关于控股子公司涉及诉讼事项的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 证券代码：600265 证券简称：ST 景谷 公告编号：2025-076 云南景谷林业股份有限公司 重要内容提示： ●案件所处的诉讼阶段：法院已立案受理，尚未开庭。 ●当事人所处的地位：云南景谷林业股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）控 股子公司唐县汇银木业有限公司（以下简称"汇银木业"）、汇银木业原实际控 制人崔会军、王兰存为被告。 ●涉案金额：汇银木业本次收到河北省顺平县人民法院（以下简称"顺平法 院"）送达的 1 份《民事起诉状》《应诉通知书》等相关法律文书，涉案金额包 括本金 100 万元及相应利息。 ●是否会对上市公司损益产生负面影响：本次诉讼案件尚未开庭审理，诉讼 的结果尚存在不确定性，对公司本期利润及期后利润的影响具有不确定性，最终 影响以法院判决为准。 ●截至本公告日，公司控股子公司汇银木业涉及财产保全及诉讼事项累计 19 项，涉案金额合计约为 11,047.65 万元（诉讼本金，不包括相应利息，最终以 收到的立案文书等为准），占最近 ...

云南景谷林业股份有限公司 证券代码：600265 证券简称：ST 景谷 公告编号：2025-072 | 人造板产品（立方米） | | 59,682.70 | | | 105,801.81 | -43.59 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 主要产品 林化产品（吨） | 2025 | 年 4-6 | 月 | 年 月 2024 4-6 | 188.64 | 变动比例（%） -100.00 | 2025 年第二季度主要经营数据公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈 述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 云南景谷林业股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）根据《上海证券交易所股 票上市规则》《上海证券交易所上市公司自律监管指引第3号——行业信息披露》 等规则要求，现将2025年第二季度主要经营数据（未经审计）披露如下： 一、主要产品产量及同比增减情况 二、主要产品销量及同比增减情况 | 主要产品 | 2025 | 年 4-6 | 月 | 2024 | 年 月 4-6 | 变动比例（%） | | --- | ...

证券代码：600265 证券简称：ST 景谷 公告编号：2025-075 云南景谷林业股份有限公司 第九届监事会第三次会议决议公告 （一）审议通过《2025 年半年度报告》及摘要。 本公司监事会及全体监事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈 述或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 一、监事会会议召开情况 经与会监事认真审议，本次会议审议并通过如下议案： 表决结果：3 票同意，0 票反对，0 票弃权。 与会监事对公司 2025 年半年度报告进行了认真严格的审核，并提出了如下 书面审核意见，与会监事一致认为： （1）公司 2025 年半年度报告的编制和审议程序符合法律、法规、规范性 文件、《公司章程》及公司内部管理制度的各项规定； （2）公司 2025 年半年度报告的内容和格式符合中国证监会和上海证券交 易所的各项规定，所包含的信息能全面、真实地反映出公司 2025 年半年度报告 的经营管理和财务状况等事项； （3）未发现参与 2025 年半年度报告编制和审议的人员有违反保密规定的 行为。 云南景谷林业股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）于 2025 年 8 月 27 日（星 期三）上 ...

云南景谷林业股份有限公司2025 年半年度报告 公司代码：600265 公司简称：ST 景谷 云南景谷林业股份有限公司 2025 年半年度报告 1 / 173 云南景谷林业股份有限公司2025 年半年度报告 重要提示 一、 本公司董事会、监事会及董事、监事、高级管理人员保证半年度报告内容的真实性、准确 性、完整性，不存在虚假记载、误导性陈述或重大遗漏，并承担个别和连带的法律责任。 二、 公司全体董事出席董事会会议。 三、 本半年度报告未经审计。 是 详见本报告第五节之一、承诺事项履行情况"注 29"及二、"报告期内控股股东及其他关联 方非经营性占用资金情况"的相关内容。 八、 是否存在违反规定决策程序对外提供担保的情况 否 四、 公司负责人吴昱、主管会计工作负责人项良宝及会计机构负责人（会计主管人员）邵琳声 明：保证半年度报告中财务报告的真实、准确、完整。 五、 董事会决议通过的本报告期利润分配预案或公积金转增股本预案 报告期内公司不进行利润分配。 六、 前瞻性陈述的风险声明 √适用 □不适用 本报告涉及的未来计划、发展战略等前瞻性描述，不构成公司对投资者的实质承诺，请投资 者注意投资风险。 七、 是否存在被 ...

ST景谷公告，2025年上半年营业收入1.23亿元，同比下降45.03%。归属于上市公司股东的净亏损1.24亿 元，上年同期净亏损819.59万元。报告期内公司不进行利润分配。 ...

Core Viewpoint - ST Jinggu announced the transfer of its 51% stake in Tangxian Huiyin Wood Industry Co., Ltd. to its controlling shareholder, Zhou Dafu Investment Co., Ltd., due to the deteriorating operational status and significant financial risks associated with Huiyin Wood [2][3][5] Group 1: Financial Impact and Risks - Huiyin Wood is a core asset for ST Jinggu, contributing 87.02% of the company's revenue in 2024, and its sale will drastically reduce the company's operational scale, potentially triggering delisting risk under Shanghai Stock Exchange rules [2][3] - The company reported a loss of approximately 969 million yuan due to a 19 million yuan inventory write-off, which was caused by the former actual controller circumventing internal controls [3][4][5] - Huiyin Wood is involved in 12 lawsuits with a total amount of approximately 95.15 million yuan, which equals 100.05% of ST Jinggu's audited net assets, indicating a severe financial strain [5][8] Group 2: Historical Context and Management Issues - Zhou Dafu Investment has invested 2.325 billion yuan in ST Jinggu over seven years, but the company has faced continuous financial difficulties, including a net asset decline of 11.28% in 2022 [2][11][12] - The acquisition of Huiyin Wood was initially seen as a lifeline, with ST Jinggu reporting a revenue increase of 420.98% in 2023, but the company failed to meet performance commitments in 2024, resulting in a significant loss [12][13] - The original controllers of Huiyin Wood failed to disclose significant debt obligations during the acquisition process, raising questions about the adequacy of due diligence conducted by ST Jinggu [7][9][10] Group 3: Future Outlook - The company faces challenges in recovering from the financial fallout of Huiyin Wood's operational failures and legal issues, with ongoing investigations and potential liabilities looming [5][14] - The home furnishing industry, which Huiyin Wood operates in, is expected to face both opportunities and risks due to its dependence on the real estate market, which may impact future performance [10]

证券之星消息，8月26日林业板块较上一交易日上涨0.36%，平潭发展领涨。当日上证指数报收于 3868.38，下跌0.39%。深证成指报收于12473.17，上涨0.26%。林业板块个股涨跌见下表： | 代码 | 名称 | 收盘价 | 涨跌幅 | 成交量(手) | 成交额(元) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 000592 | 平潭发展 | 3.52 | 4.45% | 291.96万 | 10.22 Z | | 600265 | ST景谷 | 22.45 | -2.43% | 1.16万 | 2595.01万 | | 002679 | 福建金森 | 10.18 | -3.14% | 21.42万 | 2.22亿 | | 000663 | 永安林业 | 7.01 | -3.84% | 42.46万 | 3.01亿 | 从资金流向上来看，当日林业板块主力资金净流出2889.14万元，游资资金净流入5570.42万元，散户资金 净流出2681.27万元。林业板块个股资金流向见下表： | 代码 | | | 名称 | | | | | --- | --- | --- ...

证券代码：600265 证券简称：ST 景谷 公告编号：2025-071 云南景谷林业股份有限公司 关于控股子公司涉及诉讼事项的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： ●案件所处的诉讼阶段：法院已立案受理，尚未开庭。 ●当事人所处的地位：云南景谷林业股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"）控 股子公司唐县汇银木业有限公司（以下简称"汇银木业"）、汇银木业原实际控 制人崔会军、王兰存为被告。 ●涉案金额：汇银木业本次收到河北省唐县人民法院（以下简称"唐县法院"） 和河北省顺平县人民法院（以下简称"顺平法院"）送达的《民事起诉状》《应诉 通知书》等相关法律文书 10 份，其中唐县法院 9 份，顺平法院 1 份，共涉 10 起案件，合计涉案金额包括本金 4,320 万元及相应利息。 ●是否会对上市公司损益产生负面影响：本次诉讼案件尚未开庭审理，诉讼 的结果尚存在不确定性，对公司本期利润及期后利润的影响具有不确定性，最终 影响以法院判决为准。 ●截至本公告日，公司控股子公司汇银木业涉及财产保全及诉讼事项累计 18 ...

Group 1 - The forestry sector increased by 1.54% on August 25, with Yong'an Forestry leading the gains [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3883.56, up 1.51%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 12441.07, up 2.26% [1] - Key stocks in the forestry sector showed varied performance, with Yong'an Forestry closing at 7.29, up 4.14%, and ST Jinggu down 1.24% at 23.01 [1] Group 2 - The net inflow of main funds in the forestry sector was 78.30 million yuan, while retail funds saw a net inflow of 10.63 million yuan [1] - Pingtan Development had a significant main fund inflow of 48.35 million yuan, despite a net outflow from retail funds of 11.79 million yuan [2] - Fujian Jinsen experienced a main fund inflow of 17.28 million yuan, with a net outflow from retail funds of 11.79 million yuan [2]

Core Viewpoint - The company, Yunnan Jinggu Forestry Co., Ltd., is currently involved in multiple lawsuits related to its subsidiary, Tangxian Huiyin Wood Industry Co., Ltd., which may significantly impact its financial performance and operational capabilities [2][3][15]. Legal Proceedings - The lawsuits are at the stage where the court has accepted the cases but has not yet held hearings [2]. - The defendants include the company’s subsidiary Huiyin Wood, its former actual controllers Cui Huijun and Wang Lanchun, with a total claim amount of approximately 12.58 million yuan, including principal and interest [2][5]. - Huiyin Wood has a total of 15 legal cases involving asset preservation and litigation, with a cumulative claim amount of about 107.72 million yuan, which represents 113.27% of the company's latest audited net assets attributable to shareholders [3]. Financial Impact - The ongoing lawsuits have led to the freezing of all nine bank accounts of Huiyin Wood, resulting in the suspension of its production lines, which is expected to adversely affect the company's operations [3][4]. - The company anticipates a further decline in its operating performance for the first half of 2025, indicating significant uncertainty regarding its ongoing viability [3][4]. Debt and Recovery Efforts - The company has established a special team to verify the authenticity and completeness of the related borrowings and has engaged litigation lawyers to actively respond to the lawsuits [4][16]. - The company aims to minimize the impact of these legal matters on its financial standing and to pursue recovery from responsible parties [4][16]. Summary of Lawsuits - The lawsuits stem from private lending disputes involving the former actual controllers of Huiyin Wood, with claims including: - Case 1: Claim for 500,000 yuan plus interest [7][8]. - Case 2: Claim for 5 million yuan plus interest [9][10]. - Case 3: Claim for 7,076,498 yuan plus interest [11][12][13]. Company’s Response - The company is closely monitoring the situation and has committed to fulfilling its information disclosure obligations as required by regulations [16].