克里姆林宫25日称，俄罗斯总统普京会见了国际原子能机构总干事格罗西。 当天早些时候，普京、格罗西及多国政要共同参加了在莫斯科举行的"全球原子能论坛"。 （文章来源：央视新闻） 普京指出，俄罗斯与国际原子能机构的合作几乎涵盖了所有领域，包括全球核安全领域。俄罗斯正努力 为国际原子能机构提供力所能及的援助，以应对该机构面临的全球性任务。 格罗西表示，此次访问恰逢全球核能发展的关键时刻。核安全、核安保、核不扩散等众多议题同样关 键。作为机构总干事，与俄罗斯讨论这些至关重要。 ...

【环球时报特约记者 晏清】路透社22日报道称，俄罗斯总统普京当天表示，如果美国总统特朗普采取相同行动，他准备将俄美之间最后一项限制 双方核武器数量的军控条约延长一年。 在《苏联和美国消除两国中程和中短程导弹条约》（《中导条约》）于2019年失效后，《新削减战略武器条约》成为两国间唯一军控条约。根据 条约，俄罗斯与美国计划在7年内将各自的洲际弹道导弹的数量降至700枚、核弹头数量降至1550枚，并将用于发射核弹头的已部署和未部署发射 工具数量降至800个。该条约于2010年签署，2011年2月5日生效，有效期10年。2021年2月3日，俄美双方互换外交照会，将条约有效期延长至2026 年2月5日。俄乌冲突爆发一年后，俄罗斯曾宣布暂停参与《新削减战略武器条约》。 据报道，《新削减战略武器条约》对美俄两国可部署的战略核弹头数量及其运载工具——陆基弹道导弹、潜射弹道导弹和战略轰炸机——的部署 数量设定了上限。该条约将于2026年2月5日到期，目前美俄双方尚未就延期达成一致。普京在俄罗斯联邦安全会议常务委员会议上表示，为了全 球的核不扩散利益，俄罗斯准备在《新削减战略武器条约》到期后将该协议延长一年，并推动与华盛顿就条 ...

Core Viewpoint - The report titled "Providing Security Guarantees to Non-Nuclear Weapon States: From Political Commitments to International Legal Documents" emphasizes the importance of legally binding security guarantees for non-nuclear weapon states to advance nuclear disarmament and global governance in the nuclear field [1][2][3]. Group 1: Report Overview - The report is the first of its kind from Chinese academic institutions focusing on security guarantees for non-nuclear weapon states, consisting of six chapters and approximately 11,000 words [7]. - It objectively analyzes the basic situation of non-nuclear security, major national policy positions, significant implications, and real challenges [7]. - The report aims to gather international consensus and explore practical measures for negotiating international legal documents on non-nuclear security [7]. Group 2: Key Statements from Officials - Cheng Jingye, President of the China Arms Control and Disarmament Association, stated that eliminating the threat of nuclear weapons aligns with the common interests of humanity and that providing legally binding security guarantees is crucial for advancing nuclear disarmament [2]. - Luo Qingping, Chairman of the China Nuclear Strategic Planning Research Institute, highlighted the importance of these guarantees for achieving nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation goals, as well as promoting international and regional peace and security [2][3]. - The report reflects China's commitment to actively engage in discussions on non-nuclear security and aims to encourage the international community to take effective actions on this issue [2][3].

伊朗外交部长阿拉格齐9月5日通过社交媒体发文称，西方国家对地区核扩散问题的"歇斯底里"完全是无稽之谈。 美媒：以色列在疑似核武相关设施附近建造新建筑 报道称，以色列长期以来奉行"核模糊政策"，既不承认也不否认拥有核武器。以色列自20世纪50年代后期开始在沙漠中建造核设施，迪莫纳附近的重水反应 堆在20世纪60年代投入使用。 近期，西方国家以启动"快速恢复制裁"机制相要挟，要求伊朗继续履行伊核协议，包括与国际原子能机构恢复全面合作、按照伊核协议限制核发展规模等。 （文章来源：央视新闻） 据美联社2日报道，专家对今年7月的卫星图像进行分析后认为，以色列正在疑似核武器相关设施附近建造新建筑。可能是在建造新的重水反应堆，或是建造 用于组装核武器的新设施。 阿拉格齐在社交媒体发文中还附上了此前有关以色列正在疑似核武器相关设施附近修建新建筑的报道截图。 阿拉格齐称，英法德三国及美国对盟友以色列扩大核武器库保持沉默，使这些国家在核不扩散问题上失去信誉。阿拉格齐认为，在西方国家眼中，问题的关 键不是核武器库是否存在或扩大，而是他们允许哪个国家发展核能技术，哪怕是和平利用核能的技术。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Japan is experiencing a dangerous shift in its long-standing nuclear policy, with increasing calls from politicians to reconsider the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and potentially develop its own nuclear weapons in response to perceived threats from the U.S. and regional instability [1][2][4][5]. Group 1: Political Dynamics - Japanese politicians, including right-wing figures, are advocating for a reassessment of Japan's nuclear stance, citing U.S. President Trump's foreign policy as a catalyst for this change [2][6]. - A growing number of senior politicians are willing to relax the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles," suggesting that these principles lack legal binding and can be modified [4][5]. - Public opinion in Japan is shifting, with a recent poll indicating that 41% of respondents support revising the non-nuclear principles, a significant increase from 20% three years ago [5]. Group 2: Regional Security Concerns - The discussions around Japan's nuclear policy are occurring against a backdrop of heightened security concerns in East Asia, particularly due to the U.S.-Russia tensions and the Ukraine conflict [6][7]. - Japan is reportedly engaging in "extended deterrence consultations" with the U.S., exploring scenarios where U.S. nuclear capabilities could be utilized in regional crises [7][9]. - There are discussions about "nuclear sharing" arrangements similar to those in NATO, which would involve Japan participating in nuclear planning and operations with the U.S. [9][10]. Group 3: Historical Context and Public Sentiment - Japan's historical experience as a victim of nuclear attacks has shaped its post-war pacifist stance, but younger generations are increasingly viewing nuclear weapons through a strategic lens [10][12]. - Survivors of the atomic bombings express concern over the changing attitudes towards nuclear weapons, emphasizing the need for trust and peace rather than reliance on nuclear deterrence [12][13]. - The Chinese government has criticized Japan's potential shift towards nuclear armament, urging Japan to adhere to its non-nuclear commitments and promote global nuclear disarmament [1][13].

声明称，随着美俄《新削减战略武器条约》即将于2026年2月到期，欧盟呼吁重启战略对话，并采取切 实措施，进一步削减核武库。声明说，不负责任的核言论、不透明的核武库扩张以及新势力谋求核能力 等，已经危及国际和平与安全。 当地时间6日，欧盟安全和外交政策高级代表卡拉斯发表书面声明，呼吁美俄重启核战略对话。 声明指出，面对这些挑战，《不扩散核武器条约》仍然是全球核不扩散机制的基石，也是实现核裁军的 重要基础。欧盟坚定不移地支持《全面禁止核试验条约》生效，并维护和重申现有的核武器试爆禁令。 （文章来源：央视新闻） ...

当地时间7月6日，巴西总统卢拉在金砖国家领导人第十七次会晤中发表讲话称，当今世界正面临着自二 战以来前所未有的冲突数量，而北约国家近期决定增加军费开支的做法助长了军备竞赛。卢拉还谴责某 些国家不断侵犯别国领土完整的行为，损害了通过谈判解决问题的努力，破坏了核不扩散的进程。(央 视新闻) ...

Group 1 - The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has withdrawn its last batch of inspectors from Iran, marking the first expulsion of IAEA personnel since Iran began uranium enrichment activities two decades ago [1] - The withdrawal follows Iran's new law criminalizing international oversight, leading to a more severe information blockade regarding Tehran's nuclear program [1] - Prior to the withdrawal, IAEA inspectors conducted nearly 500 inspections in Iran, tracking 409 kilograms of near-weapons-grade enriched uranium, which is now unaccounted for [1] Group 2 - The average number of visits by IAEA inspectors to nuclear facilities in Iran was 1.4 times per day last year [4] - Iran has accused the IAEA of assisting Israel in attacks on its nuclear facilities, a claim that the IAEA's Director General has denied [4] - Although Iran has not exited the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), it may invoke provisions of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties to suspend cooperation with the IAEA [4]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the complex history and ongoing political dynamics surrounding Iran's nuclear program, highlighting the role of the United States and Israel in shaping the situation, and the implications for regional stability and international relations [1][12]. Group 1: Historical Context - The U.S. initially supported Iran's nuclear capabilities in the 1950s, providing technology and training, which laid the groundwork for the current nuclear issue [4][6]. - The 1979 Islamic Revolution led to a shift in Iran's nuclear ambitions, with the new regime viewing nuclear technology as a symbol of Western influence [5][6]. - After the Iran-Iraq War, Iran sought to revive its nuclear program, recognizing the need for military deterrence [6][8]. Group 2: Key Events and Developments - The exposure of Iran's nuclear facilities in 2002 marked a turning point, leading to increased scrutiny and tensions between Iran and the international community [6][7]. - The 2005 resumption of uranium enrichment by Iran, despite international pressure, escalated the situation, resulting in UN sanctions [8][9]. - The 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was a significant diplomatic achievement, temporarily easing sanctions in exchange for limitations on Iran's nuclear program [10][11]. Group 3: Recent Tensions and Developments - The U.S. withdrawal from the JCPOA in 2018 under the Trump administration reignited tensions, leading to a "maximum pressure" campaign against Iran [12][13]. - Recent military actions by the U.S. against Iranian nuclear facilities have further complicated the situation, raising concerns about regional stability [12][13]. - The ongoing conflict between Iran and Israel, particularly in the context of proxy battles, continues to influence the dynamics of the nuclear issue [12][13].

七国集团：我们一直明确表示，伊朗绝不可能拥有核武器。 ...