10月11日，据深圳公共资源交易中心官网，深圳市发布国有建设用地使用权出让公告【深土交告〔2025〕41号】，拟以挂牌方式公开出让南山区 粤海街道一宗商业用地，地块将于11月10日出让。 地块位置图，来源：土地出让文件 按照要求，该地块准入行业类别为《深圳市产业结构调整优化和产业导向目录（2016年修订）》中的A1409行业（企业）管理和信息化解决方案 开发、基于网络的软件服务平台、软件开发和测试服务、信息系统集成、咨询、运营维护和数据挖掘等服务。 同时，地块出让公告显示，竞得人须在成交后现场即时签订《成交确认书》，并向南山区工业和信息化局申请签订《深圳市总部项目产业发展监 管协议》。根据《深圳市总部项目产业发展监管协议》，地块将用于泛视频类科技研发总部项目。 此次出让地块备受关注，地块要求由企业联合竞买，联合竞买申请人需提交由联合体各成员单位签署的联合建设总部大厦协议，且在公告期与挂 牌期内，若有1家联合体成员单位退出，则该宗地终止出让。 从地块出让信息来看，此次出让地块的宗地号为K602-0016，地块位于南山区粤海街道科苑南路与登良路交汇处西北角，土地用途为商业用地， 总用地面积9508.38平方米，挂 ...

Core Viewpoint - The National Cybersecurity Center has reported that 65 mobile applications are found to be in violation of personal information protection laws, highlighting significant issues in user consent and data handling practices [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Group 1: User Consent and Information Collection - 9 applications failed to clearly inform users about their privacy policies and data collection practices at the first run [1] - 43 applications did not specify the purposes, methods, and scope of personal information collection in their privacy policies [2] - 16 applications did not inform users about the transfer of their personal information to other parties, nor did they obtain separate consent [3] - 4 applications began collecting personal information without obtaining user consent [4] Group 2: User Rights and Data Management - 9 applications lacked effective mechanisms for users to correct, delete personal information, or cancel their accounts, and did not respond timely to such requests [4] - 3 applications failed to process complaints and reports within the promised timeframe and lacked a convenient mechanism for users to exercise their rights [5] - 32 applications did not provide users with a way to withdraw consent for data collection [5] Group 3: Sensitive Information and Security Measures - 6 applications used automated decision-making for information push and marketing without providing options to refuse or alternatives [6] - 7 applications processed sensitive personal information without obtaining separate consent and did not inform users about the necessity and impact on their rights [6] - 15 applications did not implement adequate security measures such as encryption or de-identification of personal data [7] Group 4: Privacy Policy Compliance - 5 applications were found to have no privacy policy at all [8] - 31 out of 67 previously reported applications still exhibited issues upon re-evaluation, leading to their removal from distribution platforms [8]