对此，有分析认为，上述情况的发生应该和此次法人切换有关。随后，该投资者向记者反馈称，"问题 已经处理好了，因为要过中登，得T+1生效。明天可以恢复正常交易。" 据了解，无论投资者开了多少个证券账户，都会在中登公司有一个唯一的一码通账户。就上述投资者反 映的情况，某券商相关业务负责人分析认为，这可能确实和中登公司的一码通相关，是两家券商此次合 并引发的问题，中登公司会处理。另外，在某业内人士看来，这个问题比较特殊，但应该不难解决。 今日，有投资者向《每日经济新闻》记者反映，自己之前在国泰君安和海通证券都开了证券账户，其中 海通证券的账户处于休眠状态，此前交易可以正常进行，但今天上午却发现原国泰君安的账户无法正常 交易，几次卖出委托都被系统拒绝。从他提供的交易截图来看，系统将几笔"已拒绝"的卖出委托备注 为"无效账户"。 根据国泰海通公告，公司拟于9月12日实施法人切换、客户及业务迁移，相关工作主要是将原海通证券 在中登公司、三大交易所等单位的法人主体切换为国泰海通，并相应切换相关市场的结算参与人编码、 结算账号、交易商代码、交易主体代码、编码参数等。 ...

Core Points - The article addresses common concerns regarding the cancellation of securities accounts, emphasizing that users have the right to cancel their accounts regardless of the reason [3][5] - It outlines the reasons for account cancellation, including account inactivity, switching brokers, and simplifying account management [4][5] - The article provides a detailed guide on the cancellation process, highlighting both online and offline methods [7][8][10] Summary by Sections Reasons for Account Cancellation - Users may cancel accounts due to impulsive opening, dissatisfaction with broker services, or concerns about information security [4][5] - Common reasons include account inactivity leading to fears of fees, switching to brokers with better services, and managing multiple accounts [5][16] Cancellation Process - Online cancellation is preferred for its convenience, requiring users to ensure no assets or pending transactions exist [8][9] - The steps for online cancellation include accessing the broker's app, finding the cancellation option, and submitting necessary information [8][9] - Offline cancellation is recommended for accounts with special circumstances, requiring a visit to the broker's office [10][12] Important Considerations - Users must confirm that their accounts have no assets before cancellation to avoid rejection of their requests [13][15] - Once an account is canceled, it cannot be restored, necessitating a new account setup for future use [14][15] - Users should clearly specify which account to cancel, especially if multiple accounts exist with the same broker [15][16]

Group 1 - The A-share market is experiencing increased trading activity, with a strong willingness among investors to enter the market, leading to a record high in margin trading balances over the past decade [2][5] - There has been a noticeable increase in the number of effective accounts, with daily new account openings ranging from 30 to 40 at some brokerage firms, indicating a shift from previously inactive accounts to active ones [3][4] - Online account opening has also surged, with many investors comparing brokerage services and opting for those with lower commissions and better support, although a significant portion of new investors lacks deep market knowledge [4][5] Group 2 - Margin trading balances have steadily increased since surpassing 2 trillion yuan on August 5, reaching 21,023.09 billion yuan by August 18, with the number of investors participating in margin trading also hitting a yearly high [5][6] - Many investors are inquiring about margin trading accounts, including experienced investors, as brokerages lower margin trading rates to attract more clients [5][6] - While margin trading can enhance returns, it carries significant risks, and investors are advised to assess their risk tolerance carefully before engaging in such activities [6]

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market is experiencing increased trading activity and investor interest, leading to a significant rise in the number of effective accounts and margin trading balances, reaching a ten-year high [1][4]. Group 1: Investor Activity - There is a noticeable increase in the number of investors visiting brokerage offices for consultations and account openings, with some offices reporting daily inquiries from over ten investors [2][3]. - The number of new accounts opened daily ranges from 30 to 40, with a significant portion being effective accounts rather than empty accounts, indicating a shift in investor behavior [3][4]. - Online account opening has also surged, with many investors comparing brokerage services and opting for those with lower commissions and better support [3]. Group 2: Margin Trading - The margin trading balance in the A-share market has steadily increased since surpassing 2 trillion yuan on August 5, reaching 21,023.09 billion yuan by August 18, marking a ten-year high [4]. - The number of investors participating in margin trading has also risen, with 630,200 investors involved as of August 18, a record for the year [4]. - Many investors are seeking information about margin trading, with both new and experienced investors showing interest in opening margin accounts [4][5]. Group 3: Risks and Cautions - While margin trading can enhance returns, it also carries significant risks, particularly for inexperienced investors who may not fully understand the implications of leverage [5]. - Brokerage advisors emphasize the importance of assessing risk tolerance before engaging in margin trading, suggesting that clients should not fully utilize their available margin [5].

Group 1 - The A-share market has seen increased trading activity and a strong willingness among investors to enter the market, leading to a rise in account openings at brokerage firms [1][2] - Brokerage firms are experiencing a surge in customer inquiries and account openings, with some firms reporting daily new account openings of 30 to 40 [2] - Despite the current increase in account openings, the number is still below the levels seen during the "9·24" market event last year [2] Group 2 - The margin trading balance in the A-share market has been steadily increasing, surpassing 2 trillion yuan since August 5, reaching 21,023.09 billion yuan by August 18 [3] - The number of investors participating in margin trading has also risen, with a record high of 630,200 investors on August 18 [3] - Brokerage firms are lowering margin trading rates, making it more attractive for investors, and there is a mix of new and existing investors reactivating their margin accounts [3]

Core Viewpoint - The case illustrates the complexities of identifying bribery in situations where public officials use third-party accounts for personal gain, highlighting the need for precise legal interpretation of such actions [1][3][5]. Group 1: Case Background - The case involves a public official (甲) and a private company owner (乙), where the official used the company's funds for stock trading under a pre-agreed arrangement that profits would go to the official while losses would be borne by the company [2][4]. - In 2019, the official provided assistance to the company in land transfer matters, leading to a financial arrangement where the company funded the official's stock trading activities [2][5]. Group 2: Legal Interpretations - There are differing opinions on whether the actions constitute bribery, with one view suggesting it was a legitimate private investment agreement, while the other argues it was a clear case of bribery due to the unequal risk-sharing arrangement [3][4]. - The second viewpoint posits that the official's acceptance of the arrangement, which exempted him from losses, constitutes receiving bribes, as the financial loss of 400,000 yuan effectively served as a kickback for the official's prior assistance [5][6]. Group 3: Legal Framework - The legal framework indicates that for a contract to be valid, it must reflect genuine intent, which is questioned in this case due to the nature of the agreement between the public official and the private entity [4][5]. - The actions of the official are seen as violating the integrity expected of public servants, as they exploited their position for personal financial gain, thus constituting a breach of duty [5][6].