每经编辑｜陈柯名 据新华国际援引日本富士新闻网报道，日本首相高市早苗和美国总统唐纳德·特朗普准备于11月25日通电话。据报道，此次通话要求是特朗普方面提出 的。 图片来源：视觉中国 另据央视新闻此前报道，日本首相高市早苗10月25日与美国总统特朗普举行了就任以来的首次电话会谈，双方一致同意将日美同盟"进一步提升至更高水 平"。 当时，高市早苗透露，在约10分钟的电话会谈中，她强调："强化日美同盟是本届政府外交和安全领域的最重要事项。" 日本多位前首相 接连批评高市早苗错误言论 近日，日本前首相鸠山由纪夫、石破茂和野田佳彦近日分别就现任首相高市早苗在国会发表涉台错误言论引发的日中关系紧张提出批评，呼吁其谨言慎 行。 鸠山由纪夫24日在社交平台X上发文指出，台湾问题是中国内政，高市却错误地将其与日本"存亡危机事态"挂钩，中国对其进行批判是理所应当的。 20日，鸠山曾在X上发文说，高市偏离"台湾问题是中国内政"这一立场的言论使日中关系急剧恶化，其给国家造成的损失难以估量。他引用《论语》名 句"过而不改，是谓过矣"，敦促高市尽快纠正错误立场。 石破茂23日在一档电视节目中表示，自1972年时任首相田中角荣访华推动实现 ...

如何解决台湾问题，完全是中国人自己的事，不关日本的事。台湾光复是二战胜利成果，是 战后国际秩序的重要组成部分。《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》等国际法律文件，都明确了中 国对台湾的主权。台湾问题纯属中国内政，一个中国原则是国际社会普遍共识。采取何种方 式解决台湾问题、实现中国完全统一，完全是中国人自己的事。任何人都没有资格说三道 四，负有历史罪责的日本更应谨言慎行。 来源：《解放军报》 《解放军报》11月25日刊发文章《军国主义余毒未除才是"日本有事"》。 以下为全文： 历史的回旋镖，终归会刺向自己。近日，日本首相高市早苗公然将纯属中国内政的台湾问题 与所谓日本"存亡危机事态"挂钩，暗示武力介入台海局势的可能性。这一狂妄言论，逻辑极 其荒谬、态度极其嚣张、影响极其恶劣，不仅遭到中国强烈反对和坚决反制，也引发国际社 会高度警惕。 台湾有事，多是日本惹的事。明治维新后，日本军国主义扩张野心蠢蠢欲动。1874年，日本 借口"牡丹社事件"强侵台湾，对台湾原住民进行大肆杀戮；1895年，日本通过《马关条约》 强行割占台湾，残暴殖民统治了近50年，致使65万台湾同胞生灵涂炭。二战结束后，台湾回 归祖国怀抱，但日本军国主义阴魂不 ...

中国人民和人民军队不信邪也不怕邪，不惹事也不怕事。如果高市早苗等日本政客执意在错误的道路上 一意孤行，包括中国在内的国际社会绝不会听之任之，由此引发的一切后果都将由日方承担。 来源：解放军报 作者: 宝川 台湾有事，多是日本惹的事。明治维新后，日本军国主义扩张野心蠢蠢欲动。1874年，日本借口"牡丹 社事件"强侵台湾，对台湾原住民进行大肆杀戮；1895年，日本通过《马关条约》强行割占台湾，残暴 殖民统治了近50年，致使65万台湾同胞生灵涂炭。二战结束后，台湾回归祖国怀抱，但日本军国主义阴 魂不散，觊觎台湾之心不死。在台湾问题上对中国人民负有历史罪责、犯下累累罪行的日本，是最没有 资格谈"台湾有事"的一方。高市早苗身为日本首相，不仅对历史罪责毫无反思歉疚，还发表极其错误、 极为危险、极具挑衅的涉台言论，这种挑战中国核心利益的"搞事"之举，必然遭到中国的迎头痛击。 如何解决台湾问题，完全是中国人自己的事，不关日本的事。台湾光复是二战胜利成果，是战后国际秩 序的重要组成部分。《开罗宣言》《波茨坦公告》等国际法律文件，都明确了中国对台湾的主权。台湾 问题纯属中国内政，一个中国原则是国际社会普遍共识。采取何种方式解决台 ...

2025.11. 25 本文字数：1079，阅读时长大约2分钟 《解放军报》11月25日刊发文章《军国主义余毒未除才是"日本有事"》。 以下为全文： 历史的回旋镖，终归会刺向自己。近日，日本首相高市早苗公然将纯属中国内政的台湾问题与所谓日 本"存亡危机事态"挂钩，暗示武力介入台海局势的可能性。这一狂妄言论，逻辑极其荒谬、态度极 其嚣张、影响极其恶劣，不仅遭到中国强烈反对和坚决反制，也引发国际社会高度警惕。 （注：我们会对线索进行核实。您的隐私将严格保密。） 推荐阅读 韩国宣布：中国排日本前面 IFA 118 11 I i Change 台湾有事，多是日本惹的事。明治维新后，日本军国主义扩张野心蠢蠢欲动。1874年，日本借 口"牡丹社事件"强侵台湾，对台湾原住民进行大肆杀戮；1895年，日本通过《马关条约》强行割占 台湾，残暴殖民统治了近50年，致使65万台湾同胞生灵涂炭。二战结束后，台湾回归祖国怀抱，但 日本军国主义阴魂不散，觊觎台湾之心不死。在台湾问题上对中国人民负有历史罪责、犯下累累罪行 的日本，是最没有资格谈"台湾有事"的一方。高市早苗身为日本首相，不仅对历史罪责毫无反思歉 疚，还发表极其错误、极为危险 ...

Core Viewpoint - The statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi are seen as a violation of the post-World War II international legal framework, challenging international order and potentially escalating regional tensions, which should be firmly opposed by regional countries and the international community [1][3]. Group 1 - The remarks by Takaichi are deemed completely inappropriate and lacking legitimacy, serving only to provoke conflict and contribute to the ongoing deterioration of international order [3]. - There is a resurgence of discussions in Japan regarding "collective self-defense," which may lead to a breach of Japan's constitutional principle of pacifism, raising concerns about a revival of militarism in Japan [3]. - The statements are viewed as a betrayal of Japan's pacifist constitution and a violation of international law, posing a threat to international order and representing a distortion of historical facts [5]. Group 2 - The international community, including European countries, should remain vigilant against such statements, as they could ignite significant regional conflicts, akin to throwing a lit match into dry grass [5].

Core Viewpoint - Recent remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have sparked widespread criticism, with many international figures asserting that her statements challenge historical agreements and threaten global stability [1][3]. Group 1: International Reactions - Russian State Duma member Maria Butina emphasized that Takaichi's comments attempt to challenge post-World War II international agreements, which many countries, including Russia, find intolerable [1]. - Tanzanian scholar Marcus Albani criticized Japan's efforts to strengthen ties with NATO and expand its influence in the Asia-Pacific region, arguing that Takaichi's statements violate the One China principle and undermine regional stability [1]. - British Asia-Pacific studies scholar Jenny Craig highlighted that documents like the Cairo Declaration are foundational to post-war peace, and ignoring these historical contexts undermines global peace efforts [3]. Group 2: Historical Context and Implications - Craig pointed out that Takaichi's remarks are not isolated incidents but are linked to her frequent visits to the Yasukuni Shrine and Japan's militarization, indicating a lack of genuine reflection on wartime atrocities [3]. - U.S. international affairs expert William Jones warned that Takaichi's statements reflect a resurgence of militarism and expansionism, posing risks to post-war prosperity and stability [3]. - Senegal's official media criticized Takaichi's comments as provocative and contrary to international law, highlighting a disregard for historical facts and global consensus [3].

Core Viewpoint - The recent provocative statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanna Takashi regarding Taiwan and historical issues have sparked strong protests from neighboring countries, particularly China, raising concerns about Japan's strategic direction and the resurgence of militarism [1][10][38]. Group 1: Public Protests - Thousands of protesters gathered in front of the Japanese Prime Minister's residence demanding the retraction of Takashi's controversial statements [2]. - Protesters held signs calling for Takashi's resignation, expressing their opposition to her war-provoking rhetoric and urging adherence to the constitution [4][8]. - Continuous protests have been reported across Japan, with citizens expressing their unease about the government's militaristic tendencies [6][9]. Group 2: Government Actions and Statements - Takashi has reiterated her stance on Japan's strategic relationship with China while refusing to retract her statements regarding Taiwan, which have been deemed provocative [5]. - The Japanese government has been criticized for its increasing militarization, including discussions on modifying the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and expanding defense budgets [15][21]. - Japan's recent arms exports, including the sale of "Patriot" missiles to the U.S., mark a significant shift in its defense policy [14]. Group 3: International Reactions - The United Nations has reaffirmed its stance on Taiwan, emphasizing that it remains a part of China, countering Japan's provocative claims [11][13]. - China's Foreign Ministry has warned that any military intervention by Japan in the Taiwan Strait would be considered an act of aggression [21][24]. - Concerns have been raised by international observers regarding Japan's potential return to militarism, reminiscent of its wartime past [38]. Group 4: Economic Implications - The backlash against Takashi's statements has led to a significant decline in Chinese tourist bookings to Japan, which could negatively impact Japan's economy [22]. - Economic analysts predict that a drop in Chinese tourism could reduce Japan's GDP by 0.36%, resulting in an estimated economic loss of 2.2 trillion yen (approximately 100 billion RMB) [22]. - The deteriorating relations with China are expected to have broader economic repercussions, affecting various sectors in Japan [22].

Core Viewpoint - Recent remarks by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan have sparked widespread criticism, with many international figures asserting that her statements challenge international justice and undermine the post-war international order [1][3][4]. Group 1: International Reactions - Russian State Duma member Maria Butina stated that Takaichi's comments attempt to challenge historical agreements established post-World War II, with many countries, including Russia, condemning such actions as intolerable [3]. - Tanzanian scholar Marcus Albani highlighted that Japan's efforts to strengthen ties with NATO and expand its influence in the Asia-Pacific region contradict the One China principle and threaten regional stability [4]. - British Asia-Pacific studies scholar Jenny Craig emphasized that documents like the Cairo Declaration are foundational to post-war peace, and ignoring these historical contexts undermines global peace efforts [6]. Group 2: Historical Context and Implications - Craig also noted that Takaichi's remarks are not isolated incidents but are linked to her frequent visits to the Yasukuni Shrine and Japan's accelerating militarization, indicating a lack of genuine reflection on wartime atrocities [6]. - William Jones, an expert on international issues, warned that Takaichi's statements reflect a resurgence of militarism and expansionism, posing risks to post-war global prosperity and stability [6]. - Senegal's official media criticized Takaichi's comments as provocative and in violation of international law, diverging from historical facts and global consensus [6].

Core Viewpoint - The recent statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan reflect a dangerous shift in Japan's political landscape, influenced by rising right-wing ideologies and her own extreme views [1][6]. Group 1: Background and Ideological Roots - Takaichi's right-wing stance can be traced back to her upbringing in a conservative household that emphasized loyalty to the emperor and military nationalism [3]. - Her political ideology was further shaped during her time at the Matsushita Institute of Government and Management, a breeding ground for right-wing politicians in Japan [3]. - Takaichi's opposition to acknowledging Japan's wartime atrocities dates back to her early political career, indicating a long-standing commitment to revisionist history [2][4]. Group 2: Political Career and Actions - Takaichi's political career began in 1993, and she has consistently shifted to the right, gaining attention from influential figures like Shinzo Abe [4]. - Her actions, such as visiting the Yasukuni Shrine and denying historical events like the Nanjing Massacre, have solidified her reputation as a right-wing politician [4][5]. - The recent election of Takaichi as Prime Minister was marked by compromises with right-wing factions within her party, reflecting the current political climate in Japan [5][6]. Group 3: Implications for Japan's Foreign Policy - Takaichi's statements regarding Taiwan suggest a potential shift away from Japan's post-war pacifist policies, indicating a willingness to adopt a more confrontational stance towards China [6][7]. - The Japanese government is reportedly considering revisions to its national security strategy, which may include increasing defense spending and altering its nuclear policy [6]. - Takaichi's approach may lead to heightened tensions in the region and a departure from Japan's traditional diplomatic stance, as she seeks to consolidate her political support domestically [7].

Core Viewpoint - Japan has recently exported lethal weapons for the first time after relaxing its arms export restrictions, which raises concerns about a potential return to militarism and the violation of post-war commitments [1][2] Summary by Sections Japan's Arms Export Policy - Japan has completed its first export of lethal weapons, specifically the "Patriot" air defense missiles, following the relaxation of its arms export policy [1] - The Japanese government is discussing amendments to three security treaty documents, including changes to the "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and increasing defense spending [1] International Response - China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Mao Ning, emphasized that if Japan attempts to revert to militarism and abandon its commitment to peaceful development, it will face opposition from both the Chinese people and the international community [2] - Mao pointed out that post-World War II international legal documents clearly outline Japan's obligations as a defeated nation, including complete disarmament and the prohibition of maintaining military industries that could lead to rearmament [1] Military Expansion Concerns - Japan's defense budget has seen a continuous increase for thirteen consecutive years, and the country has enacted new security laws to allow for collective self-defense [1] - The modification of Japan's "Three Principles on Arms Exports" to "Principles on Defense Equipment Transfers" indicates a significant relaxation of arms export restrictions, culminating in the export of lethal weapons [1]