Core Viewpoint - Gree Electric Appliances has taken legal action against a certain MCN company for spreading false information that damages its brand reputation, resulting in a court ruling for compensation and a public apology [1][2] Group 1: Legal Action and Compensation - Gree Electric Appliances has filed a lawsuit against an MCN company for disseminating false content related to the company, which included fabricated customer complaints and derogatory language [1] - The court has ruled that the MCN company must publicly apologize and keep the apology pinned for 30 days, in addition to compensating Gree Electric Appliances with 160,000 RMB [1] - Gree Electric Appliances has confirmed receipt of the apology and the compensation amount from the MCN company [1]

Core Viewpoint - LeEco TV has accused Nanjing Zhongdian Panda Appliance Co., Ltd. of owing 14.95 million yuan in compensation and evading debts through name changes and bankruptcy, raising questions about its motives amid significant financial struggles [2][3]. Dispute Background - LeEco was a pioneer in China's internet TV sector but faced a financial crisis leading to near delisting. In 2018, its TV business subsidiary was restructured and received significant investments [3]. - From early 2019 to March 2022, LeEco commissioned Nanjing Zhongdian Panda to manufacture 400,000 TVs, totaling nearly 450 million yuan, but faced high defect rates of nearly 20% [3][4]. - LeEco has incurred over 14 million yuan in after-sales costs due to quality issues, while Nanjing Zhongdian Panda has not compensated for its losses despite winning a lawsuit against a supplier [4]. Legal Proceedings - LeEco initiated legal action in December 2021, resulting in a court ruling in January 2024 that ordered Nanjing Zhongdian Panda to pay approximately 13.47 million yuan [4][5]. - Following dissatisfaction with the ruling, both parties appealed, but the higher court upheld the initial decision in June 2024 [4]. - Nanjing Zhongdian Panda changed its name to Nanjing Jingye Appliance Co., Ltd. shortly before the court's ruling, raising concerns about asset protection [5][7]. Current Situation - Despite court rulings, LeEco struggles to enforce its claims as Nanjing Jingye Appliance filed for bankruptcy in September 2025 [7]. - LeEco has reported debts of over 1 billion yuan to external parties, reflecting its ongoing financial distress [9]. - The competitive landscape for LeEco has worsened, with no presence in the top 20 TV brands in China as of October 2025, a stark contrast to its previous market position [9][10]. Industry Context - The decline of both LeEco and Nanjing Zhongdian Panda highlights the challenges faced by mid-sized companies in the industry, as they struggle with financial viability and market relevance [10]. - The shift in focus for Nanjing Zhongdian Panda away from TV manufacturing indicates a broader trend of consolidation and specialization within the electronics sector [10].

据悉，大疆成立于2006年，总部位于深圳，是全球民用无人机及航拍技术的龙头公司。其产品线覆盖航 拍、测绘、农业、能源巡检等。 （文章来源：每日经济新闻） 2024年1月，美国国防部更新CMC清单，继续将大疆保留在名单内。对此，大疆于2024年10月18日在美 国哥伦比亚特区地方法院正式提起诉讼。 2025年9月，美国哥伦比亚特区地区法院作出判决，最终认为国防部的大部分核心指控证据不足，但仅 基于大疆通过国家发展改革委"国家企业技术中心"资质认定这一点就作出了判定，并认为只要技术本身 具有两用用途，就符合CMC清单的列入条件，不论企业本身意愿和行为如何。14日，大疆就此判决结 果在美国联邦上诉法院提出上诉。 公开资料显示，2022年美国国防部将大疆列入其"中国军工企业"清单，但未提供任何理由或解释，引发 外界广泛关注。此后大疆持续尝试与美国国防部进行沟通，希望了解被列入清单的具体原因并提供相应 证据，也并未获得实质性回应。 大疆方面向记者表示，公司不认同也不接受这一判定，已于14日在美国联邦上诉法院提起上诉，坚决捍 卫公司的名誉和利益。大疆一直坚决反对将公司产品和技术用于任何军事或战争用途并已采取全面措 施，努 ...

笑发财了家人们。 就在昨天，乐视电视时隔三年又发出一篇檄文，公开讨伐南京熊猫家电，讨伐之余还引经据典、冷嘲热讽，比如提议南 京熊猫更名"江东Jerry"、改"贵司"为"贱司"，怒斥南京熊猫"厚颜无耻"，吐槽之密集，不知道的还以为是哪位脱口秀演员 下岗再就业了。 事件的起因还得追溯到2019年初，当时乐视系企业委托南京熊猫的东莞分公司代工做了一批电视，根据乐视方面的说 法，截止2022年3月，采购40万台电视花了4.5亿。 然而，电视卖出去后却出了问题，坏屏率近20%，而当时两家协议规定的不良率是1.8%。这还了得，于是乐视急了，开 始找南京熊猫协商，甲乙双方身份调转，而此时南京熊猫已经从"小甜甜"变身"牛夫人"，根据乐视的说法，对方不回邮 件、不垫费用、不谈解决方案。到了最后，还偷偷把东莞工厂关了。 2024年报显示，目前乐视网还有159名员工，根据年报数据计算，其人均支出薪酬高达44万元。是谁酸了我不说！ 在一众企业降本增效的时候，早在2023年，乐视就因为"四天半工作制"喜提热搜，乐视摇身一变成了打工人眼中"别人家 的公司"。 而且，媒体还报道，靠着《甄嬛传》能每年为乐视带来一千多万元的收益。 于是乐视一 ...

本文字数：511，阅读时长大约1分钟 理想方面表示，经公司核查，此类负面信息24小时不间断在多平台密集发布，具有多频次、内容高度同 质化等特征，涉嫌有组织的违法犯罪。以8月3日为例，自0时至早7时，仅1个平台就集中出现45篇以 《以前真没注意，理想车主，没有意外，一律乱停车…》为主题的相同视频。即便是凌晨时段，大量密 集地攻击仍未收手，直到现在，还未停止。这一行为背后的黑力量，在挑战社会的良知和法律的底线。 | 20 | 发布时间 | 幅盤 | -1 | 联系 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 以前真没注意,理想车主,没有意外。 一律司 | 2025-08-03 00:05 | https://www | tiao.com/i7534019 | 12 | | 以前高没注意,理想车主,没有意外,一律乱传 | 2025-08-03 00:22 | https://www | tiao.com/i753402 | 2 | | 车停泊,人依旧。以前真没注意,理想车主,法 | 2025-08-03 00:24 | https://www | tiao.com/i753402 | 2 ...

Core Viewpoint - BYD has faced organized and planned malicious attacks and defamation from online black media and public relations, which have severely damaged its reputation and disrupted market order [2] Summary by Relevant Sections Legal Actions and Court Rulings - A Sina Weibo account "Zhou Haoran Sean" was found guilty of defamation against BYD, resulting in a court ruling for public apology and compensation of 100,000 yuan [2] - A WeChat video account "AutoBiBiBi" was also ruled to have committed defamation against BYD and its executives, leading to a similar court ruling for public apology and compensation of 100,000 yuan [2] - Accounts "Tao Battery taodianchi" and "Yin Ge Talks Electric Cars" (now "Yin Ge Popularizes New Energy") were found guilty of unfair competition for spreading false claims about BYD's product safety and quality, resulting in a court ruling for public apology and compensation of 60,000 yuan [2] Criminal and Administrative Actions - An account "Samo XXX" spread false information about BYD's financial deterioration and impending bankruptcy, which was recognized as spreading false information by public security authorities [3] - An account "Grape Broken XXX" disseminated false information about BYD vehicles exploding, leading to administrative detention by public security authorities [3] - An account "Hao XXX" has been under investigation by public security for continuously spreading insulting and false information about BYD [4] Ongoing Legal Efforts - In April, BYD filed a lawsuit against the self-media "Intelligent EVO" for defamation, seeking a public apology and compensation of 2 million yuan [4] - BYD emphasizes its commitment to legal measures to protect its legitimate rights against any form of insult, defamation, or infringement [4]

6月4日，比亚迪法务部发文公布近期多起维权成果，网络账号"周浩然Sean"因诽谤比亚迪操控自媒体诋毁同行，经法院判决构成名誉侵权，须 公开道歉并赔偿10万元；"AutoBiBiBi"因公然侮辱、诋毁比亚迪及高管，经法院判决构成名誉侵权，同样须公开道歉并赔偿10万元。"淘电池 taodianchi"、"尹哥讲电车（现名"尹哥普及新能源"）"编造有关比亚迪产品安全隐患、价高质劣等诋毁性言论，被法院一审认定构成不正当竞争， 除公开道歉外，还须赔偿6万元。此外，"萨摩XXX""葡萄碎XXX" 因散布比亚迪财务状况恶化、车辆爆炸等不实消息，被公安机关认定构成散布 虚假信息并予以处罚；"糇XXX"长期持续发布侮辱信息与不实内容，目前已被公安机关立案调查。随即，比亚迪集团品牌及公关处总经理李云飞 转发比亚迪法务发文，并表示："这只是一部分诉讼的进展，目前我们在诉黑号37个，此外还有126个账号已进入黑号观察名单。这些黑号发布的 内容和相关评论区，我们全都会做证据保全！我们接受媒体的批评与监督，但对黑公关和黑媒体，绝不姑息，一追到底！"，彰显比亚迪打击黑公 关的决心。 予以行政拘留。 (6) 网络账号"猴XXX"长期持续发布 ...

Core Insights - Recent reports indicate that the brand "胖东来" has launched its self-operated products in Australia, with 12 popular items available in Chinese supermarkets [1] - The company has denied any collaboration with overseas channels, stating that its products are only sold in its stores located in Xuchang and Xinxiang [4][5] - In April, "胖东来" achieved significant sales across its three main business segments, contributing to a total sales figure of 80.27 billion yuan for the year to date [7] Group 1 - "胖东来" has introduced its self-operated brand DL products in Australian markets, with reports of 12 items being sold in local Chinese supermarkets [1] - The company clarified that it has no overseas partnerships and that its products are only available in its domestic stores [4][5] - In April, the supermarket, jewelry, and department store segments generated sales of 9.47 billion yuan, 1.85 billion yuan, and 1.76 billion yuan respectively, accounting for over 70% of total sales [7] Group 2 - As of April, "胖东来" has recorded a cumulative sales figure of 80.27 billion yuan for the year, with supermarkets, department stores, and jewelry being the core business pillars [7] - The company aims for a total sales amount of nearly 170 billion yuan for 2024, with a projected profit of over 800 million yuan [9] - "胖东来" operates 13 stores in Xuchang and Xinxiang, including 5 comprehensive department stores and 7 medium-sized community supermarkets [9]

转自：北京日报客户端 今天18时许，@小米法务部 发文称： 北京日报记者查询发现，"网络一兵"已于5月2日在哔哩哔哩上发布对雷军及小米公司的道歉信。 近日，就小米公司与自媒体"民之力"（又名"网络一兵"）网络侵权责任纠纷一案，法院作出一审判决。 法院认定被告存在侮辱、诽谤行为，侵害了小米公司的名誉权。判令被告删除在抖音、头条、哔哩哔 哩、西瓜视频、快手、微信视频号、微信公众号平台账号内发布的侵权内容，发布声明消除给小米公司 造成的负面影响，并赔偿小米公司各项损失共计6万元。 法院认为：被告发表的言论造成小米公司社会评价的降低，且超出舆论监督的合理范围。被告发表的部 分言论具有明确的侮辱、贬损性，且缺乏事实依据，构成侮辱、诽谤，侵犯了小米公司名誉权。 目前一审判决已生效。 此前，聚好看公司通过其微博账号"Vidda官方微博"发布侮辱、贬损小米公司的虚假信息和误导性信 息，损害了小米公司的商业信誉和商品声誉，构成商业诋毁。2023年8月31日，法院做出一审判决：聚 好看公司在"Vidda官方微博"账号置顶位置，连续七日刊登声明，消除影响，另赔偿小米公司经济损失 及合理开支共计55万元。随后，聚好看公司提起上诉。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent closure of the official website of Pang Donglai has raised concerns among the public, coinciding with negative media coverage and rumors affecting the company's reputation. The company reported significant sales figures despite these challenges, indicating resilience in its core business operations [1][2][12]. Group 1: Company Operations - Pang Donglai's official website is currently in a "closed" state for maintenance and upgrades, with no specific timeline for reopening provided [1][2]. - The company reported a sales figure of 1.749 billion yuan for April, with a cumulative sales total of 8.027 billion yuan for the first four months of the year, nearing 47.2% of last year's total sales [2][3]. - Key business segments include supermarkets, department stores, and jewelry, which together accounted for over 74.83% of total sales, with respective sales of 4.41 billion yuan, 0.802 billion yuan, and 0.794 billion yuan [3]. Group 2: Public and Media Response - There has been a notable public outcry supporting Pang Donglai, with calls for investigations into rival companies and expressions of loyalty towards the brand and its founder, Yu Donglai [12]. - Central media outlets, including People's Daily and Xinhua News, have published supportive content regarding Pang Donglai, reflecting a broader societal backing for the company's rights and reputation [12]. - Many comments from the public express a desire for Pang Donglai to expand its operations to other cities, highlighting the company's positive impact on local communities and its employee welfare [13].