Xunlei(XNET)
Search documents
5年悬案与2亿追索: 迅雷再诉前CEO陈磊 掏空公司
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2026-01-15 17:24
上亿元流向"影子公司" 第一财经独家了解到,本次民事诉讼的被告,除核心人物陈磊外,还包括前迅雷高级副总裁兼网心科技 营销副总裁董鳕、网心科技前人力资源总监刘超、刘超母亲赵玉芹,以及兴融合公司及其关联股东链享 云、洪恩科技。 一位接近人士对第一财经独家透露,核心当事人陈磊自2020年出境后,一直长期居留海外,导致迅雷发 起的各项追讨维权行动面临严重的取证障碍。2022年底,因客观局限,公安机关立案后因无法获取充足 证据而撤案。 如今民事追偿程序的重启,标志着这场始于2020年、因核心当事人滞留海外而一度陷入僵局的内部风暴 与权力纠葛,进入了新的民事追偿的法律阶段。 第一财经记者试图联系陈磊,向陈磊此前的两个手机号码发送了短信并拨打电话,显示一个为空号一个 停机。记者还通过微信联系陈磊,但微信显示对方账号异常,暂无法接收信息。 1月15日,第一财经记者独家获悉,时隔超五年,迅雷公司及其子公司网心科技,以"损害公司利益责任 纠纷"为由,对前CEO陈磊及其核心团队提起民事诉讼,追索金额高达2亿元。目前该案已被深圳相关法 院受理立案。 这场横跨超五年的纠纷核心,直指一家名为"兴融合"的公司。原告指控该公司为陈磊实控的" ...
涉嫌转移2亿远走海外?迅雷起诉前CEO,“影子公司”细节曝光
Feng Huang Wang Cai Jing· 2026-01-15 14:59
Core Viewpoint - The legal dispute involving Xunlei and its former CEO Chen Lei has resurfaced, with the company filing a lawsuit for damages amounting to 200 million yuan, accusing Chen of secretly siphoning off company assets through a company named "Xing Rong He" [1][2]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - In 2020, Xunlei was struggling to transition from a download tool to cloud computing and blockchain, leading to internal conflicts between CEO Chen Lei and the board [2]. - Chen Lei was accused of asset transfer and embezzlement through "Xing Rong He," which allegedly involved fictitious transactions and false contracts [2][3]. - Following these allegations, Chen Lei was dismissed and left China, which complicated the investigation and accountability process for Xunlei [2][3]. Group 2: Details of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit names several defendants, including Chen Lei, former senior executives, and the company "Xing Rong He," which is described as a shadow company controlled by Chen [4][5]. - Xunlei claims that "Xing Rong He" was used to create a hidden chain of benefit transfers, effectively siphoning off funds from its subsidiary, Wangxin Technology [4][5]. Group 3: Financial Implications - During Chen Lei's tenure, Xunlei reported a net revenue of $186 million and a net loss of $13.84 million in 2020, with insiders claiming losses of up to 1 billion yuan during his leadership [3][10]. - Xunlei alleges that between January 2019 and April 2020, Chen Lei arranged for approximately 200 million yuan to be paid to "Xing Rong He" through inflated transactions [9]. Group 4: Challenges in Legal Proceedings - The lawsuit comes after Xunlei reported the matter to law enforcement in 2020, but the pursuit of criminal charges was hindered by Chen Lei's overseas status [10][11]. - Legal experts indicate that proving the alleged illegal activities will be challenging due to the need for substantial evidence and the complexities of cross-border jurisdiction [11].
涉嫌转移2亿远走海外?迅雷起诉前CEO,“影子公司”细节曝光
凤凰网财经· 2026-01-15 14:52
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal dispute between Xunlei and its former CEO Chen Lei, focusing on allegations of corruption and asset misappropriation involving a company named "Xing Rong He" [1][2]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - In 2020, Xunlei was struggling to transition from a download tool to cloud computing and blockchain, leading to internal conflicts between CEO Chen Lei and the board [2]. - Chen Lei was accused of asset transfer and misappropriation through "Xing Rong He," which allegedly involved fictitious transactions and false contracts, resulting in significant financial losses for Xunlei [2][3]. - During Chen Lei's tenure, Xunlei reported a net revenue of $1.86 million and a net loss of $1.384 million, with insiders claiming losses of up to 1 billion yuan [3]. Group 2: Allegations Against Chen Lei - The lawsuit targets Chen Lei and several former executives, accusing them of creating a shadow company, "Xing Rong He," to siphon funds from Xunlei's subsidiary, Wangxin Technology [5]. - "Xing Rong He" was established in 2018 and is alleged to have been used as a channel for fund transfers, with no legitimate business operations or oversight [5][9]. - Chen Lei reportedly arranged for Xunlei to pay approximately 200 million yuan to "Xing Rong He" during his tenure, with the approval process being bypassed [10]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings and Challenges - Xunlei filed a civil lawsuit after facing difficulties in pursuing criminal charges against Chen Lei, who is currently residing overseas, complicating the legal process [12][14]. - The civil lawsuit requires a solid evidence chain to prove the alleged infringement, but the whereabouts of the funds and Chen Lei remain unclear [13]. - Experts note that the cross-border nature of the case poses significant challenges for evidence collection and legal enforcement [14].
知名公司起诉前CEO:掏空公司,与已婚情人、前副总裁“潜逃”美国;常说“我对钱没兴趣”
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2026-01-15 14:04
Core Viewpoint - The company, Xunlei, has officially filed a lawsuit against its former CEO, Chen Lei, accusing him of harming the company's interests, with the Shenzhen court accepting the case [1]. Group 1: Background of the Case - The lawsuit has reignited discussions about the corruption scandal involving Chen Lei, who was dismissed as CEO in April 2020 due to allegations of embezzlement and creating false contracts to siphon company funds [3]. - Chen Lei and former senior vice president Dong Xue fled abroad to evade investigation, leading to the eventual withdrawal of the case [3][4]. Group 2: Financial Impact - Under Chen Lei's leadership, Xunlei incurred losses of nearly 1 billion yuan over three years, with a significant decline in revenue attributed to his push for a blockchain business that ultimately failed [5]. - The company’s financial troubles were exacerbated by internal governance issues, including asset misappropriation and nepotism [15]. Group 3: Mechanisms of Misappropriation - Chen Lei allegedly used a company called Xing Rong He to facilitate the misappropriation of nearly 200 million yuan, which was disguised as legitimate business transactions [7]. - The approval process for these transactions was controlled by Chen Lei and Dong Xue, creating a conflict of interest and allowing for significant financial irregularities [9]. Group 4: Internal Dynamics and Corruption - Chen Lei and Dong Xue's personal relationship reportedly influenced corporate governance, leading to preferential treatment and financial misconduct within the company [12]. - Employees reported a toxic corporate culture where personal relationships with executives were necessary for career advancement, and financial misconduct was normalized [13]. Group 5: Legal and Ethical Implications - The ongoing legal proceedings highlight the importance of corporate governance and the need for stringent oversight to prevent similar issues in the future [15][17]. - Experts emphasize that the case serves as a cautionary tale for companies regarding the selection and monitoring of executives, stressing the need for ethical standards and accountability [16][17].
迅雷起诉前CEO追索2亿!滞留境外已5年,常说“对钱没兴趣”
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2026-01-15 13:40
Core Viewpoint - The company, Xunlei, has filed a civil lawsuit against former CEO Chen Lei and his core team for allegedly damaging the company's interests, seeking a compensation of up to 200 million yuan [1] Group 1: Background and Allegations - Chen Lei, the former CEO, is accused of embezzling nearly 200 million yuan from Xunlei during his tenure, which led to significant financial losses for the company [2][4] - Under Chen's leadership, Xunlei experienced a total loss of nearly 1 billion yuan over three years, primarily due to the failed blockchain business he promoted [4] - An internal investigation revealed that Chen used a company called Xingronghe to siphon funds from Xunlei, which was controlled through a complex ownership structure [5][6] Group 2: Financial Misconduct - Chen Lei approved payments totaling over 20 million yuan to Xingronghe just days before his dismissal, raising concerns about the legitimacy of these transactions [7] - The approval process for these payments was tightly controlled by Chen and his associate Dong Xue, indicating a lack of oversight and potential collusion [6][8] - Xingronghe, which had no external revenue, relied entirely on service fees from Xunlei's subsidiary, raising significant doubts about the pricing and approval processes involved [5][6] Group 3: Personal Relationships and Conduct - Chen Lei and Dong Xue reportedly had an inappropriate personal relationship, which may have influenced their professional decisions and financial dealings within the company [8][9] - Allegations include misuse of company funds for personal benefits, such as extravagant office renovations and purchasing luxury items for employees [9] - The relationship between Chen and Dong was known among employees, suggesting a culture of secrecy and misconduct within the company [8][9] Group 4: Legal and Investigative Challenges - Chen Lei and related individuals are currently overseas, complicating the investigation and potential legal proceedings against them [10] - The difficulty in gathering evidence and the potential for evidence destruction pose significant challenges for law enforcement in pursuing the case [10]
迅雷起诉前CEO,追索2亿元:其为美国籍,滞留境外已5年!他被曝与前副总裁有婚外情并一同出境,常说“我对钱没兴趣”
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2026-01-15 13:22
Core Viewpoint - The company, Xunlei, has filed a civil lawsuit against former CEO Chen Lei and his core team for allegedly damaging the company's interests, seeking a compensation of up to 200 million yuan [1] Group 1: Legal Actions and Allegations - Xunlei and its subsidiary, Wangxin Technology, have initiated legal proceedings against Chen Lei for "damaging company interests," with the lawsuit amounting to 200 million yuan [1] - Chen Lei was previously under investigation for alleged embezzlement, leading to a call for him to return to China to cooperate with the investigation [1] - Chen Lei and former senior vice president Dong Xue left the country to evade investigation, resulting in the case being dismissed [1] Group 2: Financial Misconduct - During Chen Lei's tenure as CEO, Xunlei incurred total losses of nearly 1 billion yuan, with significant losses attributed to the blockchain business he promoted [4] - An internal investigation revealed that Chen Lei allegedly used a company called Xingronghe to siphon funds from Xunlei, which was controlled through a complex ownership structure [4][5] - The company Xingronghe had no external revenue and relied solely on nearly 200 million yuan in "bandwidth and service fees" from Xunlei's subsidiary, raising significant concerns about the pricing and approval processes [8] Group 3: Personal Relationships and Management Practices - Chen Lei's close relationship with Dong Xue, who was promoted to a high-ranking position, has been highlighted, with reports of their personal relationship affecting company dynamics [11] - Allegations include misuse of company funds for personal expenses and hiring unqualified individuals under the guise of technical expertise, which were actually relatives of Dong Xue [12] - The concentration of power within a small group of executives, including Chen Lei and Dong Xue, has been criticized for leading to a lack of oversight and accountability [11]
迅雷起诉前CEO陈磊,称侵害公司利益!双方多年前已有纠纷
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2026-01-15 10:39
1月15日,南都N视频记者从知情人士处获悉,深圳市迅雷网络技术有限公司(简称"迅雷")及子公司深圳 市网心科技有限公司(简称"网心科技"),向公司前任CEO陈磊等人提起民事诉讼,指控其侵害公司利 益,要求其退赔公司2亿余元。目前,法院已受理此案。 迅雷起诉前CEO陈磊 南都记者了解到,此次民事诉讼的被告,除陈磊外,还包括深圳市兴融合科技有限公司(简称"兴融合公 司")及其关联股东,以及其他有关人员。 兴融合公司更是其中关键。此次诉讼主要聚焦陈磊是否通过兴融合公司转移侵占网心科技1.68亿元资金, 以及其是否存在低价出售网心科技硬件、转移公司员工造成网心科技损失数千万等情况。 知情人士向南都记者透露,迅雷、网心科技指控,陈磊在担任迅雷及网心科技CEO期间,利用其全面负责 集团经营管理的职权,主导控制并经营了一家与网心科技核心业务高度重合的企业——兴融合公司。同 时,陈磊推动网心科技与兴融合公司签署资源节点服务相关协议,安排网心科技根据以上协议,向兴融合 公司转移1.68亿元资金。 然而,经迅雷事后调查,签署协议时,兴融合公司本身无相应电信业务经营资质,也缺乏提供带宽服务的 实际能力,无技术员工、无其他客户,其经 ...
非法转移公司资产,迅雷再次起诉前CEO陈磊,涉案2亿元
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2026-01-15 10:22
Group 1 - The core issue revolves around a lawsuit filed by the company against former CEO Chen Lei and his core team to recover 200 million yuan, which was allegedly misappropriated through fraudulent contracts and inflated transactions [2] - The case involves a bandwidth supplier named "Xing Rong He," which was found to be a shell company with no employees, business qualifications, or service capabilities, controlled by Chen Lei through shareholding arrangements [2] - Between January 2019 and April 2020, Chen Lei allegedly arranged for the company to pay approximately 200 million yuan to Xing Rong He, with a significant payment of over 20 million yuan approved just 72 hours before his dismissal [2] Group 2 - Following Chen Lei's departure, the company shifted its focus back to membership services and compliant cloud computing, resulting in a 57.7% year-on-year revenue growth in the third quarter of 2025 [3] - The company is attempting to resolve historical issues left from Chen Lei's tenure as a necessary step for restoring normal governance [3] - Approximately 30 million yuan remains frozen in Xing Rong He's account, with the court's determination of the company's nature being crucial for the resolution of these funds [3]
时隔6年,迅雷再诉前CEO陈磊:一场正义终至的司法清算
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2026-01-15 05:17
Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit filed by Xunlei against former CEO Chen Lei highlights issues of asset misappropriation and corporate governance within the company, stemming from a tumultuous leadership transition six years ago [2][9]. Group 1: Background of the Case - Chen Lei joined Xunlei in 2014 as CTO and became CEO in 2017, but by 2020, he was accused of asset misappropriation and fled overseas to evade legal consequences [2][5]. - Under Chen's leadership, Xunlei's subsidiary, Wangxin Technology, expanded its product offerings but reported continuous financial losses [3][4]. Group 2: Financial Performance - Xunlei's 2019 financial report indicated total revenue of $181 million, a year-on-year decrease of 21.9%, with a net loss of $53.4 million, worsening from a net loss of $40.8 million in 2018 [4]. Group 3: Misappropriation Mechanisms - Chen Lei established a company named "Xing Ronghe" in 2018, which was used to facilitate the misappropriation of funds from Xunlei through inflated transactions and asset transfers [6][8]. - Between January 2019 and April 2020, Chen arranged for approximately $200 million to be paid from Wangxin to Xing Ronghe, including a suspicious transfer of over $20 million just days before his dismissal [7][8]. Group 4: Corporate Governance and Anti-Corruption - The case underscores the challenges of corporate governance and the need for effective anti-corruption measures, particularly at the executive level, as high-ranking officials often exploit their knowledge of internal operations to conceal wrongdoing [9][10]. - Xunlei's lawsuit against Chen Lei is seen as a critical step towards restructuring corporate governance and enhancing compliance within the company [10].
迅雷重启诉讼!控告前CEO秘密掏空公司
Shen Zhen Shang Bao· 2026-01-15 05:11
Core Viewpoint - The lawsuit against former CEO Chen Lei of Xunlei involves allegations of misappropriating nearly 200 million RMB through a "shadow company" and illegal asset transfers, continuing an investigation initiated by public security in 2020 [1][2][4] Group 1: Allegations and Legal Proceedings - Xunlei's subsidiary, Wangxin Technology, filed a civil lawsuit against Chen Lei and related parties for allegedly using fictitious transactions to misappropriate nearly 200 million RMB [2] - Chen Lei is accused of systematically transferring Xunlei's core resources to a company he controlled, Shenzhen Xingronghe Technology Co., which lacked qualifications and independent operations, yet received significant funds from Wangxin Technology [2][3] - The legal structure employed by Chen Lei involved a "three-layer holding" scheme to obscure control, ultimately transferring ownership to a company controlled by relatives to evade legal accountability [2] Group 2: Background and Company Impact - Chen Lei served as Xunlei's CEO from 2017 until his departure in April 2020, during which the company incurred losses exceeding 1 billion RMB [4] - Prior to leaving, Chen Lei orchestrated the dismissal of over 30 key technical staff, who subsequently joined the shadow company, indicating a coordinated effort to misappropriate resources [3] - The ongoing legal actions are seen as crucial for Xunlei to reclaim assets and clarify responsibilities, despite Chen Lei's current foreign citizenship and absence from China [4]