| | 债券简称：英特转债 | | | --- | --- | --- | | 证券代码：000411 债券代码：127028 | 证券简称：英特集团 | 公告编号：2025-038 | 一、审议通过了《2025 年半年度报告及摘要》（5 票同意，0 票反对，0 票弃权）。 经审核，监事会认为董事会编制和审议浙江英特集团股份有限公司 2025 年半年度报告 的程序符合法律、行政法规及中国证监会的规定，报告内容真实、准确、完整地反映了上市 公司的实际情况，不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。 相关内容披露在同日的巨潮资讯网（http://www.cninfo.com.cn）和证券时报上。 特此公告。 浙江英特集团股份有限公司监事会 2025 年 8 月 28 日 浙江英特集团股份有限公司 十届八次监事会议决议公告 本公司及监事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、误导 性陈述或重大遗漏。 2025 年 8 月 15 日，浙江英特集团股份有限公司以电子邮件、专人送达方式向全体监事 发出了召开十届八次监事会议的通知，会议于 2025 年 8 月 26 日以通讯表决方式召开，会议 应到监 ...

| | | 浙江英特集团股份有限公司 二、审议通过了《关于子公司申请办理应收账款无追索权保理业务的议案》（11 票同意， 0 票反对，0 票弃权）。 相关内容披露在同日的巨潮资讯网（http://www.cninfo.com.cn）和证券时报上。 该议案已经公司董事会战略委员会审核通过。 特此公告。 浙江英特集团股份有限公司董事会 2025 年 8 月 28 日 1 十届十三次董事会议决议公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、误导 性陈述或重大遗漏。 2025 年 8 月 15 日，浙江英特集团股份有限公司以电子邮件、专人送达方式向全体董 事发出了召开十届十三次董事会议的通知，会议于 2025 年 8 月 26 日以通讯表决方式召开。 会议应到董事 11 人，实际出席会议的董事 11 人，缺席会议的董事 0 人。本次会议的召开 符合有关法律、行政法规、部门规章、规范性文件和公司章程的规定。会议采用记名表决 方式对通知中所列事项进行了表决，形成以下决议： 一、审议通过了《2025 年半年度报告及摘要》（11 票同意，0 票反对，0 票弃权）。 相关内容披露在同日的巨潮资讯 ...

浙江英特集团股份有限公司 2025 年半年度报告全文 浙江英特集团股份有限公司 2025 年半年度报告 2025 年 8 月 28 日 1 浙江英特集团股份有限公司 2025 年半年度报告全文 第一节 重要提示、目录和释义 公司董事会、监事会及董事、监事、高级管理人员保证半年度报告内容 的真实、准确、完整，不存在虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏，并承担 个别和连带的法律责任。 公司负责人汪洋、主管会计工作负责人曹德智及会计机构负责人(会计主 管人员)俞康声明：保证本半年度报告中财务报告的真实、准确、完整。 所有董事均已出席了审议本次半年报的董事会会议。 本半年度报告中涉及的公司发展战略、未来计划等前瞻性陈述，均不构 成本公司对任何投资者及相关人士的承诺，投资者及相关人士均应对此保持 足够的风险认识，并且应当理解计划、预测与承诺之间的差异。 本报告第三节"管理层讨论与分析"中分析了公司未来发展可能面临的主 要风险因素和相关措施情况，敬请投资者留意查阅。 公司计划不派发现金红利，不送红股，不以公积金转增股本。 2 | 第一节 重要提示、目录和释义 2 | | --- | | 第二节 公司简介和主要财务指标 7 | ...

Market Overview - The pharmaceutical commercial sector experienced a decline of 2.71% on August 27, with Saily Medical leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3800.35, down 1.76%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 12295.07, down 1.43% [1] Individual Stock Performance - Saily Medical (603716) closed at 33.15, down 8.93% with a trading volume of 484,700 shares and a transaction value of 1.671 billion [1] - Other notable declines included HeLiang China (603122) down 5.15%, YaoYigou (300937) down 5.10%, and Guofa Shares (600538) down 4.98% [1] - The overall net outflow of main funds from the pharmaceutical commercial sector was 543 million, while retail investors saw a net inflow of 361 million [1] Fund Flow Analysis - Jiuzhoutong (600998) had a main fund net inflow of 11.8 million, accounting for 18.23% of its total [2] - Dacilin (603233) saw a main fund net inflow of 29.97 million, representing 15.70% [2] - The overall trend indicates a mixed sentiment with main funds withdrawing while retail investors are actively buying [2]

证券日报网讯英特集团（000411）8月20日在互动平台回答投资者提问时表示，截至2025年8月8日，公 司股东户数为21503户。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The pharmaceutical distribution industry is characterized by three main business models: wholesale, retail, and various new distribution models, each with distinct operational dynamics and market implications [1]. Group 1: Wholesale Model - The wholesale model, also known as the distribution model, involves selling pharmaceuticals and medical devices in bulk to entities that directly interact with consumers, such as medical institutions and retail pharmacies [4]. - The third terminal in the wholesale model is increasingly favored by internet hospitals, indicating a shift towards digital integration in pharmaceutical distribution [4]. Group 2: Retail Model - The retail model involves retail pharmacies purchasing pharmaceutical products from manufacturers or other distributors and selling them to individual consumers, generating profit from the price difference [7]. - Although the retail model operates on a smaller scale compared to wholesale, it boasts higher profit margins, making it an attractive segment within the pharmaceutical distribution landscape [7]. Group 3: Internet Retail Model - The internet retail model encompasses various online platforms, including internet hospitals and pharmaceutical e-commerce, facilitating diagnosis and drug sales through digital channels [9]. - This model includes B2B, B2C, and O2O formats, reflecting the growing trend of digital transformation in the pharmaceutical sector [9]. Group 4: Third-Party Cold Chain Logistics - The "14th Five-Year Plan" emphasizes the need for a modern, intelligent pharmaceutical supply chain, focusing on enhancing networked, scaled, and specialized logistics services [12]. - Third-party cold chain logistics offer significant advantages, such as reducing initial investment costs for pharmaceutical companies and ensuring temperature-controlled transport, which is crucial for maintaining drug quality [12]. - These logistics providers can effectively manage reverse logistics and product recalls through advanced tracking and data exchange systems, thereby minimizing losses and ensuring compliance with quality standards [12].

Core Viewpoint - The pharmaceutical distribution industry is categorized into three main business models: wholesale, retail, and various new distribution models, each with distinct characteristics and profit margins [1]. Group 1: Wholesale Model - The wholesale model, also known as the distribution model, involves selling pharmaceuticals and medical devices in bulk to entities that directly interact with consumers, such as medical institutions and retail pharmacies [3]. - The wholesale model can be further divided into categories such as hospital direct sales, commercial allocation, and third terminal distribution, with the third terminal being a key focus for internet healthcare companies [3]. Group 2: Retail Model - The retail model involves retail pharmacies purchasing pharmaceutical products from manufacturers or other distribution companies and selling them to individual consumers for profit [4]. - Although the retail model is smaller in scale compared to wholesale, it offers higher profit margins, and can be subdivided into single-store and chain models, with chain models further categorized into direct-operated and franchise operations [4]. Group 3: Internet Retail Model - The internet pharmaceutical new retail model encompasses various internet hospitals and pharmaceutical e-commerce platforms that conduct diagnosis and drug sales through online channels, including B2B, B2C, and O2O models [6]. Group 4: Third-Party Cold Chain Logistics - The pharmaceutical distribution industry is expected to build a modern smart pharmaceutical supply chain service system during the 14th Five-Year Plan period, focusing on enhancing networked, scaled, and specialized levels for safer and more efficient logistics [10]. - Third-party cold chain logistics provide significant advantages, such as reducing upfront investment for pharmaceutical companies, ensuring temperature control during transport, and optimizing the pharmaceutical supply chain through integrated information management [11].

Core Insights - As of August 15, a total of 134 stocks in the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets have experienced net buying from major funds for five consecutive days or more [1] - The stock with the longest streak of net buying is Qingsong Jianhua, which has seen net buying for 18 consecutive trading days [1] - Other notable stocks with significant net buying days include Jichuan Pharmaceutical (12 days), Dingyang Technology (11 days), Suzhou Bank, Zhongzhi Holdings, Hongchang Electronics, Everbright Jiabao, Yingte Group, and Jinko Technology, each with 10 or more days of net buying [1]

Market Overview - The pharmaceutical commercial sector experienced a slight decline of 0.01% on August 13, with Huaren Health leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3683.46, up 0.48%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 11551.36, up 1.76% [1] Stock Performance - Key stocks in the pharmaceutical commercial sector showed varied performance, with the following notable movements: - Seli Medical (603716) rose by 6.55% to a closing price of 31.09, with a trading volume of 556,200 shares and a transaction value of 1.671 billion [1] - Guofa Co. (600538) increased by 1.75% to 6.38, with a trading volume of 129,600 shares [1] - Huaren Health (301408) fell by 1.76% to 15.11, with a trading volume of 179,600 shares and a transaction value of 271 million [2] Capital Flow - The pharmaceutical commercial sector saw a net inflow of 33.73 million from institutional investors, while retail investors experienced a net outflow of 42.05 million [2] - Notable capital flows for specific stocks included: - Seli Medical had a net inflow of 10.9 million from institutional investors, while retail investors saw a net outflow of 2.46 million [3] - Yiyang Pharmaceutical (301015) had a net inflow of 6.29 million from institutional investors, but retail investors faced a net outflow of 31.02 million [3]

Group 1: Industry Overview - The Chinese pharmaceutical distribution market can be divided into three competitive tiers, with the first tier consisting of national wholesale giants such as China National Pharmaceutical Group, Shanghai Pharmaceuticals, China Resources Pharmaceutical, and Jiuzhoutong, all generating over 100 billion in revenue [1] - The retail pharmacy rankings show Dazhenlin at the top, followed by Guoyao Pharmacy and Yifeng Pharmacy, indicating significant changes in the top five rankings compared to the previous year [3] - The e-commerce segment is led by Ark Health's online pharmacy, which is pioneering a new H2H (Hospital To Home) smart healthcare model [4] Group 2: Strategic Analysis - The strategic cluster analysis of listed companies in the pharmaceutical distribution industry indicates that leaders such as China Resources Pharmaceutical, Shanghai Pharmaceuticals, Jiuzhoutong, and China National Pharmaceutical Group have revenues exceeding 100 billion and are well-established in the market [5] - The competitive landscape is characterized by intense competition, with numerous participants including wholesale and retail pharmaceutical companies, as well as brand operators entering the supply chain [7] Group 3: Competitive Forces - The analysis using Porter's Five Forces model reveals a highly competitive environment in the pharmaceutical distribution industry, with a quantification of competitive forces ranging from 0 (minimum) to 1 (maximum) [7]