2026.01. 19 制度层面，《行政执法人员行为准则》与《行政执法监督条例》也相继出台，前者明确了行政执法人员行为红线，便于行政执法人员全面掌握和严格遵 守，后者作为我国第一部关于行政执法监督制度的国家层面专门立法，将为规范行政执法、强化监督机制提供重要制度保障。 司法部此前表示，将推动专项行动从集中整治向常态化规范延伸。1月5日，司法部组织全国规范涉企行政执法专项行动视频培训。司法部党组成员、副 部长胡卫列明确了延长专项行动的任务、安排和要求，对如何建立健全规范涉企执法长效机制、准确理解把握新出台的《行政执法监督条例》进行了重 点阐释。 同时，他对延长期间有关工作作出部署，强调专项行动要以企业的可感可知为出发点和落脚点，推动由个案纠偏向类案规范、由问题整治向机制完善深 化拓展，在抓好重点任务落实、巩固深化专项行动成果基础上，总结提炼创新经验做法，强化成果运用，增强企业获得感，提振发展信心，稳定市场预 期，优化营商环境，纵深推进全国统一大市场建设。 本文字数：990，阅读时长大约2分钟 作者 | 第一财经 安然然 2026年，司法部将重点健全规范涉企行政执法长效机制，常态化纠治执法突出问题，持续推进行政执 ...

记者从1月19日司法部举行的全国司法厅(局)长会议获悉，2025年，司法牵头组织开展规范涉企行政执 法专项行动，有效纠治"四乱"等突出问题，全国涉企行政检查总量下降33%，发现问题比例平均提高 18.5个百分点。 2025年，司法行政系统首次对监狱干警和3.9万名司法所长开展全覆盖政治培训，2023年以来连续三年 举办高规格的律师培训班，实现党员专职律师全覆盖培训，行业新风正气持续充盈。统筹推进立改废 释，重点领域、新兴领域和涉外领域法律法规制修订工作提质增效，去年审查完成53件法律法规。深化 运用"小快灵"模式，牵头起草急需的法规制度。审查法规规章2508件，维护国家法治统一。加力提升行 政复议质效，办理111.5万件，90%以上实质性化解。深化各类调解衔接联动的工作格局，全年调解 1653.7万件。(经济日报记者刘亮) ...

推动由问题整治向机制完善深化拓展。 2026年，司法部将重点健全规范涉企行政执法长效机制，常态化纠治执法突出问题，持续推进行政执法 规范化建设。 1月19日，司法部召开全国司法厅（局）长会议，提出上述内容。据新华社报道，2025年，司法部牵头 组织开展规范涉企行政执法专项行动，有效纠治"四乱"等突出问题，全国涉企行政检查总量下降33%， 发现问题比例平均提高18.5个百分点。 2025年3月以来，规范涉企行政执法专项行动在全国范围内全面推开。专项行动聚焦纠治四类突出问 题：一是乱收费、乱罚款、乱检查、乱查封问题；二是违规异地执法和趋利性执法行为；三是执法标准 不一致，要求不统一，加重企业负担的行为；四是滥用职权、徇私枉法、该罚不罚、"吃拿卡要"、粗暴 执法等违反执法规范要求的行为。 《法治日报》此前报道，截至2025年12月31日，全国共查纠涉企行政执法突出问题案件5.6万件，为企 业挽回经济损失289.3亿元。2025年9月以来，司法部还发布多批典型案例，为各地区各部门开展专项行 动提供借鉴。 制度层面，《行政执法人员行为准则》与《行政执法监督条例》也相继出台，前者明确了行政执法人员 行为红线，便于行政执法 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the proactive measures taken by the government in Heilongjiang's Nenjiang City to address the challenges faced by agricultural enterprises regarding machinery inspection, thereby improving operational efficiency and reducing costs for farmers [1][2][3]. Group 1: Government Initiatives - The Nenjiang City government has identified the difficulties faced by agricultural enterprises, such as inconvenient machinery inspections and time constraints during busy seasons, as key issues to address [1]. - A new "on-site inspection" service model has been implemented, shifting from "enterprises sending machines for inspection" to "inspectors visiting enterprises," which effectively ensures timely inspections and reduces costs [1][2]. Group 2: Impact on Agricultural Enterprises - Since the implementation of the new inspection model, over 1,900 agricultural machines have been inspected, with the average inspection time reduced from 3 days to 0.5 days, saving enterprises over 410,000 yuan in transportation costs [2]. - The proactive approach of inspectors visiting fields for supplementary inspections ensures that machinery is continuously operational while still meeting safety inspection requirements [2]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The initiative is part of a larger effort by the Ministry of Justice to reform administrative law enforcement, focusing on transforming from passive regulation to active service, and from post-event corrections to preemptive measures [3]. - The Ministry aims to enhance the regulatory environment for businesses, ensuring that administrative practices are more aligned with the needs of enterprises, thereby fostering market vitality and improving the overall business climate [3].

司法部：推动执法工作从"被动监管"向"主动服务"转变 中新网北京1月14日电 (记者 谢雁冰)司法部14日发布规范涉企行政执法专项行动为民办实事第三批典型 案例。 据介绍，规范涉企行政执法专项行动深入开展以来，各地深入贯彻落实党中央、国务院决策部署，在严 肃纠治执法乱象的基础上，更加注重源头治理、系统施策和效能提升，推动执法工作从"被动监 管"向"主动服务"转变、从"事后纠偏"向"事前预防"延伸，以一系列有力度、有温度、有创新的实践举 措，破解企业群众急难愁盼问题，让经营主体感受到实实在在的变化。 本批案例涵盖吉林、黑龙江、福建、江西、山东、河南、云南、宁夏等省(自治区)，涉及执法模式创 新、审批服务优化、权益保障强化等多个维度，集中展现了各地在规范涉企行政执法中"问需于企、精 准施策"的生动实践。 下一步，司法部将继续指导各地以典型案例为引领，进一步推动执法理念革新、方式创新和制度完善， 将专项行动中的有效做法转化为长效制度机制，持续提升行政执法的规范化、精细化水平，为优化营商 环境、推动高质量发展提供更加坚实的法治保障。(完) 来源：中国新闻网 编辑：张嘉怡 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 本文为转载内容，授 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Justice has released a batch of typical cases to demonstrate the effective practices in administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, emphasizing the shift from passive regulation to proactive service and from post-event correction to pre-event prevention [1][4]. Group 1: Innovative Law Enforcement Mechanisms - Various regions have introduced efficient and collaborative new forms of law enforcement, such as the "on-site inspection" model in Heilongjiang, which reduces costs for enterprises by providing inspections at their locations [2][6]. - In Jilin, a strategy combining flexible law enforcement with source governance has been implemented to address the parking difficulties faced by large trucks, improving logistics efficiency and reducing costs for enterprises [3][9]. Group 2: Optimizing Service Supply - Local governments are proactively integrating resources to provide targeted guidance services to enterprises, helping them overcome technical, safety, and approval challenges, as seen in Shandong where a collaborative approach provided comprehensive safety guidance [2][12]. - In Ningxia, the approval process for fire safety checks has been streamlined, reducing the processing time from 13 days to 7 days, thus enhancing service efficiency while ensuring safety [3][14]. Group 3: Collaborative Precise Policies - In Henan, cross-departmental collaboration has optimized construction plans, ensuring projects are completed efficiently while benefiting enterprises and the public [3][16]. - Yunnan has effectively addressed malicious claims against small and medium enterprises through training and legal support, enhancing their ability to respond to such issues [3][20]. Group 4: Exploring New Law Enforcement Service Models - In Fujian, a "market day" joint inspection mechanism has been introduced to reduce the burden of multiple inspections on enterprises, significantly improving satisfaction rates [3][22]. - In Jiangxi, a random allocation system for market stalls has been implemented to ensure fair distribution among vendors, addressing complaints about unfair practices [3][26].

Core Viewpoint - The introduction of the Administrative Law Enforcement Supervision Regulations marks a significant step towards the rule of law in administrative law enforcement in China, effective from February 1, 2026, and aims to enhance the supervision of administrative law enforcement, particularly concerning enterprises [3]. Group 1: Legislative Developments - The Administrative Law Enforcement Supervision Regulations represent the first national-level legislation specifically addressing administrative law enforcement supervision in China [3]. - The regulations are designed to consolidate the experiences gained from recent special actions aimed at standardizing administrative law enforcement related to enterprises [4]. Group 2: Impact on Enterprises - Since the launch of the special action to standardize administrative law enforcement, 56,000 cases of prominent issues related to enterprise law enforcement have been addressed, recovering economic losses of 28.93 billion yuan for businesses [3]. - The special action has led to a 32.9% year-on-year decrease in the total number of administrative inspections, while the problem detection rate has increased by nearly 17 percentage points, indicating improved precision and effectiveness in inspections [4][8]. Group 3: Systematic Governance - The special action has effectively curbed issues such as arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and illegal enforcement practices, which are of significant concern to enterprises [4]. - A total of 137 administrative discretion benchmarks have been established, and 1.587 million administrative law enforcement cases have been reviewed, enhancing the overall governance of administrative law enforcement [4]. Group 4: Optimizing Business Environment - Business leaders have expressed that the special action has significantly improved their sense of gain and trust in the government, viewing it as a crucial step in optimizing the business environment [7]. - The focus of the administrative enforcement is shifting towards helping enterprises develop healthily rather than merely imposing penalties, fostering a new atmosphere of trust between government and businesses [7]. Group 5: Future Directions - The Ministry of Justice emphasizes the need for a balanced approach in law enforcement, ensuring that it is neither excessive nor insufficient, particularly in sectors closely related to public health and safety [5][6]. - Continuous efforts are required to deepen the results of the special action and establish long-term mechanisms for the standardization and supervision of administrative law enforcement [8].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the need to rectify issues related to administrative law enforcement against enterprises, focusing on eliminating "four chaos" problems: arbitrary charges, fines, inspections, and seizures, while also addressing improper behavior by enforcement personnel and inconsistencies in enforcement standards [1] - The Ministry of Justice has released a third batch of typical cases that showcase various practices across regions aimed at strengthening case correction while emphasizing mechanism construction, highlighting the role of administrative law enforcement supervision in resolving inconsistencies and correcting unlawful or improper enforcement actions [1][2] - There are reported cases of enforcement personnel engaging in improper conduct, such as interfering with merchant operations, soliciting bribes, and mismanaging seized assets, which undermine fair market competition and damage government credibility [2] Group 2 - The separation of penalties and confiscations is crucial for maintaining the fairness of administrative enforcement and ensuring the lawful management of financial resources, with existing laws outlining strict procedures for the seizure and management of assets [2] - The government purchasing services is an important measure for transforming government functions and improving public service supply, but some regions have improperly assigned administrative inspection tasks to third parties, violating relevant regulations [2] - The issue of extraterritorial enforcement remains a concern, with some local enforcement agencies imposing penalties on businesses from other regions, which is considered a violation of jurisdictional authority [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of regulating administrative law enforcement related to enterprises, highlighting the need for a long-term mechanism to prevent and correct illegal enforcement practices, as outlined in the recent policy recommendations from the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China [1][7]. Group 1: Achievements of the Special Action - Since the launch of the special action in March, 54,000 cases of prominent administrative law enforcement issues have been addressed, recovering economic losses of 28.92 billion yuan for enterprises [2]. - The total number of administrative inspections has decreased by 32.9% year-on-year, while the problem detection rate has increased by nearly 17 percentage points [3]. - The revenue from fines and confiscations has decreased by 8.2% year-on-year, indicating a reduction in arbitrary fines [3]. Group 2: Improvement in Enforcement Practices - The action has led to a systematic governance of excessive inspections, promoting a "comprehensive check once" approach, which has improved the precision and effectiveness of inspections [3]. - The initiative has also focused on standardizing enforcement practices, with over 330 measures introduced to unify enforcement standards across various regions [4]. - The overall service awareness and enforcement capabilities of law enforcement agencies have significantly improved, as reported by enterprises and the public [4]. Group 3: Optimizing the Business Environment - More than 10,000 problematic policy documents have been revised or abolished to eliminate unequal treatment of enterprises [5]. - The number of newly registered enterprises has increased by over 5 million this year, with a 6.8% growth in new private enterprises compared to the previous year [5]. - The special action has been synchronized with various policy measures to stimulate market vitality [5]. Group 4: Future Directions for Administrative Law Enforcement - The focus will be on strengthening the standardization of administrative law enforcement, including the introduction of management measures for law enforcement personnel [9]. - There will be an emphasis on unifying enforcement standards across market regulation areas and improving the administrative penalty and criminal penalty linkage system [10]. - A nationwide administrative law enforcement supervision platform will be established to enhance real-time monitoring of enforcement activities [10].

Group 1 - The Ministry of Justice released the third batch of typical cases regarding administrative law enforcement actions involving enterprises, highlighting a case from a county in Hunan where market regulation officials violated enforcement norms [1] - In April 2025, the county's market regulation bureau reported to the local government that its officials had solicited and accepted bribes from small businesses across various sectors, including catering, services, and real estate [1] - An investigation by the county's administrative law enforcement supervision bureau confirmed that 16 officials were involved in corrupt practices, leading to the suspension of their enforcement credentials and further accountability measures [1] Group 2 - The Ministry of Justice emphasized that corrupt practices by administrative law enforcement personnel harm the interests of enterprises and the public, damaging the image of the party and government, and undermining the local business environment [2] - The county's market regulation bureau actively engaged in self-examination and reported issues, while the supervision bureau fulfilled its oversight responsibilities, leading to effective collaboration with disciplinary inspection departments for accountability [2] - The county's market regulation bureau implemented corrective measures, using the case as a warning to enhance regulatory frameworks and ensure compliance with administrative enforcement standards [2]