NEW YORK, Sept. 18, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The Gross Law Firm issues the following notice to shareholders of Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE: LMT). Shareholders who purchased shares of LMT during the class period listed are encouraged to contact the firm regarding possible lead plaintiff appointment. Appointment as lead plaintiff is not required to partake in any recovery. CONTACT US HERE: https://securitiesclasslaw.com/securities/lockheed-martin-corporation-loss-submission-form/?id=167836&from=3  CLASS ...

NEW YORK, Sept. 18, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- WHY: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of securities of Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE: LMT) between January 23, 2024 and July 21, 2025, both dates inclusive (the “Class Period”), of the important September 26, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline. SO WHAT: If you purchased Lockheed Martin securities during the Class Period you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency ...

Core Viewpoint - The Gross Law Firm has issued a notice to shareholders of Lockheed Martin Corporation regarding a class action lawsuit due to allegations of misleading statements and lack of effective internal controls during a specified class period [1][2]. Allegations - The complaint alleges that Lockheed Martin lacked effective internal controls related to risk-adjusted contracts and profit booking rates [1]. - It is claimed that the company did not have adequate procedures for comprehensive reviews of program requirements, technical complexities, schedules, and risks [1]. - Lockheed Martin is accused of overstating its ability to meet contract commitments regarding cost, quality, and schedule [1]. - As a result of these issues, the company was likely to report significant losses [1]. - The positive statements made by the defendants about the company's business and prospects were deemed materially misleading and lacked a reasonable basis [1]. Class Action Details - The class period for the lawsuit is from January 23, 2024, to July 21, 2025 [1]. - Shareholders are encouraged to register for the class action by September 26, 2025, to potentially be appointed as lead plaintiffs [2]. - There is no cost or obligation for shareholders to participate in the case [2].

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Lockheed Martin Corporation, alleging that the company misled investors regarding its financial health and internal controls from January 23, 2024, to July 21, 2025 [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations and Misrepresentations - The lawsuit claims Lockheed Martin overstated its operational capabilities, particularly in the Aeronautics and Rotary and Mission Systems (RMS) segments, and lacked effective internal controls to assess program risks [2]. - Investors were not informed of the potential for significant losses due to these inadequate internal controls, which the lawsuit suggests were systemic issues rather than isolated incidents [5]. Group 2: Financial Disclosures and Impact - A series of negative disclosures led to substantial stock price drops, with shares falling nearly 11% following the final disclosure [3]. - Specific financial losses reported include $1.8 billion in pre-tax losses in the Aeronautics segment on January 28, 2025, and an additional $950 million and $570 million in pre-tax losses for the Aeronautics and RMS segments, respectively, disclosed on July 22, 2025 [6]. Group 3: Legal and Investigative Actions - Hagens Berman is investigating the claims on behalf of investors who suffered losses, focusing on whether the company's management was aware of the inadequacies in internal controls and the risks involved [4][5]. - The firm encourages investors with substantial losses to come forward and assist in the investigation [2].

NEW YORK, Sept. 16, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Lockheed Martin Corporation ("Lockheed Martin Corporation" or the "Company") (NYSE: LMT) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of Lockheed Martin Corporation investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between January 23, 2024 and July 21, 2025. Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team: htt ...

Group 1 - Lockheed Martin Corporation's stock is perceived to have a ~35% upside over the next 18 months, driven by durable earnings power and misunderstood market catalysts [2] - The F-35 program is entering a critical upgrade cycle, enhancing its capabilities significantly, comparable to upgrading from an "iPhone 6" to an "iPhone 12" [2] - Lockheed Martin has a substantial order backlog with over 1,000 F-35 planes in service, creating a competitive moat that rivals find difficult to replicate [2][3] Group 2 - The company benefits from a strong portfolio, including missile systems that align with U.S. defense policy, and continued strong sales of upgraded F-16s [3] - Concerns regarding write-downs and stealth obsolescence are mitigated by the program's established position within allied supply chains and political economies [4] - Lockheed's current valuation at approximately 15 times earnings, along with significant shareholder returns, indicates a mispriced opportunity in a critical defense sector [4] Group 3 - Previous bullish analyses highlighted strong first-quarter results, a robust order backlog, and improved segment margins, despite a recent 2.13% stock depreciation [5] - The emphasis on the F-35 upgrade cycle and the potential of missile and fighter jet options remains underappreciated in the market [5]

Core Insights - The recent incursions of Russian drones into Polish airspace have triggered a direct response from NATO forces, marking a significant escalation in European security dynamics [1] - Following these events, there has been a notable increase in defense equities as global investors anticipate heightened military spending and demand for advanced military capabilities [2] Defense ETFs Performance - Major U.S.-listed defense ETFs such as Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD), iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA), Select STOXX Europe Aerospace & Defense ETF (EUAD), SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR), and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) have all outperformed the S&P 500, which gained 1.2% since the incursions [3] - The significant gains in these defense ETFs are attributed to their exposure to leading defense contractors like Lockheed Martin, RTX Corp., and Northrop Grumman, which typically benefit from increased government contracts during conflicts [4][5] Market Dynamics - The surge in defense ETFs is not solely due to the recent airspace violations but also reflects a broader trend following NATO's commitment to increase defense spending from 2% to 5% of GDP, a historic bipartisan agreement [6] - U.S.-based defense contractors in these ETFs have substantial exposure to the European defense market, leading to investor confidence in steady revenues from long-term government contracts [7] Individual ETF Performance - Select STOXX Europe Aerospace & Defense ETF (EUAD) has risen 7.3% since the Polish airspace breach, outperforming other defense ETFs due to the strong performance of European defense companies [9] - Global X Defense Tech ETF (SHLD) has increased by 6.3%, benefiting from its significant focus on European markets [10] - SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has gained 3.7%, while iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF (ITA) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) have risen by 2.8% and 2.3% respectively [11] Investment Outlook - The defense industry is positioned as a key area for investors seeking resilience and growth amid rising geopolitical risks and military modernization efforts globally [8][12]

NEW YORK, Sept. 16, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Levi & Korsinsky, LLP notifies investors in Lockheed Martin Corporation ("Lockheed Martin Corporation" or the "Company") (NYSE: LMT) of a class action securities lawsuit. CLASS DEFINITION: The lawsuit seeks to recover losses on behalf of Lockheed Martin Corporation investors who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between January 23, 2024 and July 21, 2025. Follow the link below to get more information and be contacted by a member of our team: https:/ ...

Investment Rating - The industry investment rating is "Recommended (Maintain)" [1] Core Insights - The military trade market is significantly influenced by geopolitical factors, with advanced weaponry impacting national military capabilities and political dynamics. The U.S. and its allies dominate global military trade exports, accounting for 64.10% and 78.06% of total exports in the periods 2015-2019 and 2020-2024, respectively [2][34] - The global military trade market is characterized by high concentration, with the top ten exporting countries accounting for 89.70% of total exports from 2015-2019 and 88.60% from 2020-2024. The U.S. and France are the top two exporters in the latter period, with a combined share of 52.60% [2][34] - China's military trade share is expected to increase in the long term, aligning with its manufacturing capabilities and international influence, despite currently holding only 3.9% of the global military trade market in 2024 [2][34] Summary by Sections Military Trade Overview - Military trade, or arms trade, is a unique sector closely tied to geopolitical and military strategies, reflecting national interests and political continuity [12] - The United Nations defines military trade as the transfer of military equipment between countries, which plays a crucial role in regulating international political relations [12] Global Military Trade Landscape - According to SIPRI, global military trade has experienced stable growth, with total trade increasing from 80.82 billion TIV in 1950 to 289.38 billion TIV in 2024, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 1.72% [30] - The military trade market has undergone three significant fluctuations since 1950, with the most recent period (2002-present) showing a recovery in trade volumes due to increased global tensions and military spending [30] Major Military Exporting Countries - The top five military exporting countries from 2015-2019 were the U.S., Russia, France, China, and Germany, with the U.S. maintaining a dominant position [34] - The military trade export figures for the U.S. rose from 503.68 billion TIV in 2015-2019 to 609.49 billion TIV in 2020-2024, marking a 21.01% increase [35] China's Military Trade Situation - China's military trade has seen fluctuations, with exports decreasing from 88.62 billion TIV in 2015-2019 to 83.85 billion TIV in 2020-2024, a decline of 5.38% [35] - The report highlights that China's military trade is expected to grow due to increasing geopolitical conflicts and the country's enhanced military capabilities [2][34]

Group 1: Core Concept - The article discusses Trump's "American-style nationalization" policies, reflecting a significant shift in economic governance driven by his real estate developer mindset [3][4][13]. Group 2: Real Estate Developer Mindset - Trump's background as a real estate developer influences his governance approach, viewing everything as a negotiable asset and prioritizing immediate returns [4][7]. - The strategy includes converting subsidies into equity, treating key companies as "premium assets," and operating national strategies like business projects [4][7]. Group 3: National and Economic Security - The Trump administration emphasizes the importance of controlling strategic industries like semiconductors and rare earths to ensure national security [5]. - By acquiring stakes in companies like MP Materials, the government aims to reduce reliance on foreign sources, particularly China, and enhance supply chain security [5]. Group 4: Industrial Policy Reconstruction - Trump's approach represents a reaction against decades of neoliberal economic policies, seeking to bind companies more closely to government strategic goals through equity stakes rather than traditional subsidies [6][10]. - This shift marks a transition of the government from a "subsidizer" to a "strategic investor," emphasizing practical returns and national interests [7]. Group 5: Response to Chinese Competition - The administration's strategies include adopting elements of the "Chinese model" to maintain U.S. advantages in key technology sectors [8]. - By forming a "national team" and investing in critical companies, the government aims to consolidate resources for competitive advantage against China [8]. Group 6: Political Pragmatism - The policies are also driven by domestic political considerations, targeting key industries in swing states to secure voter support ahead of elections [9]. Group 7: Fiscal Pressures - The U.S. federal debt exceeding $37 trillion and increasing fiscal pressures motivate the shift towards equity-based funding, potentially transforming subsidies into assets [10]. Group 8: Controversies and Challenges - Trump's policies face criticism for undermining free market principles, creating conflicts of interest, and raising legal concerns regarding the use of subsidy funds [11][12]. - The approach may intensify global competition in industrial policy and national capitalism trends [12]. Group 9: Shift Towards National Capitalism - The combination of Trump's "America First" ideology and real estate mindset may lead the U.S. towards a "national capitalism" model, where the government plays a dominant role in the economy [13][14]. - This governance style raises questions about the future direction of the U.S. economic system, contrasting sharply with traditional free market ideals [14].