据环球时报援引日媒12月14日报道称，消息人士透露，在谈及中美以及中日关系时，美国总统特朗普曾 对日本首相高市早苗警告称"别来添乱"。 高市早苗11月7日发表涉台错误言论，暗示武力介入台海可能性，中日关系趋于恶化。 而高市的表态也令美方感到不快，据日本政府相关人士透露，在11月底的日美首脑电话会谈中，特朗普 曾以严厉语气警告高市早苗："（中美）正努力把事情处理好，别来添乱。"日本首相官邸消息人士透 露，高市早苗在通话后"情绪相当低落"。 据环球时报援引日媒12月14日报道称，消息人士透露，在谈及中美以及中日关系时，美国总统特朗普曾 对日本首相高市早苗警告称"别来添乱"。 高市早苗11月7日发表涉台错误言论，暗示武力介入台海可能性，中日关系趋于恶化。 而高市的表态也令美方感到不快，据日本政府相关人士透露，在11月底的日美首脑电话会谈中，特朗普 曾以严厉语气警告高市早苗："（中美）正努力把事情处理好，别来添乱。"日本首相官邸消息人士透 露，高市早苗在通话后"情绪相当低落"。 当地时间11月25日，美国总统特朗普与日本首相高市早苗通电话。 据报道，当被问及通话中，双方是否谈及其在国会发表的涉台错误言论时，高市早苗未 ...

对于日本来说，当前面临两条选择路径：一是立即刹车，回归到对话与合作的轨道，继续依赖经贸关系 作为稳固支撑；二是继续冒险，试探中国的底线，并准备应对更加具体和严厉的反制措施，这些反制可 能会从原材料、设备到投资和市场等多个领域逐步实施。反倾销税只是其中一个表现手段，其他领域的 反击也可能随之而来。关键在于日本政坛是否能够从这场政治赌局中抽身，正视自己的错误判断。 从 社会心理角度来看，日本的媒体追逐热点，政治人物为了抢占风头频频发言，舆论也在不断跟风。然 而，日本经济的老化、制造业的重组和日益加重的人口负担使得此时进行意识形态的冲锋，显得格外不 理智。这相当于把最后的救命稻草拿去拔河，虽能赢得面子，却会丢掉里子。中国的立场非常明确：红 线不可触碰，反制有章可循；愿意与所有国家展开合作，但必须基于理性和规矩。反倾销税更像是划定 的一条明显界线，越过这条线的代价将直接体现在具体的材料、生产线和岗位上，且代价清晰、冷静。 日本政坛最近出现了热议，前驻华大使垂秀夫在电视节目中为高市早苗关于台湾问题的言论辩护。他首 先承认台湾是中国的红线，接着又表示"话不能收回，否则可能一二十年都抬不起头"，并且暗示此言论 可以作为谈判 ...

中央广播电视总台国广《海峡飞虹》记者提问：日本首相高市早苗日前称，对于中国在1972年《中日联 合声明》中宣示"台湾是中华人民共和国领土不可分割的一部分"，而日本采取"理解并尊重"这一立场一 事，"丝毫没有改变"；并称日本对台湾议题的基本立场与《中日联合声明》一致，没有任何改变。岛内 网友讽刺"赖清德日料白吃了"。请问发言人对此有何评论？ 陈斌华回答：外交部已就此表明严正立场。我要再次强调，台湾问题纯属中国内政，不容任何外来干 涉。日本首相高市早苗在国会公然发表涉台错误言论，粗暴干涉中国内政。面对来自中方和国际社会的 质疑批评，高市只是用"立场没有变化"敷衍搪塞，我们对此不能接受，日方应切实反思，立即撤回错误 言论。 赖清德出于谋"独"的邪恶本质，迎合高市错误言论，完全丧失民族立场，其媚日行为令人不齿、枉费心 机。 人民网北京12月10日电 （记者刘洁妍、贾文婷、于洋）国务院台湾事务办公室12月10日举行例行新闻 发布会，发言人陈斌华主持发布会并答问。 ...

当地时间8日，日本"继承和发展村山谈话会"在东京举行紧急记者会。与会人士对日本首相高市早苗的涉台错误言论表示强烈担忧，指出台湾问题属于中国 内政，强烈要求高市尽快撤回错误言论。 日本关东学院大学名誉教授 足立昌胜：修改"安保三文件"，放宽防卫装备出口限制，可以随便出口武器，在防卫力提升计划中把原本预计到2027年才达到 的GDP2%的军费目标提前到今年，甚至还要将军费进一步提高到GDP的3.5%。就像我之前说的，我感觉高市内阁以及高市本人持有的基本想法是"急于参与 战争"。 "继承和发展村山谈话会"发表集体声明，强调台湾问题是中国内政，高市错误言论具有误导性和危险性。 "继承和发展村山谈话会"代表指出，该组织自2013年成立以来，一直以反省二战期间日本的侵略和殖民历史为根本宗旨，推动日本坚持和平、非战道路。此 次之所以紧急发声，是因为高市早苗的相关涉台表述，严重偏离日本战后坚持的和平路线。 日本青山学院大学名誉教授 羽场久美子：高市的发言即所谓"存亡危机事态"的说法极其危险，不仅违反宪法第九条，也违反国际法。我想强调的是，这种 发言将粉碎日本迄今为止所建立的国际信赖。 日本政治经济学者 植草一秀：高市首相在1 ...

在涉台问题引发的中日对立上，美国正刻意保持距离。 在美国高级官员中，虽然驻日本大使格拉斯对中国提出了批评，但正副总统及内阁成员级别的人物均未 在公开场合表态。只有美国务院副发言人曾于11月20日在X（原推特）上发表声明称，对日本防卫的承 诺不变。 在涉台问题引发的中日对立上，美国正刻意保持距离。在美国高级官员中，虽然驻日本大使格拉斯对中 国提出了批评，但正副总统及内阁成员级别的人物均未在公开场合表态。当前处于美国有意避免与中国 产生摩擦的局面…… 对于中国对日本采取的威慑性行动，作为日本盟国的美国的特朗普总统保持了沉默。如果对中国试探坐 视不理，东亚秩序发生动摇的风险将会上升。 日本联合美国之外的友邦的外交努力也迎来考验。 美国白宫和美国国务院12月7日并未就6日中国战机对日本自卫队战机照射雷达一事回应日本经济新闻的 置评请求。 对特朗普而言，美国中期选举将于2026年11月举行，这样做意在维系制造业的工人及农户等核心支持群 体。 在中美首脑会谈前，美方曾高调表态的台湾问题未被纳入会谈议程。有观点认为，考虑到中方不愿提及 凸显与美国分歧的台湾问题，希望中方在稀土和大豆问题上做出让步的美方选择了妥协。 在中美关 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes China's stance on the Taiwan issue, asserting that it is a matter for the Chinese people to resolve without external interference [1][2] - The Chinese government expresses a commitment to safeguarding national sovereignty and territorial integrity, highlighting the importance of mutual respect and cooperation in U.S.-China relations [1][2] - The article reiterates that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and that the Taiwan issue represents a core interest for China, marking it as a red line in U.S.-China relations [1]

Core Viewpoint - There is a strong demand from Japanese intellectuals for Prime Minister Kishi Sanae to retract her erroneous remarks regarding Taiwan, as they deviate from Japan's historical stance on the Taiwan issue and could escalate tensions in Japan-China relations [1][2]. Group 1: Reactions from Scholars and Politicians - The chairman of the "Inherit and Develop the Murayama Statement" group, Fujita Takakage, stated that Kishi's remarks in the Diet represent a significant departure from previous Japanese government positions, equating to a declaration of war if "Taiwan is in trouble," which could be seen as a revival of Japanese militarism [2]. - Japanese political scholar Uehara Kumiko emphasized that Kishi's statements contradict established international order, referencing documents like the Cairo Declaration of 1943 and the Potsdam Declaration of 1945 that clearly define Taiwan's status [2]. - Former diplomat and international political scholar Tōgō Kazuhiko noted that Kishi's comments have placed Japan-China relations in a precarious situation, stressing the importance of adhering to the 1972 Japan-China Joint Statement regarding Taiwan [2]. Group 2: Criticism of Kishi's Position - Political economist Uekusa Kazuhide criticized Kishi for her contradictory statements, suggesting that her attempts to downplay the significance of her remarks only serve to obscure the issue [3]. - Akimoto Atsushi, former editor of "Sekai" magazine, pointed out that Kishi's frequent references to dialogue with China lack the necessary respect and equality, making genuine dialogue impossible under her current approach [3]. - Professor Adachi Masakatsu highlighted Kishi's push for revising Japan's security documents, relaxing arms export restrictions, and increasing defense budgets, arguing that these actions are effectively steering Japan towards militarization and potential conflict [3].

Core Viewpoint - Japanese civil groups are demanding Prime Minister Kishi Sanae to retract her controversial remarks regarding Taiwan, which they believe deviate from Japan's historical stance on the Taiwan issue and could escalate tensions with China [1][2]. Group 1: Reactions from Scholars and Politicians - A statement from the "Inheritance and Development of the Murayama Statement" group emphasized that Kishi's remarks represent a significant departure from Japan's previous positions, equating to a declaration of war readiness in the event of a Taiwan crisis, which they view as a revival of militarism [1]. - Political scholars and former diplomats criticized Kishi's statements, highlighting that they contradict the 1972 Japan-China Joint Statement regarding Taiwan, which was established through serious negotiations [2]. - There is a consensus among experts that Kishi's contradictory explanations regarding her statements indicate an attempt to obscure the issue rather than address it directly [2]. Group 2: Implications for Japan's Defense Policy - Kishi's administration has been pushing for revisions to Japan's security documents, easing weapon export restrictions, and increasing defense budgets, which some experts argue is steering Japan towards militarization and potential conflict [2]. - The emphasis on national security measures, such as the promotion of anti-espionage laws and discussions on establishing a national intelligence agency, is seen as reinforcing internal information control and external intelligence gathering [2].

一些日本民众指出，日本社会仍存在对中国的刻板印象。受访者认为，台湾问题属于中国大陆与台湾之 间的问题，日本应保持中立立场，珍视和平、拒绝战争，同时希望中日两国未来能建立更加友好的关 系。 近日，一名英国自媒体博主在日本街头进行采访，多位民众明确表示，不支持日本介入台湾问题。受访 者普遍认为，近期中日政治关系紧张主要源于日本新任首相高市早苗在台湾问题上的不当言论，但不少 人强调这并不影响他们对中国的好感，许多人都提到中国人友好、热情，中国历史文化深厚。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese Foreign Ministry responded to the U.S. National Security Strategy report, emphasizing the importance of mutual respect and cooperation in U.S.-China relations while firmly defending China's sovereignty and territorial integrity regarding Taiwan [3][4]. Group 1: U.S.-China Relations - The Chinese side believes that cooperation benefits both nations, while conflict harms both, advocating for a stable and healthy development of U.S.-China relations [3]. - The Chinese government hopes the U.S. will work towards mutual understanding and implement the important consensus reached by the leaders of both countries [3][5]. Group 2: Taiwan Issue - The Chinese Foreign Ministry reiterated that Taiwan is an inseparable part of China and that the Taiwan issue is a core interest, representing a red line in U.S.-China relations [3][4]. - The Chinese side urged the U.S. to adhere to the One China principle and stop supporting separatist forces in Taiwan [4]. Group 3: Economic Relations - The essence of U.S.-China economic relations is mutual benefit, with a call for continued cooperation to serve as a stabilizing force in bilateral relations [5]. - The Chinese government expressed a desire for dialogue and collaboration to expand cooperation and reduce outstanding issues in the economic relationship [5].