会议讨论并原则通过《中华人民共和国国家消防救援人员法（草案）》，决定将草案提请全国人大常委 会审议。会议指出，消防救援人员是人民生命和财产安全的卫士。国家综合性消防救援队伍组建以来， 有效处置一系列重特大事故灾害，受到社会各界普遍赞誉和信赖。要进一步明确消防救援队伍职责纪 律、人员管理、待遇保障等制度安排，提升正规化、专业化、职业化建设水平。要着力增强基层消防救 援能力，聚焦薄弱环节强化风险隐患排查整治，加强先期处置、转移疏散等综合演练，夯实消防安全治 理基础，坚决防范遏制重特大火灾事故发生。 会议指出，要严厉打击涉烟违法活动，全方位全链条加强烟草生产、仓储、物流、分销、零售等监管执 法，持续净化烟草市场环境，切实维护国家利益和消费者权益。 会议还研究了其他事项。 国务院总理李强12月5日主持召开国务院常务会议，研究进一步做好节能降碳工作，听取规范涉企行政 执法专项行动情况汇报并审议通过《行政执法监督条例（草案）》，讨论《中华人民共和国国家消防救 援人员法（草案）》，部署全链条打击涉烟违法活动有关举措。 会议指出，节能降碳是推进碳达峰碳中和、加快发展方式绿色转型的重要抓手。要更高水平更高质量做 好节能降碳工作 ...

会议指出，涉企行政执法关系营商环境的优化、市场预期的稳定。今年以来，各地区各部门认真开展规 范涉企行政执法专项行动，取得积极成效。要聚焦重点难点、长效系统施治，推动由个案纠偏向类案规 范、由问题整治向机制完善深化拓展，不断提升行政执法规范化水平。要通过制定实施《行政执法监督 条例》，强化全方位、全流程监督，进一步厘清执法权责边界，压实规范执法责任，对滥用职权、任性 执法等行为严肃追责问责，使行政权力始终在法治轨道上运行。 会议讨论并原则通过《中华人民共和国国家消防救援人员法（草案）》，决定将草案提请全国人大常委 会审议。会议指出，消防救援人员是人民生命和财产安全的卫士。国家综合性消防救援队伍组建以来， 有效处置一系列重特大事故灾害，受到社会各界普遍赞誉和信赖。要进一步明确消防救援队伍职责纪 律、人员管理、待遇保障等制度安排，提升正规化、专业化、职业化建设水平。要着力增强基层消防救 ● 新华社北京12月5日电 国务院总理李强12月5日主持召开国务院常务会议，研究进一步做好节能降碳工作，听取规范涉企行政 执法专项行动情况汇报并审议通过《行政执法监督条例（草案）》，讨论《中华人民共和国国家消防救 援人员法（草案）》 ...

新华社北京12月5日电（记者齐琪）5日召开的国务院常务会议，听取规范涉企行政执法专项行动情 况汇报并审议通过《行政执法监督条例（草案）》。 涉企行政执法关系营商环境的优化、市场预期的稳定。会议指出，今年以来，各地区各部门认真开 展规范涉企行政执法专项行动，取得积极成效。要聚焦重点难点、长效系统施治，推动由个案纠偏向类 案规范、由问题整治向机制完善深化拓展，不断提升行政执法规范化水平。 记者从司法部了解到，今年3月以来，司法部统筹组织政府系统的规范涉企行政执法专项行动，各 地区、各部门高度重视，同题共答，扎实推进。截至11月，全国共查纠涉企行政执法突出问题案件5.4 万件，行政检查总量下降32.9%，发现问题比例平均提高近17个百分点。 会议提出，要通过制定实施《行政执法监督条例》，强化全方位、全流程监督，进一步厘清执法权 责边界，压实规范执法责任，对滥用职权、任性执法等行为严肃追责问责，使行政权力始终在法治轨道 上运行。 不久前，司法部发布《行政执法人员行为准则》，聚焦企业和群众反映强烈的行政执法突出问题， 尤其是规范涉企行政执法专项行动明确的四类重点问题作出规定。督促行政执法人员树牢执法为民理 念，提升企业 ...

记者从司法部了解到，今年3月以来，司法部统筹组织政府系统的规范涉企行政执法专项行动，各地 区、各部门高度重视，同题共答，扎实推进。截至11月，全国共查纠涉企行政执法突出问题案件5.4万 件，行政检查总量下降32.9%，发现问题比例平均提高近17个百分点。 新华社北京12月5日电（记者齐琪）5日召开的国务院常务会议，听取规范涉企行政执法专项行动情况汇 报并审议通过《行政执法监督条例（草案）》。 涉企行政执法关系营商环境的优化、市场预期的稳定。会议指出，今年以来，各地区各部门认真开展规 范涉企行政执法专项行动，取得积极成效。要聚焦重点难点、长效系统施治，推动由个案纠偏向类案规 范、由问题整治向机制完善深化拓展，不断提升行政执法规范化水平。 不久前，司法部发布《行政执法人员行为准则》，聚焦企业和群众反映强烈的行政执法突出问题，尤其 是规范涉企行政执法专项行动明确的四类重点问题作出规定。督促行政执法人员树牢执法为民理念，提 升企业和群众的获得感、幸福感、安全感，推动规范涉企行政执法专项行动进一步走深走实。 据悉，司法部将持续加强行政执法监督，完善行政裁量权基准制度，健全规范涉企执法长效机制，持续 提升严格规范公正文明 ...

Core Insights - Jiangmen City has launched a new administrative inspection system called "Bright Code Entry into Enterprises," aimed at enhancing the efficiency and transparency of administrative checks on businesses [1][2] - The initiative leverages digital technology to ensure that enforcement personnel display their electronic credentials and QR codes during inspections, allowing businesses to verify their identities and provide feedback [1] - Significant reductions in administrative checks and penalties have been reported since the implementation of the new system, with a 55% decrease in inspections and a 15% drop in penalty income from January to October this year [2] Group 1 - The "Bright Code Entry into Enterprises" system requires enforcement personnel to present electronic credentials and QR codes during inspections, which are automatically generated and linked to specific individuals [1] - The system allows for real-time supervision by administrative enforcement supervisors, enabling quick alerts for issues such as duplicate or excessive inspections [1] - Businesses can scan the QR codes to verify the identity of inspectors, review inspection notices, and submit feedback [1] Group 2 - Jiangmen has completed the deployment and configuration of the new system and has conducted extensive training for enforcement personnel [2] - Key performance indicators have shown a significant decline since the start of the special action to standardize administrative enforcement, with a 37% decrease in the number of administrative penalty cases handled by various levels of enforcement departments [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Shenzhen Municipal Government has introduced the "Shenzhen Administrative Law Enforcement Supervision Code Management Regulations" to enhance the supervision of administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, aiming to reduce arbitrary inspections and improve the business environment [1][2]. Background of the Regulations - The national government has prioritized the standardization of administrative law enforcement concerning enterprises, launching a special action in March to address prominent issues raised by businesses [2]. - The introduction of the enforcement supervision code aims to utilize information technology to enhance the efficiency of law enforcement supervision and to standardize administrative law enforcement practices [2][3]. - Historically, enterprises have faced issues such as multiple, redundant, and arbitrary inspections, which have diverted their focus and resources [2]. Importance of the Regulations - The enforcement supervision code system connects law enforcement bodies and business entities, allowing for real-time monitoring of the entire enforcement process [4]. - The system enables businesses to track enforcement activities and file complaints against non-compliant behaviors, thus enhancing accountability and transparency [4][5]. - The regulations aim to establish a long-term mechanism for the application of the enforcement supervision code, transitioning successful pilot practices into formal regulations [4]. Next Steps - The Shenzhen Municipal Justice Bureau plans to continue improving the system's functionality and promoting the standardization of administrative law enforcement actions [7]. - There will be an emphasis on legal education and compliance guidance for enterprises to better support their development and enhance the legal business environment in Shenzhen [7].

Core Insights - Sichuan has launched a special action to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, collecting 1,828 problem clues and rectifying 1,740 issues since March, recovering economic losses of 34.45 million yuan for businesses [1][2] Group 1: Administrative Law Enforcement Actions - The special action focuses on key areas, regions, and issues, implementing measures such as publishing enforcement entities, standardizing administrative penalty discretion, and enhancing supervision of major enterprise-related law enforcement [1] - The action has shown initial results in addressing "four chaos" issues, particularly in reducing arbitrary fines, inspections, seizures, and charges [1] Group 2: Specific Issues Addressed - In terms of "arbitrary fines," Sichuan has refined the criteria for administrative penalties, leading to a nearly 70% increase in cases not subject to penalties [1] - Regarding "arbitrary inspections," local departments have established 150 regulations, resulting in a significant decrease in on-site inspections and a steady rise in non-intrusive checks [1] - For "arbitrary seizures," 47 regulations were introduced, correcting 82 cases of wrongful seizures and allowing five companies to unfreeze accounts, releasing 340,000 yuan [1] - Concerning "arbitrary charges," 49 regulations were implemented, resulting in the return of 1.3 million yuan to businesses [1] Group 3: Digital Initiatives - Sichuan has fully implemented the "Tianfu Enterprise Code" since September 1, with plans for statewide implementation by April 1 next year, allowing businesses to refuse inspections if the code is not presented [2] - The initiative aims to enhance transparency, traceability, and supervision of administrative checks through digital means, fundamentally curbing the issue of arbitrary inspections [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the introduction of eight measures by the market regulatory authorities in the Yangtze River Delta region to standardize cross-regional law enforcement practices, aiming to prevent unfair competition and protect the legitimate rights of private enterprises [1][3]. Group 1: Background and Rationale - The Yangtze River Delta region is characterized by geographical proximity, cultural similarities, and economic integration, which provides a strong foundation for the implementation of these measures [3]. - The measures are a response to the need for regulating "offshore fishing" style law enforcement that disrupts fair competition and harms the development momentum of local economies [1][3]. Group 2: Definition and Scope of Cross-Regional Law Enforcement - The article defines "cross-regional law enforcement" as actions taken by market regulatory authorities from Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, and Anhui to investigate entities outside their jurisdiction [3]. - Emphasis is placed on minimizing the impact of such enforcement on the normal operations of businesses [3][8]. Group 3: Key Measures Introduced - The measures include prioritizing collaborative investigations and requiring local regulatory authorities to accompany enforcement personnel during cross-regional activities [4]. - Legal evidence obtained in any region of the Yangtze River Delta will be mutually recognized to prevent redundant evidence collection [6]. - Administrative coercive measures will be applied cautiously to avoid disrupting normal business activities [8]. - There will be a unified approach to administrative penalties to prevent excessive or insufficient penalties and to enhance the overall quality of law enforcement [11]. Group 4: Conflict Resolution and Communication - A mechanism for resolving jurisdictional disputes between different provincial regulatory authorities will be established, with enforcement activities suspended during the negotiation period [13]. - For cases of significant public interest or media attention, a case discussion mechanism will be organized to facilitate the exchange of opinions and achieve a balance of political, social, and legal outcomes [15]. - Channels for reporting suspected violations of cross-regional law enforcement will be improved to enhance awareness of legal rights among businesses [17].

Core Viewpoint - The Urumqi Market Supervision Bureau in Xinjiang is enhancing its regulatory practices by implementing a series of measures aimed at creating a fair and law-based business environment, focusing on administrative inspections related to enterprises and optimizing services [1] Group 1: Regulatory Measures - The bureau has strictly enforced an administrative inspection filing mechanism, ensuring compliance with the "Tacheng Region's Implementation Plan for Scanning Enterprises" [1] - A "scan code" system has been introduced for inspections, requiring prior approval and ensuring transparency during the inspection process [1] - The bureau has adopted a reasoning-based enforcement approach, adhering to a "first violation not penalized, minor violations exempted" policy, which has resulted in 4 cases not penalized, 17 cases with reduced penalties, and 11 cases with lighter penalties [1] Group 2: Service Optimization - The bureau has implemented a "three documents delivered simultaneously" mechanism, providing guidance for credit restoration alongside administrative penalty decisions [1] - Public access to complaint and reporting channels for administrative enforcement has been established, promoting social oversight [1] - Joint inspections have been conducted in collaboration with various departments, reducing redundant checks and enhancing efficiency [1] Group 3: Capacity Building - The bureau has developed a code of conduct for enforcement personnel, clarifying various enforcement processes and requirements [1] - Training sessions and case studies have been organized to improve the legal knowledge and capabilities of enforcement staff [1] - The goal is to build a high-quality, disciplined, and public-satisfaction-oriented administrative enforcement team to support the high-quality economic and social development of the city [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of standardizing administrative law enforcement related to enterprises to support healthy economic development, optimize the business environment, and protect the legitimate rights and interests of enterprises [1] Group 1: Administrative Law Enforcement Practices - The national ecological environment system has actively carried out a special action to standardize administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, achieving positive results through various effective measures [1] - Many localities have strictly implemented relevant deployments and requirements, utilizing advanced technologies such as satellite remote sensing and drones to enhance regulatory effectiveness while reducing on-site enforcement [1] Group 2: Issues in Law Enforcement - Some local practices have shown concerning behaviors, such as equating fewer enforcement actions with stronger execution, imposing additional conditions for on-site enforcement, and substituting avoidance of enforcement for standardized enforcement [1][2] - These inappropriate practices have negatively impacted ecological environment protection and need to be corrected [1] Group 3: Distinction Between Administrative and Civil Domains - A significant reason for these improper practices is the confusion between the "administrative domain" and the "civil domain," where the former involves public management actions characterized by legality and authority, while the latter involves equal interactions among civil subjects [2] - Ecological environment administrative law enforcement should maintain sufficient deterrence and authority, and not weaken the rigidity and dignity of enforcement [2] Group 4: Improving Law Enforcement Quality - There is a need to balance the intensity and warmth of ecological environment law enforcement, ensuring that enforcement is both effective and considerate [3] - Law enforcement personnel should enhance their awareness of the overall situation, combining principles with discretionary power, and consider the severity of violations and the attitude of responsible parties when deciding on penalties [3] - Encouraging compliance through education and guidance can help enterprises reduce the likelihood of penalties, fostering a cooperative relationship between local governments and enterprises [3]