Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the prevalence of "corporate disease" in large internet companies, exploring its causes and potential remedies [3][4]. Group 1: Existence of "Corporate Disease" - Large internet companies, like those in other industries, commonly suffer from "corporate disease" as they scale [4]. - The article highlights that the inefficiencies seen in foreign financial institutions are mirrored in domestic financial firms, which have adopted similar bureaucratic processes [5]. Group 2: Causes of "Corporate Disease" - Rapid expansion of personnel in internet companies is often driven by personal interests of supervisors rather than actual business needs, leading to redundancy and inefficiency [6]. - The management style and culture adopted from traditional industries contribute to a decline in operational effectiveness, referred to as "financialization" [6][10]. Group 3: Challenges in Addressing "Corporate Disease" - Once an organization grows too large, reducing its size becomes challenging, and layoffs can further decrease morale and efficiency [9]. - Management is often aware of the issues but struggles to implement effective solutions due to the complexity of organizational structures [9][12]. Group 4: Cultural Misalignment - The rapid growth of internet companies often outpaces the evolution of their management practices, leading to a disconnect between the original entrepreneurial spirit and current corporate practices [10]. - The desire to emulate "elite" corporate cultures can lead to unsustainable practices that do not align with the company's operational needs [11][12]. Group 5: Conclusion on Treatment - Addressing "corporate disease" is complex and may not always be successful, as many large companies in traditional industries have also failed to overcome similar challenges [13].

Group 1 - Boeing has faced significant challenges in delivering aircraft to Chinese customers due to increased tariffs, which have doubled the import costs for Boeing planes in China [3][4] - The Chinese government has expressed concerns over the impact of U.S. tariffs on the aviation industry, emphasizing the need for a stable environment for trade and investment [3] - Boeing's CEO indicated that the company plans to shift focus to more stable demand from other customers if Chinese clients continue to refuse aircraft deliveries [4] Group 2 - Boeing reported a revenue of $19.496 billion for Q1 2025, an 18% increase year-over-year, but still incurred a net loss of $31 million, raising concerns about its ongoing financial struggles [6] - The company has experienced continuous net losses since Q1 2019, with significant annual losses recorded from 2020 to 2024, indicating a lack of recovery in its financial performance [6] - Boeing's debt-to-asset ratio has remained above 100% since 2019, reaching 112.6% in 2023, suggesting financial instability and reliance on government support [6] Group 3 - Boeing's reputation has been severely impacted by design flaws and quality control issues, particularly related to the 737 Max aircraft, which has been involved in multiple fatal accidents [8][10] - Internal reports suggest that pressure to increase production has compromised safety and quality, leading to significant operational challenges for the company [10] - A recent strike has further exacerbated Boeing's financial difficulties, with estimated losses exceeding $5.5 billion, highlighting ongoing issues with employee relations and management practices [10] Group 4 - Analysts predict that Boeing may recover from its financial losses this year, but ongoing issues related to tariffs and management practices could hinder its competitiveness against Airbus and emerging competitors like COMAC [11][12]