吉林检察机关依法对张巍涉嫌贪污、国有公司人员滥用职权、受贿案提起公诉 央视网消息：据"最高人民检察院"微信公众号消息，检察机关依法分别对胡延生、张巍、潘发勇提起公 诉。 吉林检察机关依法对胡延生涉嫌受贿案提起公诉 日前，吉林省委巡视组原副组长、巡视专员胡延生（正厅级）涉嫌受贿罪一案，由吉林省监察委员会调 查终结，移送检察机关审查起诉。经吉林省人民检察院指定管辖，由白城市人民检察院依法向白城市中 级人民法院提起公诉。案件正在进一步办理中。 检察机关在审查起诉阶段，依法告知了被告人胡延生享有的诉讼权利，并依法讯问了被告人，听取了辩 护人意见。白城市人民检察院起诉指控：被告人胡延生利用担任长春市财政局局长、吉林省委巡视组副 组长等职务上的便利，为他人谋取利益，非法收受他人财物，数额特别巨大，依法应当以受贿罪追究其 刑事责任。 检察机关在审查起诉阶段，依法告知了被告人潘发勇享有的诉讼权利，并依法讯问了被告人，听取了辩 护人的意见。黔东南州人民检察院起诉指控：被告人潘发勇利用担任毕节织金循环经济新区党工委委 员、管委会副主任，毕节市工业和能源委员会党组书记、主任，织金县委副书记、县长等职务便利，为 他人谋取利益，非法收 ...

Core Viewpoint - The case of Li Quan, former chairman of New China Life Insurance Co., highlights significant corruption within the company, resulting in severe legal consequences for the individual involved [1][5]. Summary by Sections Case Details - Li Quan was sentenced to life imprisonment for embezzlement and death penalty with a two-year reprieve for bribery, along with the confiscation of all personal property [1]. - The court found that from June 2015 to March 2024, Li Quan illegally appropriated business profits totaling over 108 million RMB through deceitful means [3]. - From 2010 to 2023, he received bribes amounting to over 105 million RMB by leveraging his position to assist various entities in business collaborations and fund subscriptions [3]. Court Ruling - The court deemed Li Quan's actions as constituting both embezzlement and bribery, with particularly large amounts causing significant losses to the state and public interests, warranting severe punishment [5]. - Mitigating factors included his confession, cooperation with authorities, and the return of embezzled and bribed funds, which led to a lighter sentence [5]. Trial Proceedings - The trial was held on May 14, 2025, with evidence presented by the prosecution and Li Quan's defense team engaging in cross-examination [7]. - The proceedings were attended by over 30 individuals, including representatives from the National People's Congress, political advisors, and family members of the defendant [7].

日前，福建省南平市政协原党组成员、副主席江建华涉嫌受贿罪一案，由福建省监察委员会调查终 结，移送检察机关审查起诉。经福建省人民检察院指定管辖，由泉州市人民检察院依法向泉州市中级人 民法院提起公诉。案件正在进一步办理中。 检察机关在审查起诉阶段，依法告知了被告人江建华享有的诉讼权利，并依法讯问了被告人，听取 了辩护人的意见。泉州市人民检察院起诉指控：2004年至2025年，被告人江建华利用担任光泽县副县 长、顺昌县委书记、南平市政协副主席等职务上的便利，以及利用职权或者地位形成的便利条件，通过 其他国家工作人员职务上的行为，为他人谋取利益，非法收受他人财物，数额特别巨大，依法应当以受 贿罪追究其刑事责任。 央视网消息：检察机关依法分别对高应云、江建华、杨桦提起公诉，详情如下： 辽宁检察机关依法对高应云涉嫌受贿案提起公诉 日前，国家电网西藏电力有限公司原党委副书记、副总经理高应云涉嫌受贿罪一案，由辽宁省沈阳 市监察委员会调查终结，移送检察机关审查起诉。经最高人民检察院指定管辖，由沈阳市人民检察院依 法向沈阳市中级人民法院提起公诉。案件正在进一步办理中。 检察机关在审查起诉阶段，依法告知了被告人高应云享有的诉讼权利 ...

根据刑法第三百八十八条之一规定，离职的国家工作人员利用其原职权或者地位形成的便利条件，通过 其他国家工作人员职务上的行为，为请托人谋取不正当利益，索取请托人财物或者收受请托人财物，数 额较大或有其他较重情节的，构成利用影响力受贿罪。实践中，如果离职的国家工作人员与国家工作人 员勾结，伙同受贿，应以受贿罪的共犯追究刑事责任。笔者结合一起案例进行分析。 第一种意见认为，王某构成利用影响力受贿罪、行贿罪、对非国家工作人员行贿罪，应对其数罪并罚。 李某、吴某分别构成受贿罪和非国家工作人员受贿罪，金额分别按照50万元认定。首先，李某系国家工 作人员，吴某系非国家工作人员。王某利用原职务形成的影响力向李某打招呼，为A公司谋取不正当利 益，并收受张某送予的钱款，其行为构成利用影响力受贿罪，犯罪数额为180万元。其次，王某向国家 工作人员李某请托，为A公司谋取不正当利益，并因此送予李某财物，王某此行为构成行贿罪，犯罪数 额为50万元；王某向非国家工作人员吴某请托，为A公司谋取不正当利益，并因此送予吴某财物，王某 此行为构成对非国家工作人员行贿罪，犯罪数额为50万元。第二种意见认为，王某和李某、吴某构成受 贿罪共同犯罪，犯罪数 ...

2025年11月18日，贵州省贵阳市中级人民法院一审公开宣判云南省委原常委、省政府原副省长李石松受贿一案，对被告人李石松以受贿罪判处有期徒刑十五年，并 处罚金人民币五百万元；对追缴在案的李石松犯罪所得财物及孳息依法上缴国库，不足部分继续追缴。 经审理查明：2005年8月至2024年3月，被告人李石松利用担任云南省政府办公厅秘书二处副处长、处长，省政府办公厅党组成员、副秘书长，云南省红河州委常 委、副州长，云南省工业和信息化委员会党组书记、主任，云南省工业和信息化厅党组书记、厅长，云南省曲靖市委副书记、市长，云南省委常委、曲靖市委书记 等职务上的便利，为有关单位和个人在企业经营、工程承揽、职务提拔等事项上提供帮助，直接或者通过他人非法收受上述单位和个人给予的财物，共计价值人民 币1.0025亿余元。 贵阳市中级人民法院认为，被告人李石松的行为构成受贿罪。李石松受贿数额特别巨大，并使国家和人民利益遭受特别重大损失。鉴于李石松有重大立功表现；受 贿犯罪中有未遂情节；到案后如实供述罪行,主动交代办案机关尚未掌握的绝大部分受贿事实；认罪悔罪，积极退赃，赃款赃物大部分已追缴，其中李石松实际所得 已全部追缴，具有法定、酌定 ...

央视网消息：据最高人民法院微信公众号消息，2025年11月18日，贵州省贵阳市中级人民法院一审公开宣判云南省委原常委、省政府原副省长李石松受贿 一案，对被告人李石松以受贿罪判处有期徒刑十五年，并处罚金人民币五百万元；对追缴在案的李石松犯罪所得财物及孳息依法上缴国库，不足部分继续 追缴。 经审理查明：2005年8月至2024年3月，被告人李石松利用担任云南省政府办公厅秘书二处副处长、处长，省政府办公厅党组成员、副秘书长，云南省红河 州委常委、副州长，云南省工业和信息化委员会党组书记、主任，云南省工业和信息化厅党组书记、厅长，云南省曲靖市委副书记、市长，云南省委常 委、曲靖市委书记等职务上的便利，为有关单位和个人在企业经营、工程承揽、职务提拔等事项上提供帮助，直接或者通过他人非法收受上述单位和个人 给予的财物，共计价值人民币1.0025亿余元。 贵阳市中级人民法院认为，被告人李石松的行为构成受贿罪。李石松受贿数额特别巨大，并使国家和人民利益遭受特别重大损失。鉴于李石松有重大立功 表现；受贿犯罪中有未遂情节；到案后如实供述罪行,主动交代办案机关尚未掌握的绝大部分受贿事实；认罪悔罪，积极退赃，赃款赃物大部分已追缴， ...

Core Points - The article discusses the sentencing of Li Shisong, a former high-ranking official in Yunnan Province, who was convicted of bribery and sentenced to 15 years in prison along with a fine of 5 million RMB [1][2]. Summary by Sections - **Case Overview**: Li Shisong was found guilty of accepting bribes totaling over 1.0025 billion RMB during his tenure in various government positions from August 2005 to March 2024 [2][3]. - **Court Proceedings**: The trial was held on August 15, 2025, where evidence was presented, and Li Shisong expressed remorse and admitted to his crimes [4]. - **Judicial Findings**: The court noted that Li's actions caused significant losses to the state and public interests, but also recognized his cooperation and efforts to return the illicit gains, leading to a reduced sentence [2][3].

法院对被告人李显刚以受贿罪判处无期徒刑，剥夺政治权利终身，并处没收个人全部财产，以贪污罪判 处有期徒刑四年，并处罚金人民币三十万元，决定执行无期徒刑，剥夺政治权利终身，并处没收个人全 部财产；对李显刚受贿所得及孳息依法予以追缴，上缴国库，贪污所得依法返还被害单位。 公开资料显示，李显刚生于1963年2月，湖北汉川人。2024年3月，官方通报其任上被查。同年9月，官 方通报其被开除党籍和公职。 经审理查明，2006年至2024年，被告人李显刚利用担任黑龙江省双鸭山市市长、市委书记，黑龙江省政 府秘书长，黑龙江省人大常委会副主任等职务上的便利以及职权、地位形成的便利条件，为有关单位和 个人在企业经营、职务提拔、案件处理等事项上提供帮助，直接或通过他人非法收受上述单位和个人给 予的财物，共计折合人民币1.17亿余元。2009年4月、2012年4月，李显刚分别利用担任双鸭山市市长、 市委书记职务上的便利，通过高价出售、低价购买房产的手段，侵吞公共财物共计168万余元。 黑龙江省人大常委会原副主任李显刚一审被判无期徒刑 中新社北京11月17日电 (记者 张素)记者从中国最高人民法院获悉，11月17日，辽宁省大连市中级人 ...

Core Points - The article discusses the sentencing of Li Xiangang, a former deputy director of the Heilongjiang Provincial People's Congress, for bribery and embezzlement, resulting in a life sentence and confiscation of all personal assets [1][3]. Summary by Sections Case Overview - Li Xiangang was sentenced to life imprisonment for bribery and four years for embezzlement, with a total of 1.17 billion RMB in bribes received from 2006 to 2024 [3]. - The court found that Li used his official positions to facilitate illegal benefits for individuals and entities, leading to significant losses for the state and the public [3]. Details of Crimes - Li's embezzlement involved high-priced sales and low-priced purchases of properties, amounting to over 1.68 million RMB [3]. - The court acknowledged Li's cooperation during the investigation, including confessing to crimes and returning embezzled funds, which contributed to a lighter sentence [3]. Background Information - Li Xiangang, born in February 1963, held various significant positions in Heilongjiang, including mayor and secretary of the municipal party committee of Shuangyashan, and was deputy director of the Heilongjiang Provincial People's Congress from January 2018 [6]. - He was placed under investigation in March 2024 and expelled from the party in September 2024 due to moral corruption and misuse of power for personal gain [6].

Core Points - The Supreme People's Procuratorate announced the prosecution of several former officials for bribery and abuse of power, highlighting ongoing anti-corruption efforts in China [1][3][4][5] Group 1: Prosecutions - Former officials from various regions, including Ningxia, Shanxi, and Hunan, have been prosecuted for serious corruption charges, including bribery and utilizing influence for personal gain [1][3][4][5] - Specific cases include: - She Jinjun, former inspector of the Ningxia Forestry Department, accused of accepting bribes and using his influence to gain illegal benefits [2] - Wang Baoyu, former vice president of Jin Coal Group and chairman of Shanxi Blue Flame Holdings, charged with accepting bribes related to job adjustments and project contracts [3] - Duan Zhigang, former deputy director of the Hunan Provincial People's Congress, accused of using his position to illegally accept significant amounts of money [4] - Tang Xiangyang, former vice mayor and police chief of Changsha, also charged with accepting bribes while in office [5] Group 2: Legal Proceedings - The cases have been transferred to local courts for further proceedings, indicating a structured legal process following the investigations by provincial supervisory committees [2][3][4][5] - Each accused individual has been informed of their legal rights and has had the opportunity to respond to the charges during the prosecution phase [2][3][4][5]