每经记者｜潘婷 每经编辑｜陈柯名 文多 12月10日，记者注意到，天眼查信息显示，中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司及平安资产管理有限责任公司起诉华夏幸福基业控股股份公司（下称"华夏控 股"）及"王某"。开庭公告显示，本案案由为"申请确认仲裁协议效力"，审理法院为上海金融法院，开庭日期为12月17日。据知情人士透露，"王某"即华 夏幸福董事长王文学。 此前11月21日，据华夏幸福债委会消息，工作组将自11月24日起进驻华夏幸福，开展专项财务尽调的前期准备工作。 根据《授权主席单位平安资管聘请会计师事务所对华夏幸福进行专项财务尽调的议案》，华夏幸福债委会将授权平安资管以债委会名义从四大会计师事务 所中聘请一家有专业能力的会计师事务所，对华夏幸福财务状况开展专项尽职调查工作。 11月24日，华夏幸福方面向记者表示，为维护全体债权人利益，华夏幸福正在依法积极配合临时管理人开展包括资产负债调查在内的各项工作以确保预重 整程序顺利推进，公司无法定义务配合金融债委会另行对公司开展财务尽调。 此外，公开信息显示，2018年到2020年期间，平安方面曾通过股权、债权等形式，斥重金投资华夏幸福。2018年7月，平安资管斥资137.7 ...

值得注意的是，本案的被告方之一华夏幸福基业控股股份公司（简称"华夏控股"），是上市房企华夏幸 福的股东，持股比例为11.5%。而华夏控股的最大股东是北京东方银联投资管理有限公司，实控人为王 文学。 近日，天眼查信息显示，华夏控股新增一民事案件，原告为中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司、平安资产 管理有限责任公司，被告为王某、华夏幸福基业控股股份公司，案由为"申请确认仲裁协议效力"，12月 17日将在上海金融法院开庭。 据知情人士表示，前述"王某"即华夏控股的董事长王文学。 公开信息显示，本案涉及的"申请确认仲裁协议效力"，即当事人就仲裁协议效力问题有不同认识时，从 法律上由人民法院对仲裁协议的效力加以确认，以保护当事人的合法权益，对仲裁程序提供司法监督与 支持。 法院在审查仲裁协议效力时，主要针对以下因素：协议是否成立、是否具备缔约能力、是否以书面形式 订立、协议事项是否超出法定仲裁范围、是否胁迫迫使订立仲裁协议、是否有明确的仲裁机构、是否同 时选择了仲裁和诉讼。 截至目前，针对平安和华夏控股的具体仲裁事由，公司方面还未有回应。 近期，华夏控股旗下地产平台华夏幸福，正在筹划预重整工作。11月16日，华夏幸福发布公告 ...

"中国平安与华夏幸福的纠纷终于从线下口水战打到了法庭上，平安人寿及平安资管起诉华夏幸福及其 董事长王文学。此前华夏幸福曾公布被债权人申请重整消息激怒了中国平安。" 来源：险联社 减持完成后，平安人寿及平安资管合计持有华夏幸福24.99%股权，仍为华夏幸福第一大股东。 | 减持计划首次披露日期 | 2025年8月9日 | | --- | --- | | 减持数量 | 7.815.487股 | | 减持期间 | 2025年10月20日~2025年10月21日 | | 减持方式及对应减持数量 | 集中竞价减持,7,815,487 股 | | 减持价格区间 | 2.09~2.12元/股 | | 减持总金额 | 16,475,681.01元 | | 减持完成情况 | 未完成:109.596,123 股 | | 减持比例 | 0. 20% | | 原计划减持比例 | 不超过:3.00% | | 当前持股数量 | 977,914,066股 | | 当前持股比例 | 24. 99% | 企查查信息显示，中国平安人寿保险股份有限公司及平安资产管理有限责任公司起诉华夏幸福基业控股 股份公司及其董事长王文学。 根据开庭公告详情，本 ...

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码：002634 证券简称：棒杰股份 公告编号：2025-117 浙江棒杰控股集团股份有限公司关于公司被债权人申请预重整的提示性公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确、完整，没有虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大 遗漏。 重要内容及特别风险提示： 1、2025年12月5日，浙江棒杰控股集团股份有限公司（以下简称"公司"或"被申请人"）收到债权人苏州 环秀湖逐光企业管理合伙企业（有限合伙）（以下简称"环秀湖逐光"或"申请人"）的《告知函》，环秀 湖逐光以公司不能清偿到期债务且资产不足以清偿全部债务，但具备重整价值为由，向浙江省金华市中 级人民法院（以下简称"金华中院"或"法院"）提交申请对公司进行预重整的材料。 2、截至本公告披露日，公司尚未收到法院受理预重整申请的文件，申请人的预重整申请能否被法院裁 定受理，公司后续是否进入预重整或重整程序均存在重大不确定性。无论公司是否进入预重整或重整程 序，公司将在现有基础上积极做好日常生产经营管理工作。后续若收到法院受理预重整或受理重整申请 的文件，公司将及时履行信息披露义务。 3、若法院裁定受理对公司 ...

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码：603377 证券简称：ST东时（维权） 公告编号：临2025-199 ● 是否会对上市公司损益产生负面影响：本案件处于审理阶段，由于北京仲裁委员会/北京国际仲裁院 审理结果存在不确定性，最终以北京仲裁委员会/北京国际仲裁院裁决结果为准。公司将根据本次案件 的情况，按照有关规定及时履行信息披露义务，敬请投资者注意投资风险 一、本次仲裁的基本情况 近日，公司收到北京仲裁委员会/北京国际仲裁院送达的（2025）京仲案字第09433号仲裁案受理通知 书。公司因与被申请人存在合同纠纷，向北京仲裁委员会/北京国际仲裁院提起仲裁申请。现该案件已 获北京仲裁委员会/北京国际仲裁院受理，公司现将有关情况公告如下： （一）本次仲裁的各方当事人 申请人：东方时尚驾驶学校股份有限公司 被申请人：莘县天华宇宏企业管理咨询合伙企业（有限合伙）、莘县振鸿企业管理咨询中心、北京长天 鑫桥投资有限公司、荆州丽华置业发展有限公司、荆州市宇吉生物科技有限公司、陆天振、申劲、伍 彬、罗莉华 转债代码：113575 转债简称：东时转债 东方时尚驾驶学校股份有限公司 关于累计诉讼、仲裁情况的 ...

田国宝 11月16日，华夏幸福基业股份有限公司（600340.SH，下称"华夏幸福"）公布被债权人申请预重整并获 法院受理的消息后，迅速引发第一大股东兼核心债权人中国平安集团（下称"平安"）的强烈反弹。 先是平安派驻华夏幸福的董事王葳公开质疑预重整公告的合规性，并向监管部门投诉；而后华夏幸福通 过董事冯念一反驳称程序合法；随后，平安以债委会名义启动对华夏幸福的财务审计，华夏幸福则称没 有义务配合审计。 自平安入股华夏幸福以来，虽然双方时有矛盾冲突，但大抵相安无事。2018年，华夏幸福第一次爆雷 时，平安作为战略投资者帮助华夏幸福实现了重生；2021年，华夏幸福第二次爆雷时，平安牵头成立债 委会，帮助华夏幸福推进债务重组。 但这一次，华夏幸福的预重整行动激怒了平安。一位接近平安的人士告诉经济观察报，华夏幸福公布预 重整消息前，并没有与平安进行充分沟通。且一旦重整，大部分债务将转股，平安作为最大债权人之一 必将遭受严重损失。 从冲突到对抗 2025年11月16日，华夏幸福公告，债权人龙成建设工程有限公司（下称"龙成建设"）向廊坊市中级人民 法院（下称"廊坊中院"）申请重整并启动预重整，法院当日受理，并于11月17 ...

*ST正平9月以来累计26个交易日涨停。其间，该股三度停牌核查。 12月2日晚间，*ST正平（603843）公告称，公司近日就股票交易情况进行核查，鉴于相关核查工作已完成，经向上海证券交易所申请，公司股票 将于12月3日（星期三）开市起复牌。 从2025年9月1日至11月18日，*ST正平股票累计涨幅达221.93%，股票短期涨幅与同期上证指数、建筑行业存在严重偏离。股价上涨过快，积累了 较高的交易风险。为维护投资者利益，公司就股票交易情况进行停牌核查，于11月19日开市起停牌。 近期，有债权人申请对*ST正平预重整，截至本公告披露日，公司尚未收到法院关于受理预重整申请的相关法律文书，即申请人的预重整申请能否 被法院受理、公司能否进入重整程序均存在重大不确定性，公司提醒广大投资者注意相关投资风险。 *ST正平同时提到，公司近期收到上交所对公司2025年三季报有关事项的监管工作函。截至目前，年审会计师尚无法就外部借款利息、工程项目成 本费用计量准确性和完整性获取充分、恰当的审计证据。"如截至2025年度财务报告日，年审会计师仍无法就上述事项获取充分、恰当的审计证 据，可能导致无法对财务报表发表非无保留意见，公司 ...

Core Viewpoint - *ST Zhengping has experienced significant stock price fluctuations, with a cumulative increase of 221.93% from September 1 to November 18, 2025, leading to trading risks and subsequent stock suspension for investigation [1][5]. Group 1: Stock Performance and Trading Risks - The stock of *ST Zhengping has seen 26 consecutive trading days of gains since September, with three suspensions for investigation during this period [1][5]. - The company announced that its stock will resume trading on December 3, 2025, after completing the investigation into trading activities [1][5]. - The rapid increase in stock price has created a significant divergence from the Shanghai Composite Index and the construction industry, indicating heightened trading risks [1][5]. Group 2: Financial Performance and Audit Issues - In 2024, *ST Zhengping reported revenue of 1.362 billion yuan and a net loss attributable to shareholders of 484 million yuan, with a non-recurring net loss of 475 million yuan [4][8]. - For the first three quarters of 2025, the company achieved revenue of 652 million yuan and a net loss of 99 million yuan, with a non-recurring net loss of 190 million yuan [4][8]. - The 2024 annual report received an audit opinion that could not express an opinion due to limited audit scope, leading to a delisting risk warning for the stock [3][7]. Group 3: Operational Challenges and Future Uncertainties - The company faces significant uncertainties regarding its ability to develop mineral resources, as it lacks sufficient funds, personnel, and equipment for future mining operations [3][8]. - As of September 30, 2025, *ST Zhengping reported cash holdings of 72.3767 million yuan, with 30.2848 million yuan restricted due to various legal and operational issues, resulting in a high debt ratio of 92.49% [3][8]. - The company has received a mining license for its subsidiary but requires substantial investment for future development, which is currently uncertain due to multiple external factors [3][8].

Core Viewpoint - The conflict between China Ping An and Huaxia Happiness escalated after Huaxia Happiness initiated a pre-restructuring process without reaching an agreement with Ping An, leading to significant tensions between the two parties [1][3][18]. Group 1: Background and Initial Actions - On November 16, Huaxia Happiness announced that creditors had applied for pre-restructuring, which was accepted by the court, prompting a strong backlash from Ping An, its largest shareholder and core creditor [2][5]. - Ping An's representative on Huaxia Happiness's board publicly questioned the legality of the pre-restructuring announcement and filed a complaint with regulatory authorities [5][6]. - Huaxia Happiness's board member countered that the pre-restructuring process was legal and did not require board approval [5][6]. Group 2: Financial Situation and Restructuring Efforts - Huaxia Happiness has been in a dire financial situation, with a reported 72% year-on-year decline in revenue and a net profit loss of 9.8 billion yuan for the first three quarters of 2025, leading to a technical insolvency status with a debt-to-asset ratio of 96% [12]. - The company had previously committed to a debt restructuring plan aiming to reduce its debt-to-asset ratio below 70% within 2-3 years, but as of November 2025, it had only completed agreements for 192.67 billion yuan of its 245.69 billion yuan debt [11][12]. Group 3: Escalation of Conflict - The pre-restructuring process initiated by Huaxia Happiness is seen as a threat to Ping An, as it could lead to significant losses for Ping An due to the conversion of debts into equity at a discount [3][13][18]. - The relationship between Huaxia Happiness and Ping An deteriorated due to unmet performance guarantees and the failure of Huaxia Happiness to provide expected cash repayments, leading to Ping An's withdrawal of credit support [16][17]. Group 4: Legal and Procedural Developments - The court accepted the pre-restructuring application, and a temporary management team was appointed to oversee the process, which Huaxia Happiness claims is necessary to resolve its debt crisis [7][8]. - Despite the ongoing legal proceedings, Huaxia Happiness has stated that it is cooperating with the temporary management team and that the restructuring process is crucial for its survival [8][12].

Core Viewpoint - The announcement of pre-restructuring by Huaxia Happiness has led to significant backlash from its largest shareholder and core creditor, Ping An Group, highlighting a breakdown in communication and trust between the two parties [2][11]. Group 1: Company Actions and Responses - Huaxia Happiness announced that it was applying for pre-restructuring, which was accepted by the court, but did not adequately communicate this decision to Ping An beforehand [2][3]. - The company claims that the pre-restructuring process does not require board or shareholder approval, emphasizing the urgency of addressing its debt crisis [4][6]. - Huaxia Happiness has received a court notice confirming the acceptance of its pre-restructuring application and the appointment of a temporary management team [5][6]. Group 2: Financial Situation - As of the first three quarters of 2025, Huaxia Happiness reported a 72% year-on-year decline in revenue and a net loss of 9.8 billion yuan, with total equity of -4.7 billion yuan, indicating a technical insolvency status [9]. - The company's asset-liability ratio has reached 96%, reflecting severe financial distress [9]. Group 3: Relationship with Ping An - The relationship between Huaxia Happiness and Ping An has deteriorated significantly, with Ping An expressing strong dissatisfaction over the lack of communication regarding the restructuring process [2][11]. - Historically, Ping An has supported Huaxia Happiness during previous financial crises, but the current situation has led to a breakdown in trust, particularly due to the potential for debt to be converted into equity, which would result in significant losses for Ping An [11][18]. - The conflict escalated as Ping An initiated a financial audit of Huaxia Happiness, which the company refused to cooperate with, further straining their relationship [2][4].