据凤凰卫视报道，瑞士联邦委员会1月5日以"防止资金外逃"为名，立即冻结了被美军逮捕的委内瑞拉总 统马杜罗，及其关联人士在瑞士境内"可能存在"的所有资产，冻结期4年。日内瓦州大议会副议长梅唐 在接受凤凰卫视采访时，对瑞士在相关事件后"不到48小时"迅速冻结资金感到震惊，他认为，这是出于 对美国施压的预判与惧怕，瑞士对美对俄呈现态度迥异的"双重标准"，这将严重损害中立形象。(凤凰 卫视张博谛瑞士日内瓦报道) ...

就美国突袭委内瑞拉，欧盟呼吁"各方保持克制"，表态含糊其辞。 而当美国转身索要格陵兰岛，欧盟又表示将"持续坚定捍卫"丹麦国家主权、领土完整。 分析人士指出，欧洲国家在美国武力侵犯委内瑞拉主权问题上"选择性失语"，是担心得罪美方，但很快 在格陵兰岛一事上被美国霸凌。这暴露了西方国家在国际事务上一贯的"双重标准"，也揭示了欧洲在跨 大西洋关系上的困境。 表态截然不同 欧洲的"双标"在5日欧盟委员会发言人希佩尔的记者会上显露无遗。 在被问及美国对委行动是否符合国际法时，希佩尔称，就美国行为在法律层面评估所有影响还为时尚 早。但被问到格陵兰岛主权问题时，她说，欧盟将"持续坚定捍卫"国家主权、领土完整、边界不可侵犯 和《联合国宪章》原则等国际准则。 （来源：新华日报） 丹麦自治领地格陵兰岛纳尔萨克镇的码头。 （新华社发） 实际上，在美国突袭委内瑞拉后，欧盟官员和许多欧洲国家领导人的表态都含糊其辞，虽然提及国际法 和《联合国宪章》原则，却极力回避直接批评美国。 欧盟外交与安全政策高级代表卡拉斯发表声明说，欧盟呼吁各方保持冷静与克制，在任何情况下都应尊 重国际法和《联合国宪章》的原则。据称，这一声明得到欧盟27国中26国支 ...

牛弹琴 他说，美国将"无限期"掌控委内瑞拉，直到能进行安全、妥善和明智的权力交接，"站在我身后的（美 国）人，将会统治委内瑞拉"。 这不是殖民是什么呢？看来，他还想兼任委内瑞拉总统。 特朗普还谈到了石油，说美国统治委内瑞拉，"不会让我们花一分钱"，"因为从地下出来的钱非常可 观"。 当记者问：中国、俄罗斯和伊朗在委内瑞拉都有利益。这次行动会如何影响你与他们的关系吗？ 特朗普回答：对于那些想要石油的国家，我们就是做石油生意的。我们会把石油卖给他们。我们会继续 卖石油。 对全世界爱好和平、坚信美国正义的人们来说，这毫无疑问是一件坏事，美国正从世界警察，变成世界 恶霸。 但也未必都是坏事。 这如同撕下了一层精致的画皮，更有助看清美国的真面目，看到国际政治丛林般残酷的真相。 特朗普倒是得意洋洋。 在1月3日的记者会上，他宣称，实时观看了美国特种部队抓捕马杜罗的行动，称就像看了一场"电视 秀"，看到了"每一个细节"，"换了别人，根本不可能做到"。 就是这么简单、粗暴、直接、赤裸裸。 强权之下，规则不过是遮羞布；利益面前，道义常沦为装饰品。 我看到，1月3日深夜，中国外交部也表态了，强烈谴责！ 发言人是这样说的：中方对美 ...

#中方回应欧盟碳边境调节机制问题#【#欧盟对内放松监管却对中国抬高数值#】#欧盟对中国产品碳排 放设定偏高值#商务部新闻发言人就欧盟碳边境调节机制有关问题答记者问。问：欧盟碳边境调节机制 （CBAM）于2026年1月1日起正式实施，欧盟近日密集发布CBAM相关立法提案与实施细则，请问商务 部对此有何评论？ 答：中方注意到，欧盟近日密集发布CBAM相关立法提案与实施细则，包括设定碳 排放强度默认值、计划扩大产品覆盖范围等内容。其中，欧方无视中国绿色低碳发展取得的巨大成效， 对中国产品碳排放强度设定显著偏高的基础默认值，并将在未来三年内逐年提高，这不符合中国当前实 际水平和未来发展趋势，对中方构成不公平、歧视性待遇。欧方有关做法不仅涉嫌违反世界贸易组 织"最惠国待遇"和"国民待遇"等原则，也有悖于《联合国气候变化框架公约》确立的"共同但有区别的 责任"原则。欧盟还提出立法草案，计划从2028年起将CBAM范围扩展至包括机械装备、汽车及其零部 件、家用电器等约180种钢铝密集型下游产品。这些规则设计已超出应对气候变化范畴，带有明显的单 边主义与贸易保护主义色彩，中方对此表示严重关切和坚决反对。中方还注意到，欧盟最近 ...

商务部新闻发言人就欧盟碳边境调节机制有关问题答记者问。 问：欧盟碳边境调节机制（CBAM）于2026年1月1日起正式实施，欧盟近日密集发布CBAM相关立法提 案与实施细则，请问商务部对此有何评论？ 答：中方注意到，欧盟近日密集发布CBAM相关立法提案与实施细则，包括设定碳排放强度默认值、计 划扩大产品覆盖范围等内容。其中，欧方无视中国绿色低碳发展取得的巨大成效，对中国产品碳排放强 度设定显著偏高的基础默认值，并将在未来三年内逐年提高，这不符合中国当前实际水平和未来发展趋 势，对中方构成不公平、歧视性待遇。欧方有关做法不仅涉嫌违反世界贸易组织"最惠国待遇"和"国民 待遇"等原则，也有悖于《联合国气候变化框架公约》确立的"共同但有区别的责任"原则。 欧盟还提出立法草案，计划从2028年起将CBAM范围扩展至包括机械装备、汽车及其零部件、家用电器 等约180种钢铝密集型下游产品。这些规则设计已超出应对气候变化范畴,带有明显的单边主义与贸易保 护主义色彩，中方对此表示严重关切和坚决反对。 中方还注意到，欧盟最近修改了2035年燃油新车禁令，放宽对盟内的绿色监管。欧方一方面对外以绿色 为名搞保护主义，另一方面对内放松监 ...

发言人指出，香港是法治社会，法律面前人人平等，没有任何人拥有凌驾于法律之上的特权。黎智英是反中乱港 事件的主要策划者和参与者，是外部反华势力的"代理人"和"马前卒"，其言行严重危害国家安全。香港特区司法 机关依法履职尽责，维护法律权威，捍卫国家安全，合情合理合法，不容置喙。黎案与"新闻自由"毫无关系。任 何企图为黎洗白、通过政治施压干预司法的行径，都是对法治精神的公然践踏。 发言人表示，个别国家和政客，长期以来打着"人权""自由"幌子抹黑香港法治，妄图破坏香港繁荣稳定、干涉中 国内政。当他们执行维护自身国家安全的法律时，他们称之为"捍卫法治"；而当香港特区依法采取同等性质行动 时，却被污蔑为"压制自由"。这种典型的双重标准，充分暴露其虚伪面目和险恶用心。 12月15日，外交部驻港公署发言人表示，正义审判不容置喙，外部干预注定失败。全文如下： 外交部驻港公署坚决支持香港特区依法裁决黎智英串谋勾结外部势力危害国家安全罪及串谋发布煽动刊物罪等罪 名成立。针对英国、澳大利亚、美国、德国等国家、欧盟及个别政客就此定罪裁决说三道四、公然干预抹黑香港 司法，公署发言人表示强烈不满和坚决反对，予以严厉谴责。 发言人强调，有关 ...

周五的新德里暖意融融，俄罗斯总统普京与印度总理莫迪在此开启高峰会谈。新德里为普京铺上象征最 高礼遇的红地毯，莫迪则明确表态：印度坚定支持推动乌克兰和平的一切努力。四年来，普京首次莅临 印度。此次访问，核心目标在于深化俄印合作。印度不仅是俄罗斯武器的主要采购方，更荣膺其海运石 油的最大买家，双方合作前景可期。 尽管西方制裁正不断挤压两国延续数十年的合作空间，但双方都有意强化纽带，恰逢此时，新德里还在 与美国谈判，希望削减特朗普政府因印度购买俄油而加征的高额惩罚性关税，让这场峰会更添一层战略 博弈色彩。 "印度并非中立，我们的立场是为和平而立。"会谈伊始，莫迪便表明立场，宣称印度将鼎力支持一切推 动乌克兰和平的倡议。普京亦对莫迪在冲突解决方面展现的关注之情致以诚挚谢意。这场会谈也成为普 京回应美国施压的平台，他直言不讳地质疑："若美国有权购买俄罗斯核燃料，为何印度不能？"这番话 直指美国的双重标准，美欧自身仍在进口数十亿美元的俄能源与商品，却阻挠印俄合作。此前特朗普以 印度购俄油为由，对多数印度产品加征50%关税，华盛顿宣称俄油收入会"资助乌克兰战争"，但印度反 驳这一关税既不合理也不公正，强调自身与俄的合作不应 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. has initiated a new Section 301 investigation against China, signaling a readiness to escalate trade tensions [1] - U.S. Treasury Secretary Yellen indicated that if China continues to restrict rare earth exports, the U.S. may consider imposing additional tariffs, reflecting a more aggressive stance in U.S.-China trade relations [1] - The reactivation of the Section 301 investigation serves as a tool for the U.S. to exert pressure on China and regain a dominant position in trade negotiations [1][3] Group 2 - China plays a crucial role in the international supply chain, particularly in the rare earth sector, holding a significant share of global production capacity [3] - The U.S. has been applying pressure on China to fully open its rare earth supply while simultaneously imposing tariffs and trade restrictions, showcasing a double standard in its approach [5] - The differing values between the U.S. and China regarding trade partnerships contribute to ongoing friction, with the U.S. seeking dominance and China advocating for equality and mutual benefit [5] Group 3 - The trade friction between the U.S. and China is far from over and may escalate at any moment, necessitating a cautious approach to protect national interests [7] - China should remain vigilant and rational in response to U.S. threats, assessing its own strengths and leveraging strategic resources like rare earths while monitoring international developments [8]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses India's firm stance against U.S. pressure regarding oil imports from Russia, highlighting India's strategic economic calculations and diplomatic maneuvers to maintain its energy security and economic interests [2][4][24]. Group 1: India's Energy Economic Calculations - India imports 85% of its crude oil and is the world's third-largest oil consumer, with a daily consumption sufficient to circle Mumbai port multiple times [4][6]. - Since the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine conflict in 2022, India has increasingly turned to Russian oil, which is priced 10 to 15 USD cheaper per barrel than Middle Eastern oil, allowing India to save over 4 billion USD annually [4][6]. - Russian oil has become India's largest supply source, accounting for 34% of total imports, with 1.6 million barrels supplied daily [6][7]. Group 2: U.S. Miscalculations - The U.S. imposed a 25% tariff on India due to failed trade agreements and later increased tariffs related to Russian energy imports, using the justification that India's purchases exacerbate the Ukraine conflict [9][24]. - India's Foreign Minister highlighted the inconsistency in U.S. policy, questioning why other nations can continue purchasing Russian oil while India is singled out [9][24]. Group 3: India's Dual Response Strategy - India has initiated a "dual response" strategy, seeking new trade agreements to mitigate the impact of U.S. tariffs, such as a free trade agreement with the UK that has led to a 22% increase in exports of textiles and agricultural products [12][24]. - India is also actively collaborating with other nations to expose Western hypocrisy regarding energy needs, gaining support from countries like Brazil and South Africa [14][24]. Group 4: Energy Countermeasures - India is challenging Western energy pricing power by collaborating with Saudi Arabia, the UAE, China, and Russia to develop third-party energy markets in Africa, providing low-cost oil to African nations [18][24]. - The upcoming BRICS "Energy Security Conference" in 2025 aims to unify member countries for joint oil procurement, enhancing India's negotiating power with oil-producing nations [20][24]. Group 5: U.S.-India Relations - The U.S. attempts to rally allies in the Asia-Pacific region to pressure India, but India is pursuing dialogue with China and renewing military cooperation with Russia, emphasizing the importance of partnerships over confrontation [22][24]. - India's actions reflect a calculated approach to safeguard its interests, demonstrating that developing countries' voices and needs should not be overlooked in international relations [24].

Core Points - The European Union (EU) is facing a contradictory diplomatic situation, needing China's rare earth resources for its green transition and high-end manufacturing while simultaneously attempting to suppress Chinese companies in the security domain [1] - The EU's foreign policy exhibits a confusing dual standard, as evidenced by recent events involving rare earth exports and the ASML semiconductor incident [5][9] Group 1: Rare Earth Dependency - Rare earth elements are critical for high-tech products such as electric vehicles, wind turbines, and semiconductors, with China holding approximately 37% of global rare earth reserves and over 90% of processing capacity [6] - The EU relies on China for 98% of its rare earth needs, with its own mining contributing less than 1% of global supply and virtually no refining capabilities [6] - The EU's recent announcement of new export restrictions on rare earth elements by China has led to significant delays in approval for around 2,000 applications from EU companies, with only about half receiving approval [8] Group 2: Semiconductor Industry Impact - The ASML semiconductor incident highlights the EU's contradictory approach, as the Dutch government forcibly took control of ASML, a company previously owned by a Chinese firm, leading to Chinese export restrictions on semiconductor products [8][15] - The semiconductor chips produced by ASML are essential for automotive electronic systems, and major manufacturers like BMW and Volkswagen are already experiencing supply shortages [8][15] - The EU's dual standards in handling the ASML situation have resulted in significant pressure on its automotive industry, which is a key sector of the European economy [15] Group 3: Strategic Responses and Challenges - In response to the rare earth supply crisis, the EU has introduced the Critical Raw Materials Act, aiming for 10% of metal consumption to come from European sources by 2030, but faces significant technical and environmental challenges [12] - The EU's attempts to establish an independent rare earth supply chain could take 20 to 30 years, during which it will remain reliant on Chinese supplies [12] - China's response to the EU's dual standards includes emphasizing lawful export controls while providing a "green channel" for EU companies, indicating a balanced approach to cooperation [13]