Workflow
金融软件
icon
Search documents
成长股如何选,高收益低回测的ETF组合如何构建?TOP3投顾倾囊相授!新财富最佳投顾评选6月战报
新财富· 2025-07-04 08:12
Core Insights - The article highlights the strong performance of top investment advisors in the A-share market, with significant excess returns compared to the market average, showcasing their capabilities in a volatile market environment [1][3]. Performance Overview - The average return of the top 300 advisors in the stock trading group reached 27.19%, while the top 10 advisors achieved an impressive average return of 47.41% [2][3]. - In June, the three major indices in the A-share market all showed positive performance, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising by 2.9%, the Shenzhen Component Index by 4.23%, and the ChiNext Index by 8.02% [3]. ETF Group Performance - The average return for the top 200 advisors in the ETF group was 17.34%, with the top 10 achieving an average return of 30.93% [10][11]. - Compared to the benchmark indices, the top advisors significantly outperformed, with the Shanghai Composite Index rising by 5.04% and the Shenzhen Component Index by 5.71% during the same period [11]. Advisor Strategies - Advisors from leading firms like Guangfa Securities and CITIC Securities shared their strategies, focusing on growth stocks and utilizing models like "5+30" to identify high-potential sectors [13][14]. - Risk management strategies were emphasized, including controlling drawdowns and diversifying portfolios to mitigate risks during market fluctuations [15][20]. Institutional Strength - Guangfa Securities, CITIC Securities, and China Galaxy Securities led the rankings in terms of the number of advisors participating in the evaluation, indicating their strong institutional capabilities [23][28]. - The competition among institutions reflects a shift towards a client-centric approach in wealth management, emphasizing the importance of professional capabilities [39]. Future Outlook - Advisors are focusing on sectors with high growth potential, such as innovative pharmaceuticals and aerospace, while also considering macroeconomic factors like Federal Reserve policies [17][22]. - The article suggests that as market volatility becomes the norm, the ability of professional advisors to create value will be crucial for their competitive edge [39].
主业多病缠身、投资包袱难甩,4连亏银之杰为多元化豪赌买单 |看财报
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-04-16 14:10
曾被贴上"6倍大妖股"、"减持收割机"等标签而迅速蹿红的银之杰(300085.SZ)昨日公布了其2024年财报,暴露了公司毫无核心竞争力的事实。 财报显示,公司去年营业收入8.63亿元,同比下降15.02%,归母净利润-1.29亿元,同比亏幅扩大。因此前重金收购的移动信息服务业务屡现亏损,对 外投资持续爆雷却难甩包袱,加之金融板块深陷巨亏,银之杰在过去四年间累计亏损已高达5.22亿元。 尽管公司多元化发展失利、深陷亏损泥潭,但仍挡不住大股东各种花式减持。颇为荒诞的是,去年实控人协议转让股份的举动,巧妙迎合了市场关于 借壳、重组预期的炒作,令银之杰完美演绎了一出股价绝地大反弹。 豪赌多元化失利 公开资料显示,银之杰成立于1998年10月,2010年5月在深圳证券交易所创业板上市。 2014年开始,银之杰通过频繁并购踏上多元化发展之路,并逐渐形成了金融信息化、移动信息服务、电子商务三大业务布局。在此之前,银之杰的主 业为金融信息化,营收占比一度曾达到100%。 截至目前,公司金融服务收入占比已降至11.49%,移动商务服务和电子商务营收占比分别达到56.37%、32.14%,成为公司的两大营收支柱。 | | | ...