中信证券：关于回归基准配置的几个误区和几个事实 我们认为市场对于公募考核新规以及回归基准行业配置的讨论存在一些误区。从海外经验来看，回归基准是通 过基准的行业配比向基金持仓配比演化而不是相反；产品投资策略向客户盈利导向回归，在长期视野下，这与 追求排名和绝对收益并不矛盾，反而是统一的；跑输基准的惩罚机制最终导致的是基金减少博弈性持仓，长期 来看最大的影响是活跃头寸的占比下降。 此外，用前瞻眼光去看，未来如果外资逐步回流，市场生态也会相较过去3年发生重大转变，不能用后视镜视 角静态去看行业配比，好公司和差公司之间的差异会远远超过所谓的"好行业"和"差行业"。 申万宏源：公募持仓向业绩比较基准靠拢未必是普遍趋势 《推动公募基金高质量发展行动方案》是长期改革，而其短期映射，成为结构性行情的主要线索。在我们看 来，主动公募产品调整业绩比较基准，是集中梳理产品策略的一次机遇。而持仓向业绩比较基准靠拢却未必是 普遍趋势。 如何去有效地设定基准是长期而言实现客户利益、赢得竞争并避免被被动型产品替代的最关键问题。对于主动 权益型产品而言，沪深300、中证800以及A500作为全市场基金基准都有较大的局限性，能够反映新质生产力 ...

Core Viewpoint - The report summarizes the sponsorship and underwriting process for the initial public offering (IPO) of Liaoning Dingjide Petrochemical Co., Ltd, detailing the issuance of 33.36667 million shares at a price of RMB 21.88 per share, raising a total of RMB 730.0627 million, with a net amount of RMB 656.9027 million after deducting issuance costs [1][2][3]. Group 1: Sponsorship and Issuance Details - The IPO was approved by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) and listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange on August 18, 2022 [1][2]. - The registered capital of Liaoning Dingjide Petrochemical Co., Ltd is RMB 134.511667 million, with a legal representative named Wu Chunye [2][3]. - The company’s actual controller is Zhang Zaiming, and the securities code is 603255 [2]. Group 2: Sponsorship Responsibilities - During the due diligence phase, the sponsoring institution coordinated with various intermediaries, conducted thorough investigations, and prepared necessary documentation for the IPO [3][4]. - In the ongoing supervision phase, the sponsor focused on preventing resource misappropriation by major shareholders and ensuring compliance with corporate governance standards [3][4]. Group 3: Major Events and Issues - A change in the designated sponsor representative occurred in February 2023, with Zhang Yuheng replacing Ding Shangjie due to a job change [4][5]. - The company faced issues related to non-operating fund occupation by related parties in 2024, which were not promptly reported to the sponsor [5][6]. - The sponsor conducted a special inspection regarding fund occupation and provided training to the company's management to enhance internal control [5][6]. Group 4: Fund Usage and Compliance - The sponsor reviewed the usage of raised funds, confirming compliance with CSRC and stock exchange regulations, with all funds being used appropriately [6]. - The report indicates that the company has completed the use of all funds raised from the IPO as of the report date [6].

Core Viewpoint - Jilin Zhongyan High Polymer Materials Co., Ltd. has successfully completed its initial public offering (IPO) and is under continuous supervision by Guotai Junan Securities Co., Ltd. from September 20, 2023, to December 31, 2026, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements and effective corporate governance [3][4]. Group 1: Company Overview - The company has issued shares with a par value of RMB 1 each, raising a net amount of RMB 799.71 million [3]. - The company operates in the PEEK (Polyether Ether Ketone) materials sector, which is characterized by high technical barriers and limited competition in large-scale industrial production [9][17]. Group 2: Financial Performance - For the year 2024, the company reported a revenue of RMB 277.09 million, a decrease of 5.05% compared to RMB 291.84 million in 2023 [16]. - The gross profit margin for the company was 40.08%, slightly up from 39.48% in the previous year, indicating stable profitability despite revenue decline [10][16]. - The net assets attributable to shareholders increased to RMB 135.45 million, reflecting an 8.80% growth from RMB 124.50 million in 2023 [16]. Group 3: Risk Factors - The company faces core competitiveness risks due to the reliance on key technical personnel, whose departure could adversely affect operations [10]. - Operational risks are present as the company expands its business scale, necessitating enhanced management capabilities to adapt to changing environments [10]. - Financial risks include potential declines in gross margin due to increased competition and rising raw material costs, which could impact profitability [11][16]. Group 4: Research and Development - The company has significantly increased its R&D investment, with total R&D expenditures reaching RMB 3.19 million in 2024, accounting for 11.52% of revenue, up from 7.91% in 2023 [23]. - The company has developed new medical-grade PEEK products and completed various biocompatibility evaluations, transitioning from research to development phases [24]. Group 5: Market Position - The company is recognized as a national high-tech enterprise and has established itself as a leader in the domestic PEEK market, surpassing international competitors in sales volume [17][22]. - The company has a diverse product range, including 89 specifications of PEEK products, which enhances its market resilience and competitive advantage [19].

国泰海通证券股份有限公司 关于峰岹科技（深圳）股份有限公司 差异化分红事项的核查意见 国泰海通证券股份有限公司（以下简称"国泰海通"或"保荐机构"）作为 峰岹科技（深圳）股份有限公司（以下简称"峰岹科技"或"公司"）首次公开 发行股票并在科创板上市的持续督导保荐机构，根据《中华人民共和国证券法》 《证券发行上市保荐业务管理办法》《上海证券交易所上市公司自律监管指引第 规定，对峰岹科技 2024 年年度利润分配所涉及的差异化分红进行了核查，核查 情况及核查意见如下： 一、本次申请特殊除权除息处理的原因 五次会议，审议通过了《关于使用超募资金以集中竞价交易方式回购公司股份方 案的议案》，同意公司以超募资金通过集中竞价交易方式回购公司发行的人民币 普通股（A 股）。回购的股份将在未来适宜时机全部用于员工持股计划或股权激 励计划。回购的价格不超过人民币 178 元/股（含），回购的资金总额不低于人民 币 2,000 万元（含），不超过人民币 3,000 万元（含）。回购期限自董事会审议通 过回购股份方案之日起 12 个月内。 公司于 2024 年 1 月 31 日至 2024 年 9 月 10 日间累计回购公司股份 ...

Core Viewpoint - The accumulation of OCI (Other Comprehensive Income) floating profits in banks has been largely consumed, primarily due to passive consumption from a weak bond market rather than active selling by banks. The pressure on net interest margins is mainly observed in large banks, and with the alleviation of the "lack of liabilities" issue in Q2, a clearer bottom for net interest margins is expected [1][15]. Group 1: OCI Floating Profit Consumption - Most banks have consumed over half of their OCI floating profit accumulation, with some banks even turning to floating losses. Among the six major banks, one has consumed about half of its floating profit accumulation, while others have consumed around one-third. In total, 25 out of 33 listed banks have consumed more than half of their OCI floating profits, with 7 turning to floating losses [2][5]. - The low performance of bond market investment returns has significantly dragged down the revenue performance of listed banks. In Q1, non-interest income reduced the revenue growth of joint-stock banks and city commercial banks by 3.81 percentage points and 6.42 percentage points, respectively, while the contribution to rural commercial banks dropped from 7.30 percentage points to 4.52 percentage points [2][5]. Group 2: Net Interest Margin Pressure - The pressure on net interest margins and the resistance to recovery are primarily seen in large banks, which have passively shifted to interbank certificates of deposit and interbank fixed deposits due to a "lack of liabilities" in Q1. The average net interest margin for large banks narrowed by 0.10 percentage points to a low of 1.39% in Q1 [15]. - The alleviation of the "lack of liabilities" pressure and the stabilization of interbank deposit scale and prices are expected to lead to a significant easing of net interest margin narrowing pressure for large banks in Q2, reflecting the effectiveness of previous measures to reduce funding costs [15]. Group 3: Retail Loan Risks - Risks in retail loans remain, with no consistent trend of alleviation observed. Banks with a higher proportion of retail loans face greater difficulty in reducing non-performing loan rates compared to their peers, and the speed of provision consumption is faster [9]. - An analysis of three state-owned banks with retail loan ratios exceeding 50% shows a divergence in the direction and magnitude of changes in provision coverage ratios, the proportion of loans under scrutiny, and non-performing loan rates [9].

| > 龙虎榜 | | | | | | Q、输入问句,你想知道的都在这里 | | 开始搜索 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2025-05-16 | 2025-05-14 | 2025-05-12 | 2025-05-09 | | 2025-05-08 | | | 历史龙虎榜信息>> | | 上榜原因:日涨幅偏离值达7%的证券 | | | | | | | | 更多个股解读> | | 营业部名称 | | | | 买入金额(元) | 占总成交比例 | 卖出金额(元) | 占总成交比例 | 净额(元) | | 国泰海通证券股份有限公司三亚迎宾路证券营业部 | | | | 3.57亿 | 9.90% | 4.74万 | 0.00% | 3.57亿 | | 机构专用 | | | | 9507.16万 | 2.64% | 2645.67万 | 0.73% | 6861.49万 | | 国盛证券有限责任公司宁波天童南路证券营业部 | | | | 8070.80万 | 2.24% | 158.39万 | 0.04% | 7912.41万 ...

Core Viewpoint - The People's Bank of China, along with other regulatory bodies, is preparing to launch a "Technology Board" in the bond market to support the issuance of technology innovation bonds by financial institutions, technology companies, and equity investment institutions, which has led to a surge in issuance activity in the capital market [2][3]. Group 1: Issuance Activity - From May 6 to May 15, a total of 85 technology innovation bonds were issued, amounting to approximately 135.8 billion yuan, with issuers from various sectors including new materials, information technology, finance, biomedicine, and electrical equipment [2]. - The bonds predominantly have medium to long-term maturities, with over 60 bonds having terms of 3 years or more [2]. - The issued technology innovation bonds feature low coupon rates, generally around 2%, and high subscription multiples, indicating strong investor confidence in the credit quality of the issuers [5][8]. Group 2: Market Demand and Characteristics - The issuance of technology innovation bonds is driven by both policy guidance and market demand, filling a financing gap for high-tech and strategic emerging industries [3]. - The current economic transformation and accelerated technological innovation have increased the demand for financing tools that support technology companies, making technology innovation bonds attractive to investors [3][10]. - The bonds are perceived as a new investment category with a combination of credit premium and policy support, making them appealing in a low-interest-rate environment [3][10]. Group 3: Investor Perspective - Despite the coupon rates being around 2%, technology innovation bonds are still attractive to institutional investors due to their relatively low risk and strong credit backing [8][12]. - Innovative bond terms, such as expected yield pledges and intellectual property pledges, are expected to enhance the investment value and flexibility of these bonds [8][10]. - The market for technology innovation bonds is anticipated to expand significantly, with projections suggesting annual issuance could exceed 300 billion yuan within the next 1-2 years as more entities participate [10].

科创债于2021年开始试点，最近因打造债市科技板而备受关注。"积极参与承销和投资商业银行和科 创 企业发行的科技创新债券，不断加大对科创企业和科创用途资金需求的支持力度。未来，将充分发挥全牌 照业务优势，助力债券市场发展。"华泰证券表示。 科创债承销哪家强？ 中证协公布的最新数据显示，今年一季度，一共有40家券商作为科技创新债券主承销商，承销107只债 券，合计金额1042.93亿元。不论是承销金额还是承销家数，位居前三的都是中信证券、中信建投、国泰 海通。2024年，60家券商承销了超6000亿元的科创债。 中信证券位居榜首 | 序号 | 公司名称 | 金额(亿元) | | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | 中信证券 | 243.58 | | 2 | 中信建投 | 150.67 | | 3 | 国泰海通 | 128.26 | | 4 | 中要公司 | 100.50 | | 5 | 华泰联合 | 65.84 | | 6 | 招商证券 | 37.73 | | 7 | 广发证券 | 37.07 | | 8 | 申万宏源 | 33.61 | | 9 | 西部证券 | 26.00 | | 10 | 平安 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is the successful construction of a sentiment timing model that predicts market trends based on the number of stocks hitting the daily limit up or down, reflecting market sentiment and capital activity [1][2]. - The sentiment timing model integrates five key factors: board strategy return factor, next-day return factor for limit down stocks, proportion of limit up stocks, proportion of limit down stocks, and net limit up proportion factor, achieving an annualized return of 6.65% and a maximum drawdown of 29.39% [1][2]. - The model's performance is superior to the Wind All A Index and any single factor combination, demonstrating its effectiveness in predicting short-term market sentiment [1][2]. Group 2 - Improvement 1 involves incorporating overall market trend analysis, which enhances the model's ability to identify macroeconomic changes, resulting in an annualized return of 9.41% and a maximum drawdown of 46.35% [2]. - Improvement 2 includes weighting factor signals, leading to an annualized return of 9.68% and a maximum drawdown of 24.47%, significantly outperforming the Wind All A Index [2]. Group 3 - The underlying logic of the factors indicates that changes in the number of limit up and down stocks can directly reflect market sentiment, while the effectiveness of chasing and low-buy strategies reveals investor behavior and emotional tendencies [3]. - The limit up proportion factor and limit down proportion factor show strong performance in predicting short-term market sentiment, while the next-day return factor for limit up stocks is less reliable as a leading indicator [3].

Core Viewpoint - The company, Jinlang Technology, is responding to an inquiry regarding its application for issuing convertible bonds, highlighting its revenue sources, financial performance, and market conditions in the photovoltaic industry [1][10]. Financial Performance - The company's operating revenue from 2021 to the first nine months of 2024 was 3.31 billion, 5.89 billion, 6.10 billion, and 5.16 billion CNY respectively, with inverter product sales and distributed photovoltaic power generation being the main revenue sources [1][12]. - The sales revenue from grid-connected inverters was 1.02 billion, 3.79 billion, 4.06 billion, and 4.00 billion CNY, while the sales revenue from energy storage inverters was 175.78 million, 1.07 billion, 438.70 million, and 383.00 million CNY [1][12]. - The company's gross profit margin for the reporting periods was 28.71%, 33.52%, 32.38%, and 33.67%, with the gross margin for photovoltaic inverter business declining [2][4]. Market Environment - The global photovoltaic market is experiencing growth, driven by the transition to renewable energy and the decreasing costs of photovoltaic technology, leading to increased demand for inverters [11][14]. - The company is focusing on expanding its presence in emerging markets such as India and Pakistan, which are expected to drive future growth in inverter demand [14][12]. Business Structure - The company has established two core business segments: photovoltaic inverters and distributed photovoltaic power generation, with the inverter business focusing on string inverters [12][13]. - The revenue contribution from distributed photovoltaic power generation has been increasing, with its gross profit contribution exceeding 50% in recent periods [14][12]. Customer Dynamics - The company has seen significant changes in its top five customers during the reporting period, with new customers such as Luminous Power Technologies and AE SOLAR ALTERNATIVE ENERGY emerging [3][12]. - Accounts receivable have increased, with the balance at the end of each period being 482.37 million, 1.05 billion, 936.07 million, and 1.51 billion CNY, indicating a trend of decreasing proportion of receivables aged within one year [3][4]. Financial Health - The company's total liabilities increased from 407.07 million CNY at the end of 2021 to 1.36 billion CNY by September 2024, with a debt ratio that fluctuated but remained below industry averages [4][10]. - The cash balance at the end of each period was 747.33 million, 1.58 billion, 1.08 billion, and 1.11 billion CNY, indicating a need for careful liquidity management [4][10].