Core Viewpoint - Decathlon, once known as an affordable sports paradise, has transformed into a brand that many consumers now find unaffordable and unappealing due to significant price increases without corresponding improvements in product quality or desirability [3][12][26]. Group 1: Price Increases and Consumer Sentiment - Between 2022 and 2024, the average selling price of Decathlon products rose from 128.81 yuan to 196.32 yuan, marking a 52% increase [6]. - Specific product price changes include a 20L backpack increasing from 49.9 yuan to 89.9 yuan, a white cotton T-shirt from 19.9 yuan to 39.9 yuan, and a fleece jacket from 249 yuan to 499 yuan [7][10]. - Consumers express feelings of betrayal as they now have to reconsider purchases that were once straightforward, indicating a shift from a "buy without thinking" mentality to a more cautious approach [11][12]. Group 2: Market Position and Brand Perception - Decathlon's strategy to raise prices in an attempt to reposition itself as a higher-end brand has not resonated well with consumers, leading to a loss of its original customer base [12][26]. - The brand's attempt to cater to both price-sensitive consumers and higher-end markets has resulted in a fragmented identity, with products ranging from low-cost items to high-end bicycles priced at 69,999 yuan [28][30]. - The company's revenue for 2024 was reported at 16.2 billion euros, but profits fell by 15.5%, indicating that price increases did not translate into brand premium [25][26]. Group 3: Competitive Landscape and Consumer Choices - The outdoor sports market is seeing a rise in competition, with many brands increasing their prices, yet some are still able to attract consumers willing to pay a premium [14][15]. - The emergence of alternative brands offering similar products at lower prices is contributing to Decathlon's challenges, as consumers are increasingly opting for these alternatives [20][26]. - The trend of consumers gravitating towards mid to high-end products suggests a shift in market dynamics, where Decathlon's traditional value proposition is being undermined [15][16]. Group 4: Brand Strategy and Future Directions - Decathlon's recent rebranding efforts, including the introduction of a new logo and the establishment of specialized brands, aim to redefine its market presence [23][25]. - Despite these efforts, the brand struggles to connect emotionally with consumers, lacking the storytelling and cultural resonance that competitors like Lululemon and Arc'teryx have successfully cultivated [33][34]. - The recent popularity of a free promotional item, the "urea bag," highlights a potential return to Decathlon's roots of practicality and value, contrasting sharply with its recent pricing strategy [42][44].

Core Viewpoint - Decathlon, once known as an affordable sports paradise, has transformed into a brand perceived as expensive and less appealing due to significant price increases without corresponding improvements in product quality or consumer experience [4][12][14]. Group 1: Price Increases and Consumer Sentiment - From 2022 to 2024, the average selling price of Decathlon products rose from 128.81 yuan to 196.32 yuan, marking a 52% increase [4]. - Classic products have seen notable price hikes, such as a 20L backpack increasing from 49.9 yuan to 89.9 yuan and a fleece jacket from 249 yuan to 499 yuan [7]. - Consumers express feelings of betrayal as they perceive the price increases without enhanced value, leading to a shift in purchasing behavior [12][14]. Group 2: Market Position and Competition - Decathlon's strategy to raise prices aims to transition from a budget brand to a more premium positioning, but this has alienated both price-sensitive consumers and potential high-end buyers [32][39]. - The outdoor sports market is experiencing a general price increase, with many brands successfully raising prices while maintaining consumer interest, unlike Decathlon [15][17]. - Competitors in the outdoor segment, such as Camel and Columbia, have also raised prices significantly, yet they continue to attract consumers [16]. Group 3: Brand Strategy and Identity - Decathlon has attempted to rebrand itself under new leadership, focusing on becoming a multi-domain professional sports brand, but the execution has not resonated with consumers [25][27]. - The brand's identity is perceived as fragmented, with a mix of low-priced and high-end products leading to confusion among consumers about its core value proposition [33][34]. - The recent introduction of a free promotional item, the "urea bag," has garnered positive attention, suggesting a potential return to its roots of practicality and affordability [56][62]. Group 4: Financial Performance - In 2024, Decathlon reported revenues of 16.2 billion euros but experienced a 15.5% decline in profits, indicating that price increases have not translated into brand premiumization [29][30]. - The company is reportedly considering selling a 30% stake in its Chinese subsidiary, valued at approximately 10 billion yuan, reflecting challenges in its market strategy [31].

Core Viewpoint - Decathlon, once known as an affordable sports paradise, has undergone significant price increases, leading to a loss of its original appeal to price-sensitive consumers while failing to attract higher-end customers [5][8][28]. Group 1: Price Increases and Consumer Sentiment - Between 2022 and 2024, the average selling price of Decathlon products rose from 128.81 yuan to 196.32 yuan, marking a 52% increase [9]. - Classic products have seen notable price hikes, such as a 20L backpack increasing from 49.9 yuan to 89.9 yuan and a fleece jacket from 249 yuan to 499 yuan [13]. - Consumers express feelings of betrayal as the perceived value of products has not improved alongside price increases, leading to hesitation in purchasing [11][18]. Group 2: Market Position and Competition - Decathlon's price increases have positioned it as a less favorable option compared to other brands, with consumers questioning why they should choose Decathlon over brands like Lululemon or local alternatives [18][20]. - The outdoor sports market has seen a general price increase, with many brands successfully raising prices while maintaining consumer interest, unlike Decathlon [19]. - The number of new brands in the outdoor sports sector has doubled, indicating increased competition for Decathlon in the mid-range market [20]. Group 3: Brand Strategy and Identity Crisis - Decathlon has attempted to reposition itself as a multi-domain professional sports brand, but this strategy has not resonated well with consumers [26][27]. - The company has faced a significant drop in profit, with a 15.5% decrease year-on-year, indicating that price increases have not translated into brand premium [27]. - The brand's identity has become fragmented, with a mix of low-priced and high-priced items leading to confusion among consumers about its market position [28][29]. Group 4: Consumer Experience and Brand Perception - The shift towards higher prices has alienated Decathlon's original customer base, who valued the brand for its affordability and practicality [37]. - The lack of emotional connection and storytelling in the brand's transition to higher pricing has resulted in a failure to engage both existing and potential customers [35][38]. - Recent marketing efforts, such as the introduction of a free urea bag, have garnered positive attention, suggesting a potential return to the brand's roots of practicality and value [42][47].