智通财经APP讯，科森科技(603626.SH)发布公告，公司及相关人员于2025年11月21日收到中国证券监督 管理委员会江苏监管局(以下简称"江苏证监局")下达的《江苏证监局关于对昆山科森科技股份有限公 司、徐金根、向雪梅、瞿李平采取出具警示函措施的决定》，内容公告如下： 2022年，科森科技以购销往来款名义向唯士达支付资金并于当期收回，构成关联方非经营性资金占用， 单笔资金占用周期1至4天。科森科技未按相关规定履行审议程序和信息披露义务，违反了2021年《信披 办法》第三条第一款、第四十一条的规定。科森科技时任董事长、总经理徐金根，时任财务总监、副总 经理、董事向雪梅未勤勉尽责，对该事项承担主要责任。 2018年至2024年，科森科技与关联方江苏唯士达智能检测系统有限公司(以下简称唯士达)、江苏盈智融 科技有限公司、东台市科盛餐饮管理有限公司发生日常购销关联交易，公司未按相关规定履行审议程序 和信息披露义务，迟至2025年4月27日召开董事会追加审议并于2025年4月29日对外披露，相关公告存在 关联交易金额披露错误的情形。 根据2007年《信披办法》第五十九条、2021年《信披办法》第五十二条的规定， ...

登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 证券代码：600368 证券简称：五洲交通 公告编号：临2025-047 广西五洲交通股份有限公司 关于收到广西证监局行政监管措施决定书的公告 本公司董事会及全体董事保证本公告内容不存在任何虚假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏并对其内容的 真实性、准确性和完整性承担个别及连带责任。 广西五洲交通股份有限公司(以下简称五洲交通)于近日收到中国证券监督管理委员会广西监管局（以下 简称广西证监局）下发的《关于对广西五洲交通股份有限公司采取责令改正措施的决定》（〔2025〕39 号）［以下简称决定书（一）］和《关于对周异助、张毅、许国平、玉莉采取监管谈话措施的决定》 （〔2025〕40号）［以下简称决定书（二）］。现将具体情况公告如下： 一、决定书（一）主要内容： "经查，广西五洲交通股份有限公司(以下简称五洲交通)存在以下问题： 一、会计核算不规范 2022年至2024年，五洲交通开展的商贸业务中，部分业务收入确认依据不足，部分业务收入错误适用总 额法进行确认，导致上述年度相关财务报告信息披露不准确。上述情形违反了《上市公司信息披露管理 办法》(证监会令第182号)第三 ...

本次行政监管措施不会影响五洲交通正常的生产经营活动，五洲交通将严格按照广西证监局的要求，在 规定的期限内形成整改报告。 五洲交通(600368)11月20日晚公告，公司于近日收到广西证监局下发的《关于对广西五洲交通股份有限 公司采取责令改正措施的决定》（〔2025〕39号）［以下简称决定书（一）］和《关于对周异助、张 毅、许国平、玉莉采取监管谈话措施的决定》（〔2025〕40号）［以下简称决定书（二）］。 经查，五洲交通存在的问题主要包括会计核算不规范、未履行拟聘任董监高诚信档案查询义务。 2022年至2024年，五洲交通开展的商贸业务中，部分业务收入确认依据不足，部分业务收入错误适用总 额法进行确认，导致上述年度相关财务报告信息披露不准确。上述情形违反了《上市公司信息披露管理 办法》(证监会令第182号)第三条第一款规定。 另外，2022年至2024年，五洲交通未按规定查询拟聘任董监高的诚信档案。上述情形违反了《证券期货 市场诚信监督管理办法》(2020年修订)第三十七条规定。 根据相关规定，广西证监局决定对五洲交通采取责令改正的行政监管措施，并记入资本市场诚信档案。 同时，广西证监局决定对五洲交通的相关责 ...

五洲交通（600368）11月20日晚公告，公司于近日收到广西证监局下发的《关于对广西五洲交通股份有 限公司采取责令改正措施的决定》(〔2025〕39号)［以下简称决定书(一)］和《关于对周异助、张毅、 许国平、玉莉采取监管谈话措施的决定》(〔2025〕40号)［以下简称决定书(二)］。 经查，五洲交通存在的问题主要包括会计核算不规范、未履行拟聘任董监高诚信档案查询义务。 2022年至2024年，五洲交通开展的商贸业务中，部分业务收入确认依据不足，部分业务收入错误适用总 额法进行确认，导致上述年度相关财务报告信息披露不准确。上述情形违反了《上市公司信息披露管理 办法》(证监会令第182号)第三条第一款规定。 另外，2022年至2024年，五洲交通未按规定查询拟聘任董监高的诚信档案。上述情形违反了《证券期货 市场诚信监督管理办法》(2020年修订)第三十七条规定。 2025年前三季度，五洲交通实现营业收入12.05亿元，同比减少0.86%；实现净利润5.08亿元，同比减少 10.26%。 五洲交通表示，公司及相关责任人高度重视此次检查所指出的问题，将严格按照广西证监局的要求，认 真检讨，以此为鉴，吸取教训，切实 ...

豪恩汽电回复：尊敬的投资者您好，感谢您对公司的关注。公司严格按照《上市公司信息披露管理办 法》履行信息披露义务，不存在上述违规情形，谢谢。 以上内容为证券之星据公开信息整理，由AI算法生成（网信算备310104345710301240019号），不构成 投资建议。 证券之星消息，豪恩汽电(301488)11月05日在投资者关系平台上答复投资者关心的问题。 投资者提问：你好，【我们需要确保在向特定机构投资者交流后，其核心内容必须经过规范化处理，并 通过法定渠道向全体公众发布】公司这样的阐述，是否违反交易所规定。据【2025年7月1日起实施的 《上市公司信息披露管理办法》（证监会令第226号），信息披露义务人应当同时向所有投资者披露依 法需披露的信息，不得提前向任何单位或个人泄露 。公告应先通过证券交易所网站及符合规定的媒体 发布，确保所有投资者公平获取信息】 ...

Core Viewpoint - The company Shanshui Bide (300844.SZ) received a warning letter from the Guangdong Securities Regulatory Bureau due to violations related to the management and use of raised funds [1][2][3] Group 1: Regulatory Violations - From September 2021 to August 2023, the company used idle raised funds for cash management, involving 22 transactions, of which 3 were principal-protected and 19 were non-principal-protected [2] - The company failed to accurately disclose the types of financial products used in cash management and did not sufficiently warn about the risks associated with non-principal-protected products [2] - These actions violated multiple regulations, including the "Guidelines for the Management and Use of Raised Funds by Listed Companies" [2] Group 2: Company Leadership Responsibility - Key executives, including Chairman Cai Bin and Secretary Qin Peng, were found primarily responsible for the company's violations due to their failure to fulfill their duties as per the information disclosure regulations [3] - The company’s major shareholders, including Sun Hu and Cai Bin, have a close relationship and jointly control several investment entities [3] Group 3: Company Background and Financials - Shanshui Bide was listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange on August 13, 2021, with an initial price of 80.23 yuan per share, raising a total of 810 million yuan, netting 691 million yuan after expenses [4] - The company’s stock price peaked at 116.11 yuan on its first trading day but has since experienced a decline, currently trading below its initial offering price [4] - The company has a history of dividend distribution, with a plan to increase shares by 4 for every 10 held in May 2025 [5]

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) issued a warning letter to Yonghui Supermarket Co., Ltd. for failing to timely disclose changes in shareholding after reducing its stake in Hongqi Chain Co., Ltd. from 11% to 10% [1][5][6] Group 1: Company Actions - Yonghui Supermarket acquired over 5% of Hongqi Chain shares in 2017 through a transfer agreement [1][5] - From April 21 to April 24, 2025, Yonghui Supermarket reduced its holdings by 13.6 million shares, resulting in a decrease in ownership from 11% to 10% [1][5] - The company did not disclose the change in shareholding until July 21, 2025, violating the regulations [1][6] Group 2: Regulatory Framework - According to the "Measures for the Administration of the Acquisition of Listed Companies," investors must report changes in shareholding when reaching or crossing the 5% threshold within three days [3][4] - The CSRC can impose administrative measures, including issuing warning letters, for non-compliance with disclosure obligations [4][6] - Yonghui Supermarket's actions were recorded in the securities and futures market integrity database as part of the regulatory measures [1][6]

Core Viewpoint - The investigation report on a safety incident at Kanglong Chemical, a leading CRO in China, reveals that two employees died due to asphyxiation during a production operation, highlighting significant management failures and safety protocol violations [2][3][4]. Company Overview - Kanglong Chemical (SZ300759) is a prominent CRO providing comprehensive R&D services to pharmaceutical companies, with a current stock price of 35.25 yuan and a market capitalization of 62.681 billion yuan [2]. Incident Details - The incident occurred on June 3, resulting in the deaths of two night shift operators during the crystallization experiment of a new drug, DP818. The accident was classified as a general production safety incident due to violations of operational protocols [2][3][4]. - The specific operation involved 248 steps, with the incident occurring during step 193, where operators were required to monitor and record temperatures [3]. Investigation Findings - The investigation identified that the operators failed to use an oxygen content detection device while releasing nitrogen gas, leading to their asphyxiation. The report indicated multiple management failures, including inadequate safety training and lack of adherence to safety protocols [4][5]. - The company’s management, including the COO, faces penalties, with suggested fines ranging from 20% to 50% of their annual salaries [5]. Financial Implications - Kanglong Chemical may face fines between 300,000 to 1 million yuan, which is relatively minor compared to its 2024 projected revenue of 12.276 billion yuan and net profit of 1.793 billion yuan [5]. Disclosure Obligations - The incident does not fall under mandatory disclosure requirements for listed companies as it is classified as a general accident. However, the company may still have obligations to disclose the incident if it significantly impacts financial performance or reputation [6].

Core Viewpoint - Shenzhen Kanda Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. received a warning letter from the Shenzhen Securities Regulatory Bureau regarding a violation of reporting obligations related to shareholding changes [1][2]. Summary by Sections Warning Letter Details - The warning letter was issued to Guo Fengming, a shareholder holding over 5% of the company's shares, for failing to report and announce changes in shareholding when the combined holding with concerted actors reached a multiple of 5% [1][2]. - The actions violated the "Measures for the Administration of the Acquisition of Listed Companies" and related regulations [1][2]. Regulatory Measures - The Shenzhen Securities Regulatory Bureau decided to issue a warning letter as an administrative regulatory measure, emphasizing the need for Guo Fengming to learn from the incident and prevent future violations [2]. - Guo Fengming is required to submit a written report to the bureau within 15 days of receiving the decision [2]. Company Response - The company and relevant personnel have acknowledged the issues raised in the warning letter and committed to enhancing their understanding of securities laws and regulations to prevent recurrence [3]. - The company will ensure that all directors, senior management, and relevant shareholders strengthen their compliance with regulations and fulfill information disclosure obligations [3]. - The regulatory measures will not affect the company's normal operations, and it will continue to comply with disclosure requirements [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the implications of the "non-ST stock one yuan lightning delisting" mechanism, highlighting the unfairness faced by investors due to sudden delistings and lack of information disclosure, which exacerbates information asymmetry and investor losses [1][2][4]. Group 1: Investor Impact - Investors in non-ST companies faced significant losses due to sudden delistings without prior warning or adequate information, leading to a sense of betrayal and confusion [1][2]. - The absence of quarterly reports post-delisting has left investors in an information vacuum, making it difficult to assess the financial health of the companies they invested in [1][2]. - Many investors were unaware of the risks associated with delisting, as they had not signed agreements acknowledging such risks, resulting in unexpected liquidity issues [2][4]. Group 2: Regulatory Concerns - Regulatory bodies failed to announce penalties against major shareholders of delisted companies, allowing them to sell shares at a loss to unsuspecting investors [2][4]. - The lack of transparency and timely information from regulators has led to suspicions of collusion between major shareholders and regulatory personnel [2][4]. - The article emphasizes the need for stricter enforcement of disclosure regulations to protect investors and ensure accountability among listed companies [5][6]. Group 3: Information Disclosure System - The article critiques the suggestion by former President Trump to reduce earnings report frequency, arguing that it could worsen information asymmetry in the Chinese market, where quarterly disclosures are crucial for investor protection [4][6]. - It advocates for a differentiated disclosure system where compliant companies could benefit from reduced reporting frequency, while problematic companies would face increased scrutiny through more frequent disclosures [6][7]. - The need for timely and accurate information disclosure is underscored as essential for maintaining market fairness and protecting investors, particularly during delisting processes [5][6][7].