Core Viewpoint - The statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi regarding Taiwan are considered dangerous and indicative of a war policy, reflecting a resurgence of Japanese militarism that historically caused significant suffering in Asia [1][2]. Group 1: Japan's Militarism and Historical Context - Takaichi's remarks are seen as a representation of a war policy rather than a peace-oriented approach, raising concerns about the potential revival of militarism in Japan [1]. - The historical context of Japan's militarism is highlighted, emphasizing the need for vigilance against its resurgence, which could lead to catastrophic consequences for the region [1]. Group 2: Economic and Social Issues in Japan - Japan has been facing prolonged economic stagnation and various social issues for many years [2][4]. - Takaichi's promotion of war policies is perceived as an attempt to divert public attention from these domestic economic and social challenges [2][4]. - There is a concern that this strategy may not only fail to address the underlying issues but could also exacerbate the overall situation in Japanese society [4].

Core Viewpoint - The statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida regarding Taiwan are considered dangerous and indicative of a war policy, reflecting a resurgence of Japanese militarism that historically caused significant suffering in Asia [1][1][1] Group 1: Japan's Militarism and Historical Context - The remarks by Kishida are seen as a representation of a war policy rather than a peace-oriented approach, raising concerns about the revival of militarism in Japan [1][1] - Historical context is provided, highlighting that Japan's past militarism is linked to its wartime atrocities, which should not be overlooked [1][1] Group 2: Domestic Economic and Social Issues - Japan has been facing prolonged economic stagnation and various social issues for many years [1][1] - Kishida's promotion of a war policy is perceived as an attempt to divert public attention from these domestic economic and social challenges [1][1] - There is a concern that this strategy may lead to further deterioration of the overall social conditions in Japan [1][1]

妄言台湾问题，开启"潘多拉魔盒"？ | 新漫评 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 来源：中国新闻网 编辑：董文博 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 此番挑衅言论，无异于打开藏着日本军国主义亡魂的"潘多拉魔盒"，不仅意在将东亚推向军事对峙边 缘，更可能把日本引向万劫不复的战争歧途。日本政界和舆论纷纷批评，高市作为首相把日本拖入"国 家危机"，"罪责深重"。 历史不容遗忘。日本军国主义曾多次发动对外侵略，包括以"行使自卫权"为由悍然制造"九一八事变"， 挑起侵华战争，还曾侵略韩国、朝鲜、菲律宾、马来西亚、新加坡等国家，并对中国台湾地区等实行殖 民统治，犯下罄竹难书的罪行，给包括中国在内的亚洲乃至世界人民，带来深重灾难。 国际社会绝不允许日本军国主义否定历史、重蹈覆辙。如今，日本当政者妄图介入台海事务，是对国际 正义的粗暴践踏、对战后国际秩序的公然挑衅。日本军国主义的"魔盒"一旦打开，后果不堪设想，只 要"露头"，必将遭到迎头痛击！ 日本首相高市早 ...

Core Points - The spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mao Ning, emphasized that Japan's use of "existential crisis" and "self-defense" as justifications for external aggression is a common tactic of militarism [1][2] - Mao Ning highlighted that Japan's historical actions, such as the invasion of Northeast China in 1931 and the declaration of the "Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere," were framed as matters of national survival, leading to significant military conflicts [2] Summary by Sections - **Japan's Militaristic Tactics** - Japan has historically invoked "existential crisis" to justify military aggression, as seen in events like the Mukden Incident in 1931 and the Pacific War [2] - The international community must remain vigilant against any resurgence of militarism from Japan [2] - **Legal and Historical Context** - The concept of "collective self-defense" was established under the UN Charter to maintain international security and prevent the resurgence of fascism [1] - Post-World War II, Japan was restricted from exercising this right, as outlined in the Potsdam Declaration and its own constitution, which commits to renouncing war and military threats [1]

中方：以所谓"存亡危机"发动对外侵略是日本军国主义惯用伎俩 中新网北京11月19日电 (记者 黄钰钦)中国外交部发言人毛宁19日主持例行记者会。 有记者提问：近日有不少分析指出，在日本历任首相中，高市早苗第一个明确表态将"台湾有事"与"存 亡危机事态"相挂钩。这意味着一旦出现这种"事态"，日本即可行使所谓"集体自卫权"，日本武力介入 台海成为可能，这触犯了中方底线。发言人是否认同这种说法？ 毛宁：《联合国宪章》规定的"集体自卫权"是为维护国际社会集体安全、防止法西斯势力复活而创设的 权利。日本在二战后被限制行使这一权利。《波茨坦公告》明确规定日本"禁止重新武装"，日本在其宪 法中承诺"永远放弃发动战争、武力威胁或以武力作为解决国际争端的手段"，确立专守防卫原则。这些 都是日本作为战败国义务的法律化。 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 警钟已经敲响，悲剧不能重演。在中国人民抗日战争暨世界反法西斯战争胜利80周年之际，国际社会必 须高度警惕、坚决阻击任何复活军国主义的图谋，共同维护 ...

近日，日本首相高市早苗在国会答辩时悍然发表涉台露骨挑衅言论，进行武力威胁，发出战争叫嚣。 针对高市的错误言论，中国外交部发言人接连表态：日本当政者妄图介入台海事务，既是对国际正义的 粗暴践踏、对战后国际秩序的公然挑衅，也是对中日关系的严重破坏。如日方胆敢武力介入台海局势， 将构成侵略行为，中方必将迎头痛击！ 日本军国主义"毒素"正随着政治操弄的浇灌，不断扩散。这种蓄意散播的地缘政治病毒，不仅毒化地区 合作土壤，更企图让军国主义的残根在和平的花园中生长。必须斩断这些播撒混乱的毒手，让国际公义 的阳光洒满和平的土壤。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo regarding Taiwan represent a dangerous historical and strategic perspective, necessitating vigilance from the international community, especially Asian nations [1][2][3]. Group 1: Japan's Military and Strategic Posture - Kishi Nobuo's assertion that "Taiwan's issues equate to Japan's issues" reflects a troubling trend in Japanese politics, linking China's national unification with Japan's security [2]. - The historical context of Japanese militarism is invoked, highlighting past aggressions justified under the guise of "survival crises," which raises concerns about a potential resurgence of militaristic policies [2][3]. - Japan's recent shifts in security policy, including increased defense budgets and the pursuit of offensive capabilities, indicate a significant and concerning strategic pivot [3]. Group 2: Historical Context and Implications - Japan's historical actions in Taiwan, including colonization and wartime aggression, are emphasized, underscoring the moral implications of current political rhetoric [3]. - The article stresses that Taiwan is a core interest for China, and any external interference in its resolution is unacceptable, reinforcing China's sovereignty [3]. - The 80th anniversary of the victory in the Anti-Japanese War is highlighted, contrasting Japan's historical aggressions with China's current resolve to maintain territorial integrity [3].

Core Viewpoint - The statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo regarding Taiwan represent a dangerous historical and strategic perspective, necessitating vigilance from the international community, especially Asian nations [1][2][3] Group 1: Political Implications - Kishi Nobuo's assertion that "Taiwan's issues equate to Japan's issues" reflects a troubling trend in Japanese politics, linking China's national unity with Japan's security [2] - The rhetoric surrounding "survival crisis" has historical precedents in Japan's militaristic past, raising concerns about a potential resurgence of militarism [2][3] Group 2: Historical Context - Japan has a significant historical responsibility regarding Taiwan, having occupied it for half a century and committing numerous atrocities [3] - The return of Taiwan to China post-World War II is supported by international legal documents, yet Japan's current stance undermines this historical resolution [3] Group 3: Military and Security Concerns - Japan's recent shifts in security policy, including increased defense budgets and the potential development of offensive weapons, indicate a move towards militarization [3] - The current administration's ambiguous stance on nuclear policies raises alarms about Japan's intentions, suggesting a departure from its post-war pacifism [3]

Core Points - The article discusses the historical significance of Etajima, a location in Japan that played a crucial role in the development of the Japanese Navy and military ideology during the Meiji Restoration and beyond [4][5][12] - It highlights the transformation of Japan's military from traditional samurai influences to a modern naval power, emphasizing the importance of the Navy in Japan's rise and fall [4][12] - The narrative also touches on the legacy of key figures in Japanese naval history, such as Tōgō Heihachirō and Yamamoto Isoroku, and their impact on Japan's military ethos [7][12] Summary by Sections Historical Context - Etajima is located in the Seto Inland Sea, near Hiroshima, and is part of Hiroshima Prefecture, which is significant for understanding modern Japanese history [1][3] - The Meiji Restoration marked a shift towards Westernization and militarism in Japan, with the Navy being a central element of this transformation [4][12] Naval Education and Legacy - The Etajima Naval Academy, established in 1870, is compared to prestigious naval academies in the UK and the US, serving as a training ground for Japan's naval leaders [5][7] - The academy has historical ties to significant naval victories, such as the Battle of Tsushima, which established Japan's dominance in East Asia [9][12] Cultural and Military Significance - The article discusses the "Etajima Spirit," which embodies loyalty and sacrifice, but also critiques the loss of the pursuit of excellence that once characterized Japan's military ethos [12][24] - The narrative reflects on the remnants of Japan's naval history, including museums and memorials that preserve the legacy of the Imperial Navy [11][19] Modern Implications - The discussion extends to the current state of Japan's Self-Defense Forces and their naval capabilities, highlighting advancements and comparisons with other nations [15][17] - The article concludes with a call for awareness of Japan's militaristic past and the importance of historical understanding in fostering future peace between Japan and its neighbors [24][25]

Core Viewpoint - Japan's defense budget for fiscal year 2026 is set to reach a record high of 8.85 trillion yen, indicating a significant military expansion that raises concerns about a resurgence of militarism in Japan [1] Group 1: Defense Budget and Military Expansion - The Japanese Ministry of Defense has announced a budget draft that will result in a defense budget of 8.85 trillion yen for fiscal year 2026, marking a historical peak [1] - Japan plans to deploy improved Type 12 land-based anti-ship missiles in Kyushu, which will have a range covering the coastal areas of China [1] Group 2: International Concerns and Historical Context - The spokesperson for the Ministry of National Defense expressed that Japan's accelerated military expansion and development of offensive weaponry exceed the requirements of its "defensive-only" policy, raising alarms among peace-loving nations [1] - The statement highlighted the historical context of Japan's militarism, referencing the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's Anti-Japanese War and the global anti-fascist war, emphasizing the need for Japan to reflect on its invasion history and respect the security concerns of Asian neighbors [1]