Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the hidden truth within the automotive supply chain, where large parts manufacturers impose longer payment terms, creating significant pressure on small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) [4][7]. Group 1: Payment Terms and Their Impact - A recent lawsuit involving a mold company and a joint venture parts manufacturer illustrates the underlying issue of payment terms, where SMEs complete their work but face delayed payments from larger firms [2]. - The automotive industry has seen a positive response to commitments from automakers to a 60-day payment term, previously criticized for exploiting SMEs [3]. - However, large parts manufacturers, such as Huayu Automotive and Dongfeng Technology, have payment turnover days of 163 and 196 days respectively, indicating a trend of extended payment cycles that adversely affect SMEs [5][6]. Group 2: Industry Dynamics and Power Shifts - The payment turnover days are not equivalent to the contractual payment terms, as they reflect the actual payment cycles, which can serve as an indirect indicator of a company's payment practices and credit cycles [6]. - Some suppliers, while not directly affiliated with automakers, also exert pressure on SMEs, as seen with companies like CATL, which has a payment turnover day exceeding 258 days, indicating a trend of stringent payment practices [6]. - Large parts manufacturers leverage their negotiating power to impose even stricter payment terms on their suppliers, exacerbating the financial strain on SMEs [7]. Group 3: Need for Transparency and Fairness - To address the challenges posed by extended payment terms, there is a call for large enterprises to publicly disclose their payment policies, which is seen as a crucial first step towards restoring fairness in the industry [8]. - The article argues that while long payment terms may appear as a financial strategy, they should not undermine fair competition and the integrity of the industry credit ecosystem [9]. - The question is raised whether large parts manufacturers should also take a stance on the issue of extended payment terms, emphasizing the need for collective responsibility within the industry [10].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing issues in the automotive supply chain, particularly focusing on the extended payment terms imposed by large parts manufacturers on smaller suppliers, despite recent commitments from automakers to shorten their payment periods [3][4]. Group 1: Payment Terms and Industry Dynamics - A recent lawsuit highlights the contract disputes between a mold company and a joint venture parts manufacturer, revealing underlying issues related to payment terms and cash flow for small enterprises [3]. - Automakers have received praise for their commitment to a 60-day payment term, but the larger issue lies with major parts manufacturers who impose even longer payment terms on smaller suppliers [3][4]. - For instance, Huayu Automotive, a major parts supplier under SAIC, has an accounts payable turnover period of 163 days, while Dongfeng Technology has a turnover period exceeding 196 days [4]. Group 2: Impact on Smaller Suppliers - The accounts payable turnover days do not equate to the contractual payment terms, indicating that actual payment cycles can be significantly longer, affecting the cash flow of smaller suppliers [4]. - Larger parts manufacturers, such as CATL, have been able to maintain a favorable accounts receivable turnover period of around 60 days, while their own accounts payable turnover days exceed 258 days, further straining smaller suppliers [4][5]. - The article suggests that these large manufacturers are leveraging their negotiating power to impose harsher terms on smaller suppliers, exacerbating the financial strain within the supply chain [5]. Group 3: Call for Transparency and Fairness - The article advocates for greater transparency in payment policies from large manufacturers, similar to the commitments made by automakers, to foster a healthier competitive environment [5]. - It emphasizes that while extended payment terms may seem like a financial strategy, they should not undermine fair competition and the integrity of the supply chain [5]. - The article questions whether large parts manufacturers should also take responsibility and clarify their payment practices to ensure fairness across the industry [5].

Core Viewpoint - The performance of the CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility Index shows mixed results among its constituent stocks, with a slight overall decline, while the ETF associated with this index has seen significant inflows and strong long-term performance metrics [1][5]. Group 1: Index Performance - As of June 13, 2025, the CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility Index decreased by 0.37% [1]. - The ETF associated with this index, CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF (515300), experienced a turnover of 4.49% during the trading session, with a total transaction value of 268 million yuan [1]. - Over the past month, the average daily transaction value of the ETF was 11.7 million yuan, and its latest scale reached 5.975 billion yuan [1]. Group 2: Stock Performance - Among the constituent stocks, Shanghai Port Group led with a gain of 1.39%, while Shanghai Bank, Industrial Bank, and Jiangsu Bank saw declines [1]. - The top ten weighted stocks in the index accounted for 36.97% of the total index weight, with China Shenhua and Gree Electric Appliances being the most significant contributors [2][4]. Group 3: Dividend and Investment Trends - The upcoming dividend season from May to July is expected to attract more investments into dividend-paying stocks, as the yield on dividend indices reaches new highs [5]. - Regulatory support for increasing insurance funds' market participation is anticipated to enhance the valuation expectations for dividend stocks [5]. - Investors without stock accounts can access investment opportunities through the corresponding CSI 300 Dividend Low Volatility ETF linked funds [5].

Investment Rating - The industry is rated as "Overweight" [6] Core Views - Multiple automakers have committed to shortening payment terms to within 60 days, which is expected to improve the automotive supply chain ecosystem [1] - The shortening of payment terms is anticipated to alleviate concerns regarding automakers' repayment capabilities and promote healthy industry development [1] - The average cash turnover rates for components, complete vehicles, and dealers in 2024 are projected to be 4.5, 2.2, and 8.9 respectively, with the new payment terms expected to enhance cash flow [1] - The reduction in payment terms aligns with international standards, potentially benefiting Chinese brands in overseas markets [2] - Price competition has paused, leading to a narrowing of discount rates, which is favorable for healthy competition within the industry [2] Summary by Sections Section 1: Impact of Shortened Payment Terms - The adjustment to a 60-day payment term is expected to have limited impact on the cash flow of complete vehicle manufacturers, as many currently operate with payment terms exceeding 110 days [2] - The new terms are expected to enhance the cash turnover ability and cash levels of upstream component manufacturers, with an estimated increase in cash funds of approximately 32 billion yuan (+37%) if accounts receivable turnover improves to 6 [3] Section 2: Export Growth of Domestic Passenger Vehicles - Domestic brands are leading in competitiveness within the market, driving foreign brands out [4] - In 2024, market shares for domestic brands in various price segments are projected to be 80%, 48%, and 42% respectively, with year-on-year increases of 7, 14, and 4 percentage points [4] - In May, domestic brand exports reached 375,000 units, a year-on-year increase of 18% and a month-on-month increase of 10% [4] - The global market is viewed as a significant growth opportunity for Chinese automakers, with a recommendation to focus on industry leaders with global competitiveness [4]

Group 1 - The announcement details the election results of the employee representative director for Huayu Automotive Systems Co., Ltd. [1][2] - Mr. Huan De has been elected as the employee representative director for the 11th Board of Directors, following the 12th joint meeting of the third employee representative assembly [2] - The term for the newly elected board members, including Mr. Huan De, will last for three years, in accordance with the Company Law and the company's articles of association [2] Group 2 - Mr. Huan De, born in August 1976, holds a master's degree in business administration and has extensive experience in various leadership roles within the automotive industry [3] - His previous positions include roles at Shanghai Volkswagen Automotive Co., Ltd. and SAIC Volkswagen Automotive Sales Co., Ltd., among others [3] - Currently, he serves as the deputy chairman of the labor union at SAIC Motor Corporation Limited and is the employee representative director at Huayu Automotive Systems Co., Ltd. [3]

证券代码：600741 证券简称：华域汽车 公告编号：临 2025－016 华域汽车系统股份有限公司 关于职工代表董事选举结果的公告 2025 年 6 月 7 日 1 附件：简历 华恩德：男，1976 年 8 月出生，中共党员，研究生毕业，工商 管理硕士，工程师。曾任上海大众汽车有限公司团委书记、上海上汽 大众汽车销售有限公司党委副书记、上海大众汽车有限公司本部分党 委书记、党委办公室副主任兼合规部经理、党委办公室副主任，上海 大众动力总成有限公司党委副书记（主持工作）、纪委书记、工会主 席，华域皮尔博格有色零部件（上海）有限公司党委书记、纪委书记、 工会主席，上汽大众汽车有限公司党委副书记、纪委书记、工会主席， 上海汽车集团股份有限公司董事会办公室主任、工会副主席、上海汽 车工业（集团）有限公司董事会秘书。现任上海汽车集团股份有限公 司工会副主席（主持工作），华域汽车系统股份有限公司职工代表董 事。 2 根据《华域汽车系统股份有限公司章程》（以下简称：《公司章程》） 的规定，公司职工代表董事由公司职工通过职工代表大会、职工大会 或者其他形式民主选举产生，并直接进入董事会。近日，公司董事会 接到公司工会的函， ...

Group 1 - The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and other departments have launched the 2025 New Energy Vehicle (NEV) initiative to promote NEV usage in rural areas, focusing on quality and reliable models [1] - The initiative includes exhibitions, test drives, and collaboration with after-sales service, charging service, insurance, and financial service companies to enhance the NEV ecosystem in rural regions [1] - Policies such as tax reductions and incentives for vehicle trade-ins will encourage manufacturers to expand their product offerings and improve service levels in rural markets [1] Group 2 - Dongxing Securities notes that the automotive industry is experiencing intensified competition, impacting profitability and cash flow, but leading companies are still showing improvements in net profit and operating cash flow [2] - The release of new vehicles during auto shows and the ongoing effects of new policies are expected to gradually improve the performance of automotive companies in the second quarter [2] - Recommended companies for investment include SAIC Motor, Jianghuai Automobile, BYD, Changan Automobile, and others within the automotive and related sectors [2]

华域汽车系统股份有限公司 章程修订对照表 序号 修订前 修订后 （1）所有"股东大会"调整为"股东会"； （2）删除"监事"、"监事会"相关描述，部分描述调整为"审计委员会" （3）所有"董事、监事、高级管理人员"调整为"董事、高级管理人员"； （4）所有提及的公司股份的"种类"调整为公司股份的"类别"； （5）所有公司合并、减资、分立、债权人通知的公告渠道，均新增"国家企业信用信息公示系统" 第一章 总则 第一条 为维护公司、股东和债权人的合法权益，规范公司的组织和 第一条 为维护公司、股 东、职工和债权人的合法权益，规范公司的组织 行为，根据《中华人民共和国公司法》 （以下简称《公司法》） 、《中华 和行为，根据《中华人民共和国公司法》 （以下简称"《公司法》" ）、《中华 人民共和国证券法》 （以下简称《证券法》 ）、《中国共产党章程》和其 人民共和国证券法》 （以下简称"《证券法》" ）、《中国共产党章程》和其他 他有关规定，制订本章程。 有关规定，制定本章程。 第八条 董事长为公司的法定代表人。 担任法定代表人的董事长辞任的，视为同时辞去法定代表 人。 日内确定新的法 定代表人。 序号 修订前 修订 ...

| 序号 | 修订前 | 修订后 | | --- | --- | --- | | 年）》（下称《指引》）共性调整如下： | 1.根据中国证监会《上市公司章程指引（2025 | | | （1）所有"股东大会"调整为"股东会"； | | | | （2）删除"监事"、"监事会"相关描述，部分描述调整为"审计委员会" | | | | （3）所有"董事、监事、高级管理人员"调整为"董事、高级管理人员"； | | | | （4）所有提及的公司股份的"种类"调整为公司股份的"类别"； | | | | （5）所有公司合并、减资、分立、债权人通知的公告渠道，均新增"国家企业信用信息公示系统"。 | | | | 2.如仅涉及序号顺调的，不再逐项列示。 | | | | 第一章 | 总则 | | | 第一条 | 为维护公司、股东和债权人的合法权益，规范公司的组织和 | 第一条 为维护公司、股东、职工和债权人的合法权益，规范公司的组织 | | 行为，根据《中华人民共和国公司法》（以下简称《公司法》）、《中华 | 1. | 和行为，根据《中华人民共和国公司法》（以下简称"《公司法》"）、《中华 | | 人民共和国证券法》（以下简称《证券 ...

从中证上海国企指数持仓的市场板块来看，上海证券交易所占比100.00%。 从中证上海国企指数持仓样本的行业来看，金融占比29.89%、工业占比23.44%、可选消费占比 12.21%、房地产占比9.67%、医药卫生占比7.22%、信息技术占比5.40%、通信服务占比4.91%、公用事 业占比3.59%、主要消费占比2.16%、原材料占比1.52%。 金融界5月30日消息，上证指数低开低走，中证上海国企指数 (上海国企，950096)下跌0.45%，报 1331.98点，成交额167.25亿元。 数据统计显示，中证上海国企指数近一个月上涨2.51%，近三个月下跌0.19%，年至今下跌5.78%。 据了解，中证上海国企指数以上海市（含区县）国资控股以及重要参股的上市公司证券为待选样本，结 合盈利能力、成长能力、股东回报水平等进行选样，以反映基本面情况较好的上海国资国企相关上市公 司证券的整体表现。该指数以2012年12月31日为基日，以1000.0点为基点。 从指数持仓来看，中证上海国企指数十大权重分别为：中国太保（8.87%）、上海机场（6.23%）、国 泰海通（5.39%）、上海银行（5.34%）、浦发银行（ ...