Core Viewpoint - The emergence of AI-generated actress Tilly Norwood, created by Particle6, signifies a transformative shift in the film industry driven by AI video generation technology [1][9][17]. Group 1: Introduction of Tilly Norwood - Tilly Norwood is an AI-generated actress who made her debut at the Zurich Film Festival, capturing significant media attention [2][4]. - She is the first AI actress developed by Particle6, a company that claims all its videos are "100% AI-generated" [9][30]. Group 2: Industry Trends and Adoption of AI - Many media and entertainment companies have begun to adopt AI technology, shifting from skepticism to active collaboration with AI firms like Particle6 [17][19]. - Major companies and studios are reportedly initiating AI-assisted projects, with applications like Sora demonstrating significant advancements in video generation quality [20][28]. Group 3: Potential Impact on the Acting Profession - Tilly Norwood may become one of the first AI actresses to sign with talent agencies, marking a potential shift in the traditional actor-agent relationship [30][31]. - The rise of AI actresses has sparked concerns about the future of human actors, with some industry figures suggesting that AI could lead to job losses and diminish human creativity [38][40]. Group 4: Ethical and Artistic Considerations - The introduction of AI actors has raised ethical questions regarding copyright and the use of human performances to train AI without consent [38][39]. - Critics argue that AI-generated characters lack genuine human experience and emotional depth, questioning their status as true artists [46][47]. - Proponents, including Particle6's founder, defend AI actors as innovative art forms that expand the boundaries of performance [43][49].

Group 1 - The article discusses a humorous situation where a boyfriend threatens to break up over a food delivery issue, highlighting the absurdity of relationship dynamics in modern times [1][24]. - It reflects on the communication breakdown between partners, as one party feels neglected or unappreciated due to the other's actions [22][28]. - The narrative suggests that trivial matters can escalate into significant relationship issues, showcasing the fragility of modern relationships [24][28]. Group 2 - The article includes a light-hearted commentary on the challenges of sharing food among friends, emphasizing social etiquette in group settings [35]. - It touches on the theme of fairness and sharing, particularly in situations where resources are limited, such as dividing food among a group [35]. - The humorous tone throughout the article serves to engage readers and provoke thought about everyday social interactions [35][36].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the transformative impact of AI on jobs and society, emphasizing that while AI may displace many jobs in the short term, it will ultimately create new, more human-centered roles in the long run [10][11][12]. Group 1: AI and Employment - AI is expected to replace a significant number of jobs in the short term, but historically, technological revolutions have led to the creation of new job opportunities [10][11]. - The focus of future work will likely be more human-centric, as humans inherently prioritize interpersonal relationships over machine interactions [11][12]. Group 2: AI's Cognitive Advancements - AI has surpassed human intelligence in several top cognitive tasks, indicating a significant shift in capabilities [2][19]. - The "technological gap" between AI's capabilities and societal understanding is widening, raising concerns about whether society can keep pace with AI advancements [4][22]. Group 3: OpenAI's Strategic Decisions - OpenAI's pivotal decision to invest heavily in scaling models and computational power was crucial for its success, especially when many doubted the importance of language models [34][36]. - The launch of ChatGPT was a significant moment that demonstrated the practical value of AI, shifting public perception [36][39]. Group 4: Risks Associated with AI - The potential for "superintelligent" AI poses existential risks, with estimates suggesting a 2% probability of human extinction due to AI [46][48]. - Risks can be categorized into three types: misuse of AI by humans, AI gaining autonomy and acting against human interests, and AI gradually taking control of decision-making processes without malicious intent [50][55][62]. Group 5: The Future of Journalism - Despite challenges from AI, the need for journalism remains critical, as it plays a vital role in ensuring freedom of expression and providing in-depth analysis [71][72]. - The journalism industry may evolve towards individual reporters and social media, but the role of trusted fact-checkers will persist [72][74]. - There is a need to develop new economic models or innovate existing frameworks to incentivize quality content production in journalism [75][76].

Group 1 - The article discusses various humorous observations and anecdotes about daily life and social interactions, highlighting the absurdities and challenges people face in their routines [1][17][75] - It includes commentary on the nature of work and the dynamics of workplace relationships, emphasizing the often unspoken hierarchies and pressures that exist [17][18] - The content reflects on the struggles of modern life, with a focus on the emotional states of individuals and their interactions with friends and family [106][113][120] Group 2 - There are mentions of safety tips regarding the use of umbrellas during thunderstorms, emphasizing the importance of holding the handle to avoid electrical hazards [45][47][48] - The article also touches on the humorous side of personal experiences, such as the challenges of communicating feelings and the tendency to downplay one's struggles in social settings [106][130] - It presents a light-hearted take on the complexities of human relationships and the shared experiences of feeling overwhelmed in contemporary society [106][120][130]

Core Insights - South Korea experienced its most severe digital infrastructure incident due to a fire at the National Information Resources Service data center, which resulted in 647 critical systems going offline, accounting for approximately 40% of the national digital service framework [1][9]. Incident Details - The fire broke out on September 26 during a battery transfer operation involving lithium batteries, which had been identified as a risk prior to the incident. The fire was ignited by a spark from one of the batteries, leading to a rapid escalation of the blaze [2][7]. - The fire reached temperatures of 160 degrees Celsius, causing the temperature and humidity control systems to fail, prompting the management to shut down all remaining equipment to prevent further damage [2][9]. - The fire was extinguished after 22 hours, resulting in the complete destruction of 384 lithium batteries and damage to 740 computing devices [3][4]. Response and Recovery - Approximately 73 firefighters and 70 fire trucks were involved in the rescue efforts, with one reported injury [4]. - As of the following Monday, only 62 out of the 647 systems had been restored, indicating a recovery rate of less than 10% [13]. Infrastructure Critique - The incident highlighted significant flaws in the infrastructure, including the aging of the lithium batteries, which were installed in 2014 and had surpassed their warranty period. Recommendations for replacement had been made but were not acted upon [7][15]. - Criticism was directed at the layout of the data center, where the distance between the batteries and critical servers was less than the recommended 90 centimeters, increasing the risk of fire spread [7]. Systemic Impact - The fire led to widespread service disruptions across South Korea, affecting critical systems such as mobile identification, banking services, and emergency response systems [9][10]. - The incident prompted the activation of the highest emergency response level for an IT disaster in South Korea, marking a significant escalation in the response to such incidents [10]. Industry Implications - The fire has raised concerns about the safety of lithium batteries in data centers, with experts calling for stricter safety measures, including better isolation of battery modules and improved fire detection and suppression systems [19]. - The market share of lithium batteries in data center applications has increased significantly, from 15% in 2020 to an estimated 38.5% currently, indicating a growing reliance on this technology despite the associated risks [19].

Core Viewpoint - The article narrates the unusual experience of a programmer, WDE, who was fired after identifying a critical security bug in a chaotic development environment, highlighting issues in company culture and management priorities [1][2][13]. Group 1: WDE's Achievements and Initial Success - WDE, a seasoned full-stack engineer with 17 years of experience, successfully developed a new SaaS product from scratch in a small startup, achieving a project size of under 300KB and optimizing all performance metrics to 100/100 [5]. - The product generated immediate revenue for the company, leading to WDE being recognized as a "star developer" and being assigned new projects by the CTO [5]. Group 2: The Chaotic Team Environment - WDE was assigned to assist a troubled team, which exhibited disorganized development practices, including excessive use of force push in Git, overwriting of his work, and unauthorized changes to his code [6][7]. - The team's QA process was chaotic, with a single Jira task tracking thousands of issues, and a lack of adherence to agile principles, as tasks had been ongoing for six months without resolution [7][8]. Group 3: The Security Bug Incident - While working with the team, WDE discovered a significant security vulnerability that exposed sensitive data, including private API keys, posing a risk to both the company and its users [9][10]. - After reporting the bug, WDE was dismayed by the inadequate fix implemented by the backend developer, which he criticized for being ineffective and potentially harmful [10][11]. Group 4: Consequences of Reporting the Bug - Following his feedback on the security issue, WDE faced backlash from the backend developer and was subsequently fired by the CTO, who acknowledged the validity of WDE's concerns but stated that his presence was deemed problematic [11][12]. - The incident sparked discussions in the developer community about the importance of engineering culture and the tendency of management to prioritize results over process, often viewing those who raise concerns as troublemakers [13][14].

转自：吐槽星君 男朋友还房贷压力大要我出一半？ （vi a .@叁川说 ） 过去和他住,每个月帮他还一半的房 贷,我都已经快成他老婆了,帮他还还 房贷不过分,说我应该为了我们的将来 付出,我认为婚后可以和他一块还,现 在不是以前,现在一个家庭需要两个人 的努力才能撑起来,但是现在就要我帮 他还,万一那天分手了,我的这些付出 就打水漂了 在他的认知里既然我们要结婚,我就有 义务和他一同承担责任 % 公众号 · 吐槽星君 09:48 昨晚你说的搬过去和你住,想了一晚上,还 是喜欢一个人住。你觉得房贷压力大,等我 们婚后可以一起还,现在还太早了。 愣住 09:54 今早洗头吹头发又掉好多头发 压力太大了 估摸着昨晚两三点才睡着 10:13 去医院开点药 成年人谁活着不累 买这套为了我们结婚有地方住,租房一个 月一千多,搬过来和我住,帮我分担一些压 力,我们也可以多在一起了解阿 VS 1 11 11 6 公众号 · 吐槽 白天别午睡了 跟午睡没关系,午睡就睡20分钟 睡一两个小时可能会睡多 10:23 你们买房也没和我说过,现在买房太早了, 我们估计要一两年以后才结婚。 跟你说了吧 买了才说 我忘了 10:28 你自 ...

Core Insights - OpenAI's valuation has surged to $500 billion, surpassing SpaceX and becoming the world's most valuable unicorn company [1][2][3] - Elon Musk's personal wealth has also crossed the $500 billion mark, highlighting a significant moment in the tech and investment landscape [1][4] Valuation and Market Position - OpenAI's valuation of $500 billion is a result of a secondary share sale, where employees sold $6.6 billion worth of stock to top investors [8][9] - This valuation exceeds the $300 billion valuation from a previous funding round led by SoftBank earlier this year [9] - OpenAI's rapid rise in valuation reflects unprecedented interest from the capital markets, positioning it as a potential industry and economic game-changer [15][18] Investment and Financial Dynamics - Nvidia invested $10 billion in OpenAI, acquiring approximately 2% of the company at the current $500 billion valuation [16] - OpenAI has secured significant agreements with major companies like Oracle and SK Hynix, despite not yet being profitable [18] - The secondary sale mechanism serves as a strategic tool to retain talent and attract external investors, providing liquidity without waiting for an IPO [22][23] Competitive Landscape - The AI sector is characterized by intense competition for talent, with companies like Meta offering substantial compensation packages to attract top talent from OpenAI and Google [21] - OpenAI's high valuation is not guaranteed, as competitors like Google and Anthropic are also ramping up their financing efforts [26] - OpenAI is responding to competitive pressures with rapid product iterations, including upcoming releases like GPT-5 and Sora 2 [27][28]

十一国庆假期一过，电商行业年度重头戏"双十一"就要拉开帷幕，你准备好钱包了吗？今年的促销玩法很简化，主打单件直降、无需凑单。 今日，京东官方宣布，京东11.11购物节将于10月9日晚8点正式开启。相比去年10月12日开启"抢先购"，今年的节奏来得更早。 根据招商规则显示，今年京东11.11购物节分为预热期和正式期，共计37天。 预热期从10月9日00:00持续至19:59，正式期从10月9日20:00持续至11月14日23:59。 据悉，京东11.11选择在"十一黄金周"结束后的第一天启动，是为了给消费者提供更充裕的时间选购商品、享受优惠。 此外，促销玩法也升级了。今年京东促销主打"官方直降""跨店满减"的玩法。 同时，每满300元减50元的跨店满减玩法继续，促销费用由商家承担。但不支持与普通总价促销（满减、满折等）叠加。 近期，天猫的双11活动规则也已经公布，分为预售和现货两个阶段，从10月15日开始，至11月14日结束。 其中，预售期又分为预售预热、预售定金支付、预售尾款支付三个阶段，而现货期则分为现货预热和现货售卖两个阶段。 1.预售： 预售预热：10月15日14:00:00-10月15日19:59:5 ...

微信朋友圈作为用户分享生活点滴的热门平台，一直有一个饱受用户诟病的问题——精心挑选的照片在上传后，画质却不可避免地遭受压缩。 以下图为例，照片原始分辨率为 4032x3024，下载到本地后再查看可见被压缩到 1440x1080，画质明显下降。 但现在，iOS 微信通过算法升级，使得朋友圈照片画质显著提升。 不少网友在社交平台发帖称，iOS 微信更新到 8.0.64 最新版本后，实况照片、静态照片和历史旧图都更清晰了。 部分网友反馈多年前发布的照片重新加载后细节更锐利，如花草纹理、建筑棱角甚至食物的光泽感都清晰可见。即便是放大查看，画面模糊感也比以往大幅降 低。这种"旧图焕新"的效果让网友惊喜。 实测发现，iOS 微信更新后，将同样一张照片上传到朋友圈后，再次下载时分辨率已经提升到 2568x1926，被压缩的程度明显降低了。 虽然仍然存在一定程度的压缩，但相比过去，画质清晰度有了明显改善。 目前，视频画质压缩问题仍是痛点，用户呼吁同步升级。 此前8月份，腾讯客服回应用户时表示，朋友圈发送视频时，系统会根据图片/视频质量（尽量保持原图质量的程度）、屏幕大小及实际机型进行压缩，压缩比例 取决于设备平台、机型和照片 ...