Core Insights - The Shandong Provincial Market Supervision Administration announced the results of the first batch of quality supervision and spot checks for plastic shopping bags in 2025, revealing that 6 out of 128 batches tested were non-compliant with relevant standards [2][3]. Group 1: Quality Inspection Results - A total of 128 batches of plastic shopping bags were inspected, including 14 from the production stage and 114 from the circulation stage [2]. - The inspection was based on standards such as GB/T 21661-2020 for plastic shopping bags and GB/T 38082-2019 for biodegradable plastic shopping bags, focusing on environmental requirements, drop tests, leak resistance, sealing strength, and impact resistance [2]. - Non-compliant products were identified from one producer, Ju County Mingxiang Plastic Products Co., Ltd., and five retailers, including Jining High-tech Zone Haoyouduo Supermarket and others, with issues related to environmental requirements and impact resistance [2][3]. Group 2: Non-compliance Details - The specific non-compliance issues included: - Ju County Mingxiang Plastic Products Co., Ltd.: Impact resistance failure [3]. - Jining High-tech Zone Haoyouduo Supermarket: Environmental requirement failure [3]. - Jining Longgui Shopping Plaza Co., Ltd.: Impact resistance failure [3]. - Li Qun Group Zibo Shopping Plaza: Impact resistance failure [3]. - Shandong Huasheng Chain Supermarket: Environmental requirement failure [3]. - Shandong Yueduo Trading Co., Ltd.: Impact resistance failure [3]. Group 3: Regulatory Actions - The Shandong Provincial Market Supervision Administration has instructed relevant market supervision departments to take appropriate follow-up actions against the producers and sellers of the non-compliant products, in accordance with the Product Quality Law of the People's Republic of China and related regulations [2].

对于抽查发现的不合格产品，苏州市市场监督管理局已全部移交经营主体所在地市场监管部门依法查处，监督经营主体停止生产、销售不合格产品，及时整 改，全面消除不合格产品安全隐患，守牢产品质量安全底线。 2025年苏州市建筑防水卷材产品监督抽查不合格结果表 | 序 | | 标称商 | | 标称产品批号或生产 | | 销售单位名 | 所属电商平 | 样品来 | | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 标称产品名称 | | | 标称规格型号 | | 标称生产企业名称 | | | | 不合格项目 | | | 号 | | 标 | | 日期 | | 称 | 台 | 源 | | | | 1 | 弹性体改性沥青防水 | —— | SBS I PY PE PE | 2025/5/23 | | 吴江市星球防水环保材料有 —— | —— | 生产企 | 热老化（低温柔 | | | 3 10 | 卷材 | | | | 限公司 | | | 业 | 性） | | | 2025年苏州市建筑防水卷材产品监督抽查未发现不合格结果表 | | | ...

一、产品概况和产业分布 中国质量新闻网讯 近日，江苏省苏州市市场监管局网站发布2025年童鞋产品质量市级监督抽查情况（第45期）。 童鞋是供处于生长发育阶段的0-14周岁儿童穿用的鞋。按产品类型可分为布面童胶鞋、儿童皮鞋、儿童旅游鞋、儿童皮凉鞋；按使用对象和鞋号大小可分为 0～3岁儿童使用、鞋号不大于170mm的婴幼儿童鞋和3～14岁使用、鞋号不大于250mm的儿童鞋。 据不完全统计，目前全国有一定规模的童鞋生产企业约有1000多家，形成了浙江温州、浙江台州、广东广州和福建泉州4个国内童鞋制造基地。江苏省内童 鞋企业较少，约有十家左右，主要分布在南京、扬州、苏州等地，这些企业大部分都是小企业，分布比较分散，无相对集中的产业区，主要还是以出口或来 料代加工为主，自主品牌比较少。 二、检验的主要依据和项目 本次童鞋产品质量监督抽查检验的主要依据为QB/T4331-2021《儿童旅游鞋》、QB/T2880-2016《儿童皮鞋》、QB/T4546-2021《儿童皮凉鞋》以及 GB30585-2014《儿童鞋安全技术规范》。 附原文： 2025年童鞋产品质量市级监督抽查情况公告（第45期） 根据《中华人民共和国产品质量 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Jiangsu Provincial Changzhou Municipal Government announced the results of the second batch of product quality supervision and spot checks for 2025, revealing significant non-compliance in mobile phones, particularly for elderly users [4]. Group 1: Product Quality Supervision - The Changzhou Market Supervision Administration conducted quality checks on 11 types of products, including mobile phones, starting from July 2025 [4]. - A total of 27 batches of mobile phones (specifically for elderly users) were inspected, with 7 batches found to be non-compliant [4]. Group 2: Non-compliance Details - The non-compliant products will be handed over to the respective market supervision departments for legal processing [4]. - Specific brands and manufacturers of the non-compliant mobile phones include GIONEE, Lenovo, and others, with various issues related to compliance standards [5][6].

Core Insights - The Anhui Huangshan Market Supervision Administration conducted a quality supervision inspection of various products, including electric bicycle chargers, safety helmets, and food-related products, achieving a compliance rate of 99% with 90 out of 91 samples passing inspection [1]. Group 1: Product Quality Inspection Results - A total of 91 product samples were planned for inspection, and all 91 were completed, with 90 samples passing, resulting in a compliance rate of 99% [1]. - The inspected products included electric bicycle chargers, safety helmets, paper products, student supplies, liquefied petroleum gas, food-related products, and electrical wires and cables [1]. Group 2: Specific Product Compliance - Electric bicycle chargers from brands such as Aima and Tailling passed inspection, indicating adherence to quality standards [2]. - Safety helmets from various manufacturers, including Fuguang and Rongyu, also met compliance requirements [2]. - Disposable products like cotton underwear and sanitary napkins from brands such as Beilaikang and Qiduxiang were found to be compliant [2]. Group 3: Market Implications - The high compliance rate suggests a strong regulatory environment in Huangshan, which may enhance consumer confidence in product safety and quality [1]. - The successful inspection of a wide range of products indicates effective market supervision, potentially benefiting local manufacturers and retailers by ensuring product quality [1].

Core Points - The Chongqing Municipal Market Supervision Administration conducted a quality supervision sampling inspection of 31 products, revealing 150 batches of non-compliant products [2][30] - The inspection covered various categories including finished oil, children's products, building glass, cycling safety helmets, and more, with specific non-compliance issues identified for each category [2][30] Group 1: Inspection Overview - A total of 31 products were inspected, resulting in 150 batches found to be non-compliant [2] - Non-compliance was noted in categories such as finished oil (2 batches), children's products (1 batch), and building materials [2][30] Group 2: Specific Non-Compliance Findings - Finished oil: 2 batches failed due to flash point issues [2] - Children's products: 1 batch failed due to packaging materials [3] - Building glass: 2 batches failed due to fragment conditions [4] - Cycling safety helmets: 5 batches failed due to structural integrity [5] - Fire safety products: 4 batches failed due to various performance tests [6] - Plastic drainage pipes: 12 batches failed due to thickness and other specifications [9] - Automotive shock absorbers: 5 batches failed due to corrosion resistance [10] - Security doors: 6 batches failed due to material specifications [11] - Jewelry: 22 batches failed due to metal content [22] Group 3: Regulatory Actions - The market supervision departments will take legal actions against non-compliant products, including confiscation and prohibition of production and sales [30] - Non-compliant manufacturers will be required to implement corrective measures and may face criminal charges for severe violations [30]

Core Points - The article discusses the announcement of the eighth list of non-compliant products identified during the provincial quality supervision and inspection tasks organized by the Sichuan Provincial Market Supervision Administration for the year 2025 [2] Group 1: Non-compliant Products - A total of 14 non-compliant travel bag products were identified, with issues primarily related to oscillation impact performance [3][4] - Specific companies involved include Chengdu Ouxiyi Trading Co., Chengdu Auchan Supermarket Co., and Guangzhou Jieshi Bag Co., among others [3][4] - The inspection covered various specifications and models of travel bags, indicating a widespread issue across different manufacturers [3][4] Group 2: Other Non-compliant Products - Non-compliance was also noted in brake hoses and swimming suits, with issues such as necking after passing volume and fiber content [4][5] - The inspection revealed problems in children's shoes, including heavy metal content and phthalates, highlighting safety concerns in children's products [5][6] - The report emphasizes the importance of product quality and safety standards across various industries, including textiles and automotive parts [4][5][6]

Core Viewpoint - The recent quality inspection of fireworks and firecrackers in Suzhou revealed that 3 out of 37 batches tested were non-compliant with safety and quality standards, primarily due to inadequate understanding and execution of mandatory standards by some manufacturers [3]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 37 batches of fireworks and firecrackers were planned for inspection, with all 37 batches actually tested [3]. - Out of the tested batches, 3 were found to be non-compliant, all of which were purchased from physical stores [3]. - The main non-compliance issues were related to the ignition device's ignition time and the composition of the materials used [3]. Group 2: Regulatory Actions - The Suzhou Market Supervision Administration has transferred all non-compliant product findings to the local market regulatory authorities for legal action [3]. - Producers and sellers of the non-compliant products are required to immediately cease production and sales of the affected products and undertake corrective measures [3].

Core Insights - The Shanghai Municipal Market Supervision Administration conducted a quality inspection of lithium-ion batteries for electric bicycles, testing 20 batches with no non-compliance found [1] Group 1: Inspection Results - All 20 batches of lithium-ion batteries inspected were compliant with relevant standards, indicating a positive quality assurance for products sold in Shanghai [1] - The inspected samples were sourced from four provinces: Anhui, Fujian, Guangdong, and Zhejiang, with no non-compliant products identified from external manufacturers [1] Group 2: Regulatory Framework - The inspection was organized based on the implementation guidelines SHSSXZ0224-2025 for quality supervision of lithium-ion batteries for electric bicycles in Shanghai [1]

Core Points - The quality inspection results for automotive urea solution products in Dongying City, Shandong Province, indicate that out of 99 batches tested, 97 were qualified while 2 were found to be non-compliant with relevant standards [3][4]. Group 1: Inspection Results - A total of 99 batches of automotive urea solution were sampled in the market supervision check [3]. - 97 batches were found to be compliant, resulting in a compliance rate of approximately 98% [3]. - The two non-compliant batches were sold by Dongying Wenlong Finished Oil Sales Co., Ltd. and Dongying Haoxiang Petrochemical Co., Ltd., with issues related to urea content, density, and refractive index [3][4]. Group 2: Standards and Regulations - The inspection was conducted based on the GB29518-2013 standard for diesel engine nitrogen oxide reducing agent urea solution (AUS32) [3]. - The inspection criteria included urea content, density, impurity content, refractive index, and consistency confirmation [3]. Group 3: Consumer Guidance - Consumers are advised to check product packaging and labeling for clear manufacturer information, production dates, quality certificates, and compliance standards [4]. - The urea solution should be a colorless, transparent liquid, and consumers should avoid products that are past their storage period or do not meet storage conditions [4]. - Products showing yellowing, turbidity, or visible impurities should not be used [4].