中化新网讯 近日，全生物降解地膜研发应用中心揭牌仪式在福建省农业科学院举行。 全生物降解地膜作为环境友好型农资产品，正逐步替代传统聚乙烯地膜，然而其在材料稳定性、产品适 用性和安全性等方面仍面临现实挑战。该中心将聚焦全生物降解地膜新产品创制、作物专用膜研发、产 品适用性评价、土壤生态安全性及降解微生物菌剂等方向开展系统攻关，力争推出一批新型地膜产品， 制定配套技术规程与标准，系统回答地膜应用对土壤—作物—环境的综合影响，为福建省农业绿色转型 提供科技支撑。 (罗阿华) ...

Core Viewpoint - The city has made significant progress in agricultural and rural development during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, focusing on enhancing agricultural production capacity, developing rural industries, and improving living conditions in rural areas [4][13]. Group 1: Agricultural Production and Supply - Grain production has shown a steady increase, with a total planting area of 3.82 million acres and a total output of approximately 30 billion pounds, marking a 14% increase compared to the end of the "13th Five-Year Plan" [5][14]. - The supply of "vegetable basket" products remains stable, with total production of vegetables, meat, eggs, and milk exceeding 800,000 tons, a 20% increase from the end of the "13th Five-Year Plan" [5][14]. - Agricultural production conditions have improved, with 840,000 acres of high-standard farmland newly built or upgraded during the "14th Five-Year Plan" period, and the total agricultural machinery power exceeding 3.1 million kilowatts [5][14]. Group 2: Saline-Alkali Land Utilization - The city has effectively utilized saline-alkali land, improving 145,900 acres and exploring various governance techniques [6][15]. - A comprehensive promotion system for crop varieties has been established, resulting in the development of 23 proprietary crop varieties, an increase of 19 from the end of the "13th Five-Year Plan" [6][15]. Group 3: Development of Specialty Agriculture - The city has fostered significant agricultural clusters, including a modern livestock industry and a modern fishery, with the total agricultural output value projected to reach 38.696 billion yuan in 2024, a 27.2% increase from the end of the "13th Five-Year Plan" [7][16]. - The number of agricultural leading enterprises has grown to 207, a 36% increase, with three enterprises entering the "Top 500 Agricultural Enterprises in China" [7][16]. - The brand influence of "Yellow River Mouth Agricultural Products" has significantly increased, with the brand value of Yellow River Mouth crabs and rice reaching 3.193 billion and 1.204 billion yuan, respectively [7][16]. Group 4: Rural Development and Environment - The city has implemented a rural revitalization action plan, covering over 40% of villages through the construction of 16 provincial, 28 municipal, and 17 county-level areas [8][17]. - Rural sanitation has improved, with 1,791 rural toilets rebuilt and 630 administrative villages undergoing wastewater treatment, achieving a 95% coverage rate for sanitary toilets [8][17]. - The city has effectively maintained poverty alleviation results, implementing 169 assistance projects with funding more than doubling compared to the "13th Five-Year Plan" period [8][17]. Group 5: Future Outlook - The modernization of agriculture and rural areas is crucial for China's overall modernization, with a commitment to prioritize agricultural and rural development in the "15th Five-Year Plan" [9][18].

Core Insights - The OECD report highlights that global agricultural support policies are at a high level, with a significant portion being distorting and misaligned with green transition needs, indicating substantial room for improvement [1] Group 1: Agricultural Support Policies - From 2022 to 2024, countries are expected to provide an average of $842 billion annually in positive support for agriculture, with distorting policies like market price support and output-based subsidies dominating, accounting for 66% of total support expenditures [1] - Support policies aimed at promoting agricultural green transition are notably weak, with technology innovation and infrastructure support making up only 2.4% of industry value, and agricultural knowledge and innovation systems support at a mere 0.5%, dropping to 0.3% in emerging economies [1] Group 2: Environmental Impact of Current Policies - Current agricultural support policies lack environmental conditions, with only 17% of policies having compliance requirements, and only 5% exceeding regulatory requirements [1] - Distorting subsidies lead to a vicious cycle in agricultural production, where higher yields encourage more inputs, resulting in increased pollution and environmental pressures such as greenhouse gas emissions, water pollution, soil degradation, and loss of biodiversity [2] Group 3: Consequences of Input Subsidies - Input subsidies are identified as a direct cause of pollution, as they lower fertilizer prices, leading to excessive application and subsequent soil and water contamination [3] - Energy subsidies for irrigation contribute to over-extraction of groundwater and increased greenhouse gas emissions, while output-based subsidies reinforce high-emission production systems [3] Group 4: Trade and Sustainability Challenges - As sustainability becomes a critical aspect of trade rules, countries are implementing more environmental requirements for agricultural products, but these measures lack coordination, increasing compliance costs for developing countries and small-scale producers [3] - The lack of unified and effective incentives for emission reduction or environmental improvement may lead to fragmented supply chains and a potential shift of production to countries with lower environmental standards, exacerbating global environmental pressures [3][4] Group 5: Trade Measures and Environmental Policies - Although environmental-related trade measures are increasing, their lack of coordination may create trade barriers and diminish the overall effectiveness of environmental policies, potentially leading to a situation where high and inconsistent standards result in insufficient compliant supply chains [4] - Farmers may prematurely discard products or increase inputs to meet compliance, indirectly raising agricultural carbon, water, and waste footprints, ultimately worsening overall environmental outcomes [4]

Core Insights - The OECD report highlights that global agricultural support policies are at a high level, with most being distorting and misaligned with green transition needs, indicating significant room for improvement [1] Group 1: Agricultural Support Policies - From 2022 to 2024, countries are expected to provide an average of $842 billion annually in positive support for agriculture, with distorting policies like market price support and output-based subsidies dominating, accounting for 66% of total support expenditures [1] - Support policies aimed at promoting green transition are notably weak, with technology innovation and infrastructure support making up only 2.4% of industry value, and agricultural knowledge and innovation systems support at a mere 0.5%, dropping to 0.3% in emerging economies [1] Group 2: Environmental Impact of Current Policies - A vicious cycle in agricultural production is noted, where distorting subsidies lead to higher production, which in turn encourages more inputs, resulting in increased pollution [2] - Current policies in developed countries, such as market price support and unlimited subsidies for fertilizers and energy, exacerbate environmental pressures, including greenhouse gas emissions and biodiversity loss [2] Group 3: Pollution and Subsidy Effects - Input subsidies are identified as a direct cause of pollution, as they encourage higher fertilizer application, leading to soil and water contamination [3] - The reliance on production-based subsidies solidifies a high-emission production system, while insufficient investment in green technologies exacerbates environmental pressures [3] Group 4: Trade and Sustainability Standards - As sustainability becomes a crucial part of trade rules, countries are implementing more environmental requirements for agricultural products, but these measures lack coordination, increasing compliance costs for developing countries and small producers [3] - The lack of unified and effective incentives for emission reduction or environmental improvement may lead to fragmented supply chains and a potential shift of production to countries with lower environmental standards, worsening global environmental pressures [3] Group 5: Trade Barriers and Environmental Policies - Rapid growth in environment-related trade measures is noted, but the lack of coordination may increase trade barriers and reduce the overall effectiveness of environmental policies, potentially leading to insufficient compliant supply chains [4] - Farmers may face increased costs to meet compliance, which could inadvertently raise their agricultural carbon, water, and waste footprints, ultimately deteriorating overall environmental outcomes [4]

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs emphasizes the need for a comprehensive green transformation in agriculture, which opens new avenues for banks to serve the agricultural sector [1] Group 1: Agricultural Green Transformation - The green transformation of agriculture requires long-term financial investment, with banks playing a crucial role as "blood suppliers" and "empowerers" [1] - The transformation faces challenges such as long cycles, strong public welfare nature, and unclear returns, necessitating banks to incorporate green transformation indicators into their credit rating systems [1][2] - Key areas for resource allocation include comprehensive utilization of livestock manure, research and development of green agricultural machinery, and carbon sequestration in planting [1] Group 2: Financial Product Innovation - The mismatch between traditional credit products and the needs of green transformation leads to issues of "difficult and expensive financing" [2] - Banks should innovate financial products tailored to the unique attributes of green agriculture, simplifying approval processes and adopting a "one-time approval, on-demand lending" model [2] - New collateral models should be explored, including loans backed by forestry carbon credits and pollution rights, to broaden financing channels for green agriculture [2] Group 3: Collaborative Efforts - The green transformation is a systemic project requiring collaboration among government, banks, enterprises, and farmers [3] - Banks need to break down "information silos" and strengthen cooperation with various departments to create a shared agricultural public information data platform [3] - Financial technology should be leveraged to enhance the accessibility and convenience of green financial services, particularly in rural areas [3] Group 4: Financial Responsibility and Goals - The comprehensive green transformation of agriculture is essential for food security and environmental improvement, presenting significant opportunities for banks [3] - Banks should integrate green development concepts into their agricultural financial services, ensuring continuous financial support flows into key areas of agricultural green transformation [3]

Core Insights - The 2025 Lancang-Mekong Agricultural Inputs Economic and Trade Cooperation Forum was held in Shanghai, focusing on enhancing agricultural cooperation between the Lancang-Mekong region and Central Asia [1][2] - The forum aims to promote agricultural green transformation, innovation in agricultural inputs technology, and regional economic cooperation [1][2] Group 1 - The forum marks the 9th anniversary of the Lancang-Mekong cooperation mechanism and is part of the "Year of High-Quality Development of China-Central Asia Cooperation" [1] - The event emphasizes the importance of communication and showcasing to deepen cooperation in the agricultural inputs sector [1][2] Group 2 - A proposal was made to enhance cooperation in three areas: ensuring agricultural stability and productivity, promoting green transformation of agricultural inputs, and building an integrated economic market [2] - The China Supply and Marketing Cooperative expressed willingness to share experiences in agricultural technology innovation and expand trade cooperation [2] - The forum is seen as a bridge for future collaborative development between the Lancang-Mekong and Central Asia, contributing to regional agricultural sustainability and food security [2]

Core Points - The 2025 Lancang-Mekong Agricultural Input Economic and Trade Cooperation Forum was held in Shanghai, focusing on enhancing agricultural cooperation among Lancang-Mekong, ASEAN, and Central Asian countries [1][2] - The forum gathered over 150 representatives from government departments, trade associations, cooperatives, and agricultural input enterprises from 12 countries [1] - The event emphasized the importance of agricultural green transformation, technological innovation in agricultural inputs, and regional economic cooperation [1] Summary by Sections Forum Objectives - The forum aims to strengthen communication and showcase agricultural cooperation between the Lancang-Mekong region and Central Asia, marking the 9th anniversary of the Lancang-Mekong cooperation mechanism [1] - It is also recognized as the "Year of High-Quality Development of China-Central Asia Cooperation" and the second "International Year of Cooperatives" by the United Nations [1] Key Suggestions - The Shanghai government proposed three key suggestions: building a new platform for green agricultural cooperation, expanding smart agriculture cooperation, and creating an open and win-win cooperation ecosystem [1] Technological Exchange - The forum featured a series of short videos titled "Lancang-Mekong Agricultural Lecture Hall," highlighting the development of China's plant protection drones and the organic fertilizer industry, facilitating regional agricultural technology exchange [2] Future Cooperation - The forum marked the first in-depth discussion on agricultural economic and trade cooperation between the Lancang-Mekong and Central Asian regions, establishing a bridge for future collaborative development and contributing to regional agricultural sustainability and food security [2]

Core Viewpoint - The 2025 China Phosphate and Compound Fertilizer Industry Exhibition showcased Xinyangfeng Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. as a leader in promoting agricultural green transformation and high-quality development through innovative products and systematic service solutions [1][8]. Group 1: Innovative Products - Xinyangfeng presented its "4+N" core products, focusing on "efficiency, specialization, environmental protection, and functionality," including high-value crop-specific fertilizers and upgraded sulfur-based compound fertilizers [1][9]. - The company's products were noted for their stability and quality, with positive feedback from attendees highlighting their non-caking properties [1]. Group 2: Interactive Demonstrations - The interactive trial area at the exhibition featured experiments demonstrating the quick dissolution of the bio-organic fertilizer "Yangfeng Dou" and the unique soil pH adjustment capabilities of the upgraded sulfur-based compound fertilizer "Yangfeng Supreme" [4][6]. Group 3: Research and Development - Xinyangfeng has established a comprehensive innovation system from product development to industrialization, supported by research bases in Jingmen and Beijing [7]. - The company emphasizes strict field trial validations, with multiple technical indicators exceeding national standards, reflecting its commitment to R&D investment and technological innovation [7]. Group 4: Industry Recognition - The exhibition attracted notable leaders and experts who praised Xinyangfeng's practices in driving green development through technological innovation [8][10]. - The company aims to enhance quality and efficiency by transitioning fertilizers from generic to functional types and upgrading production processes to be greener and smarter [9]. Group 5: Technical Services and Training - Xinyangfeng has built a professional technical service team of over 200 members, conducting over 10,000 training sessions and market observation meetings in 2024, benefiting over 610,000 participants [11]. - The company received accolades for its digital transformation and brand communication efforts, winning the "Traffic King" title in multiple categories [11]. Group 6: Future Outlook - Xinyangfeng plans to continue its commitment to green development and deepen its "three doubles and one more" strategy, focusing on ongoing technological innovation and service upgrades to contribute to agricultural modernization and food security [11].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the transition of the Dapu pomelo industry towards sustainable agricultural practices, focusing on the replacement of chemical fertilizers with green manure and organic fertilizers to restore soil health and enhance product quality [4][7][66]. Group 1: Soil Health and Agricultural Practices - The reliance on chemical fertilizers has led to soil degradation, including issues like soil acidification and reduced organic matter, which negatively impacts pomelo quality and increases market risks [12][14][15]. - A consensus has emerged among various stakeholders, including government agencies and local farmers, to explore the path of "green manure organic fertilizer replacement" to restore soil health and reduce chemical fertilizer dependency [16][18][19]. Group 2: Green Manure Benefits - Green manure is not merely about planting grass; it involves creating a micro-ecosystem that improves soil structure, conserves water, and enhances biodiversity [23][25]. - Leguminous green manures have nitrogen-fixing capabilities, converting atmospheric nitrogen into a form that plants can absorb, thus reducing the need for chemical nitrogen fertilizers [27][29]. Group 3: Implementation and Challenges - The successful implementation of green manure requires careful selection of species that are well-suited to local conditions, such as fast-growing varieties that can suppress weeds [30][34]. - The transition from expert knowledge to practical application in the fields involves a complex system of technical promotion, cost-benefit analysis, market incentives, and policy support [44][46]. Group 4: Market Dynamics and Future Outlook - The involvement of companies in providing specific products and solutions is crucial for the practical application of green manure techniques, reflecting a market response to the demand for sustainable agriculture [51][56]. - Establishing effective market return mechanisms is essential for motivating farmers to adopt green manure practices, with potential for premium pricing for higher quality, sustainably produced pomelos [60][62]. Group 5: Broader Implications - The exploration of sustainable practices in the Dapu pomelo industry signifies a shift from high-input agricultural models to a more sustainable approach that benefits both the environment and the economy [65][68].

Group 1 - The Fourth Smart Irrigation Conference was held in Jiangsu Kunshan on October 26-27, focusing on "Developing Smart Irrigation and Empowering Agricultural Water Conservation with Digital Technology" [1] - The smart irrigation industry in China has accelerated its development, achieving breakthroughs in technology research and development, equipment promotion, and application scale [1] - By 2024, the area of water-saving irrigation projects in China is expected to reach 6.38 million hectares, a 12.5% increase compared to the end of the 13th Five-Year Plan [1] Group 2 - The effective utilization coefficient of irrigation water in farmland is projected to reach 0.580 by 2024, with the average water usage per hectare of irrigated land reduced to 342 cubic meters, a 4% decrease from the end of the 13th Five-Year Plan [1] - The transition of agriculture in China is moving from a traditional model based on resource and input competition to a modern path relying on technology and innovation [2] - The Agricultural Research Institute has focused on "safe water supply, precise water control, and efficient water use" for smart irrigation technology innovation [2] Group 3 - Smart irrigation technology in China has shifted from single equipment improvement to systematic technological reconstruction, with results moving from generic technology supply to scenario-specific precision adaptation [3] - The integration of digital technology with agricultural water-saving practices is expected to enhance smart irrigation, ensuring efficient and ecological water use for every inch of arable land [3]