日本首相石破茂：（关于美国对伊朗的打击行动）我们必须始终以国际法的评估为准绳。 ...

伊朗外交部发言人：伊朗遵守国际法，只针对"特定和合法的军事目标"。 ...

外交部：攻击国际原子能机构保障监督下的核设施严重违反联合国宪章宗旨原则和国际法 金十数据6月23日讯，6月23日，外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持例行记者会。关于美打击伊朗核设施的问题， 郭嘉昆表示，中方已经清晰阐明立场，攻击国际原子能机构保障监督下的核设施，严重违反联合国宪章 宗旨原则和国际法。中方敦促冲突当事方，防止局势轮番升级，坚决避免战争外溢，重回政治解决轨 道。中方愿同各方加强沟通协调，凝聚合力，主持公道，为恢复中东地区和平发挥建设性作用。 （央 视新闻） ...

Core Points - The international community condemned the U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, stating it violates the UN Charter and international law, posing a threat to peace and security in the Middle East [1][2][3] - Various countries and organizations called for restraint and emphasized the need for dialogue and diplomatic solutions to resolve the conflict [1][2][3][4] Group 1: Reactions from International Organizations - The UN Secretary-General urged member states to de-escalate tensions and fulfill their obligations under international law [1] - The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) expressed concern that U.S. actions would exacerbate regional tensions and called for diplomatic solutions [1] - The Arab League condemned any military actions that violate national sovereignty and warned against a cycle of violence [1] Group 2: Statements from Individual Countries - Egypt reiterated its opposition to actions violating international law, emphasizing that military solutions are not viable [2] - Russia strongly condemned the U.S. strikes, highlighting the violation of international law and UN resolutions [2] - India called for immediate de-escalation and restoration of peace through dialogue [2] Group 3: Regional Concerns - Lebanon warned that the U.S. strikes could escalate conflicts between Israel and Iran [2] - Qatar expressed concerns about the potential catastrophic consequences of the current tensions [3] - Saudi Arabia condemned the infringement of Iranian sovereignty and called for political solutions [3] Group 4: Broader International Responses - Cuba condemned the U.S. actions as a serious violation of international law, warning of irreversible crises in the Middle East [4] - Colombia urged all parties to return to negotiations to prevent regional conflict escalation [4] - Switzerland emphasized the importance of respecting international law and called for maximum restraint [3]

Group 1 - The U.S. military successfully targeted and eliminated three Iranian nuclear facilities, marking an escalation in Middle Eastern tensions [1][2] - The U.S. military dropped six bunker buster bombs on the Fordow facility and launched 30 Tomahawk missiles at other Iranian nuclear sites [1] - Iran's Foreign Minister condemned the U.S. actions as a "barbaric military invasion" and a violation of international law [2][3] Group 2 - Iran's officials confirmed the attacks on the Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan nuclear facilities, asserting that they would defend their sovereignty and interests [2] - The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) announced an emergency meeting to discuss the situation in Iran following the attacks [3] - Israel coordinated closely with the U.S. military during the operation, with Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu stating that the destruction of Iran's nuclear facilities was a fulfilled promise [2]

Group 1: Iran-Israel Conflict - Iran has evacuated three nuclear facilities prior to the attacks, with only the surface of the Fordow facility damaged and repairable [2] - The Iranian Revolutionary Guard has vowed to strike all U.S. interests in the Middle East, and a senior official stated that any action against Khamenei would eliminate the possibility of negotiations [2] - Israel's air force has conducted strikes on Iranian facilities, destroying two F-5 fighter jets and targeting locations in Yazd for the first time [2] Group 2: U.S. Military Actions - The U.S. military used B-2 bombers and 14 massive bunker-busting bombs in the attack on Iranian nuclear facilities [2] - U.S. officials noted that Iran has the naval capability to block the Strait of Hormuz [2] - Satellite imagery indicated that Iran had reinforced the entrances to its nuclear facilities with dirt prior to the U.S. strikes [2] Group 3: Diplomatic Efforts - UK Prime Minister Starmer emphasized the need for Iran to return to the negotiating table for a diplomatic resolution [3] - The EU's foreign policy chief stated that Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons and called for a return to negotiations [3] - The Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency stressed the urgency of returning to negotiations and allowing inspectors back into Iran's nuclear facilities [3] Group 4: Regional Tensions - The Houthis have announced plans to resume attacks on U.S. vessels [4] - Iranian state media has labeled U.S. citizens and military personnel as "legitimate targets" [4] Group 5: Economic and Political Implications - The Iranian National Resistance Council stated that Iran's nuclear program has cost trillions and resulted in countless deaths, calling for Khamenei's resignation [5] - The U.S. Vice President indicated that Trump concluded in mid-May that negotiations with Iran were unproductive and issued a final ultimatum [5] - Reports suggest that the U.S. is withdrawing more diplomatic personnel from Iraq [6]

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights China's condemnation of the U.S. attack on Iran's nuclear facilities, emphasizing the violation of international law and the detrimental impact on global nuclear non-proliferation efforts [1] Group 1: U.S. Actions and International Response - The U.S. attack on Iran's nuclear facilities is described as a blatant violation of the United Nations Charter and international law [1] - The attack is said to have caused a devastating blow to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) mechanism, which is a crucial pillar of international order [1] Group 2: Impact on Iran and the U.S. - Iran has suffered damage due to the U.S. actions, but the U.S. itself has also harmed its own credibility as a nation and as a participant in international negotiations [1]

Group 1 - Iranian President Pezeshkian condemned the U.S. for its actions against Iranian nuclear facilities, stating that the U.S. is the mastermind behind Israel's hostile actions towards Iran [1] - Pezeshkian emphasized the need for unity among Iranians to defend their homeland, despite the significant losses incurred from Israeli attacks [1] Group 2 - U.S. Secretary of Defense Hagel stated that the U.S. successfully destroyed Iran's nuclear program without targeting Iranian military or civilians, clarifying that the mission was not aimed at regime change [2] - Hagel mentioned that the operation was in compliance with the War Powers Act and that Congress was informed post-operation [2] Group 3 - Over 125 U.S. aircraft participated in the operation, including B-2 stealth bombers, which launched 75 precision-guided munitions, including 14 GBU-57 massive penetrator bombs [3] - Initial assessments indicated severe damage to three Iranian nuclear facilities, although a senior U.S. official acknowledged that the B-2 bombers did not completely destroy the Fordow facility [4] Group 4 - U.S. Vice President Pence remarked that the decision to strike Iran was not taken lightly and could provide an opportunity to restart dialogue with Iran [5] - President Trump confirmed the completion of strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, with prior notification given to Israel [5] Group 5 - Russia strongly condemned the U.S. actions, labeling them as a violation of international law and the UN Charter [7] - Russian officials expressed concerns that the U.S. involvement could lead to a new conflict, with most countries opposing the U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran [7]

Core Viewpoint - The Russian Foreign Ministry strongly condemns the U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, stating it grossly violates international law, the UN Charter, and UN Security Council resolutions [1] Group 1 - The Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov commented on Western countries supporting Israel's so-called right to self-defense, warning that if countries interpret the UN Charter's self-defense provisions at will, it would lead to global chaos [1] - Dmitry Medvedev, Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council, stated via social media that following the U.S. strikes on Iran, "the U.S. is involved in a conflict that could potentially escalate into ground operations" [1] - Medvedev also noted that the vast majority of countries oppose the attacks by Israel and the U.S. on Iran [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Iranian Foreign Minister, Zarif, condemned the recent U.S. military actions against Iran's peaceful nuclear facilities, labeling them as a severe violation of international law and the UN Charter, and stated that Iran will respond as necessary to protect its sovereignty and people [3][4]. Group 1 - Zarif strongly criticized the U.S. for its "barbaric" military aggression against Iran's nuclear facilities, asserting that the U.S. must be held accountable for the consequences of this dangerous attack [3]. - He emphasized that Iran will take all necessary measures to defend itself against U.S. military aggression and Israeli attacks, indicating a commitment to self-defense [4]. - Zarif mentioned that there is currently no precise information regarding the extent of damages caused by the attacks on the nuclear facilities, which he described as an unforgivable illegal act [4][5]. Group 2 - Zarif announced plans to meet with Russian President Putin, highlighting the strategic partnership between Iran and Russia [6][7]. - He noted that Iran had recently engaged in discussions with foreign ministers from several regional countries to address the issue of Israeli aggression and agreed on the importance of keeping diplomatic channels open [4][8]. - Zarif expressed confusion over why Iran is facing attacks, stating that the country is suffering from unjust accusations [5].