Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of marine data as a foundation for marine scientific research, economic activities, and national security, highlighting the need to protect marine data to safeguard national interests and ensure sustainable development [1] Group 1: Importance of Marine Data - Marine data encompasses a wide range of information, including geographical, ecological, meteorological, and social activity data, which are crucial for national security [2] - Specific types of marine data, such as seabed topography, meteorological data, and remote sensing data, are highlighted as sensitive and vital for national defense and security [2] Group 2: Threats to Marine Data Security - Foreign intelligence agencies are increasingly targeting marine data through various means, posing a threat to national security [3] - Tactics include disguising espionage activities under the guise of public welfare, deploying covert devices in marine areas, and compromising data transmission channels [3] Group 3: Public Involvement in National Security - The article calls for public participation in national security efforts, encouraging citizens to report suspicious activities related to marine data security [4] - National security agencies have successfully identified and addressed several espionage incidents through public cooperation, reinforcing the importance of community involvement in safeguarding national interests [4]

伊拉克联合作战司令部声明称，伊拉克安全部队近日在北部尼尼微省与萨拉赫丁省的沙漠地区展开大规 模搜查行动，重点覆盖多处仓库、山谷与洞穴。此次行动由伊拉克总理兼武装部队总司令苏达尼下令发 起，由反恐局局长现场督导，并与尼尼微省和萨拉赫丁省的作战部队以及人民动员组织协同作战，展开 多线打击，旨在挫败针对伊拉克安全部队及国家关键基础设施的潜在袭击图谋。近期，伊拉克库尔德自 治区(库区)多处油田连续遭无人机袭击。伊拉克安全部门称将严厉打击任何试图破坏国家安全、掠夺国 家资源的组织与个人，并追究其法律责任。(央视新闻) ...

稀土相关物项具有军民两用属性，是国家战略资源。为了更好地维护国家安全和利益，我国充分借鉴 国际通行做法，依法对稀土相关物项实施出口管制。但近年来， 境外间谍情报机关及其代理人企图勾 连策反境内不法分子，利用寄递手段窃取我稀土相关物项，给我国家安全带来严重危害。 掌握确凿证据后，国家安全机关会同有关部门依法采取行动，截断稀土相关物项非法出境渠道，有力维护了我 资源安全与国家安全。 来源：国家安全部微信公众号 责编：叶舒筠 证券时报各平台所有原创内容，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载。我社保留追 究相关 行 为主体 法律责任的权利。 转载与合作可联系证券时报小助理，微信ID：SecuritiesTimes 某国不能自主生产提纯稀有金属，但为保证其国内稀有金属供应，一直通过各种渠道和手段进行相关囤积。国 家安全机关工作发现—— 该国某重点领域承包商一方面通过 更换包装伪造"非中国原产"标签 后转口偷运至其国内； 另一方面企图采取 虚报含量成分、伪报品名、快递小包多次少量、更换运输渠道 等方式，将我国稀土等出口 管制物项非法输送出境。 校对： 高源 版权声明 点击关键字可查看 潜望系列深度报道丨 股事会专栏 丨 ...

克里姆林宫：俄罗斯有义务考虑此类声明，并采取相应的安全措施。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the efforts of a certain country to secure its supply of rare metals through various means, including illegal activities to circumvent export controls from China [1]. Group 1 - The country in question cannot independently produce and purify rare metals, leading to its reliance on stockpiling through different channels [1]. - A key contractor in this country has been found to engage in illegal activities such as changing packaging to falsely label products as "non-Chinese origin" for re-export [1]. - The contractor is also attempting to misreport content composition, falsify product names, and use multiple small shipments to illegally transport controlled items like rare earth elements out of China [1]. Group 2 - The national security agency has gathered solid evidence and, in collaboration with relevant departments, has taken legal action to cut off illegal export channels for rare earth-related items [1]. - These actions are aimed at effectively safeguarding the country's resource security and national security [1].

Group 1 - The article highlights the strategic importance of rare earth elements, which possess dual-use attributes for military and civilian applications, leading to the implementation of export controls by the country to safeguard national security and interests [1] - There is a significant threat from foreign espionage agencies attempting to illegally acquire rare earth materials through various deceptive methods, posing a serious risk to national security [2][3] Group 2 - The country has a leading position in the global rare earth market, with the highest reserves, production, consumption, and export volumes, creating a resource and industrial chain advantage [3] - Foreign entities are employing sophisticated tactics to illegally transport rare earth materials out of the country, including mislabeling and concealing these materials within legitimate shipments [3][4] - The national security agencies are actively working to prevent and combat the infiltration and espionage activities targeting critical mineral resources, emphasizing the importance of public vigilance and reporting suspicious activities [4]

相关链接 非法窃取我国稀土 国家安全机关坚决截断 金十数据7月18日讯，据国家安全部消息，近年来，境外间谍情报机关及其代理人企图勾连策反境内不 法分子，利用寄递手段窃取我稀土相关物项，给我国家安全带来严重危害。某国不能自主生产提纯稀有 金属，但为保证其国内稀有金属供应，一直通过各种渠道和手段进行相关囤积。国家安全机关工作发 现，该国某重点领域承包商一方面通过更换包装伪造"非中国原产"标签后转口偷运至其国内；另一方面 企图采取虚报含量成分、伪报品名、快递小包多次少量、更换运输渠道等方式，将我国稀土等出口管制 物项非法输送出境。掌握确凿证据后，国家安全机关会同有关部门依法采取行动，截断稀土相关物项非 法出境渠道，有力维护了我资源安全与国家安全。 ...

消息人士：因国家安全担忧，美国与阿联酋的芯片交易被搁置，交易涉及向中东地区出口英伟达芯片。 特朗普政府目前不打算批准向阿联酋科技公司G42出口芯片，但未来可能会批准。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent 232 investigations by the U.S. extend from upstream basic materials to downstream high-tech applications and derivatives, indicating a need for vigilance in the industry [1] Group 1: Investigations Overview - The U.S. has initiated two new 232 investigations concerning "drone systems and their components" and "polysilicon and its derivatives," which began on July 1 and are currently in the public comment phase [2][3] - The investigations aim to assess the impact of these products on national security, focusing on domestic production capabilities and foreign supply chain roles [3] Group 2: Industry Implications - The products under investigation lack comparative advantages in the U.S. market, suggesting that imposing tariffs could harm domestic supply chains [1][3] - The investigations are seen as a pretext for implementing protective tariffs to promote domestic production and reduce reliance on foreign imports [3][5] Group 3: Historical Context and Future Outlook - Previous 232 investigations, such as those on steel and aluminum, followed a similar logic, where the U.S. established strategic importance for certain products and quantified the national security threats posed by imports [5][6] - The U.S. is likely to continue favoring tariff measures as a means of addressing perceived national security threats in various industries [4][5]

Group 1 - The recent conflict between the U.S. and China over a small portion of farmland has escalated tensions in U.S.-China relations, with the U.S. taking drastic measures such as contract termination and forced confiscation [1][4][15] - Chinese investments in U.S. agricultural land account for less than 0.03%, indicating that the perceived threat is minimal compared to investments from U.S. allies like Canada and the Netherlands, which far exceed Chinese investments [3][4][19] - The U.S. government's justification for these actions is framed around "national security" and "food security," but the data suggests that this narrative is not substantiated [4][6][11] Group 2 - The U.S. appears to be reacting out of a sense of insecurity as China has rapidly advanced in various sectors, including high-tech industries, leading to a shift in the power dynamic [8][11][23] - The U.S. is shifting its focus to agriculture as a new battleground, reflecting a lack of effective strategies in previous trade and technology conflicts [11][15][23] - China's response has been measured, emphasizing the importance of normal economic and trade relations and adjusting its asset allocation to reduce reliance on U.S. debt while increasing gold holdings [15][19] Group 3 - China holds a significant advantage in rare earth resources, which are critical for high-tech and military applications, giving it leverage in the ongoing tensions [17][19] - The U.S. faces a paradox where it seeks to impose restrictions on China while simultaneously recognizing its own vulnerabilities in rare earth supply, leading to a sense of urgency to negotiate [19][21] - If the U.S. proceeds with contract violations and confiscation of Chinese investments, it risks undermining its own reputation for rule of law and property rights, which could have far-reaching consequences for global investment [21][23]