检察机关在审查起诉阶段，依法告知了被告人杨华享有的诉讼权利，并依法讯问了被告人，听取了辩护人的意见。西双版纳州人民检察 院起诉指控：被告人杨华利用担任曲靖市煤炭工业管理局党组成员、副局长、云南煤矿安全监察局曲靖办事处主任、云南煤矿安全监察 局曲靖监察分局局长、云南煤矿安全监察局副巡视员等职务上的便利，为他人在煤矿出售、安全事故调查、煤矿安全检查等方面提供帮 助， 非法收受他人财物，数额特别巨大 ，依法应当以受贿罪追究其刑事责任。 ▲ 杨华 资料图 日前， 原云南煤矿安全监察局副巡视员杨华 涉嫌受贿罪一案，由云南省监察委员会调查终结，移送检察机关审查起诉。经云南省人民 检察院指定管辖，由西双版纳州人民检察院依法向西双版纳州中级人民法院提起公诉。案件正在进一步办理中。 2024年5月11日，中央纪委国家监委网站发布消息，原云南煤矿安全监察局副巡视员杨华涉嫌严重违纪违法，目前正接受中央纪委国家 监委驻应急管理部纪检监察组纪律审查和云南省监察委员会监察调查。 来源：高检网、检察日报正义网 End 欢迎分享给你的朋友！ 出品 | 中国能源报（c ne ne rgy） 编辑丨赵方婷 ...

日前，湖南省政协原党组成员、副秘书长龚文密（正厅级）涉嫌受贿罪一案，由湖南省监察委员会 调查终结，移送检察机关审查起诉。经湖南省人民检察院指定管辖，由衡阳市人民检察院依法向衡阳市 中级人民法院提起公诉。案件正在进一步办理中。 检察机关在审查起诉阶段，依法告知了被告人龚文密享有的诉讼权利，并依法讯问了被告人，听取 了辩护人的意见。衡阳市人民检察院起诉指控：被告人龚文密身为国家工作人员，利用职务上的便利为 他人谋取利益，单独或伙同他人非法收受他人财物，数额特别巨大，依法应当以受贿罪追究其刑事责 任。 云南检察机关依法对施春明涉嫌受贿案提起公诉 日前，云南省迪庆州政协原党组副书记、副主席施春明（副厅级）涉嫌受贿罪一案，由云南省监察 委员会调查终结，移送检察机关审查起诉。经云南省人民检察院指定管辖，由楚雄州人民检察院依法向 楚雄州中级人民法院提起公诉。案件正在进一步办理中。 央视网消息：据最高检消息，检察机关依法分别对龚文密、施春明、杨华、西然江措提起公诉。 湖南检察机关依法对龚文密涉嫌受贿案提起公诉 日前，原云南煤矿安全监察局副巡视员杨华涉嫌受贿罪一案，由云南省监察委员会调查终结，移送 检察机关审查起诉。经云南省人 ...

Core Points - The Yantai Intermediate People's Court sentenced Zhang Xijun, former Deputy Director of the Qingdao Municipal People's Congress Standing Committee, to death with a two-year reprieve for bribery, along with lifelong deprivation of political rights and confiscation of all personal property [1][2] - The court found that from late 1999 to February 2023, Zhang utilized his official positions to illegally accept or solicit bribes totaling over 317 million RMB, with 16.77 million RMB being classified as attempted bribery [1] - The court emphasized the severity of Zhang's actions, which caused significant losses to the state and the public, and noted his cooperation during the investigation as a mitigating factor for the sentence [2] Summary by Sections Legal Proceedings - Zhang Xijun was tried and sentenced for bribery, with the court ruling that his actions constituted a particularly serious crime due to the large amount involved and the negative impact on state interests [1][2] - The court's decision included a provision for the confiscation of Zhang's illicit gains and their proceeds, which will be turned over to the national treasury [1] Financial Implications - The total amount of bribes accepted by Zhang was over 317 million RMB, indicating a significant scale of corruption within the local government [1] - The court's ruling reflects a broader effort to combat corruption and uphold integrity within governmental positions [2]

Group 1 - The case involves a public official, Ding, who is accused of accepting bribes through a rental agreement that exceeded market prices, raising questions about the legality of his actions [1][2] - There are two main viewpoints regarding Ding's potential bribery: one argues that the rental agreement was a legitimate market transaction, while the other contends that Ding's knowledge of the request for favor constitutes bribery [2][3] - The essence of bribery is characterized by the exchange of power for benefits, and Ding's actions are scrutinized based on whether he used his official position to benefit another party [2][4] Group 2 - Ding's role in the public sector involved responsibilities related to external publicity, which connects him to the request made by Wang for business favors [3][4] - The rental agreement between Liu and Wang, which involved a payment significantly above market rates, is viewed as a means for Wang to curry favor with Ding, indicating a potential quid pro quo arrangement [6][7] - The legal framework suggests that both Ding and Liu may be considered co-conspirators in the bribery scheme, as Liu was aware of the inflated rental price and the implications of the arrangement [7]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the case of Xu, a former official in the health sector, who is accused of violating organizational discipline and engaging in bribery during her tenure, highlighting the dual responsibilities of disciplinary and legal oversight in such cases [1][2][3]. Summary by Relevant Sections Basic Case Facts - Xu, a member of the Communist Party since June 1987, held various positions including Secretary and Director of the B City Health Commission until her retirement in December 2023 [2]. - From 2013 to 2022, Xu violated organizational discipline by intervening in the hiring and job adjustments of several officials, receiving a total of 37 million yuan in bribes [2][6]. Bribery Charges - Between 2013 and 2022, Xu utilized her position to gain improper benefits for others in areas such as medical equipment procurement and project contracting, receiving a total of 1.07 million yuan in cash, with 300,000 yuan being an attempted bribe [3][8]. Investigation Process - The investigation began on January 10, 2024, leading to Xu's detention and subsequent disciplinary actions, including expulsion from the Party and cancellation of retirement benefits [4][5]. Legal Proceedings - On August 9, 2024, the C District People's Procuratorate formally charged Xu with bribery, resulting in a conviction and a sentence of three years and four months in prison, along with a fine of 300,000 yuan [5]. Disciplinary Violations - Xu's actions in facilitating personnel benefits for others while receiving bribes were classified as violations of organizational discipline, warranting disciplinary measures in addition to legal consequences [6][8]. Family Influence and Responsibility - Xu's son, utilizing her position, sought benefits for others, but Xu was not found to have direct knowledge of his actions, leading to a conclusion that she violated disciplinary regulations rather than being complicit in bribery [9][12]. Bribery Without Actual Receipt - The case also discusses the implications of Xu agreeing to receive a bribe of 300,000 yuan but not actually obtaining it, which was classified as attempted bribery under the law [13][15].

Group 1 - The case involves a significant financial misconduct where Dong Hua, the former director of the laboratory department at Gong'an County People's Hospital, misused two bank cards belonging to his housekeeper, Guo Zhixiang, to deposit and hold large sums of money [1][2] - Guo Zhixiang discovered the funds in her accounts and withdrew a total of 3.5 million yuan, which she then transferred to her husband and used for personal expenses, leading to her being charged with theft [1][2] - The court initially found Guo guilty of "occupying crime," which is a self-prosecuted case, and thus terminated the trial [1][2] Group 2 - Dong Hua later filed a self-prosecution, resulting in a court ruling in August 2025 that found Guo guilty of occupying crime, sentencing her to three years in prison with a five-year probation [2][3] - Dong Hua was also found guilty of bribery and money laundering, receiving a ten-year prison sentence and a fine of 1 million yuan for accepting 6.5 million yuan in bribes from various entities between 2010 and 2023 [2][3] - The court determined that Dong Hua laundered part of the bribe money by depositing it into Guo's bank accounts, which constituted money laundering [2][3]

Group 1 - The case involves a significant financial misconduct where a hospital official misappropriated funds through the use of another person's bank accounts [1][4] - The total amount misappropriated by the hospital official, Dong Hua, was 3.5 million yuan, which was later transferred to various parties including his wife and used for personal expenses [1][4] - Dong Hua was found guilty of bribery and money laundering, receiving a combined sentence of 10 years in prison and a fine of 1 million yuan [4][5] Group 2 - The court determined that the actions of Guo Zhixiang constituted "embezzlement," leading to a sentence of 3 years in prison with a 5-year probation period [2][4] - Guo Zhixiang was ordered to repay 3.45 million yuan to Dong Hua as part of the court's ruling [5] - The case highlights issues of corruption within the healthcare procurement process, with Dong Hua receiving 6.5 million yuan in bribes from various entities [4]

Core Viewpoint - The case involves a former hospital director who misappropriated funds through a caretaker's bank accounts, leading to legal consequences for both parties involved [2][11][16]. Group 1: Background Information - The former director, Dong Hua, was the head of the laboratory department at the Public Hospital of Gong'an County, Hubei Province, and had a long tenure in various medical roles [7]. - The caretaker, Guo Zhixiang, unknowingly became involved in the case when Dong Hua used her bank accounts to store large sums of money [2][7]. Group 2: Financial Transactions - Dong Hua transferred approximately 385 million yuan into Guo's bank accounts over several years, which included both cash deposits and funds from a medical equipment company he established [11][15]. - Guo discovered the funds in her accounts in 2023 and subsequently withdrew a total of 3.5 million yuan, which she used for personal expenses and to support family members [2][13]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - Initially, Guo was charged with theft, but the court later determined her actions constituted "embezzlement," leading to a change in the legal approach [12][16]. - In 2025, Guo was convicted of embezzlement and sentenced to three years in prison, with a five-year probation period, and was ordered to repay 3.45 million yuan to Dong Hua [5][16].

Core Points - The case involves a significant financial misconduct where a hospital director, Dong Hua, used his former housekeeper, Guo Zhixiang's bank accounts to store and manage illicit funds totaling approximately 3.85 million yuan [12][19] - Guo Zhixiang, upon discovering the funds in her accounts, withdrew 3.5 million yuan and distributed it among her family, leading to her arrest for theft, which later changed to a charge of embezzlement [11][21] - The court proceedings revealed that Dong Hua was involved in corruption and money laundering, receiving 6.5 million yuan in bribes during his tenure at the hospital [12][21] Summary by Sections Case Background - Guo Zhixiang worked as a housekeeper for Dong Hua and unknowingly became involved in a financial scheme when Dong Hua used her bank accounts to deposit large sums of money [7][8] - Dong Hua, a former director at the public hospital, was later found to have committed multiple financial crimes, including bribery and money laundering [12][21] Financial Transactions - Between 2018 and 2019, Dong Hua deposited approximately 3.85 million yuan into Guo's accounts, which were later used for personal expenses by Guo after she discovered the funds [12][19] - Guo transferred 2.6 million yuan to her husband, who used part of it to purchase a luxury vehicle, while also spending on personal luxuries [16][19] Legal Proceedings - Initially charged with theft, Guo's case transitioned to embezzlement as the court determined her actions met the criteria for this crime [21] - In 2025, Guo was sentenced to three years in prison with a five-year probation period and ordered to repay 3.45 million yuan to Dong Hua [21][22]

Core Points - Liu Xingtai, former deputy director of the Hainan Provincial People's Congress, was sentenced to death with a two-year reprieve for bribery, involving over 3.16 billion RMB [1][2] - The court found that Liu utilized his various official positions from 2003 to 2024 to illegally accept substantial amounts of money in exchange for assistance in business operations and funding allocations [1][2] - Liu's actions were deemed to have caused significant losses to the state and the public, with the court acknowledging mitigating factors such as his confession and cooperation with authorities [2] Summary of Events - Liu Xingtai was investigated and expelled from the Party in November 2024, following revelations of serious violations of political and organizational discipline, including accepting bribes and engaging in corrupt practices [3][4] - The court proceedings included evidence presented by the prosecution, with Liu admitting his guilt and expressing remorse during the trial [2] - Liu's career spanned various significant roles in Shandong and Hainan provinces, culminating in his position as deputy director of the Hainan Provincial People's Congress before his investigation [4]