俄罗斯总统普京表示，俄罗斯尊重美国的国家利益，并认为俄罗斯的国家利益将得到同样对待。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Fourth China News Spokesperson Forum emphasizes the importance of proactive communication to ensure that China's voice is heard and the truth prevails in the international discourse [1] Group 1: Importance of Communication - The spokesperson from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Guo Jiakun, highlights that authenticity and certainty in the international public opinion arena are becoming scarce [1] - It is essential to speak out promptly and actively to occupy the first point of impact and allow the truth to dominate [1] Group 2: Defense Against Hostility - Guo Jiakun notes that a minority of anti-China hostile forces persistently hold onto ideological biases and continuously attack and smear China [1] - In the face of baseless malicious slanders, spokespersons must stand up to defend national interests and uphold national dignity [1] Group 3: Commitment to Truth - The forum advocates for using truth to shatter lies and reason to crush fallacies, learning to engage in struggle while firmly guarding China's discourse territory [1] - The aim is to clarify to the world who engages in bullying and harm to various countries and who upholds fairness and justice [1]

其中提到，中国始终按照相互尊重、和平共处、合作共赢的原则处理中美关系，致力于中美关系稳定、 健康、可持续发展。中国不惹事也不怕事，谈，我们大门敞开，打，中国也将奉陪到底，施压和威胁绝 不是同中国打交道的正确方式。维护发展权利是中国国家安全的红线之一，维护国家利益也是中国国家 安全的基本要求。正如白皮书指出的，中国不觊觎他国权益，不嫉妒他国发展，但决不放弃自身正当权 益，在原则问题上寸步不让。中国有决心有信心有能力应对美国关税冲击，致力于维护多边贸易体制， 维护国际公平正义。中国国家安全将变压力为动力，把应对美国冲击视为加快构建新安全格局、推进国 家安全体系和能力现代化的战略机遇。 ...

英国首相斯塔默：我将为工人和企业的国家利益采取行动。 ...

克里姆林宫：（回应特朗普关于俄罗斯倾向于在油价下跌的情况下解决乌克兰冲突的言论）油价不能影 响俄罗斯对其国家利益的态度。 ...

李嘉诚向美国贝莱德财团出售海外港口所引发的舆论风波仍在持续发酵，近日，又有最新消息传来，长和集团已经开始想方设法的"变换手法"，以求继续推 进与美国财团交易港口。那他们的具体动作是怎样的呢？根据目前曝出来消息，长和集团是准备将售卖的43个港口一分为二，一部分是41个相对不敏感的港 口，另一部分是2个相对敏感的港口。前者卖给加拿大，后者卖给美国的贝莱德公司，其目的很明显就是想以此绕过国家审查。只能说，李嘉诚现在是真的 铁了心要一条道走到黑了。 话说回来，即便现在李嘉诚向美国霸权"秒跪"，难道就能换来安宁吗？显然是不可能的。依照美国的霸权行事风格，你越是妥协屈服于美国的霸权淫威，那 么最后的结果就只会进一步遭到美国的"收割"和打压，继而进一步的对美方妥协，直到自身利益被美国"剥夺"完了为止，当自身失去了利用价值后，美国就 会一脚将你踢开。在这之前，无数的实例早已证明了这一点。总而言之一句话，没有脱离国家利益的资本安全，也没有凌驾于主权之上的商业逻辑。何去何 从，长和应当作出明智的抉择。 之所以这件事会引起舆论的高度关注，主要就是因为该事件的时间点，恰好处在美国特朗普政府多次强调要"收回"巴拿马运河的特殊背景下，也 ...

巴基斯坦军队总司令：巴基斯坦将继续致力于地区和平，但也准备维护国家利益。 ...

大陆对长和集团出售港口事件，并没有一下子把事情做绝，说明我们仍旧不忍心下死手。长和集团以拖待变，幻想事情还有转机。港媒劝李嘉诚悬崖勒马， 彻底终止交易。 国家市监总局宣布对长和集团港口交易，依法开展审理审查，是为维护国家安全和民族利益的应有之义，要注意的是，我们用的是审查，态度比较缓和，同 时援引的《反垄断法》，也让审查的基调没有那么激烈。 这说明国家方面对于长和集团，还有其背后的李家，并没有忍心把事情做绝，没有痛下杀手，否则的话只需一纸红头文件，资本家就会认识到跟国家意志对 抗的下场。 因为这个原因，现在长和集团出售港口事件，就变成了博弈游戏。 大陆方面不忍心把事情做绝，希望通过审查手段，倒逼李家主动取消交易，这样面子上大家都过得去，以后还是一家人，有钱一起挣。 能看得出来，长和集团还在拖，他们还在幻想大陆会雷声大雨点小，还在幻想特朗普会对北京施压，逼迫中国人同意长和集团出售港口。但是这些都只能是 幻想。 在国家出手对长和集团售港交易进行审查后，国务院港澳办方面，也再次通过转载港媒文章的形式，敦促李家不要再执迷不悟。 这篇文章名为《港商须有底气，不应向霸权主义低头》，提到在目前国际地缘政治风险加剧、企业家在 ...

Core Viewpoint - The sale of ports by Li Ka-shing to the American financial group BlackRock has raised significant concerns regarding national interests and strategic infrastructure, especially in the context of escalating US-China tensions [3][15]. Group 1: Transaction Details - Li Ka-shing's company, CK Hutchison Holdings, announced an agreement to sell 43 ports across 23 countries to BlackRock for $22.765 billion [3][6]. - BlackRock's transaction involves ports that handle one in every twenty shipping containers globally, highlighting the strategic importance of this deal [6][10]. - The primary operational partner for BlackRock in this transaction is the Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC), which is the largest shipping group globally [7][8]. Group 2: Implications of the Deal - If the transaction is completed, BlackRock will significantly enhance its influence in the infrastructure sector, potentially controlling around 100 port investments globally through its GIP fund [10][12]. - The deal has sparked concerns in China, as it could lead to increased operational costs for Chinese shipping companies entering these ports, especially with the US considering imposing a service fee on Chinese vessels [15][17]. - The transaction has been met with public discontent, with calls for a review of the deal due to its implications for national security and economic interests [19][21]. Group 3: Potential Outcomes - There are four possible outcomes for the transaction: normal completion, modification of the deal to exclude sensitive ports, complete cancellation, or a split sale where strategic ports are sold to state-owned enterprises [19][21]. - The likelihood of the deal being canceled is considered high, given the ongoing scrutiny and regulatory reviews [19][21].

Core Viewpoint - The sale of overseas ports by Cheung Kong Group, led by Li Ka-shing, is facing significant scrutiny and potential backlash from the Chinese government, particularly regarding the strategic importance of the Panama Canal ports involved in the transaction [1][3]. Group 1: Transaction Details - Cheung Kong Group is reportedly in collaboration with BlackRock to finalize the sale of key ports in Panama, aiming to sign an agreement by April 2 [1]. - The ports in question, Balboa and Cristobal, are critical for maritime trade, significantly impacting shipping routes and costs if controlled by the U.S. [3]. Group 2: Government Response - The Chinese government has expressed strong opposition to the transaction, emphasizing the need to protect national interests and warning against economic coercion [3][5]. - State-owned enterprises in China have been instructed to pause collaborations with Li Ka-shing's companies, indicating a significant pushback against the perceived threat to national interests [5]. Group 3: Potential Outcomes - Cheung Kong Group has the option to withdraw from the transaction, as the deal is contingent upon several conditions, including regulatory approvals and compliance with local laws [5]. - The Chinese government is actively engaging with both the Panamanian government and U.S. entities to seek a resolution, highlighting the importance of maintaining strategic relationships [8].