Core Insights - The global sports footwear and apparel industry is largely defined by the competition between Nike and Adidas, with a historical context of dominance by German, American, and Japanese brands before Nike's rise in the 1980s [1] - In the Chinese market, Nike and Adidas have faced increasing competition from domestic brands like Anta and Li-Ning since 2017, leading to a decline in Adidas's market share [1][10] - Adidas is actively working to regain its position in the Chinese market, showing a notable increase in revenue and market strategies [10][12] Market Dynamics - Nike's market share in China has decreased from 18.1% in 2021 to 16.2% in 2024, while Adidas's share has dropped from 15% to 8.7% in the same period [14] - Anta's market share increased from 9.8% to 10.5%, and Li-Ning's share rose slightly from 9.3% to 9.4% [14] - The competitive landscape is intensifying, with domestic brands gaining traction and impacting the pricing power of established international brands [6][22] Financial Performance - Nike's revenue in Greater China fell by 10% to $1.512 billion (approximately 10.775 billion RMB) for the latest fiscal quarter, with a decline in both direct and wholesale channels [4][5] - Adidas reported a 2.2% increase in revenue to €5.952 billion (approximately 49.625 billion RMB) in Q2, with a significant contribution from the Greater China region, which saw an 11% increase [10][11] - The operating profit margin for Adidas in China reached 22.7%, surpassing its margins in Europe and North America [11] Strategic Initiatives - Adidas's CEO, Bjorn Gulden, has been actively engaging with the Chinese market, emphasizing the importance of local production and design [12][14] - Nike is also increasing its investment in China, focusing on enhancing its retail experience and product offerings to regain market share [17][20] - Both companies are facing pressure from the rise of domestic brands, which are improving product quality and competitive pricing [8][22]

Core Insights - The global sports footwear and apparel industry is largely characterized by the competition between Nike and Adidas, with a historical context of dominance by German, American, and Japanese brands before Nike's rise in the 1980s [1][2]. Market Dynamics - Nike surpassed Adidas in North America in 1980, achieving a market share of 50%, while Adidas struggled due to a lag in the sports fashion trend [2]. - Since 2017, domestic brands like Anta and Li-Ning have rapidly gained market share in China, leading to a significant decline in Adidas's position, which fell below Nike, Anta, and Li-Ning by 2024 [3][4]. Performance Metrics - In the Chinese market, Nike's market share decreased from 18.1% in 2021 to 16.2% in 2024, while Adidas's share dropped from 15% to 8.7% during the same period [12]. - As of the latest fiscal quarter, Nike's revenue in Greater China fell by 10% to $1.512 billion (approximately 10.775 billion RMB), with a notable decline in both direct and wholesale channels [7]. Competitive Strategies - Adidas reported a 2.2% increase in revenue to €5.952 billion (approximately 49.625 billion RMB) in Q2, with Greater China being a key growth driver, showing an 11% increase to €798 million (approximately 6.653 billion RMB) [11]. - Adidas's operating profit margin in China reached 22.7%, surpassing that of Europe and North America, indicating a strong performance in the region [11]. Brand Positioning - Domestic brands are increasingly competitive, with claims that they have closed the product gap with Nike, focusing on high-quality products at competitive prices [9]. - Nike is responding to market pressures by enhancing its investment in China, including the transformation of retail spaces into sports experience centers and optimizing product offerings [15][18]. Leadership Changes - Nike appointed Dong Wei as the new chairperson and CEO for Greater China, emphasizing the importance of the Chinese market in its recovery strategy [18][19].

Core Insights - Nike's brand connection with China has weakened over the past two decades, leading to a significant decline in revenue and brand narrative clarity [4][5][6] - The latest financial report indicates a 21% year-over-year revenue drop in the Greater China region, with e-commerce down 31% and wholesale channels down 24% [4][17] - The company's shift towards a Direct to Consumer (DTC) model has created initial efficiencies but has also led to a disconnect with local market dynamics [16][29] Group 1 - Nike's advertising strategy in the early 2000s effectively resonated with a nation eager for recognition and success, exemplified by Liu Xiang's Olympic victory [1][2] - The brand's previous dominance in the market was characterized by consistent double-digit growth, with little competition, leading to complacency [8][12] - The rise of the sneaker resale market in 2019 marked a shift in consumer behavior, focusing more on investment potential rather than product experience [9][10] Group 2 - Under CEO John Donahoe, Nike adopted a DTC approach, which initially seemed effective but ultimately led to a loss of brand identity and connection with consumers [15][21] - The restructuring of the organization to prioritize efficiency over brand essence has diluted Nike's core narrative centered around sports [23][28] - The company's response to market challenges has been slow and ineffective, revealing deeper issues within its global structure and decision-making processes [30][32] Group 3 - The introduction of the "Win Now" strategy aims to restore Nike's brand spirit by focusing on local market needs and empowering regional leadership [36][38] - The shift back to professional and technical products reflects a recognition of changing consumer preferences towards lifestyle and comfort [45][46] - Nike's recent organizational changes indicate a move towards greater local adaptability, essential for regaining market relevance in China [40][46]