中新网10月1日电(钟新军)美国《华尔街日报》日前刊文称，特朗普正重新强化美国对拉丁美洲的"统 治"。外媒指出，自冷战以来，还没有哪位美国总统像特朗普这样大规模动用军事和经济力量，对该地 区施加如此大的压力。 武力施压，美舰机进逼委内瑞拉 先看一则消息：美国全国广播公司26日披露，五角大楼正制定针对委内瑞拉境内"贩毒分子"的行动方 案，或在几周内对该国目标实施打击。 英国广播公司称，美委关系虽恶化已久，但此前美历届政府除了封锁孤立和招降纳叛，并没有采取更激 进的措施，甚至一度放松对委石油工业的制裁。 而随着特朗普第二个总统任期开始，一切都变了。 据路透社报道，以2025年3月，美国将约200名委内瑞拉移民空运驱逐出境为肇始，特朗普政府对委方的 态度愈发咄咄逼人。 8月，美司法部借口所谓"协助贩毒集团和街头帮派"，悬赏5000万美元缉拿委领导人。 美军舰队。图/美国《新闻周刊》 紧接着，美国将多艘导弹驱逐舰、两栖攻击舰和核潜艇派往委附近海域，又增调包括F-35在内的大批军 机，进驻与委隔海相望的波多黎各。 进入9月，美军露出獠牙，多次实施海上袭击。据英国《卫报》统计，美军已造成至少4艘委船只沉没、 20人丧生。 ...

新华社基辅9月25日电（记者李东旭）据乌克兰国际文传电讯社25日报道，乌国防部情报总局24日使用 无人攻击艇袭击了位于黑海沿岸的俄罗斯关键后勤设施——新罗西斯克港和图阿普谢港。 新罗西斯克港和图阿普谢港均位于俄南部克拉斯诺达尔边疆区的黑海沿岸地区，是俄方在黑海关键后勤 补给设施。 此外，乌克兰空军25日在社交媒体发文称，当天凌晨，乌军击落了一架在扎波罗热执行轰炸任务的俄军 苏－34战机。 乌国际文传电讯社援引乌特种部队消息人士的话报道，袭击行动导致位于俄罗斯新罗西斯克港口附近的 石油装运设施以及终端设备瘫痪，相关设施每日出口原油约200万桶。此外，乌方的无人机还袭击了俄 大型石油装载码头图阿普谢港。 ...

截至发稿，暂未看到俄罗斯官方对乌方说法作出回应。 【环球网报道】据乌克兰"Strana.ua"新闻网报道，乌克兰国防部情报总局25日公布的视频显示，乌方使 用无人机在克里米亚对俄方目标发动袭击，两架安-26运输机被击中。 ...

Group 1 - The Venezuelan Defense Minister, Padrino Lopez, stated that the U.S. is engaging in an "undeclared war" against Venezuela, prompting the military to enhance its readiness to counter perceived threats [1][3] - Lopez emphasized the constitutional mission of the Bolivarian National Armed Forces is to "defend and guarantee national independence," indicating a commitment to increasing military preparedness in response to U.S. actions [3][4] - The Venezuelan Attorney General, Tarek William Saab, condemned the use of missiles and nuclear weapons against unarmed fishermen as "crimes against humanity," calling for a United Nations investigation into U.S. military actions in the Caribbean [3][4] Group 2 - The U.S. has deployed multiple warships in the Caribbean under the pretext of combating drug trafficking in Latin America, leading to heightened tensions between the two nations [4][3] - President Trump announced that U.S. military forces have engaged and sunk several "drug trafficking boats" in the region, resulting in multiple casualties [4][3] - Venezuelan Interior Minister, Cabello, countered Trump's claims by stating there is no evidence that the attacked vessels were involved in drug trafficking [4]

Group 1: U.S. Military Actions - Five U.S. F-35 stealth fighters landed at the Roosevelt Roads military base in Puerto Rico as part of a deployment of 10 F-35s to the Caribbean region to combat drug trafficking and address tensions with Venezuela [1] - The U.S. has increased military presence in the Caribbean, including transport planes and Ospreys, with recent visits from U.S. Defense Secretary and military leaders [1] - The U.S. Navy recently engaged a Venezuelan vessel in the Caribbean, resulting in 11 deaths, which Venezuela denies were drug traffickers [1] Group 2: Venezuela's Response - Venezuela accused the U.S. Navy of illegally detaining its fishing vessel "Carmen Rosa" in its exclusive economic zone, claiming the U.S. actions are provocations and excuses for military escalation [2] - Venezuelan Foreign Minister held a press conference to demand the U.S. cease actions that threaten regional security, emphasizing Venezuela's commitment to peace [2] Group 3: Military Training in Venezuela - Venezuela launched a large-scale militia training program called "People into the Barracks," opening over 300 military camps for militia training to enhance national defense readiness [3] - The program allows over 8 million registered militia members to participate in weekly training sessions, marking a new phase in national defense [3] - President Maduro announced the initiation of high-level training and combat coordination, urging citizens to engage in military training [3]

Group 1 - The U.S. has deployed a naval fleet with 4,000 soldiers near Venezuela, indicating a military buildup aimed at combating drug trafficking in Latin America [1][2] - Venezuela's President Maduro has condemned the U.S. actions as an invasion attempt and announced plans to mobilize over 4 million militia members in response [3][5] - The Venezuelan government claims that U.S. accusations of drug trafficking are unfounded and part of a broader strategy to undermine the country's sovereignty [6][8] Group 2 - Multiple Latin American countries have expressed strong opposition to the U.S. military presence in the Caribbean, viewing it as a threat to regional stability [12][14] - Colombian President Petro warned that U.S. intervention could lead to chaos in Venezuela and potentially drag Colombia into conflict [14] - Brazil and Mexico have also criticized U.S. actions, emphasizing the need for cooperation rather than unilateral intervention to address issues like drug trafficking [16][17]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Department of Defense expresses strong dissatisfaction with Japan's slow response in increasing defense spending compared to other allies like South Korea, Australia, Germany, and Canada [2][4]. Group 1: U.S. Defense Department's Perspective - U.S. officials have noted that Japan has long expressed concerns about the deteriorating security environment but has cited constitutional limitations as a reason for not providing more substantial support [4]. - The U.S. Defense Department has been negotiating with allies to enhance their defense capabilities since the second Trump administration, highlighting a general expectation for Japan to increase its defense spending [4][5]. - Japan aims to raise its defense spending to 2% of GDP by 2027, but U.S. officials believe this is still insufficient given the current security landscape [4]. Group 2: Comparison with Other Allies - The U.S. has praised other allies for aligning with its defense spending expectations, contrasting this with Japan's perceived reluctance to take similar steps [2][4]. - There is an indication that negotiations with South Korea's new government are progressing, while Japan's attitude remains negative [4]. Group 3: Expectations for Japan - U.S. officials expect Japan to play a more active role in its own defense and collective self-defense, indicating a shift in how Japan is treated compared to other nations [5].

Core Viewpoint - The Estonian Minister of Defense stated that the United States will not discuss any troop withdrawal issues with NATO [1] Group 1 - The statement emphasizes the commitment of the United States to NATO and its presence in Europe [1] - The Minister's remarks reflect the ongoing geopolitical tensions and the importance of NATO's collective defense strategy [1] - This position may influence defense spending and military strategies among NATO member countries [1]

Group 1 - The U.S. Department of Defense is transitioning military personnel from Title 10 status to Title 32 status, affecting 1,200 active-duty service members [1] - This adjustment will increase the total support personnel for the Department of Defense to approximately 1,700 [1]

Core Viewpoint - Iran asserts its military capabilities and public support have successfully countered enemy offensives, causing significant losses to adversaries [1] Group 1: Military Stance - Iran's Chief of Staff, Mousavi, emphasizes that the country has never initiated war but will determine the outcome of conflicts if national sovereignty and territory are threatened [1] - The statement highlights that Israel is the frontline aggressor, but the U.S. has also directly intervened, with NATO countries providing intelligence, logistics, and operational support to the aggressors [1] Group 2: Monitoring and Warnings - Iran is closely monitoring the actions of Israel and its supporters, warning that any strategic miscalculations will result in severe consequences [1]