长沙晚报掌上长沙1月28日讯（全媒体记者 曹开阳）1月28日，中国最大的休闲食品饮料连锁零售商——湖南鸣鸣 很忙商业连锁股份有限公司（以下简称"鸣鸣很忙"）正式在香港联合交易所主板挂牌上市，证券简称为"鸣鸣很 忙"，股份代号为1768.HK，开盘较发行价236.6港元/股大涨超88%，对应总市值超952亿港元。 鸣鸣很忙是继红星冷链于1月13日在港上市后，今年上市的第二家长沙企业。至此，长沙境内外上市公司增至96 家。1月22日，"长沙企业上市香港之家"授牌成立，以进一步助力本地企业对接香港资本市场，搭建更高效的上市 服务桥梁。据了解，麦济生物、军信股份、可孚医疗、安克创新、西子健康等企业均已提交港股上市申请。 这一模式构成了"消费者得实惠、产业端有发展"的良性循环。 深耕国内大市场，服务实体经济 鸣鸣很忙的快速发展，建立在中国统一大市场建设、物流体系完善和数字化能力提升的坚实基础之上。通过全国 化的仓储物流网络和标准化管理体系，实现了对万店规模的稳定运营和高质量发展。 鸣鸣很忙旗下拥有"零食很忙""赵一鸣零食"两大品牌，是中国食品饮料量贩模式的引领者。2025年前9个月，鸣鸣 很忙实现零售额661亿元人民币 ...

Core Insights - The construction of a unified national market in China is progressing steadily, as indicated by tax data showing an increase in inter-provincial trade and sales [1][2] Group 1: Tax Data and Market Progress - From January to November, inter-provincial trade sales accounted for 41.1% of national sales revenue, an increase of 0.8 percentage points year-on-year [1] - The number of tax-related business entities engaged in cross-province sales exceeded 50%, up by 1.2 percentage points from the previous year [1] - The number of provinces experiencing growth in inter-provincial trade rose from 19 to 27, reflecting deepening trade connections between provinces [1] Group 2: Tax Policy and Compliance - The tax authority is committed to implementing tax and fee preferential policies effectively while preventing misuse of these policies [2] - A total of 3,904 high-risk gas stations were investigated, resulting in tax recovery of 4.163 billion yuan [2] - The tax authority has focused on high-risk sectors and individuals, recovering 1.523 billion yuan from 1,818 individuals, including celebrities, involved in tax evasion [2] - The agency has conducted checks on 69,600 suspected fraudulent tax enterprises, recovering 8.606 billion yuan in export tax refunds [2] - A total of 484 tax-related intermediaries were penalized for facilitating tax evasion through malicious planning [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the necessity and urgency of advancing China's unified market, as indicated by the current high levels of local protectionism reflected in the tax competition index and tax refund rates for listed companies, both at a 20-year high [2][3]. Group 1: European Single Market and Scoreboard System - The European Single Market was established in 1993, allowing free movement of goods, services, capital, and people among its 31 economies [5][19]. - The Single Market Scoreboard (SMS) was created in 1997 to monitor compliance with EU regulations, evolving from a compliance tool to a governance and performance tool by 2011 [22][24]. - The SMS uses a "traffic light" system to evaluate member states' performance across three dimensions: enforcement tools, business framework conditions, and outcomes and competitiveness [6][26]. Group 2: Operation Mechanism of the Scoreboard - The scoreboard evaluates member states based on a set of quantifiable indicators, allowing for cross-regional and temporal comparisons [3][16]. - The first dimension, enforcement tools, includes metrics such as transposition deficit, infringement proceedings, and the efficiency of the Internal Market Information System (IMI) [27][34]. - The second dimension, business framework conditions, assesses the ease of access to public procurement, services markets, and financing, among other factors [10][12][14]. - The third dimension focuses on outcomes and competitiveness, comparing the EU's performance in growth, employment, and digital and green transitions against global benchmarks [15][16]. Group 3: Implications for China's Unified Market - The advantages of the European scoreboard system, such as its quantifiable assessment framework and focus on small and medium enterprises, can serve as a reference for China in building its unified market [3][16]. - The experience of the European Single Market in addressing cross-border barriers and enhancing governance can provide valuable insights for China's market integration efforts [2][3].

Group 1: Core Conclusions - The tax competition index and tax refund rate for listed companies in China are currently at a 20-year high, indicating the urgent need for a unified market in China[2] - The European Single Market Scoreboard system provides valuable insights for China's unified market construction, focusing on historical context and operational mechanisms[2] Group 2: European Single Market Scoreboard - The Scoreboard uses a "traffic light" system to evaluate member states' performance, categorizing them as "green" (above average), "yellow" (average), or "red" (below average)[3] - It consists of three dimensions: Enforcement tools, Business Framework Conditions, and Outcomes and Competitiveness, with multiple quantifiable sub-indicators under each dimension[3][13] Group 3: Advantages of the Scoreboard - The evaluation system is quantifiable, allowing for cross-regional and temporal comparisons, with regular publication of results[3][14] - The Scoreboard emphasizes support for small and medium-sized enterprises, which can be a reference for China's market development[3][14] Group 4: Operational Mechanisms - The Enforcement tools dimension includes six indicators to assess the correct implementation of EU market rules, such as transposition deficit and infringement proceedings[6][35] - The Business Framework Conditions dimension evaluates member states' performance in creating a conducive business environment, with six indicators including market supervision and access to public procurement[9][10] Group 5: Implications for China - The Scoreboard's comprehensive evaluation can guide China in establishing its own unified market framework, focusing on governance, performance, and competitiveness[3][14] - The emphasis on resolving cross-border disputes and sharing government information through systems like IMI, SOLVIT, and EURES can enhance China's market efficiency[3][14]