exotic RWAsAJC (@AvgJoesCrypto):Great read, thanks for the shout @andrebeganski! https://t.co/vST9xYbvYT ...

RT Xeer (@Xeer)the @MavrykNetwork leaderboard on kaito is easily one of the most competitive ones.but apart from the supposed $10b+ RWA deal with @multibank_io, do yappers actually know why they needed to launch an L1 with its own token $MVRK?whether or not that matters, we will know in 8 days once the TGE happens. ...

Group 1 - The core argument is that the legalization of stablecoins does not guarantee their acceptance or success in all payment scenarios, as they are not legal tender and have specific application contexts [1][2][7] - The recent legislation in the US, Hong Kong, and the EU aims to regulate stablecoins, but existing stablecoins may not comply with the new rules, necessitating a transition period for issuers [2][4] - Stablecoins are primarily seen as payment intermediaries rather than currencies themselves, and their use is contingent on the existence of a transaction need [2][7] Group 2 - The article outlines four potential strategies for stablecoins post-legalization: maintaining existing markets while exploring new ones, reducing gray areas, integrating mainstream transactions on-chain, and identifying unique payment scenarios [8][10] - Current stablecoin applications are categorized into four types: virtual world payments, cross-border transactions to evade sanctions, usage in countries with unstable currencies, and illegal activities [8][9][10] - The main challenge for stablecoins in mainstream payment scenarios is that they do not offer advantages over legal tender in environments where the latter is readily available [10][11][13] Group 3 - Retail payment scenarios for stablecoins include general retail transactions and merchant-issued stablecoins, which face limitations in acceptance across different platforms [12][11] - In domestic and cross-border trade payments, stablecoins have not demonstrated significant advantages, as traditional currencies remain the preferred method for transactions [13][14] - The potential for stablecoins to serve as a transitional tool for companies navigating foreign exchange regulations is highlighted, particularly for businesses operating in multiple jurisdictions [15][16] Group 4 - The article discusses the concept of tokenized financial instruments, such as bills of exchange, which may be more appealing than stablecoins due to their dual function of payment and financing [19][20] - The idea of deposit tokenization is presented as a more advantageous alternative to stablecoins, as it directly links to bank deposits and offers seamless integration with existing banking systems [20] - The regulatory landscape in the US is characterized by a balance between maintaining financial order and allowing space for innovation in the cryptocurrency sector [21][22]

Core Concept - The article discusses the distinction between RWA (Real World Asset) and RDA (Revenue Generating Digital Asset), emphasizing the importance of understanding these concepts for making informed decisions in the context of blockchain integration with real-world assets [1][3]. Group 1: Definitions - RWA refers to the tokenization of tangible or intangible assets in the real world, representing ownership or a share of the asset itself [6]. - RDA represents the rights to future cash flows or revenues generated by an asset, without conferring ownership of the asset [6][4]. Group 2: Key Differences - The fundamental difference lies in ownership: RWA involves the transfer or division of ownership, while RDA does not change ownership, allowing the asset holder to retain full ownership [10]. - RWA is more complex due to legal structures, compliance, and asset custody, whereas RDA is simpler and focuses on cash flow rights [10]. - RWA is suitable for asset restructuring and financing, while RDA is ideal for short-term liquidity without losing ownership [10][11]. Group 3: Implications for Asset Holders - The choice between RWA and RDA depends on the asset holder's goals: RWA is better for deep asset restructuring and global liquidity, while RDA is more flexible for short-term financing needs [9][11]. - Understanding the differences between RWA and RDA can help asset holders communicate effectively with technology and project partners, ensuring their needs are accurately expressed [11].

For reference:https://t.co/J0ws52ky4MAndy (@ayyyeandy):A new massive RWA player is coming onchain.Introducing: Fidelity Digital Interest Token.While I was snooping around @RWA_xyz , I found this new product from Fidelity with $203M in it.Ticker $FDIT https://t.co/LmBmiPsgwa ...

RT fabda.eth (@fabdarice)Fidelity has launched $FDIT, a tokenized share of the Fidelity Treasury Digital Fund (FYOXX):🔹Backed by U.S. Treasuries🔹Redeemable 1:1 for fund shares🔹Natively built on Ethereum+$200M, RWA is growing on Ethereum. https://t.co/TiUVy3SQbX ...

RT Sei (@SeiNetwork)RWAs are breaking out, led by private credit and Treasuries.For the first time, these assets are liquid, composable, and DeFi-ready - and demand is clear.Trillions will be tokenized, and that growth will come on frictionless rails like Sei.RWAs Move Faster on Sei. ($/acc) https://t.co/LHWdugyEfd ...

A new massive RWA player is coming onchain.Introducing: Fidelity Digital Interest Token.While I was snooping around @RWA_xyz , I found this new product from Fidelity with $203M in it.Ticker $FDIT https://t.co/LmBmiPsgwa ...

Overview of $STBL Stablecoin - $STBL aims to redefine the stablecoin narrative by separating yield and principal, allowing users to enjoy utility without sacrificing earnings [1] - Reeve Collins, the creator of Tether, is behind $STBL [1] $STBL's Innovative Mechanism - $STBL introduces a new mechanism where minting yields two assets: $USST (stablecoin) and $YLD (yield-bearing NFT) [2] - Users can spend $USST while $YLD continues to generate yield, eliminating the trade-off between liquidity and returns [2] Asset Backing and TradFi Integration - $STBL is backed by real-world assets (RWAs) such as tokenized Treasuries and money market funds like Franklin Templeton's BENJI and Ondo's USDY [2] - $STBL aims to unlock RWA liquidity by converting tokenized treasuries and RWAs into $USST stablecoin and $YLD yield [3] Market Momentum and Future Plans - $STBL has secured $500 million in institutional minting commitments [3] - Token Generation Event (TGE) is coming soon [3]

#比特幣 #加密貨幣 #邦妮區塊鏈 🎉 頻道專屬！新老用戶瓜分 10000U 美股代幣，NVDA, TSLA等任意代幣隨機空投！ 👉 請到 Line at 或是 telegram 輸入 『美股』即會有活動資訊 🔵邦妮區塊鏈｜唯一官方Telegram社群 https://t.me/+IjpxC7GEx7c5ZTJl 🟢幣圈新手登機門｜官方LINE https://line.me/R/ti/p/@399zbjsc ＿＿ 📕幣圈全攻略系列影片： 1️⃣ 新手入門指南：https://www.youtube.com/watch 2️⃣ 出入金：https://www.youtube.com/watch 3️⃣ 永續合約：https://www.youtube.com/watch 4️⃣ 合約網格機器人：https://www.youtube.com/watch 5️⃣ 網格＆馬丁格爾機器人：https://www.youtube.com/watch 6️⃣ 冷錢包：https://www.youtube.com/watch 7️⃣ 幣圈卡：https://www.youtube.com/watch ＿＿ 你知道美股已 ...