转自：北京日报客户端 关于12月1日IJ005航班的情况声明 对于搭乘该航班的旅客，本公司已在抵达成田机场后向每位旅客支付了补偿金。同时，我们已尽最大努 力为旅客安排后续事宜，此航班也已经于12月2日10点（日本时间）从成田重新起飞。 春秋航空日本株式会社 2025年12月02日 来源：春秋航空日本 尊敬的旅客： 12月1日由成田飞往上海浦东的IJ005航班，因发生旅客在机内妨碍航班安全运行的非法行为，导致无法 维持机内秩序并继续安全飞行。经综合判断，航班决定返回成田机场。 ...

Core Points - On December 1, Spring Japan's IJ005 flight from Narita to Shanghai Pudong had to return to Narita due to illegal behavior by a passenger that disrupted flight safety [1][4] - The company compensated each passenger upon arrival at Narita and made efforts to arrange subsequent travel for them [1][4] - The flight successfully took off again from Narita at 10 AM Japan time on December 2 [1][4]

Core Insights - The aviation and airport sector experienced a decline of 0.34% on December 2, with Huaxia Airlines leading the drop [1] - The Shanghai Composite Index closed at 3897.71, down 0.42%, while the Shenzhen Component Index closed at 13056.7, down 0.68% [1] Stock Performance - Xiamen Airport (600897) closed at 16.34, up 1.18% with a trading volume of 72,500 shares and a turnover of 119 million yuan [1] - Baiyun Airport (600004) closed at 9.75, up 0.93% with a trading volume of 176,000 shares and a turnover of 171 million yuan [1] - Shenzhen Airport (000089) closed at 6.99, up 0.72% with a trading volume of 108,500 shares and a turnover of 7.56 million yuan [1] - China Eastern Airlines (600115) remained unchanged at 5.12 with a trading volume of 674,100 shares and a turnover of 345 million yuan [1] - Huaxia Airlines (002928) closed at 9.93, down 2.36% with a trading volume of 206,800 shares and a turnover of 207 million yuan [2] Capital Flow - The aviation and airport sector saw a net outflow of 82.29 million yuan from institutional investors and 44.87 million yuan from retail investors, while individual investors had a net inflow of 127 million yuan [2] - Notable capital flows included: - Southern Airlines (600029) had a net inflow of 15.42 million yuan from institutional investors [3] - Spring Airlines (601021) saw a net inflow of 9.77 million yuan from institutional investors [3] - China Eastern Airlines (600115) experienced a net outflow of 5.52 million yuan from institutional investors [3]

Core Viewpoint - The increasing trend of paid seat selection in the airline industry is criticized for limiting consumer choice and infringing on their rights, with some airlines locking a significant percentage of seats for additional fees, leading to a perception of a caste system in seating arrangements [1][4][10] Group 1: Paid Seat Selection Practices - Paid seat selection, initially a strategy for low-cost carriers, has now become widespread among all airlines, with some airlines being humorously suggested to rename themselves as "low-cost" carriers [3][4] - The practice of charging for seat selection has evolved into a complex system where even economy class seats are categorized into multiple tiers, with limited free options available [1][4][5] - Reports indicate that some airlines have seat lock rates exceeding 50%, with fees for seat selection ranging from 50 to 500 yuan [5][12] Group 2: Consumer Experience and Perception - Consumers are increasingly frustrated with the lack of available seats during the selection process, often left with undesirable options, leading to comparisons with social hierarchies [4][7] - The complexity of seat classifications and the inconsistency in naming conventions across airlines contribute to consumer confusion and dissatisfaction [7][10] - The perception of inequality in seating arrangements has been likened to a caste system, where better seats are reserved for those who can afford to pay more [4][5] Group 3: Financial Implications for Airlines - Airlines are increasingly relying on ancillary revenue from seat selection and other services, with reports indicating that such services contribute over 50% of their ancillary income [19][21] - Despite efforts to boost revenue through paid seat selection, many airlines are still facing significant financial losses, with major carriers projecting net losses in the range of 12 to 22 billion yuan for the first half of 2025 [22][23] - The competitive landscape has led airlines to prioritize high-tier members for better seating options, further complicating the experience for regular travelers [21][23]

Core Viewpoint - The issue of "seat locking" and paid seat selection services by airlines has sparked widespread discussion among consumers, with many reporting that desirable seats in economy class are often locked and require additional fees to select [1] Group 1: Investigation Results - The Jiangsu Provincial Consumer Rights Protection Committee conducted a survey of 10 domestic airlines, including China Southern Airlines, Air China, Hainan Airlines, Xiamen Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Shandong Airlines, Sichuan Airlines, Eastern Airlines, Spring Airlines, and Juneyao Airlines [1] - The survey revealed that all 10 airlines engage in seat locking practices, with Xiamen Airlines having a seat locking rate as high as 42.5%, while most airlines reported seat locking rates exceeding 30%, and some even surpassing 50% [1] - The Jiangsu Provincial Consumer Rights Protection Committee has issued clear rectification requirements to the 10 airlines regarding the seat locking issue, demanding written reports on corrective actions within 15 working days [1]

近段时间，飞机"锁座"以及有偿选座服务引发广泛热议，不少消费者反映，在线选座时，经济舱前排、靠窗、靠过道等较为便利、舒适的座位常被单独锁 定，要想选择则需要额外付费。对此，消费者是怎么看的呢？ 记者在采访中发现，不少消费者都遭遇过飞机"锁座"的情况。张女士告诉记者，如果没有足够的积分，要想兑换心仪的座位就需要花钱购买积分，对此，张 女士算了一笔账。 消费者 张女士：我在它的App上看到，它显示的是10个积分两块钱。按照这个兑换，第一排需要2000积分，换算下来需要额外加400元，对于我来说是不公 平的。我既然购买了经济舱机票，我应该拥有去选择座位的权利。 江苏省消保委已对10家航司展开调查 针对旅客反映航班"锁座"的问题，江苏省消费者权益保护委员会选取了国内10家航空公司进行调查，包括南方航空、中国国航、海南航空、厦门航空、深圳 航空、山东航空、四川航空、东方航空、春秋航空、吉祥航空，并于近日（11月26日）公布了调查结果。 此次调查通过实际购票体验等方式，重点核查这10家航空公司在经济舱的锁座比例、锁座范围、兑换模式等内容，结果发现，这10家航空公司的经济舱均存 在锁座行为，购票阶段锁座比例介于19.9%到 ...

近期国内和国际航空市场的表现如何？ 自 2025 年 9 月以来，国内航空市场表现出显著的票价上涨趋势。9 月份，国 内燃油票价同比上升约 2 个百分点，这一趋势在 10 月份继续延续，涨幅进一 步扩大至 3 个百分点以上。11 月份，尽管换季通常会带来短期低谷，但需求依 然保持强劲增长，客座率同比上升 2-3 个百分点，票价也同比上升 1-2 个百分 点。这一系列数据表明，自 9 月至 11 月期间，国内航油票价连续三个月实现 同比上涨。 国际市场方面，从 2025 年 9 月开始也表现良好。暑运结束后国际 客座率并未像往年一样回落，而是维持在 80%左右，与暑运水平接近，并较去 年同期明显上升。这种高客座率推动了国际航线票价的上涨，其涨幅甚至超过 了国内航线。特别是欧洲航线需求增长显著，这与免签政策效应密切相关，不 仅提升了入境旅游需求，还通过大型航空公司在首都和浦东等枢纽的战略布局， 航空业未来两年的核心逻辑是国内干线市场票价市场化完成后的供需恢 复。干线票价中枢上升将推动整个行业盈利中枢上升，提供业绩估值双 重空间。 建议把握当前逆向布局时机，看好未来两年行业长逻辑演绎。供需恢复 将驱动票价与盈利中枢 ...

证券代码：601021 证券简称：春秋航空 公告编号：2025-067 春秋航空股份有限公司 关于股份回购进展的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： | 回购方案首次披露日 | 2025/8/29 | | | | | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 回购方案实施期限 | 2025 年 月 8 月 | 8 | 27 | 日~2026 | 年 | 26 | 日 | | 预计回购金额 | 30,000万元~50,000万元 | | | | | | | | 回购用途 | □减少注册资本 √用于员工持股计划或股权激励 | | | | | | | | | □用于转换公司可转债 | | | | | | | | | □为维护公司价值及股东权益 | | | | | | | | 累计已回购股数 | 744,550股 | | | | | | | | 累计已回购股数占总股本比例 | 0.0761% | | | | | | | | 累计已回购 ...

格隆汇12月1日丨春秋航空(601021.SH)公布，截至2025年11月28日，公司通过上海证券交易所交易系统 以集中竞价交易方式回购公司股份744,550股，占公司目前总股本的0.0761%，回购最高价格为人民币 55.99元/股，回购最低价格为人民币53.99元/股，使用资金总额为人民币4075.58万元（不含交易佣金、 过户费等交易费用）。 ...

春秋航空公告称，公司于2025年8月27日启动股份回购，回购期限至2026年8月26日，预计回购3亿元-5 亿元股份用于员工持股计划。因2025年半年度权益分派，回购价格上限由不超65元/股调整为不超64.57 元/股。截至11月28日，公司累计回购744,550股，占总股本0.0761%，回购价格53.99元/股-55.99元/股， 使用资金4075.58万元。 ...