登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 受损股民可至新浪股民维权平台登记该公司维权：http://wq.finance.sina.com.cn/ 近日，上海沪紫律师事务所刘鹏律师团队代理的投资者诉弘高创意证券虚假陈述责任纠纷案又收到一批 北京金融法院送达的一审判决书，投资者获得胜诉，公司需向受损股民赔付损失部分。（刘鹏律师专 栏） 不过公司股票因触及交易类强制退市情形已于2023年8月被深交所终止上市，虽已退市许久，但公司主 体仍在运转，不影响投资者维权事宜。 关注@新浪证券、微信关注新浪券商基金、百度搜索新浪股民维权、访问新浪财经客户端、 新浪财经首页都能找到我们！ 一、投资者已有胜诉 根据法院判决支持于2016年4月19日-2023年1月5日期间买入，并在2023年1月6日之后卖出或仍持有 而亏损的投资者即符合维权要求。鉴于案件已有一审胜诉判决，依据"同案同判"原则，后续同类型案件 胜诉概率极高。（*ST弘高维权入口） 二、财务造假引发股民起诉 案件回溯，2023年12月28日，证监会公布对该公司的《行政处罚决定书》，经查明，其下属子公司连续 八年通过虚构工程项目合同、未如实核算工程项目、未及时 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company disclosed recent legal developments, including the failure of a judicial auction for its office building and the withdrawal of certain lawsuits related to false securities statements, indicating that these matters will not significantly impact its operations [1][2]. Group 1: Judicial Auction - The company's office building located at 42 Donghua Zhengjie, Chengdu, was auctioned from December 9 to December 10, 2025, but the auction ended without any bids, resulting in a failure to sell [1]. - The company stated that the failure of this auction will not have a significant impact on its production and operations, and the possibility of a second auction remains uncertain, pending the court's execution results [1]. Group 2: Securities Litigation - The company received a civil ruling from the Chengdu Intermediate People's Court, allowing the plaintiffs to withdraw their lawsuits, which includes cases involving individuals and a bank [2]. - A previous lawsuit filed by Nuon Asset Management against the company for false securities statements was dismissed by the court on November 3, 2025, and both parties have confirmed they will not appeal, making the ruling effective [2]. - As of the announcement date, the company has no other significant undisclosed litigation or arbitration matters, and the impact of these legal issues on profits will be determined by the auditing results [2].

Core Viewpoint - The case involves a representative lawsuit filed by 11 investors against multiple defendants, including Eastsun Group and Eastsun Optoelectronics, for alleged false statements that led to investment losses. The court has established a rights registration process for affected investors to join the lawsuit [1][2][32]. Group 1: Case Background - The lawsuit was initiated on April 1, 2025, by plaintiffs Wu Caiquan and Xiao Jianhui, representing 11 investors against defendants including Li Zhaoting, Guo Xuan, and Eastsun Group [1][2]. - The court decided to apply the ordinary representative lawsuit procedure on August 8, 2025, and confirmed the scope of rights holders [2][39]. - The case involves allegations of false statements made by Eastsun Optoelectronics, which has since been delisted, and the plaintiffs claim to have suffered losses due to these misrepresentations [32][60]. Group 2: Defendants - The defendants include individuals and companies, such as Eastsun Group, Eastsun Optoelectronics, and various financial institutions and accounting firms [1][4][16]. - Notable defendants include Li Zhaoting (Chairman of Eastsun Group), Guo Xuan (Chairman of Eastsun Optoelectronics), and several other individuals associated with the companies [4][58][59]. Group 3: Rights Registration - The rights registration period for affected investors is set from December 10, 2025, to January 8, 2026, allowing those who purchased Eastsun Optoelectronics shares between February 15, 2016, and July 5, 2024, to register [33][62]. - Investors can register through the court's online platform, and there is no prepayment required for case acceptance fees [63][66]. Group 4: Representative Selection - The plaintiffs have selected Wu Caiquan and Xiao Jianhui as the proposed representatives for the lawsuit, with the support of the China Securities Investor Service Center [36][65]. - Investors who wish to contest the selection of representatives or join the lawsuit must submit written objections during the registration period [65].

Core Viewpoint - Recent developments in the lawsuit against ST Hongda (002211) indicate that the company is required to pay over one million yuan in investment loss compensation to three investors, following a ruling by the Shanghai High People's Court that upheld the original judgment [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - ST Hongda has received a civil judgment requiring it to pay a total of 108.3 thousand yuan to three investors: 24.38 thousand yuan to Zhang*, 6.43 thousand yuan to Ye*jie, and 77.49 thousand yuan to Zhao*qin [5]. - The company has accumulated 228 related legal cases with a total claim amount exceeding 29.16 million yuan, of which nearly 27.28 million yuan remains unpaid [4][5]. - The company is also facing joint liability for these payments, with specific percentages assigned to individuals and an accounting firm [5]. Group 2: Financial Performance - For the first three quarters of 2025, ST Hongda reported a revenue of 328 million yuan, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 47.36%, but also a net loss of 10.65 million yuan [9]. - The company has experienced continuous losses since 2023, with net losses of 29.36 million yuan in 2023 and 39.04 million yuan in 2024 [9]. - The company has been classified as a "ST" (Special Treatment) stock due to ongoing financial difficulties and has been warned by the Shenzhen Stock Exchange regarding its financial disclosures [9]. Group 3: Regulatory Issues - ST Hongda received a warning letter from the Shanghai Securities Regulatory Commission for failing to accurately disclose related party transactions totaling 72.81 million yuan [7]. - The company also inadequately accounted for asset impairment, leading to inaccuracies in its financial reporting [7]. - In addition to the warning from the regulatory body, ST Hongda has received a regulatory letter from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange, urging compliance with disclosure obligations [8].

Core Viewpoint - Beijing Bank has been implicated in a securities false statement liability dispute involving Kangde Xin Composite Materials Group Co., Ltd, following a lawsuit initiated by investors including Hu Juling, which stems from regulatory findings by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) regarding serious information disclosure violations by Kangde Xin from 2015 to 2018 [3][11]. Group 1: Background of the Case - The lawsuit is based on the CSRC's administrative penalty decision from September 24, 2020, which identified three major violations by Kangde Xin: false records in annual reports, failure to disclose related party guarantees, and inaccurate reporting of fundraising usage [3][11]. - The CSRC imposed a fine of 600,000 yuan on Kangde Xin and issued warnings to its executives, with fines ranging from 30,000 to 900,000 yuan for 12 individuals [3][11]. Group 2: Involvement of Beijing Bank - Beijing Bank and its branches have multiple business ties with Kangde Xin, which is a key reason for its involvement in the lawsuit and previous regulatory penalties [6][14]. - Beijing Bank acted as the lead underwriter for Kangde Xin's "2018 First Phase Short-term Financing Bond" and managed cash management services for Kangde Xin, which included responsibilities for account management [7][14]. Group 3: Regulatory Penalties on Beijing Bank - On December 23, 2020, the Beijing Banking and Insurance Regulatory Bureau penalized Beijing Bank and five individuals for issuing false confirmation letters and deposit certificates, as well as for deficiencies in internal controls [15][16]. - The total fine imposed on Beijing Bank was 3.5 million yuan, with additional penalties including the disqualification of two individuals from holding senior management positions for five years [15][16]. Group 4: Details of the Lawsuit - The lawsuit involves a large number of parties, with 40 defendants including Kangde Xin and its affiliates, as well as Beijing Bank, which is listed as the 29th defendant [9][17]. - The plaintiffs are seeking a total of 4.139 billion yuan in damages for investment losses due to false statements, along with additional claims for legal and associated costs totaling 3 million yuan [9][17].

根据公告，原告胡菊玲等投资者以康得新证券虚假陈述为由起诉，要求康得新支付投资损失赔偿款暂计 41.39亿元，其余39名被告（含赛鼎宁波、相关中介机构、原高管等）承担连带赔偿责任，同时索赔公 告费、律师费等300万元及全部诉讼费用。 （文章来源：中国经营报） 12月8日，中国化学（601117.SH）发布公告披露，其孙公司中国化学赛鼎宁波工程有限公司（以下简 称"赛鼎宁波"）收到江苏省苏州市中级人民法院《应诉通知书》。因康得新复合材料集团股份有限公司 （以下简称"康得新"）证券虚假陈述责任纠纷，赛鼎宁波被列为共同被告。 中国化学在公告中回应称，经初步核实，赛鼎宁波不存在明知康得新造假而配合的情形，且非本案主要 责任主体，初步评估该诉讼不会对公司本期及期后利润产生实质影响。截至公告披露日，该案已立案受 理，但尚未开庭审理，公司将持续关注进展并履行信息披露义务。 ...

乐视网近日公告称，在不影响公司主营业务正常发展的前提下，拟利用自有资金购买股票获得额外的资 金收益，投资本金总额不超过1.8亿元。消息一出，外界哗然，身背238亿元债务，却花1.8亿元炒股？ 对此，乐视网表示被误读，称这笔投资几乎为无风险投资，1.8亿中不低于1.5亿元用于打北交所新股和 国债逆回购，而北交所打新目前"看起来是百分百挣钱"。另外0.3亿元则主要投资沪深300指数成分股及 银行股，自认相当稳健。当然，乐视也知道外界真正关心的不在于此，接着表示："公司一直处于高负 债经营状况，不是不还，是不知该怎么还。公司当前的资金，在考虑保留基本的运营流动资金后，计算 的清偿率不会高于1.5%，公司并不排斥按这个比例清偿债务。" 当然，从某种角度而言，与其让乐视用有限资金偿还天量债务，不如让其保留资金维持经营，赢得账期 腾挪空间，甚至尝试通过投资获取收益，可能好过破产重组，债权人全员亏损入账。但乐视最好还是多 给予外界一些回应，譬如自己的主业聚焦——贴牌、影视版权、消费电子OEM进展及收益率，有没有 明晰的还款来源和计划，哪怕逐年一小笔一小笔地去还。毕竟，个人欠债，靠打零工还到老的都大有人 在，遑论曾经的上市公 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company is involved in a lawsuit concerning securities false statement liability, with its subsidiary, China Chemical Sading Ningbo Engineering Co., Ltd., being one of the defendants in a case initiated by investors against Kangde Xin Composite Materials Group Co., Ltd. [3][4][6] Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The lawsuit has been accepted by the court but has not yet gone to trial [2] - The plaintiff includes multiple investors, with the primary defendant being Kangde Xin Composite Materials Group Co., Ltd., alongside several other defendants [4][5] - The plaintiffs are seeking approximately RMB 4.14 billion in damages for investment losses due to false statements, along with additional costs totaling around RMB 3 million [6] Group 2: Impact on Company - As of the announcement date, the lawsuit has not resulted in any legally binding judgments, and the company has preliminarily assessed that the lawsuit will not have a substantial impact on its current or future profits [6] - The company will closely monitor the progress of the lawsuit and fulfill its information disclosure obligations as required by law [6] Group 3: Project Update - The company's nylon new materials project, implemented by its subsidiary Tianchen Qixiang New Materials Co., Ltd., has achieved full production capacity and is now in a stable operational phase [12] - The project is expected to enhance production efficiency, reduce costs, and improve market competitiveness, positively impacting the company's future development [12]

至此，高负债已成表演艺术。乐视言外之意很明显：就算我们想还，1.8亿元相对于238亿元债务，不过 是杯水车薪。不如干脆拿一部分钱去"增收"，能挣点是点。乐视网的路数非但令债主目不暇接，也令看 客记忆犹新。几年前的春节，各大互联网平台在App图标上标注给用户瓜分10亿、20亿元不等之际，反 而被"过气网红"——乐视抢了风头，乐视在其春节版App图标上直接标注了"欠122亿"字样，"乐视网欠 款大家都知道，虽然有困难，但逆境时更要乐观面对"，引发网友关注并喜提热搜。单就当时App新版 本下载吸引力而言，想出这一噱头的人堪称营销鬼才，不输贾老板"PPT造车"。 众所周知，乐视手握一些热门影视剧版权，公司靠运营和版权收入养活数百名员工，工资、社保一分不 少，在外界口中已呈不卷不急的小乌托邦之态。但自乐视退市，先后倒在这一"天坑"当中的数十万投资 人并没有凭空消失。2023年北京金融法院就"证券虚假陈述责任纠纷"一审判决乐视赔偿股民20亿元，涉 及近2500名投资者。乐视并未认罚，当前案件还在二审之中，未登记的股民仍可继续提起诉讼索赔。对 于乐视这几年的相关热搜新闻，这些股民的愤慨可想而知。 贾跃亭早已在美宣布完成个人 ...

Core Viewpoint - China Chemical announced that its subsidiary, Saiding Ningbo, has received a "Notice of Response" regarding a lawsuit filed by investors, including Hu Juling, against Kangde Xin for securities false statement liability. The plaintiffs are seeking compensation of 4.139 billion yuan for investment losses, with additional claims for announcement fees of 3 million yuan and litigation costs [1] Summary by Relevant Sections - **Lawsuit Details** - The lawsuit involves claims against Kangde Xin for a total of 4.139 billion yuan in compensation for investment losses [1] - The plaintiffs also request that other defendants bear joint liability and cover additional costs of 3 million yuan for announcement fees and litigation expenses [1] - **Company's Position** - As of the announcement date, the lawsuit has not yet gone to court [1] - Preliminary verification indicates that Saiding Ningbo was not involved in any financial fraud and is not a primary responsible party [1] - The expected impact on the company's profits is deemed negligible [1]