证券代码：688667 证券简称：菱电电控 公告编号：2025-046 武汉菱电汽车电控系统股份有限公司 关于本次交易相关主体买卖股票情况自查报告的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 武汉菱电汽车电控系统股份有限公司（以下简称"上市公司"、"公司"或 "菱电电控"）拟发行股份及支付现金购买北京兰之穹信息科技研究中心（有限 合伙）等27名交易对方合计持有的江苏奥易克斯汽车电子科技股份有限公司 根据《上市公司重大资产重组管理办法》《上市公司监管指引第7号——上 市公司重大资产重组相关股票异常交易监管》《公开发行证券的公司信息披露内 容与格式准则第26号——上市公司重大资产重组》《监管规则适用指引——上市 类第1号》等法律、法规的要求，公司对本次交易相关内幕信息知情人买卖股票 情况进行了核查，具体情况如下： 一、本次交易内幕信息知情人核查范围 本次自查范围包括： 二、本次交易内幕信息知情人自查期间 本次自查期间为上市公司首次披露本次重组事项或就本次重组申请股票停 牌（孰早）前六个月至重组报告书披露之前一日止，即20 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the rampant insider trading in the A-share market, indicating that the frequency and audacity of such activities have reached unprecedented levels, overshadowing previous regulatory efforts [3][22]. Group 1: Instances of Pre-announcement Price Surge - Guokewi announced on June 6 its intention to acquire 94.366% of Zhongxin Ningbo's equity, leading to a 20% price surge on May 20, just before the announcement [5]. - Shangluo Electronics saw a 22.82% increase over four trading days prior to its announcement on June 4 regarding the acquisition of Guangzhou Ligong Technology [6]. - Bangji Technology's stock price surged on June 4 before announcing its acquisition plans [7]. - ST Jinbi experienced a 7.13% increase in the two trading days leading up to its announcement on June 4 regarding a share transfer [8]. - Huamao Technology's stock rose by 11.16% in the three trading days before its June 4 announcement of acquiring Shenzhen Fuchuang Youyue Technology [9]. Group 2: Long-term Price Increases Before Major Announcements - Honghui Fruits and Vegetables saw a 38.14% increase from April 1 to June 6, despite only a 2.97% rise on the announcement day [23]. - Maipu Medical's stock surged over 69.61% from April 7 to May 21, with significant increases noted before its announcement [23]. - Haitai Development's stock rose by 73.84% from April 7 to June 5, despite only a 1.73% increase on the announcement day [23]. - Feiyada's stock increased by 50.76% in May, with multiple days of over 9% gains leading up to its announcement on June 4 [23]. Group 3: Techniques of Insider Trading - The article discusses the strategy of creating false market signals to mislead investors, as seen in the case of Qunxing Toys, which experienced a sudden surge in trading volume before announcing a major asset restructuring [29]. - The practice of buying shares before creating favorable news is highlighted, with examples such as Diou Home, where the actual controller's shareholding was transferred to a related party [31]. - The article notes that insider trading is often concealed effectively, making it difficult for regulatory bodies to detect [34]. Group 4: Regulatory Challenges - The article emphasizes that even significant price increases do not necessarily trigger regulatory scrutiny, as companies can claim no insider information was leaked [36][38]. - Instances of companies reporting substantial price increases before announcements without facing consequences illustrate the challenges in enforcing regulations [40][41].

作 者丨尹华禄 编 辑丨曾静娇 6月9日晚间，化工行业上市公司瑞丰高材（300243.SZ）发布公告称，公司于当日收到董事会秘书赵子阳的 通知，其于当日收到证监会出具的《立案告知书》，证监会决定对赵子阳因涉嫌内幕交易予以立案。 瑞丰高材在公告中表示，"本次立案调查系对赵子阳的个人调查，且不涉及本公司股票交易。上述事项与公司 的日常经营管理和业务活动无关，目前公司生产经营一切正常。" 据该公司2020年披露的履历信息，赵子阳生于1987，大专学历，2009年4月至2011年10月任证券事务代表并 参加了瑞丰高材改制、辅导、公开发行股份并上市的工作；2011年11月至2015年2月任证券事务代表兼办公 室主任；2015年3月至2016年6月任证券事务代表兼证券部部长；2016年6月至今任公司董事会秘书。 到了2024年，赵子阳的学历更新为本科。此外，2023年7月至今，他还兼任控股子公司瑞丰玥能董事；2023 年9月至今，兼任参股公司迪纳新材董事。 瑞丰高材2024年年报显示，赵子阳持有公司股票21.99万股，其中限售股数为16.49万股。2024年，赵子阳在 上市公司获得的税前报酬为41.61万元。 南财快讯记 ...

作 者丨尹华禄 编 辑丨曾静娇 6月9日晚间，化工行业上市公司瑞丰高材（300243.SZ）发布公告称，公司于当日收到董事会秘书赵子阳的 通知，其于当日收到证监会出具的《立案告知书》，证监会决定对赵子阳因涉嫌内幕交易予以立案。 瑞丰高材在公告中表示，"本次立案调查系对赵子阳的个人调查，且不涉及本公司股票交易。上述事项与公司 的日常经营管理和业务活动无关，目前公司生产经营一切正常。" 据该公司2020年披露的履历信息，赵子阳生于1987，大专学历，2009年4月至2011年10月任证券事务代表并 参加了瑞丰高材改制、辅导、公开发行股份并上市的工作；2011年11月至2015年2月任证券事务代表兼办公 室主任；2015年3月至2016年6月任证券事务代表兼证券部部长；2016年6月至今任公司董事会秘书。 到了2024年，赵子阳的学历更新为本科。此外，2023年7月至今，他还兼任控股子公司瑞丰玥能董事；2023 年9月至今，兼任参股公司迪纳新材董事。 瑞丰高材2024年年报显示，赵子阳持有公司股票21.99万股，其中限售股数为16.49万股。2024年，赵子阳在 上市公司获得的税前报酬为41.61万元。 南财快讯记 ...

因芝华仕沙发闻名的上市家居企业敏华控股，近日因一高管随意罚款言论"出圈"，引发热议。 01 高管因罚款言论引热议，企业回应 据《南方都市报》报道，近日有网友发帖称，"敏华家居电商部一刘姓高管要求员工不得在工位 就餐，强制加班并要求一天打卡6次，不愿意的自行离职"，质疑相关行为违反劳动法。 图据@厂里厂外那些事 该网友公布的聊天截图显示，今年5月，该刘姓高管在工作群里发文称，有同事"上班不在工 位"，有上厕所的，有"照镜子的、有奇怪理由的"，称"被我查到打游戏的，直接开除！吃东西 的，罚领导2000，主管1000，次主管500"，"无事不在岗位的，超过三次以上的月度工资降 2000"。此外，刘某被披露追加罚款内容称"下班不关电脑罚100"。 另一聊天截图显示，刘某在微信群表示"今天晚上进账大几千，团队建设经费又有了"，表示将 经费"买书籍，建图书馆"。上述言论引发网友热议。 据芝华仕电商部员工提供的《关于互联网品牌中心8S办公环境管理规定》显示，规定要求包括 离开工位超过10分钟需锁屏，离开时椅子归位。对违反规定的，直接责任人处50元经济处罚， 对所属部门负责人处以100元经济处罚，所有违规罚金均纳入"8S激励 ...

证券代码：600745 证券简称：闻泰科技 公告编号：临 2025-099 转债代码：110081 转债简称：闻泰转债 闻泰科技股份有限公司 关于本次交易相关内幕信息知情人买卖股票情况的 自查报告的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述 或者重大遗漏，并对其内容的真实性、准确性和完整性承担法律责任。 重要内容提示： ● 根据中国证券登记结算有限责任公司出具的查询结果，经公司自查、独 立财务顾问和法律顾问核查，相关主体在自查期间买卖闻泰科技股票的行为不 属于利用内幕信息进行内幕交易的行为，不会对本次交易构成实质性法律障碍。 闻泰科技股份有限公司（以下简称"闻泰科技"或"公司"或"上市公司"） 拟以现金交易的方式向立讯精密工业股份有限公司及立讯通讯（上海）有限公司 转让公司下属的昆明闻讯实业有限公司、黄石智通电子有限公司、昆明智通电子 有限公司、闻泰科技（深圳）有限公司、Wingtech Group (HongKong) Limited（含 PT. Wingtech Technology Indonesia）的 100%股权以及下属公司闻泰科技（无锡） 有限公司、无锡闻讯电子有限 ...

Core Viewpoint - Recent administrative penalties against two senior IT staff from securities firms highlight significant compliance management failures within the industry, particularly regarding insider trading practices known as "mouse warehouses" [1][2][8]. Group 1: Administrative Penalties - The Anhui Securities Regulatory Bureau imposed a total fine of 4.2628 million yuan on Li Haipeng, a senior manager at CITIC Securities, for insider trading using non-public information [1][3]. - The Jilin Securities Regulatory Bureau fined Shao for similar violations, totaling 1.0757 million yuan, including a fine of 581,800 yuan for insider trading and an additional 300,000 yuan for unauthorized stock trading as a securities professional [1][7]. Group 2: Details of Violations - Li Haipeng accessed non-public information about a private fund's holdings and executed trades through his wife's account, resulting in profits of 2.1314 million yuan from trading 128 stocks with a total transaction amount of 64.838 million yuan [3][5]. - Shao utilized his access to the trading system to conduct "shadow trading," where his account mirrored trades from the proprietary accounts of his firm, leading to profits of 193,900 yuan from 58 stocks [6][7]. Group 3: Regulatory Response and Industry Implications - The frequency of "mouse warehouse" cases has prompted regulators to adopt stricter penalties and enhanced monitoring through big data technologies to prevent insider trading [2][9]. - The China Securities Regulatory Commission reported 59 cases of violations by industry professionals last year, indicating a growing concern over compliance and the need for improved oversight mechanisms [8][9]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - Experts suggest implementing stricter controls, such as physical separation of IT and trading systems, real-time monitoring of unusual activities using AI, and enhancing compliance measures through dual review processes [9][10].

Group 1 - Company announced plans to acquire multiple livestock companies through a combination of share issuance and cash payment [1] - The acquisition targets include 100% equity of several livestock companies and 80% equity of a consulting firm, with a preliminary agreement signed [1] - Company stock was suspended from trading for up to 10 trading days to comply with disclosure obligations during the acquisition process [1] Group 2 - Company stock has increased by 71.03% year-to-date, influenced by significant share purchases by the controlling shareholder and rising pig prices [2] - The feed industry in China is experiencing slow growth, with a decline in total industrial feed production expected in the first half of 2024, particularly in pig feed [2] - The industry is characterized by low concentration but increasing scale, with larger companies extending their market presence through mergers and alliances [2] Group 3 - Company has focused on pig feed development, production, and sales since its establishment in 2007, with a diverse product range [3] - The company experienced a significant revenue increase in Q1 2025, with a 160.84% year-on-year rise in revenue and a 37.71% increase in net profit [3] - The planned acquisition aligns with the company's core business and aims to enhance market competitiveness by integrating resources and achieving synergies [3]

昨日，停牌前股价提前涨停的菲林格尔发布了控制权拟变更的提示性公告并复牌。 本次交易可分为两部分。一，安吉以清科技合伙企业（有限合伙）（下称"安吉以清"）及实控人金亚伟 拟受让菲林格尔实控人丁福如及其一致行动人的股份合计25%，成为上市公司新控股股东和实控人。而 丁福如方仍持有菲林格尔19.56%股权，但承诺"放弃争夺控制权"。二，菲林格尔单一第一大股东菲林格 尔控股拟将所持27.22%股权协议转让给陕国投·乐盈267号信托、渤源达朗基金、和融联基金（简称"三 只信托及私募产品"），实现完全退出。 然而，此次易主交易结构之复杂、股权安排之巧妙，折射出背后诸多蹊跷之处。 自称相互独立的多个收购方是否存在隐性关联关系？"拆分式"易主背后是否为"分仓式"减持铺路？提 前"抢跑"的股价是否暗藏内幕交易风险？公司过往财报疑团会否随着易主而石沉大海？若方案最终实 施，其他公司会否群起效仿？ 同时，交易完成后，安吉以清的控股比例并不高，仅三只信托及私募产品的合计持股就足以动摇安吉以 清对上市公司的控制权，更遑论原实控人丁福如方还保留大额持股。 如果没有足够的控制方式与安全保障，安吉以清及其背后的金亚伟怎敢入局收购？ 更耐人寻 ...

Core Viewpoint - Recent administrative penalties imposed by the Anhui and Jilin Securities Regulatory Bureaus highlight severe violations of insider trading regulations by senior IT staff at brokerage firms, revealing significant compliance management flaws within these institutions [2][3][4]. Group 1: Administrative Penalties - Li Haipeng, a senior manager at CITIC Securities, was fined a total of 4.26 million yuan for insider trading, including a fine of 2.13 million yuan for profits gained from trading based on undisclosed information [3][6]. - Shao, a former head of research system construction at Huatai Securities, was penalized with a total of 1.08 million yuan for similar violations, including a fine of 583,000 yuan for insider trading [3][12]. Group 2: Details of Violations - Li Haipeng accessed confidential trading information of a well-known private equity fund, resulting in profits of 2.13 million yuan through coordinated trading activities [5][8]. - Shao utilized his access to Huatai Securities' internal systems to conduct shadow trading, resulting in profits of 193,900 yuan while incurring overall losses of 2.63 million yuan over 14 years of trading [11][12]. Group 3: Compliance Management Issues - The cases expose critical vulnerabilities in compliance management within brokerage firms, such as inadequate monitoring of employee access to sensitive information and failure to detect unusual trading activities [3][14]. - Regulatory authorities are increasingly adopting stringent measures, including significant penalties and enhanced monitoring technologies, to combat insider trading and improve compliance among securities personnel [3][17]. Group 4: Regulatory Response and Future Measures - The China Securities Regulatory Commission has initiated actions to address the frequent occurrence of insider trading cases, emphasizing the need for improved oversight and compliance mechanisms within the industry [16][17]. - Recommendations for preventing insider trading include establishing physical barriers between IT and trading systems, implementing AI for real-time monitoring of unusual activities, and enhancing compliance measures through regular audits and dual-review processes [18].