Workflow
AI魔改
icon
Search documents
诸葛亮飙英文、唐僧大谈反内耗……AI“魔改”经典,国家广播电视总局出手
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-12-31 12:40
Core Viewpoint - The National Radio and Television Administration (NRTA) will implement a one-month special governance initiative starting January 1, 2026, to address the rampant spread of "AI-modified" videos that distort classic works and disrupt cultural understanding among minors [1][2]. Group 1: Background and Context - The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence technology has led to the misuse of AI tools by some online accounts, resulting in the disruptive alteration and vulgar adaptation of classic films and animations [1]. - These AI-modified contents significantly deviate from the original spirit of classic works, disturb the order of online dissemination, promote infringement, and harm industry development [1]. Group 2: Specific Issues Addressed - The NRTA's governance will focus on cleaning up videos that modify classic works, particularly those based on the Four Great Classical Novels, historical themes, revolutionary themes, and heroic figures [2]. - The targeted videos include those that severely violate the original spirit and character portrayal, promote violence and vulgarity, and misappropriate or distort Chinese culture, leading to a distorted understanding of real historical contexts and cultural identity [2]. Group 3: Implementation and Responsibilities - Online video platforms are required to fulfill their primary responsibilities by strengthening content review processes, decisively removing violations, and addressing accounts that prominently spread "AI-modified" videos [3]. - The initiative aims to reverse the negative trend of "AI-modified" videos and create a healthier online environment for the growth of young people [3].
“AI魔改”视频专项治理将启动!南都曾曝光换脸伪造乱象
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-12-31 04:05
国家广播电视总局指出,部分网络账号滥用AI工具,对经典影视、动画片等内容进行颠覆性篡改、魔 性解构与低俗化改编,这些内容严重背离经典作品精神内核,扰乱网络传播秩序,助长侵权行为,危害 行业发展,干扰未成年人形成正确文化认知和现实感知。 南都此前报道,随着生成式AI在国内得到越来越广泛的应用,不少问题逐渐显现。例如,曾有男子利 用AI技术"换脸"炮制出了自己与女星迪丽热巴亲吻的画面,随后引起热议。 南都记者调查发现,"AI明星换脸"在网络上有不同的消费套餐,价格在28元至138元不等,68元即可购 买一套AI技术明星换脸淫秽视频,共500部左右。 12月31日,南都N视频记者从国家广播电视总局获悉,为整治"AI魔改"视频传播乱象,国家广播电视总 局自2026年1月1日起,在全国范围内开展为期一个月的专项治理。重点清理基于四大名著、历史题材、 革命题材、英模人物等电视剧作品进行"AI魔改"的视频。 《三国演义》和《西游记》的影视画面被"AI魔改"。 据介绍,专项治理重点清理视频范围包括严重违背原作精神内核和角色形象,颠覆基本认知,解构普遍 共识;内容渲染血腥暴力、猎奇低俗,宣扬错误价值观,违背公序良俗;存在对中华 ...
国家广电总局:2026年1月1日起,专项治理
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-12-31 01:52
Core Viewpoint - The National Radio and Television Administration (NRTA) is launching a one-month special governance initiative starting January 1, 2026, to address the rampant spread of "AI-modified" videos that distort classic works and disrupt online order [1] Group 1: Governance Initiative - The initiative aims to tackle the misuse of AI tools by online accounts that alter classic films and animations, leading to a deviation from the original spirit of these works [1] - The focus will be on cleaning up videos based on the Four Great Classical Novels, historical themes, revolutionary themes, and heroic figures that severely violate the original spirit and character images [1] - The governance will also target content that promotes violence, lowbrow themes, and incorrect values, as well as significant issues of appropriation and distortion of Chinese culture [1] Group 2: Responsibilities and Future Actions - Online audiovisual platforms are required to take responsibility for content review and to eliminate violations, addressing accounts that contribute to the spread of "AI-modified" videos [1] - Following the governance initiative, the NRTA will summarize the outcomes and develop comprehensive governance measures to ensure ongoing and effective management [2]
诸葛亮飙英文、唐僧反内耗……AI“魔改”的边界在哪?
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-12-14 20:49
Core Viewpoint - The rise of AI-modified videos, particularly in the context of classic films and TV shows, raises questions about copyright infringement and the preservation of original cultural narratives [3][10]. Group 1: AI Modification in Media - AI technology allows creators to modify classic film dialogues, resulting in characters speaking in ways that diverge from their original portrayals, such as speaking fluent English or discussing modern concepts [1][3]. - The production of AI-modified videos has a low barrier to entry, enabling widespread participation among creators, which has led to a significant increase in such content across various short video platforms [6][10]. Group 2: Legal and Ethical Considerations - The National Radio and Television Administration has issued warnings regarding AI-modified content, stating that it undermines traditional cultural values and may constitute copyright infringement [3][15]. - The first case of "AI voice infringement" in China concluded with a ruling that recognized the rights of voice actors, highlighting the legal complexities surrounding the use of AI in media [11][14]. - Legal experts emphasize that whether the use of modified audio is lawful depends on the specific context and purpose of the content, with a distinction made between fair use and infringement [15][16].
诸葛亮飙英文、唐僧反内耗……AI「魔改」的边界在哪?
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-12-14 09:53
Core Viewpoint - The rise of AI "magic modification" videos, which alter classic film and television dialogues using AI technology, raises concerns about copyright infringement and the impact on traditional cultural perceptions [3][9][12]. Group 1: AI Modification Technology - AI modification allows creators to easily alter dialogues in videos, with low technical barriers enabling widespread participation [7][10]. - The process involves uploading original audio and selecting emotional styles to generate realistic voiceovers in minutes, significantly reducing the complexity compared to traditional methods [9][10]. Group 2: Legal and Ethical Concerns - The National Radio and Television Administration has issued warnings about AI-modified videos, stating they may violate copyright laws and undermine the essence of original works [3][12]. - The first case of "AI voice infringement" in China ruled that unauthorized use of a voice constitutes infringement, resulting in a compensation of 250,000 yuan [9][12]. - Legal experts emphasize that whether AI modifications are lawful depends on the context of use, with potential for reasonable use under copyright law if the modifications serve critical or satirical purposes [13].
家长请注意!小学生沉迷的“外国山海经”“奥特曼怀孕”等邪典视频卷土重来,内容诡异、暴力,背后谁在“作妖”?
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-11-23 10:57
每经编辑|金冥羽 近日,《法治日报》记者调查发现,"外国山海经""AI山海经"等AI魔改(指利用AI技术对原作品进行大幅或颠覆性改编的行为)内容在网络上迅速走红, 甚至渗透到低龄群体中。 夹杂暴力、血腥内容 "外国山海经"爆火小学生圈 "Tung Tung Tung Sahur"(音同"通通通通撒呼啦")、"Lirili larlla"(音同"哩哩哩辣力辣")……这些近来经常出现在小学生们口中,宛如神秘咒语的词汇,实则 是几幅AI生成的动画形象的名字,比如上述两个词汇分别对应"木棒人""仙人掌象"。 诸如此类由AI拼接而成的形象还有很多,它们被孩子们统称为"外国山海经"或者"AI山海经"。 "外国山海经" 图片来源:潮新闻 有家长发现,"孩子仿佛'着了魔',口中时不时蹦出来这些词语,跟他一起玩耍的小朋友们也都如此。" 这些将毫不相干元素强行拼凑出的怪异形象,为何能在孩子们的圈子里流行起来?"上述家长百思不得其解,而且,这"外国山海经"不仅造型诡异,更夹 杂不少暴力、血腥词汇和内容,"孩子或许并不理解其中的含义,但会模仿学习,很容易对他们产生负面影响"。 奥特曼怀孕、卡通人物挖眼珠子吃 "邪典视频"卷土重来 最 ...
比邪典动画更可怕!AI拼接的怪异形象,为何让孩子集体“着迷”?
Huan Qiu Wang Zi Xun· 2025-11-18 05:10
来源:法治日报 "通通通通撒呼啦""哩哩哩辣力辣"……天津市河东区某小学生家长李女士发现,自己的孩子最近总是念 叨着这些宛如神秘咒语的词汇。经了解,李女士才知道,这些看似无意义的音节,实则是几幅AI生成 的动画形象的名字,"Tung Tung Tung Sahur"(音同"通通通通撒呼啦")是所谓的"木棒人","Lirili larlla"(音同"哩哩哩辣力辣")是"仙人掌象","Tralalerotralala"(音同"特拉辣累喽特拉拉辣")是"耐克 鞋鲨鱼"。诸如此类由AI拼接而成的形象还有很多,它们被孩子们统称为"外国山海经"或者"AI山海 经"。 "孩子仿佛'着了魔',口中时不时蹦出来这些词语,跟他一起玩耍的小朋友们也都如此。这些将毫不相 干元素强行拼凑出的怪异形象,为何能在孩子们的圈子里流行起来?"李女士说,"外国山海经"不仅造 型诡异,更夹杂不少暴力、血腥词汇和内容,"孩子或许并不理解其中的含义,但会模仿学习,很容易 对他们产生负面影响"。 《法治日报》记者调查发现,近期,"外国山海经""AI山海经"等AI魔改(指利用AI技术对原作品进行大 幅或颠覆性改编的行为)内容在网络上迅速走红,甚至渗透到低 ...
人工智能“魔改”应有底线
Jing Ji Ri Bao· 2025-11-05 00:20
Group 1 - The emergence of AI-generated "remixed" videos of classic films has sparked discussions about the balance between creative freedom and the integrity of original works [1][2] - AI technology lowers the barriers to video production, but it raises legal and ethical concerns regarding copyright infringement and the potential for unauthorized adaptations [1][2] - The National Radio and Television Administration has issued guidelines for short video platforms to monitor and regulate AI-generated content, emphasizing the need for stricter content review processes [2] Group 2 - There is a risk that AI "remixes" could dilute cultural values and aesthetic standards, particularly among younger audiences who may struggle to distinguish between reality and parody [3] - Educational institutions are encouraged to foster copyright awareness and aesthetic appreciation among the youth to protect cultural heritage [3] - Collaboration among technology companies, legal institutions, and the cultural sector is essential to create a framework that allows for responsible use of AI while preserving the essence of classic works [2][3]
AI“魔改”视频争议:创意还是恶搞?边界到底在哪儿?
Qi Lu Wan Bao Wang· 2025-09-18 02:53
Core Viewpoint - The rise of AI "magic modifications" in short videos has sparked controversy regarding creativity versus parody, raising questions about the boundaries of such practices and the need for better regulation to ensure AI technology empowers rather than misleads [2][3][9] Group 1: AI "Magic Modifications" Phenomenon - AI "magic modifications" refer to the use of artificial intelligence to create transformative adaptations of original works, commonly seen in short videos and visual creations [1][2] - These modified videos have gained significant popularity on short video platforms, with some achieving tens of thousands of likes and rapid follower growth for creators [2][8] - The low technical barrier and economic cost of using AI for content creation contribute to the proliferation of these modifications, making it accessible for many creators [4][5] Group 2: Public Perception and Cultural Impact - Public opinion is divided, with some viewing these modifications as creative expressions while others argue they undermine the integrity and cultural significance of original works [3][8] - Concerns have been raised about the potential negative impact on younger audiences' values and the distortion of cultural memories due to unauthorized modifications [3][8] - Legal cases, such as the "Ultraman AI-generated infringement case," highlight the risks of AI modifications distorting historical memory and cultural heritage [3][9] Group 3: Economic Incentives for Creators - Creators of AI-modified content can achieve significant exposure, follower growth, and advertising revenue, often surpassing traditional original content in terms of engagement [8][9] - Many creators promote low-cost, high-return opportunities in AI-generated content, attracting individuals seeking to monetize their efforts through minimal investment [8][9] Group 4: Regulatory Responses and Recommendations - Regulatory bodies, such as the National Radio and Television Administration, are urging short video platforms to monitor and manage AI-modified content to protect original works and cultural integrity [9][10] - Experts suggest that platforms should take responsibility for filtering out infringing or inappropriate content while fostering innovation and protecting copyright holders [10] - A collaborative approach involving technology companies, legal regulators, and ethical committees is recommended to establish comprehensive governance guidelines for AI applications [10]
新华视点·关注AI造假丨透视AI“魔改”视频争议:创意还是恶搞?
Xin Hua She· 2025-09-17 13:55
新华社北京9月17日电 题:透视AI"魔改"视频争议:创意还是恶搞? 新华社"新华视点"记者周盛盛、邵鲁文 唐僧和孙悟空争当"话事人"、《甄嬛传》变成"枪战片"、《人民的名义》中沙瑞金和高育良开展魔法攻 击……近段时间,一些AI"魔改"内容在短视频平台上引发争议。 所谓AI"魔改",是指利用人工智能技术对原作品进行颠覆性改编的行为,常见于短视频、视觉创作等领 域。 AI"魔改"是创意还是恶搞?边界到底在哪儿?如何更好规范治理,让AI技术更多"赋能"而非"跑偏"? 备受争议的"魔改" "家人们,看着五指山压的是谁?如来老儿。当年压我500年,现在必须压他1000年。"孙悟空手举相 机"现场直播",在他身后,如来佛祖被压在山下…… 看着短视频平台推送的内容,青海西宁市民李女士着实吓了一跳。"我和孩子一起刷短视频,看到这个 视频画面流畅、人物说话嘴型丝毫不差,不仔细分辨,还以为是电视剧原有的画面。" 随着AI技术普及,一些视频博主将其变成猎取流量的工具,选取电视剧经典片段,剪辑成天马行空的 剧情,以猎奇的画面、夸张的台词激发观众兴趣。 在一些短视频平台上,此类"魔改"短视频数据火爆,有的点赞量高达数万。部分账号起号 ...