纪检监察信访举报工作既是党领导下人民信访工作的重要组成部分，也是纪检监察工作的重要基础性工 作。山东省青岛市纪委监委坚持政治引领，紧盯群众急难愁盼问题，突出重点、精准发力，持续推动纪 检监察信访举报工作高质量发展。 提高政治站位，在围绕中心服务大局上持续发力 坚持人民至上，在解决群众急难愁盼问题上持续发力 青岛市纪委监委秉持"信访是送上门来的群众工作"理念，将群众身边不正之风和腐败问题集中整治作为 重中之重，畅通问题线索"主渠道"，持续解决群众急难愁盼问题。 在畅通渠道上持续用力。在有效畅通信、访、网、电举报渠道的基础上，市、区、镇三级纪检监察接访 窗口张贴举报二维码，增加"码上举报"、基层小微权力"监督一点通"小程序等便捷举报方式，并利用微 信公众号广泛宣传。探索建立镇（街道）初次来访远程视频接访机制，对远程视频接访件"即收即 办""当日分办"，推动实现"数据多跑路、群众少跑腿"。 在解决问题上持续用力。强化攻坚治理，围绕"校园餐"、农村集体"三资"管理等领域突出问题，定期梳 理相关信访举报，对纳入集中整治的重点信访举报件建立"红、黄、蓝"三色管理机制，坚持分类管理， 推动源头治理。强化内外联动，出台业务外 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the interpretation of the scope of supervisory objects under the Supervision Law, particularly focusing on whether certain management personnel in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) should be considered as supervisory objects based on their appointment processes and the nature of their roles [1][2][3]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Definitions - The Supervision Law specifies that supervisory objects include "management personnel of state-owned enterprises" [1]. - The implementation regulations clarify that management personnel in state-owned enterprises are those who perform organizational, leadership, management, and supervisory duties, either in wholly state-owned enterprises or in state-controlled enterprises [3][4]. - There are two categories of supervisory objects: those in wholly state-owned enterprises and those in state-controlled or joint-stock enterprises, with distinctions based on the nature of the enterprise [3][4]. Group 2: Case Analysis - In the case of Company A, which is 51% state-owned, the company’s party branch has decision-making authority over significant matters, including personnel appointments [2][6]. - There are differing opinions on whether the appointed procurement manager, Huang, qualifies as a supervisory object; one view argues he does not due to the lack of formal appointment by a state body, while the other view supports his classification based on the party branch's authority [2][6]. - The article supports the view that Huang should be considered a supervisory object due to the party branch's decision-making role and the nature of his appointment [2][6][7]. Group 3: Implications of the Case - Huang's actions, which involved using his position to benefit a private individual and accepting bribes, constitute a violation of the law, confirming his status as a state worker under the relevant legal framework [7]. - The case highlights the complexities in determining the supervisory status of personnel in state-controlled enterprises, particularly regarding the authority of party branches in such organizations [6][7].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the complexities of defining the nature of gift exchanges between state officials and clients, emphasizing the need to accurately distinguish between legitimate gift-giving and bribery based on various factors such as the context, value, and intent behind the exchanges [1][7]. Summary by Sections Basic Case Facts - The case involves a communication management bureau head (甲) and his wife (乙), who accepted bribes from a private technology company manager (丙) over a period from 2007 to 2019, utilizing their official positions to benefit丙's company [2][3]. Disputed Opinions - Three opinions exist regarding the nature of the financial exchanges: 1. Some argue that the exchanges were merely traditional gift-giving, not constituting bribery [4]. 2. Others believe the exchanges exceeded normal social interactions and should be classified as bribery, with a potential deduction for gifts given to丙 [5]. 3. The third opinion asserts that all exchanges should be classified as bribery without deductions, as they reflect a clear pattern of corruption [6][5]. Analysis of Opinions - The article supports the third opinion, arguing that the exchanges between甲,乙, and丙 were not genuine gift-giving but rather indicative of a bribery scheme, as they involved significant financial transactions and were linked to specific requests for favors [6][9]. Nature of Financial Exchanges - The nature of the exchanges is analyzed through several lenses: - The lack of a genuine personal relationship between the parties involved [8]. - The disproportionate value of gifts exchanged, which far exceeded typical gift-giving norms [8]. - The timing and purpose of the exchanges, which were closely tied to requests for favors, indicating a clear intent to engage in bribery [9]. Legal Considerations - The article discusses legal interpretations regarding whether the gifts should be deducted from the total amount considered for bribery charges, concluding that the exchanges should be treated as separate bribery incidents [10][12]. Joint Bribery Charges - The article concludes that both甲 and乙 should be charged with joint bribery, with the total amount received from丙 being 630 million yuan, reflecting their collaborative efforts in the bribery scheme [16].

Core Viewpoint - The case involves Wu, a former leader of a state-owned enterprise, who engaged in corrupt practices by investing in a real estate project through relatives and receiving illicit profits, leading to serious disciplinary actions and legal consequences [3][4][10]. Group 1: Background of the Case - Wu served as the Party Secretary and Chairman of A Province Investment Company and Chairman of B Investment Management Company until his resignation in January 2021 [3]. - Wu violated integrity discipline by investing 3.08 million RMB in a real estate project through relatives, earning a total profit of 786,500 RMB from 2019 to 2021, with Wu personally profiting 418,600 RMB [3][4]. Group 2: Corruption Details - Wu and Zhang conspired to receive 10.14 million RMB from D Investment Partnership, manipulating the shareholding structure of B Investment Management Company to benefit themselves [4][5]. - They arranged for Zhang to take out a loan in the name of D Investment Partnership to cover their investment, agreeing to repay the loan with the investment returns, which was deemed a form of bribery [12][15]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings - The investigation into Wu's misconduct began on May 27, 2023, leading to his expulsion from the Party on November 27, 2023, and subsequent criminal charges for bribery [7][8]. - On February 5, 2024, the court sentenced Wu to ten and a half years in prison and imposed a fine of 2 million RMB for his bribery offenses [9]. Group 4: Expert Opinions on Misconduct - Experts argue that Wu's actions constituted a violation of integrity regulations, as he used his position to engage in profit-making activities that conflicted with his official duties [10][11]. - The nature of Wu's investment in the real estate project was scrutinized, with opinions suggesting it was a facade for receiving bribes rather than a legitimate investment [18][19]. Group 5: Implications for State-Owned Enterprises - The case highlights the risks associated with leadership positions in state-owned enterprises, emphasizing the need for strict adherence to integrity and anti-corruption regulations [10][20]. - It serves as a cautionary tale regarding the potential for abuse of power and the importance of transparency in investment activities within state-owned entities [20].

近日，面对前来走访的云南省镇沅彝族哈尼族拉祜族自治县纪委监委干部，该县古城镇古城村党总支书 记罗庆荣说："现在村民死亡证明、户口遗失证明、学生贫困证明等各种证明不用我们村组织出具，工 作轻松了不少。" 为基层减负的一个重要环节是帮助基层厘清权责，把资源、精力都集中在关键领域。镇沅县纪委监委此 前在一线走访时了解到，村级存在权责不清、事务繁杂、任务繁重等问题。随后，该县纪委监委协助县 委健全完善整治形式主义为基层减负专项工作机制，采取"室组地"联动、"纪委+职能部门"协作等方 式，整合县、乡、村三级力量开展调研式监督，推动厘清乡镇、职能部门、村组履职清单和职责，明确 基层该干什么活、能办什么事、应担什么责，督促县、乡相关职能部门建立村（社区）组织履职事项清 单52项、协助服务事项清单53项。 在此基础上，针对村务公开混乱、村组干部用权不规范等农村基层"微腐败"暴露出的问题，该县纪委监 委联合县委组织部、县民政局、县财政局等职能部门进一步完善县村组小微权力清单，绘制村级11类32 项、村民小组5类7项小微权力流程图，分层级为村级党组织和村干部行使权力定下"边界"，推动干部按 清单办事、依规范用权，明晰权责事项，规 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint highlights the development of the Yao medicine industry in Jinxi County, which has become a leading characteristic industry with a planting area of 190,000 acres and an expected annual output of 23,500 tons and a value of 510 million yuan in 2024 [1] - The local government has improved infrastructure, including a newly built 12-kilometer long and 4.5-meter wide gravel road, facilitating easier access to the medicinal herb planting demonstration base [1] - The county's supervisory body has implemented a problem-oriented approach to ensure accountability and address community concerns regarding the development of the Yao medicine industry [1] Group 2 - The Yao medicine industry faces challenges due to its extensive and diverse nature, prompting the county's supervisory body to adopt a collaborative supervision mechanism to focus on key areas such as standardized planting and infrastructure development [2] - The establishment of a technical training base for Yao medicine has led to the cultivation of over a hundred types of medicinal herbs, benefiting local farmers through job creation and guaranteed buyback of their produce [2] - Continuous supervision efforts have resulted in the resolution of over 20 specific issues related to the development of the Yao medicine industry, enhancing overall project execution [3]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of reducing bureaucratic burdens through the "精文减会" initiative, which aims to streamline documentation and meetings to enhance efficiency and effectiveness in grassroots governance [3][4][5] - Since the 18th National Congress, the initiative has been integrated with the fight against formalism, leading to a significant reduction in the number of documents and meetings, thereby improving the work environment for officials [3][4][5] - The implementation of strict regulations and guidelines has resulted in a notable decrease in the frequency and duration of meetings, as well as a reduction in associated costs, promoting a culture of concise and practical communication [3][4][5] Group 2 - Despite progress, there are still hidden issues of formalism and bureaucratic practices in some areas, indicating the need for ongoing vigilance and reform [8][10] - Specific problems include excessive meetings, superficial compliance with directives, and a tendency to increase meeting specifications unnecessarily, which burdens grassroots officials [9][10] - The persistence of these issues is attributed to misaligned performance metrics, where some leaders prioritize quantity over quality in documentation and meetings, leading to inefficiencies [10][11] Group 3 - To ensure the effectiveness of the "精文减会" initiative, continuous supervision and accountability measures are essential, including dynamic monitoring of document and meeting practices [12][13] - Strengthening the responsibility of leadership and enhancing the quality of documents and meetings are critical to achieving the desired outcomes of the initiative [14][15] - The focus should be on practical results, with an emphasis on reducing unnecessary documentation and meetings while ensuring that essential communication remains effective [17][18][19]

Group 1 - The central government has issued policies aimed at improving and safeguarding people's livelihoods, focusing on addressing urgent and pressing issues faced by the public [1][2] - The policies include 10 measures across four main areas, emphasizing the need for balanced and inclusive social policies to meet diverse public demands [1][2] - There is a commitment to enhance coordination among over 20 departments to prevent policy fragmentation and ensure effective implementation of major livelihood policies [2] Group 2 - The Ministry of Civil Affairs plans to expand monitoring of low-income populations and improve social assistance policies, including the establishment of a national dynamic monitoring platform for low-income individuals [3] - Efforts will be made to strengthen digital capabilities for precise assistance, including the development of methods for identifying low-income households and ensuring nationwide connectivity of information systems [3] - A comprehensive social assistance framework will be established to effectively coordinate resources and implement a layered management approach for social support [3] Group 3 - In education, the government aims to improve resource allocation in response to population changes, focusing on expanding quality education and addressing shortages in high school placements [4] - Plans include the construction or renovation of over 1,000 quality high schools and achieving standardized construction in compulsory education institutions within five years [4] - Higher education resources will be directed towards central and western provinces, with an emphasis on aligning academic programs with economic and social development needs [4] Group 4 - The National Health Commission is working to enhance the distribution of quality medical resources, aiming to provide accessible healthcare services to the public [5] - Initiatives include the establishment of a new urban medical service system led by tertiary hospitals and the promotion of integrated medical communities in county areas [5] - The focus is on strengthening grassroots healthcare services and improving the quality of care, particularly in pediatrics, traditional Chinese medicine, and dental services [5]

开展村（社区）巡察时，巡村小组人员制作巡察明白卡，列明巡察时间、巡察内容、反映问题渠道等， 深入田间地头、入户走访，向群众"面对面"了解情况。 通过制定《县委巡察整改工作成效评估办法（试行）》，由巡镇大组长、巡村小组组长等组建专项检查 组，重点检查评估被巡察单位党组织巡察整改责任落实、任务落实、追责问责、满意度等4个方面指 标，按照"好""较好""差"等次进行评定，进一步构建巡察整改监督闭环。深化运用协作区"一月一专 题"监督机制，通过调阅资料、走访座谈、督导约谈等形式，督促推动改彻底、改到位。 安徽省蒙城县针对镇村一体巡质效不高、人员力量分配不合理等问题，结合基层实际，推行"大组带小 组"工作法，即组建一个巡镇大组，配备若干巡村小组，巡镇大组带着巡村小组，力求既全面覆盖、形 成震慑，又精准施策、突出重点，切实提升镇村一体巡察质效。 在每轮巡察中，蒙城县委巡察机构根据巡察村（社区）数量和巡察任务设立2个以上巡察小组，巡镇大 组副组长兼任巡村小组组长，每个巡村小组配备约3名组员，由巡察人才库中熟悉基层纪检监察、组织 党建、财务审计等领域的干部构成。深化运用"巡察+协作区"监督机制，每个巡镇大组配备1名纪检监察 ...

广西壮族自治区陆川县纪委监委深入高考考点，紧盯考点考场设置、网络监控、食品安全、考生服务等 重点环节开展监督检查，全力以赴保障高考安全有序、公平公正进行。图为该县纪检监察干部在陆川实 验中学考点察看视频监控巡查情况。（广西壮族自治区陆川县纪委监委 黎佳颖 摄） image.png image.png 为确保高考各项工作安全平稳有序推进，河南省舞钢市纪委监委对教育、公安、交通等涉考职能部门的 履职情况开展监督检查，实地查验考点周边交通疏导、电力供应、防暑降温、食品安全、噪音管控等关 键保障措施落实情况，为高考安全有序、公平公正提供坚实纪律保障。图为舞钢市纪委监委第六纪检监 察室联合驻市教体局纪检监察组在市一高考点开展监督检查。（河南省舞钢市纪委监委 毛永慧 摄） image.png 今年，全国高考报名人数1335万人，共设置考点7899个。各地纪检监察机关立足"监督的再监督"职责定 位，紧盯重点环节、关键部位，强化对职能部门履职情况的监督检查，为高考安全有序、公平公正提供 坚强纪律保障。 image.png 云南省昆明市寻甸县纪委监委立足职责定位，主动靠前发力，组建专项监督检查组，深入车辆安排、电 力保供、考场 ...