Core Insights - The fund advisory market experienced significant positive performance in the first half of 2025, with all 16 mid-to-high risk star fund advisory portfolios achieving positive returns, averaging a return rate of 6.48% [1][4] - Global asset advisory portfolios also performed well, with 22 portfolios showing an average return of 6.81%, led by Guotai Fund's "Progressive Global Allocation" with a return of 15.44% [3][6] Group 1: Domestic Fund Advisory Performance - The A-share market showed a strong upward trend, with the North Certificate 50 Index leading with a cumulative increase of 39.45% [4] - Silver华 Fund's "Tianji - Qiaoqiao Ying" portfolio achieved the highest return of 12.76%, benefiting from strategic allocations in hard technology, pharmaceuticals, and basic consumer sectors [4][5] - Other notable performers included Huaxia Wealth's "Active Progress" portfolio with a return of 12.09% and Huabao Securities' "Cosmic Warrior" portfolio with a return of 9.2% [4] Group 2: Global Fund Advisory Performance - The global asset advisory portfolios expanded rapidly over the past three years, with all 22 portfolios achieving positive returns in the first half of 2025 [6][7] - Guotai Fund's "Guotai Progressive Global Allocation" led with a return of 15.44%, and since its inception, it has achieved a return of 39.63% [6] - Other strong performers included Huaxia Wealth's "Huaxia Global Selection" with a return of 14.68% and "Siyuan Regular Investment Global Good Assets Portfolio" with a return of 12.26% [7] Group 3: Portfolio Adjustments - Several fund advisory portfolios made strategic adjustments in June, focusing on undervalued sectors [7][8] - The "Active Progress" portfolio reduced its convertible bond holdings and increased allocations to real estate and other undervalued sectors [8] - The "Huaxia Global Selection" portfolio also adjusted its holdings, reducing exposure to convertible bonds and overseas equities while increasing positions in Hong Kong real estate and A-share growth sectors [8]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles indicates that 17 equity star advisory portfolios collectively reported negative returns over the past month, with only 8 maintaining positive returns in the first four months of the year [1][2] - The top three performing advisory portfolios have shifted their strategies towards defensive positions, increasing allocations in consumer sectors and undervalued assets, reflecting differing responses to market volatility [1][2] - The average return of the 17 equity star advisory portfolios was 0.22%, with the best-performing portfolio, "Yinhua Tianji - Qiaoqiao Ying," leading with a return of 7.65% in the first quarter, focusing on hard technology, medical healthcare, and basic consumer sectors [2][3] Group 2 - The "Yinhua Tianji - Qiaoqiao Ying" portfolio made adjustments in late April, increasing its allocation to consumer sectors while balancing technology categories, and reducing the proportion of index funds [2][3] - The "Jihua Jinqu" portfolio also made adjustments in late April, reducing exposure to bonds and low-volatility assets while increasing investments in undervalued sectors like pharmaceuticals and real estate [3][4] - The "Zhongou Super Stock All-Star Portfolio" conducted a rebalancing in early April, maintaining an overweight position in growth styles while optimizing specific holdings due to macroeconomic uncertainties [4] Group 3 - The global asset direction advisory portfolios showed significant performance divergence, with an average return of approximately -0.62% over the past month, and only 9 out of 27 portfolios reporting gains [4][5] - The "Guotai Jinqi Global Allocation Portfolio" achieved the highest return of 11.84% in the first four months, focusing on the Hong Kong stock market and sectors like innovative pharmaceuticals and gold [5] - The "Time Traveler Portfolio" completed its first rebalancing since 2025 in late April, shifting from high-volatility tech investments to lower-volatility index funds due to anticipated increases in U.S. stock market volatility [5]