Group 1 - The core narrative revolves around the contrasting impacts of tax reform and tariffs on the U.S. economy, with tax cuts expected to stimulate growth while tariffs may hinder consumer purchasing power and economic expansion [1][4][5] - Economists are skeptical about the effectiveness of tariffs in boosting domestic manufacturing and employment, with many predicting that the negative impact of tariffs will outweigh the positive effects of tax reforms [1][6] - The average tariff rate has increased significantly from 2.5% at the beginning of the year to approximately 15%, which is estimated to act as a tax increase equivalent to 1% to 1.5% of GDP [6][7] Group 2 - The U.S. Treasury Secretary projected a growth rate close to 3% within a year, while independent analyses suggest a much lower impact from tax cuts on GDP growth [5][6] - Consumer confidence has dropped to the second-lowest level on record, and inflation expectations have reached multi-decade highs, indicating potential economic strain [6] - The tax savings from reforms may be offset by rising prices due to tariffs, particularly affecting low-income households [7]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting between House Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris and President Trump highlighted the significant challenges Trump faces in achieving his proposed tax reforms [1] Group 1 - Andy Harris emphasized that there is still a long way to go for Trump to realize his tax reform agenda [1]

美国众议长约翰逊：我们"几乎就要"达成税改协议。 非常相信我们将完成税改立法谈判。 ...

白宫新闻秘书Leavitt：白宫本周末将讨论税改问题。 ...

当地时间5月16日，由共和党主导的美国众议院预算委员会否决了一项涵盖税改和医保调整的特朗普政 府法案。据悉，这项法案价值数万亿美元。五位共和党内保守派强硬派与所有民主党议员一同投下反对 票。知情人士透露，未来几天共和党将继续与党内持反对意见的议员磋商，并希望最快于下周一(19日) 重新推进立法进程。共和党领导层表示，该法案尚不成熟，税收与医疗补助条款仍需大幅修改才能赢得 保守派支持。(央视新闻) ...

Core Viewpoint - The tax reform proposal supported by President Trump failed to pass through a House committee due to disagreements among Republicans regarding costs [1] Group 1: Tax Reform Proposal - The proposal faced opposition from hardline conservatives who demanded further cuts to Medicaid [1]

智通财经5月17日电，特朗普税改案在美国众议院委员会未通过，共和党在成本问题上有分歧。 ...

在共和党人就是否提高百万富翁的税率进行了数周的辩论之后，该提案并未包括对最富有的美国人增税。该法案将永久延续特朗普2017年税法中设定的 37%的个人最高税率。尽管特朗普上周还告诉众议院议长迈克·约翰逊，他希望对收入超过250万美元的个人征收39.6%的税率。 这份提案是共和党控制的众议院向本月内进行全院表决迈出的关键一步，也是特朗普立法议程的核心。然而，由于众议院共和党席位优势微弱，特朗普 需要党内几乎一致的支持才能通过该法案。 SALT上限调整：政治妥协与地区博弈 法案草案将州地方税扣除上限(SALT)从目前的1万美元提高至3万美元，适用于个人和夫妇，但对收入超过20万美元的单身纳税人或40万美元的联合申 报者设限。 SHMET 网讯：共和党公布万亿级税改方案，将SALT扣除限额提至3万美元，取消小费和加班税，剔除富人税增提议，同时寻求提高债务上限4万亿美 元。 美东时间周一，根据媒体报道，众议院税务委员会公布了特朗普税改方案，提出在未来十年减税超过4万亿美元，同时削减开支至少1.5万亿美元。根据 报道，该法案还寻求将国家债务上限提高4万亿美元，低于参议院倾向的5万亿美元水平。这一举措旨在将任何额外债务上 ...

Group 1 - The Republican Party in the U.S. House of Representatives is planning to limit tax deductions for corporate executives earning over $1 million, potentially expanding the scope to include retired executives [1][3] - This move is seen as a political strategy to balance interests between middle-class voters and wealthy donors, while also aiming to fill budget gaps with increased corporate taxes [3][4] - The proposed policy could result in an additional $12 billion in annual tax payments from S&P 500 companies, impacting executive compensation structures such as stock options and bonuses [3] Group 2 - The increased corporate tax burden may lead to higher prices for consumers and reduced employee benefits, ultimately affecting the working class [4] - The political maneuvering is perceived as a complex strategy to maintain support from both middle-class voters and corporate interests, while extending benefits from the 2017 tax cuts [4] - The uncertainty surrounding the final details of the proposal raises questions about its actual impact, with concerns that it may only target less significant positions rather than affecting major corporate executives [4]

智通财经5月2日电，美国总统特朗普表示，如果国会山不批准重大的税改草案，税收将上升68%。 ...