community group buying into the spotlight, with major players like Didi, Meituan, and Pinduoduo investing heavily [9][10]. - The industry saw over 559 billion yuan in financing, with nearly 200 companies entering the market, leading to what was termed the "second group buying war" [9][10]. - By 2021, regulatory measures began to impact the market, leading to the collapse of many smaller platforms due to unsustainable business models reliant on subsidies [10][11]. Group 2: Current Landscape - As of 2025, only Pinduoduo's "Duoduo Mai Cai" remains in the community group buying space, having adapted its model to focus on high-frequency, durable goods rather than perishables [6][11]. - The GMV for Duoduo Mai Cai is projected to approach 300 billion yuan, achieved by shifting from a community group buying model to a "low-cost instant retail" approach [11][12]. Group 3: Reasons for Decline - **Reason 1: Hidden Costs** Community group buying is perceived as a "light asset" model, but it incurs significant hidden costs related to warehousing, logistics, and customer service, leading to unsustainable losses [14][15]. - **Reason 2: Quality Control Issues** Poor product quality and lack of supplier qualifications have led to numerous consumer complaints, damaging the reputation of community group buying platforms [17][19]. - **Reason 3: Slow Delivery** The lengthy delivery process, often taking over 24 hours, has resulted in customer dissatisfaction, as users prioritize reliability over low prices [20][21]. Group 4: Competition from Instant Retail - Instant retail has emerged as a formidable competitor, offering faster delivery times (within 30 minutes) and better quality control, which community group buying struggles to match [24][26]. - The ability of instant retail to provide a wide range of products and immediate availability has shifted consumer preferences away from community group buying [30].

Core Viewpoint - Community group buying has been recognized as a significant failure in the internet industry, with major players incurring substantial losses and ultimately leading to a rapid decline in the sector's viability [1][3]. Group 1: Industry Overview - The community group buying sector experienced explosive growth in 2020, followed by a swift decline, with major companies like Meituan and Pinduoduo reporting cumulative losses exceeding 80 billion yuan from 2020 to 2024 [1][3]. - Major players such as Meituan, Pinduoduo, Alibaba, and Didi invested heavily in community group buying, with Alibaba's Taocai Cai reportedly spending at least 20 billion yuan to secure a top market position [4][3]. - The community group buying model was initially seen as a cost-effective alternative to traditional retail, with lower prices and reduced delivery costs compared to other models like front warehouses [6][8]. Group 2: Business Model Analysis - Community group buying utilized a "next-day delivery + self-pickup" model, significantly reducing operational costs compared to traditional delivery methods [6][4]. - The model aimed to streamline supply chains by minimizing intermediaries, reducing markup rates from 45% to below 20% [8]. - Despite its initial promise, the community group buying sector faced challenges such as high operational costs, limited profit margins, and regulatory scrutiny, leading to a decline in market viability [10][14]. Group 3: Market Dynamics - By mid-2022, Pinduoduo and Meituan held a combined market share of 76%, but both companies shifted focus towards reducing losses rather than aggressive competition [12][14]. - The community group buying sector's struggles were exacerbated by the rise of instant retail, which offered a more efficient and profitable alternative, leading to questions about the future viability of community group buying [22][24]. - Instant retail's market size reached 650 billion yuan in 2023, significantly overshadowing community group buying, which faced increasing competition from established players like JD and Alibaba [22][24].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the competitive landscape of the e-commerce sector in China, focusing on Alibaba's Taotian Group and its declining performance compared to rivals like JD.com and Pinduoduo. It highlights the challenges faced by Alibaba in maintaining its market share and profitability amidst increasing competition and changing consumer behavior [3][5][8]. Group 1: Competitive Landscape - Taotian Group is not only a key revenue driver for Alibaba but also faces significant challenges as its growth lags behind Alibaba International and Alibaba Cloud [3][5]. - The retail battle intensifies with JD.com aggressively entering the food delivery market, prompting Taotian to collaborate with Ele.me to compete [4][37]. - Alibaba's market share has been declining, from 51.3% in 2021 to an estimated 36.2% by 2026, while Pinduoduo and JD.com have gained ground [21][25]. Group 2: Financial Performance - In the fiscal year 2025, Alibaba's revenue reached 99.63 billion yuan, with a growth rate of 5.9%, falling short of the 1 trillion yuan target [10][18]. - Taotian Group contributed 44.98 billion yuan in revenue, accounting for 45% of Alibaba's total, but this represents a 1% decrease year-on-year [12]. - The revenue growth of Taotian Group was only 3%, significantly lower than the double-digit growth rates of Alibaba International and Alibaba Cloud [13][15]. Group 3: Strategic Initiatives - Alibaba plans to invest 380 billion yuan over the next three years in AI and cloud computing to address traffic concerns and enhance user experience [31][35]. - The upcoming "618" shopping festival is seen as a critical opportunity to assess the performance of the new leadership under Jiang Fan, who took charge of Alibaba's e-commerce division [3][40]. - Taotian Group has implemented changes to its merchant operating rules to improve monetization rates, which have been lower than competitors [27][30]. Group 4: Market Dynamics - The rise of live-streaming e-commerce has significantly impacted Taotian's market share, with platforms like Douyin and Kuaishou capturing a larger audience [22][24]. - The competition is expected to continue intensifying, with Alibaba's Taotian Group needing to stabilize its market position while managing costs associated with aggressive promotional strategies [26][40].