美媒：美国对大疆等所有外国制造新型无人机禁令引发美国消费者愤怒，"疯狂囤货" 报道继续称，亚利桑那州一家无人机操控员协会的联合创始人格雷格·雷维迪奥近期就大疆无人机禁令 对8000名无人机操控员进行了调查。调查结果显示，约43%的受访者认为禁令将对其公司造成"极其负 面"或"可能导致公司倒闭"的影响；约85%的受访者表示，他们的公司可能只能维持两年或更短时间。 "人们购买大疆无人机不是因为它是中国产的，而是因为它是可用的、价格实惠且性能优异。"雷维迪奥 说。 报道称，有类似想法的还有杰森·科利普，他与大约300名房地产经纪人合作，负责拍摄房屋的航拍照片 和视频。"我，一个在南部密西西比州操控无人机飞越松树林和房屋的小人物，为什么要限制这类活动 呢？"科利普表示，"作为一名小企业主，我们还有什么其他选择？目前我们真的没有答案。" 美国联邦通信委员会（FCC）当地时间22日表示，以"国家安全"为由将中国大疆公司等所有外国制造的 无人机和零部件列入"受管制清单"，禁止批准其新型无人机对美出口或在美销售，在美国消费者中引发 广泛争议。据美国《华尔街日报》同日晚些时候报道，这项禁令在美国近50万名获得认证的民用无人机 ...

转自：北京日报客户端 美国联邦通信委员会（FCC）当地时间22日表示，以"国家安全"为由将中国大疆公司等所有外国制造的 无人机和零部件列入"受管制清单"，禁止批准其新型无人机对美出口或在美销售，在美国消费者中引发 广泛争议。据美国《华尔街日报》同日晚些时候报道，这项禁令在美国近50万名获得认证的民用无人机 操控员中引发愤怒，因为大疆公司在美国民用、地方政府和业余爱好者无人机市场占有约70%至90%的 份额。 《华尔街日报》称，许多无人机操控员目前正在囤积大疆无人机和零部件，并向他们所在区的国会议员 和白宫发出"最后的信件"，表示他们没有"西方的替代品"，且其与中国制造无人机有关的生计可能受到 严重影响。 "我是个彻头彻尾的美国人。我开的是雪佛兰皮卡。"印第安纳州的一家建筑工地监控公司的老板埃里克 ·埃伯特说，"但美国的无人机无法与之竞争。" 报道称，为了延长无人机队的使用寿命，无人机操控员们近来一直在疯狂购入飞机、电池和备件。埃伯 特拥有一支由七名无人机操控员组成的团队，他们负责监控数千英亩（1英亩约合4047平方米）土地上 太阳能和风力涡轮机装置的建设。他的公司储备了三十多架无人机及相关设备，"因为预见到了 ...

来源：环球网 【环球网报道 记者 索炎琦】美国联邦通信委员会（FCC）当地时间22日表示，以"国家安全"为由将中 国大疆公司等所有外国制造的无人机和零部件列入"受管制清单"，禁止批准其新型无人机对美出口或在 美销售，在美国消费者中引发广泛争议。据美国《华尔街日报》同日晚些时候报道，这项禁令在美国近 50万名获得认证的民用无人机操控员中引发愤怒，因为大疆公司在美国民用、地方政府和业余爱好者无 人机市场占有约70%至90%的份额。 《华尔街日报》称，许多无人机操控员目前正在囤积大疆无人机和零部件，并向他们所在区的国会议员 和白宫发出"最后的信件"，表示他们没有"西方的替代品"，且其与中国制造无人机有关的生计可能受到 严重影响。 "我是个彻头彻尾的美国人。我开的是雪佛兰皮卡。"印第安纳州的一家建筑工地监控公司的老板埃里克 ·埃伯特说，"但美国的无人机无法与之竞争。" 报道称，为了延长无人机队的使用寿命，无人机操控员们近来一直在疯狂购入飞机、电池和备件。埃伯 特拥有一支由七名无人机操控员组成的团队，他们负责监控数千英亩（1英亩约合4047平方米）土地上 太阳能和风力涡轮机装置的建设。他的公司储备了三十多架无人机及相关 ...

Group 1 - The article highlights the increasing reliance of the U.S. artificial intelligence industry on large-capacity lithium-ion batteries, primarily supplied by China, raising national security concerns [3][4][17] - The U.S. military is also facing a growing demand for batteries to power new technologies such as drones and laser weapons, with a significant portion of these batteries sourced from China [4][12][27] - Experts warn that the dominance of China in the battery supply chain poses a strategic risk, as approximately 6,000 components used in U.S. military weapon systems depend on Chinese suppliers [4][17] Group 2 - The U.S. government is shifting its focus towards developing a domestic battery supply chain to reduce dependence on China, recognizing the critical role of battery technology in various sectors, including defense and artificial intelligence [18][19] - Recent government actions include approving subsidies for battery manufacturers and initiating high-level meetings to discuss battery supply chain strategies [18][19] - The U.S. Department of Energy has announced funding of up to $500 million for battery materials and recycling projects, indicating a commitment to bolster domestic production [18][19] Group 3 - China controls 99% of the global production of lithium iron phosphate battery cells and over 90% of core components, making it a dominant player in the battery supply chain [23][24] - The International Energy Agency compares the global reliance on Chinese batteries to Europe's dependence on Russian natural gas, highlighting the risks of single-source supply chains [23][24] - Experts estimate that U.S. manufacturers will need at least five years to produce lithium iron phosphate battery cells that meet domestic demand, with a complete supply chain taking even longer to establish [23][24] Group 4 - The energy demands of artificial intelligence technologies are significant, with estimates suggesting that a single AI query consumes about ten times the energy of a traditional internet search [25][26] - Data centers are increasingly relying on batteries as backup power sources to maintain operational stability, especially given the volatility of energy demand [25][26] - Companies like Google and Microsoft are transitioning to battery power for their data centers, with Google deploying over 100 million battery cells globally [26][27] Group 5 - The ongoing conflict in Ukraine has underscored the strategic importance of battery supplies in military applications, with many drones relying on batteries made from Chinese materials [27][28] - The U.S. military is experiencing a surge in battery demand due to the modernization of its equipment, necessitating a comprehensive battery strategy [28][29] - The Biden administration is recognizing the national security implications of battery supply chains, leading to increased support for domestic battery production initiatives [29][30]

近十年来，美国官员打着"国家安全"旗号，一直努力禁止政府机构及无人机爱好者使用中国无人机。现 在，华盛顿的"奸计"终于得逞。 【文/观察者网 齐倩】 当地时间12月22日，美国政府宣布，全面禁止外国无人机在美销售。 "此举引发了美国多数飞手（无人机操控员）的愤怒，"美国《华尔街日报》22日称，美国有近50万名持 证飞手。现在他们正着急囤积大疆无人机及部件，并向国会和白宫抗议，指出中国无人机"无可替代"。 据报道，在美国商业、地方政府及爱好者无人机市场，大疆无人机占比高达70%至90%。 "我彻头彻尾是美国制造，我开雪佛兰皮卡，"埃里克·埃伯特是美国印第安纳州戴尔市一家建筑工地监 控公司的老板，历来支持美国制造，但也承认"美国无人机根本竞争不过"中国无人机。 埃伯特的公司有七名无人机操控员，监控数千英亩太阳能和风力涡轮安装项目。 他现在忧虑，美国政府最新禁令将破坏他和员工的生计。他说，在"清楚2026年意味着什么"之后，他的 公司迅速囤积了30多架中国无人机及设备配件。 报道提及，五角大楼计划将投入11亿美元支持美国无人机制造商，到2027年采购数十万套本土无人机系 统。该计划源于美国总统特朗普的行政命令，呼吁 ...

来源：新华国际头条 美国总统特朗普22日强硬表态说，美国"必须得到格陵兰岛"，并声称这是出于"国家安全"考虑，而非为 获取其矿产资源。 "我们需要格陵兰岛来保障国家安全。"特朗普在佛罗里达州海湖庄园对媒体称，"我们必须得到格陵兰 岛。" 特朗普称，丹麦未在格陵兰岛投入必要资金，也没有为其提供军事保护。丹麦数百年前乘船到过那里 （格陵兰岛）。"我确信我们也乘船到过那里。所以，我们得把这事彻底解决。" 谈及任命路易斯安那州州长杰夫·兰德里为美国格陵兰岛特使时，特朗普称此举并非他主动发起。"不是 我打电话给他（兰德里），是他打给我的。他很积极主动。" 特朗普还说，兰德里在电话中还提醒他关于19世纪初美国从法国手中购买路易斯安那领地的历史。 来源：新华国际头条 美国总统特朗普22日强硬表态说，美国"必须得到格陵兰岛"，并声称这是出于"国家安全"考虑，而非为 获取其矿产资源。 "我们需要格陵兰岛来保障国家安全。"特朗普在佛罗里达州海湖庄园对媒体称，"我们必须得到格陵兰 岛。" 特朗普称，丹麦未在格陵兰岛投入必要资金，也没有为其提供军事保护。丹麦数百年前乘船到过那里 （格陵兰岛）。"我确信我们也乘船到过那里。所以，我们得 ...

据环球时报消息，中国无人机制造商大疆创新23日在一份声明中表示，对于美国联邦通信委员会 （FCC）将所有非美国制造的无人机列入"Covered List"（受管制清单）的决定表示遗憾。此举不仅限制 了美国消费者与商业用户的选择自由，也损害了开放、公平竞争的市场原则。 转自：北京日报客户端 料图 声明表示，"作为全球民用无人机和航拍技术的开创者与引领者，大疆始终致力于为世界范围内的影像 创作者提供创新工具与灵感；我们的产品与技术也在农业、巡检、测绘、消防救援、自然资源保护等众 多关键领域深度应用，为提升生产效率、保障生命和公共安全创造了不可替代的价值。" 声明称，大疆产品的安全性与可靠性，多年来被全球市场和多家权威独立第三方机构所验证。"我们将 评估所有可行路径，坚定维护公司及全球用户的合法权益。" 来源：长安街知事微信公众号 近年来，FCC频频打着"国家安全"旗号对中国企业出手。据《科技日报》统计，2019至2022年间，先后 以安全风险为名拒绝中国移动在美国的运营申请，并撤销中国联通和中国电信在美运营许可。2020年， 将华为、中兴列入"国家安全威胁清单"，禁止其设备进入美国市场。2022年，再以安全风险名 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles is that the U.S. President Trump has expressed a strong desire to acquire Greenland, citing national security concerns, which has led to significant backlash from Denmark and the EU [1][2][3]. - Trump appointed Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry as a special envoy to Greenland, stating that this decision was not initiated by him but rather by Landry's proactive approach [1]. - Denmark's Prime Minister Frederiksen and other officials have firmly rejected the notion of selling Greenland, emphasizing that its future should be determined by its residents and that the territory is an integral part of Denmark [2][3]. Group 2 - The EU has expressed solidarity with Denmark and the people of Greenland, reiterating that territorial integrity and sovereignty are fundamental principles of international law [4][5]. - The EU Commission President von der Leyen stated that Arctic security remains a priority for the EU and that they will work closely with allies and partners to uphold these principles [4]. - The Danish Defense Minister and other officials have called for respect for Denmark's sovereignty and have deemed the U.S. envoy's comments regarding Greenland's status as unacceptable [2][3].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. President Trump emphasizes the need for Greenland for national security, appointing Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry as a special envoy, which has sparked criticism from Denmark and Greenland regarding U.S. intentions towards the resource-rich Arctic island [1][2]. Group 1: Strategic Importance of Greenland - Greenland, a former Danish colony with a population of approximately 57,000, holds strategic significance due to its location between Europe and North America, making it a key site for the U.S. ballistic missile defense system [2]. - The island's rich mineral resources have heightened U.S. interest, with Trump asserting that the acquisition of Greenland is essential for national security rather than solely for its mineral wealth [1][2]. Group 2: Diplomatic Tensions - Following Trump's appointment of Landry, Danish Prime Minister Frederiksen and Greenland's Premier Nielsen issued a joint statement asserting that Greenland belongs to its people and cannot be annexed by another country, even under the pretext of international security [1][2]. - Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen announced plans to summon the U.S. ambassador, expressing that the sudden emergence of a U.S. special representative claiming to take over Greenland is completely unacceptable [2][3]. - The appointment of Landry has been interpreted as a failure of Denmark's investments and diplomatic efforts in Greenland and Arctic defense, highlighting the strained relations between Denmark and the U.S. [3].

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. government has officially blacklisted all foreign-manufactured drones and their components, citing "unacceptable national security threats," which significantly escalates efforts to curb Chinese drone manufacturers like DJI and Daotong [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has placed all foreign-made drones, including those from DJI, on a regulated "Covered List," prohibiting the approval of new drone models for sale in the U.S. [2] - This decision does not affect existing drone models that have already received FCC approval, meaning previously deployed drones will not be grounded [2]. Group 2: Industry Impact - DJI, a leading global drone manufacturer, expressed regret over the FCC's decision, stating it limits consumer choice and undermines fair market competition [6]. - The U.S. accounts for a significant portion of the global drone market, with Chinese manufacturers producing 70% to 80% of commercial drones, and DJI holding a 90% market share in the U.S. commercial sector [9]. Group 3: Political Reactions - U.S. lawmakers, particularly from the Republican Party, have celebrated the ban, framing it as a move to protect national security and bolster American drone manufacturers [5]. - The Chinese government has condemned the U.S. for misusing the concept of national security, arguing that such actions disrupt normal economic trade and harm global supply chain stability [5]. Group 4: Historical Context - The U.S. has a history of targeting Chinese drone manufacturers, with DJI previously placed on a sanctions list by the Department of Defense in 2017, alleging potential data sharing with the Chinese government [9]. - The Trump administration intensified these efforts, aiming to promote the U.S. drone industry and ensure supply chain independence from foreign control [9].