科研领域工作人员 玛丽萨贝尔·阿尔特亚加：委内瑞拉人民正在捍卫并支持一个通过投票选举产生的政府。委内瑞拉科学研究所被轰炸，五个科研中心受到 影响，今天我们走上街头，是为了声援这里，声援人民，也作为委内瑞拉公民的彼此声援。 委内瑞拉全国代表大会议员 瓦内萨·蒙特罗：民众将继续站在委内瑞拉的街头，要求美国释放我们的总统，因为我们必须明白这一点。 在委内瑞拉首都加拉加斯，数千人聚集在蒂乌纳堡军事基地附近的居民区，人们高举委内瑞拉国旗和写有"释放马杜罗"字样的标语，沿着主要干道前行，同 时高喊口号。美国3日对委内瑞拉发动袭击，爆炸最为密集的区域之一就在蒂乌纳堡军事基地一带。 10日，委内瑞拉多地举行集会游行，要求美国释放此前被美方强行带离并控制的马杜罗总统及其夫人，表达捍卫国家主权的决心。 总台报道员 莱昂内尔·雷塔马尔：在美国对委内瑞拉实施空袭一周之后，委内瑞拉人民走上街头，反对这场侵略行动。今天，全国各地同时举行一百多场活 动，要求美国释放总统马杜罗及其夫人。 ...

据新华社消息，美国总统特朗普11日再次对古巴施压， 威胁古巴若不尽快"达成协议"，将面 临"零石油、零资金"流入古巴的局面。 特朗普当天在社交媒体平台"真实社交"上发文说，多年来，古巴一直依赖委内瑞拉提供的大 量石油和资金生存。作为回报，古巴为委内瑞拉提供"安全服务"。特朗普声称这种关系"现在 已经终结"，不会再有石油和资金流入古巴。 特朗普威胁说，古巴需要"在为时已晚之前达成协议"。 但他没有在帖文中说明要求古巴达成 什么协议。 来源：央视新闻 据央视新闻报道，针对美国总统特朗普的威胁性言论，当地时间1月11日，古巴国家主席迪亚 斯-卡内尔表示，古巴是一个自由独立的主权国家， "那些把一切都当作生意甚至以人命做交 易的人，没有资格对古巴指手画脚"。 迪亚斯-卡内尔表示，他们对古巴的激烈攻击，是出于对古巴人民自主选择政治模式的愤怒。 迪亚斯-卡内尔说，那些指责革命导致古巴遭受严重经济困难的人应该感到羞耻。因为他们知 道、也承认，这些困难是美国60多年来对古巴实施的严酷封锁措施所造成的，而且现在还威 胁要变本加厉。 迪亚斯-卡内尔强调，"古巴是一个自由、独立、主权完整的国家。没有人能对我们发号施 令。古巴不主动 ...

Group 1 - Venezuela's Foreign Ministry reaffirmed its historical stance on relations with Cuba, emphasizing alignment with the principles of the UN Charter and international law [1] - The relationship between Venezuela and the Caribbean region, including Cuba, is based on brotherhood, solidarity, mutual assistance, and win-win cooperation [1] - Venezuela stressed that international relations should adhere to principles of international law, non-interference, equality of state sovereignty, and the right to self-determination of peoples [1] Group 2 - Venezuela highlighted that political and diplomatic dialogue is the only path to peacefully resolve disputes [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights the Venezuelan people's demand for the release of President Maduro and his wife, following a recent U.S. military attack on Venezuela [1][5] - Over a hundred protests took place across Venezuela, with thousands gathering in Caracas near the Tiuana military base, showcasing national pride and unity against perceived foreign aggression [1][3] - The Venezuelan scientific community expressed solidarity with the government and the affected research institutions, emphasizing the importance of defending a democratically elected government [3] Group 2 - Venezuelan representatives reiterated the commitment of the populace to continue protests until President Maduro is released, underscoring the significance of national sovereignty [5]

Core Viewpoint - The recent military action by the United States against Venezuela has created significant uncertainty and concern among Venezuelan immigrants in Brazil, impacting their daily lives and the local economy [1][2][3][4] Group 1: Impact on Venezuelan Immigrants - Many Venezuelan immigrants in Brazil are expressing anxiety about the situation in their home country, with reports of increased military presence and a decrease in tourist arrivals from Venezuela [2][3] - Immigrants are uncertain about their future, with many having fled Venezuela to seek safety and stability in Brazil [3][4] Group 2: Local Economic Effects - The influx of Venezuelan immigrants has been a significant aspect of the local economy in the border region, but the recent military actions have led to a decline in business activity, particularly in the tourism sector [3] - Brazilian authorities have responded to the situation by increasing military personnel and implementing stricter border controls, which may further affect cross-border movement and local commerce [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Venezuelan government asserts that the U.S. claims regarding the country's "unsafe" situation are unfounded, emphasizing that Venezuela is currently in a state of "complete tranquility, peace, and stability" [1] Group 1: Venezuelan Government's Position - The Venezuelan Foreign Ministry criticized the U.S. State Department's security alert as based on non-existent narratives aimed at creating a false perception of risk [1] - The government claims that all residential areas, transportation routes, checkpoints, and security systems are functioning normally, with all weapons under government control [1] - The Venezuelan government reiterated its commitment to maintaining peace, stability, and harmonious coexistence among its people [1] Group 2: U.S. Actions and Warnings - The U.S. State Department issued a travel warning for Venezuela, maintaining the highest alert level (Level 4) since 2019, citing a rapidly changing security situation [1] - On March 3, the U.S. launched a large-scale military operation in Venezuela, targeting the capital Caracas and forcibly detaining President Maduro and his wife, who appeared in a New York federal court on March 5 to deny the U.S. allegations of "criminal" activity [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Venezuelan National Electoral Council condemned the illegal armed attack by the U.S. government and military, asserting it violated Venezuela's sovereignty and international law [1] Group 1: Government Response - Venezuelan interim president Delcy Rodríguez vowed to rescue President Maduro and his wife, who are under U.S. control [1] - Venezuelan Foreign Minister Jorge Arreaza reiterated the country's commitment to sovereignty and peace, rejecting the label of Venezuela as a "drug trafficking nation" [1] Group 2: Public Reaction - Venezuelan citizens held nationwide protests demanding the release of Maduro and his wife, with participation from local officials in Caracas [1] Group 3: U.S. Actions - U.S. President signed an executive order declaring a national emergency to protect Venezuelan oil revenues stored in U.S. Treasury accounts from seizure [1] - During a meeting with oil executives, the U.S. President requested $100 billion in investments to significantly increase Venezuelan oil production, but received little commitment from the companies [1]

Core Viewpoint - The interim president of Venezuela, Delcy Rodríguez, has vowed to rescue President Maduro, who has been forcibly controlled by the U.S. for a week, emphasizing the need for respect for Venezuela's sovereignty and peace in the region [1] Group 1 - The Venezuelan government has condemned the U.S. actions and called for the release of President Maduro and his wife, asserting the country's commitment to maintaining dignity and peace [1] - Rodríguez stated that Venezuela is actively working towards the return of President Maduro, indicating that the nation is not passive in this situation [1] - The Venezuelan Foreign Minister, Ivan Gil, reiterated the country's stance on sovereignty and dignity, rejecting claims of Venezuela being a "drug trafficking nation" as unfounded [1] Group 2 - The National Electoral Council of Venezuela issued a resolution condemning the illegal armed invasion by the U.S. military on January 3, highlighting the violation of national sovereignty and international law [1] - The Council expressed solidarity with the Venezuelan people and extended condolences to the families of the victims of the invasion [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Venezuelan National Electoral Council strongly condemns the illegal armed attack by the U.S. government and military on January 3, which is seen as a serious violation of Venezuela's sovereignty and territorial integrity [1] Summary by Relevant Sections - **Violation of Sovereignty** The resolution states that the attack constitutes a severe infringement on Venezuela's sovereignty, territorial integrity, and political independence, violating international legal order [1] - **Consequences of the Attack** The attack resulted in the forced control of President Maduro and his wife, Flores, leading to the loss of valuable lives, including military personnel and innocent civilians, which is classified as a crime against humanity [1] - **Breach of International Principles** The actions are described as blatant violations of fundamental principles of the United Nations Charter, including the principle of equal sovereignty of states, the prohibition of the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, and the prohibition of interference in internal affairs [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the distinction between the situations in Venezuela and Taiwan, arguing that comparing them is misleading due to their differing international legal statuses and the nature of the issues involved [2][3] - The article asserts that China's decision-making regarding Taiwan is based on its comprehensive strength, strategic goals, and risk assessment, rather than being driven by external pressures or emotional responses [2][3] - It highlights that the pursuit of a decisive approach is aimed at preventing the Taiwan Strait from descending into chaos and war, embodying the logic of "using war to stop war" [4] Group 2 - Trump's recent comments suggest a transactional approach to international relations, indicating that the U.S. may not be willing to bear additional strategic costs or risks regarding Taiwan, reflecting a shift away from maintaining an abstract international order [6][7] - The article notes that Trump's stance does not equate to support for either side but rather redefines the U.S. position in the Taiwan issue as one of non-intervention, which could help reduce miscalculations by pro-independence forces [7] - It emphasizes that while China welcomes a reduction in U.S. intervention in Taiwan, it does not accept a new order that disregards international law and norms, advocating for a world with established boundaries and basic regulations [7]