Core Viewpoint - NIO has successfully taken legal action against multiple online accounts that disseminated false information about the company, resulting in a court ruling that recognizes the infringement of NIO's rights and mandates public apologies and compensation for economic losses [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Outcomes - The court has ruled against several online accounts, including "妄图网络," for spreading false information that maliciously defamed NIO's business operations, leading to a requirement for public apology and compensation [2]. - Another ruling involved accounts operated by "老蔡商业反思," which were found to have published defamatory content against NIO, resulting in a court-ordered compensation and apology from the defendants [2]. Group 2: Company Response and Future Actions - NIO is committed to using legal means to protect its and its users' rights, adopting a zero-tolerance policy towards any defamatory actions against the company [2]. - The company plans to donate any compensation received from legal actions to support education and elderly care charitable initiatives [1][2].

1月12日，懂车帝法务部官方发布维权进展公告，称针对近期网络上出现的恶意诽谤、诋毁品牌等 不实言论，已对20余名涉事自媒体账号采取包括刑事控告、行政报案、民事诉讼在内的多种法律行动， 其中部分涉事账号运营者已公开道歉并承担赔偿责任。 据披露，此次维权行动针对多起典型侵权案例逐一推进。其中，新浪微博用户"狮子头_又无 助"(UID:2461095800)曾发布博文称懂车帝"恶意剪辑何小鹏在法国车展的采访内容"，在懂车帝发布辟 谣信息后，该用户仍持续发布极端不实言论，严重损害品牌声誉。懂车帝随即启动诉讼维权，近日已收 到法院生效判决，判令该用户立即停止侵权行为，在其微博账号置顶道歉10日，并赔偿懂车帝相应维权 费用。 此外，新浪微博用户"小七***"(UID:75***39)、微信公众号用户"三先***茶"也曾多次发布针对懂车 帝的诽谤言论。经懂车帝依法维权，目前两名用户均已发布道歉声明，并将相关声明置顶15日以上，以 消除侵权行为造成的不良影响。 为全面捍卫合法权益，懂车帝已完成对其余20余名涉事账号的取证工作，涉事主体包括微博用 户"毅***博""股***5""自***车"等、哔哩哔哩弹幕网用户"A***m" ...

据了解，该事件发生于2025年3月。先是2025年3月6日，有网友分享了多条视频，视频显示，疑有男子为寻求刺激，站在某海底捞门店桌上向火锅 内排尿。很快，该视频受到关注，在抖音、小红书、微博等平台被大量传播，并冲上热搜。 2026年1月8日，一则刊登在《人民法院报》上的致歉声明，为2025年轰动一时的海底捞"小便门"事件画上了一个阶段性的句点。 当事人唐某在道歉声明中称："我深刻认识到自己的错误行为，在此向四川新派餐饮管理集团有限公司、上海捞派餐饮管理有限公司表示真诚的歉 意。我也接受到了来自家长、学校、公安、法院，以及网络广大消费者的批评与教育，我会吸取深刻的教训，改过自新。长大后，我要努力成为 一位对家庭，对国家，对社会有担当的人。" 唐某父母则表示："作为监护人，我们对于孩子做出的不当行为深表歉意！对判决结果没有异议，今后一定引以为戒，加强对孩子的教育，引导他 成长为一名行为规范的好公民。" 经济赔偿责任方面，判决唐某父母、吴某父母赔偿上海某餐饮公司餐具损耗费和清洗消毒费13万元，赔偿四川某餐饮公司、上海某餐饮公司经营 损失和商誉损失200万元及维权开支7万元，共计220万元（唐某、吴某有个人财产的，从 ...

Group 1 - BYD's legal victory against malicious online defamation highlights the severity of legal repercussions for such actions, with a court ruling mandating the cessation of infringement and a compensation of 2 million yuan [1] - The company has been actively combating black public relations, with previous cases resulting in significant compensation awards, including 313,800 yuan for defamation against the Fangchengbao model and 2,018,700 yuan for over 300 false claims by "Long Zhu - Ji Che" [1][2] - BYD's brand and public relations manager emphasized the company's zero tolerance for malicious defamation while welcoming objective reporting and constructive criticism [1] Group 2 - Since 2021, BYD has implemented a reward mechanism for reporting black public relations, increasing the reward range from 50,000 to 1 million yuan to 50,000 to 5 million yuan, demonstrating a proactive approach to legal and technical defenses [2] - The electric vehicle industry has become a hotspot for online black public relations, with some media outlets engaging in a gray industry chain that includes malicious editing and evidence fabrication [2] - Regulatory bodies and industry stakeholders have responded positively to corporate legal actions, with initiatives from the Central Cyberspace Administration to address online chaos in the automotive sector, leading to the shutdown of several non-compliant accounts [2]

【#小米辟谣不让卖小米事件##小米称遭歪曲事实恶意造谣#】据媒体报道，近日山东一村支书称在网上 卖农作物小米，被小米公司法务"关联雷氏营销"投诉下架视频一事引起热议。@小米公司发言人 今日 发布声明称，相关视频内容完全失实，是彻头彻尾的歪曲与污蔑。 小米在声明中表示，此前，我司对该账号部分内容的投诉，针对的是其恶意模仿、捏造污蔑，对我司及 我司高管名誉的侵害行为，并非针对"小米"二字或"小米"农产品的正常使用。将投诉行为曲解为"不让 用'小米'二字"，是偷换概念，以"助农"议题为名，行污蔑造谣、博取流量之实。 小米方面表示，"运用法律武器，坚决维护自身合法权益，是每个人、每个机构的正当权利。感谢大家 对小米的关注和支持，我们也呼吁大家一起，坚决对虚假网络信息说不，对刻意挑动网络舆情的行为说 不，共同营造风清气正的网络舆论空间。" ...

Core Viewpoint - Gree Electric Appliances has taken legal action against a certain MCN company for spreading false information that damages its brand reputation, resulting in a court ruling for compensation and a public apology [1][2] Group 1: Legal Action and Compensation - Gree Electric Appliances has filed a lawsuit against an MCN company for disseminating false content related to the company, which included fabricated customer complaints and derogatory language [1] - The court has ruled that the MCN company must publicly apologize and keep the apology pinned for 30 days, in addition to compensating Gree Electric Appliances with 160,000 RMB [1] - Gree Electric Appliances has confirmed receipt of the apology and the compensation amount from the MCN company [1]

Core Viewpoint - LeEco TV has accused Nanjing Zhongdian Panda Appliance Co., Ltd. of owing 14.95 million yuan in compensation and evading debts through name changes and bankruptcy, raising questions about its motives amid significant financial struggles [2][3]. Dispute Background - LeEco was a pioneer in China's internet TV sector but faced a financial crisis leading to near delisting. In 2018, its TV business subsidiary was restructured and received significant investments [3]. - From early 2019 to March 2022, LeEco commissioned Nanjing Zhongdian Panda to manufacture 400,000 TVs, totaling nearly 450 million yuan, but faced high defect rates of nearly 20% [3][4]. - LeEco has incurred over 14 million yuan in after-sales costs due to quality issues, while Nanjing Zhongdian Panda has not compensated for its losses despite winning a lawsuit against a supplier [4]. Legal Proceedings - LeEco initiated legal action in December 2021, resulting in a court ruling in January 2024 that ordered Nanjing Zhongdian Panda to pay approximately 13.47 million yuan [4][5]. - Following dissatisfaction with the ruling, both parties appealed, but the higher court upheld the initial decision in June 2024 [4]. - Nanjing Zhongdian Panda changed its name to Nanjing Jingye Appliance Co., Ltd. shortly before the court's ruling, raising concerns about asset protection [5][7]. Current Situation - Despite court rulings, LeEco struggles to enforce its claims as Nanjing Jingye Appliance filed for bankruptcy in September 2025 [7]. - LeEco has reported debts of over 1 billion yuan to external parties, reflecting its ongoing financial distress [9]. - The competitive landscape for LeEco has worsened, with no presence in the top 20 TV brands in China as of October 2025, a stark contrast to its previous market position [9][10]. Industry Context - The decline of both LeEco and Nanjing Zhongdian Panda highlights the challenges faced by mid-sized companies in the industry, as they struggle with financial viability and market relevance [10]. - The shift in focus for Nanjing Zhongdian Panda away from TV manufacturing indicates a broader trend of consolidation and specialization within the electronics sector [10].

据悉，大疆成立于2006年，总部位于深圳，是全球民用无人机及航拍技术的龙头公司。其产品线覆盖航 拍、测绘、农业、能源巡检等。 （文章来源：每日经济新闻） 2024年1月，美国国防部更新CMC清单，继续将大疆保留在名单内。对此，大疆于2024年10月18日在美 国哥伦比亚特区地方法院正式提起诉讼。 2025年9月，美国哥伦比亚特区地区法院作出判决，最终认为国防部的大部分核心指控证据不足，但仅 基于大疆通过国家发展改革委"国家企业技术中心"资质认定这一点就作出了判定，并认为只要技术本身 具有两用用途，就符合CMC清单的列入条件，不论企业本身意愿和行为如何。14日，大疆就此判决结 果在美国联邦上诉法院提出上诉。 公开资料显示，2022年美国国防部将大疆列入其"中国军工企业"清单，但未提供任何理由或解释，引发 外界广泛关注。此后大疆持续尝试与美国国防部进行沟通，希望了解被列入清单的具体原因并提供相应 证据，也并未获得实质性回应。 大疆方面向记者表示，公司不认同也不接受这一判定，已于14日在美国联邦上诉法院提起上诉，坚决捍 卫公司的名誉和利益。大疆一直坚决反对将公司产品和技术用于任何军事或战争用途并已采取全面措 施，努 ...

笑发财了家人们。 就在昨天，乐视电视时隔三年又发出一篇檄文，公开讨伐南京熊猫家电，讨伐之余还引经据典、冷嘲热讽，比如提议南 京熊猫更名"江东Jerry"、改"贵司"为"贱司"，怒斥南京熊猫"厚颜无耻"，吐槽之密集，不知道的还以为是哪位脱口秀演员 下岗再就业了。 事件的起因还得追溯到2019年初，当时乐视系企业委托南京熊猫的东莞分公司代工做了一批电视，根据乐视方面的说 法，截止2022年3月，采购40万台电视花了4.5亿。 然而，电视卖出去后却出了问题，坏屏率近20%，而当时两家协议规定的不良率是1.8%。这还了得，于是乐视急了，开 始找南京熊猫协商，甲乙双方身份调转，而此时南京熊猫已经从"小甜甜"变身"牛夫人"，根据乐视的说法，对方不回邮 件、不垫费用、不谈解决方案。到了最后，还偷偷把东莞工厂关了。 2024年报显示，目前乐视网还有159名员工，根据年报数据计算，其人均支出薪酬高达44万元。是谁酸了我不说！ 在一众企业降本增效的时候，早在2023年，乐视就因为"四天半工作制"喜提热搜，乐视摇身一变成了打工人眼中"别人家 的公司"。 而且，媒体还报道，靠着《甄嬛传》能每年为乐视带来一千多万元的收益。 于是乐视一 ...

本文字数：511，阅读时长大约1分钟 理想方面表示，经公司核查，此类负面信息24小时不间断在多平台密集发布，具有多频次、内容高度同 质化等特征，涉嫌有组织的违法犯罪。以8月3日为例，自0时至早7时，仅1个平台就集中出现45篇以 《以前真没注意，理想车主，没有意外，一律乱停车…》为主题的相同视频。即便是凌晨时段，大量密 集地攻击仍未收手，直到现在，还未停止。这一行为背后的黑力量，在挑战社会的良知和法律的底线。 | 20 | 发布时间 | 幅盤 | -1 | 联系 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 以前真没注意,理想车主,没有意外。 一律司 | 2025-08-03 00:05 | https://www | tiao.com/i7534019 | 12 | | 以前高没注意,理想车主,没有意外,一律乱传 | 2025-08-03 00:22 | https://www | tiao.com/i753402 | 2 | | 车停泊,人依旧。以前真没注意,理想车主,法 | 2025-08-03 00:24 | https://www | tiao.com/i753402 | 2 ...