中美金融战

Search documents
英伟达投资OPEN AI 1000亿美元,背后的逻辑是什么?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-10-07 09:16
当然如果你这么想,也没有错,但是这仅仅只是从业绩层面。对于英伟达、OPEN AI这样的公司来说, 他们的发展不仅影响创始人团队的财富,更影响华尔街大佬的财富,甚至会影响美国的国运。 往大了说,未来中美的竞争,其实就是英伟达、OPEN AI等美国企业跟中国的华为、DPC等公司的竞争 而已。所以说这么大的一笔交易,如果没有站在更高层面考虑,那是不可能的。最近还有一个事情,那 就是甲骨文的老板埃里森成为了世界首富。这个事情跟OPEN AI也有关系,那就是OPEN AI给甲骨文一 张历史级的超级大订单,他们将在未来5年内向甲骨文采购3000亿美元的云计算服务。 在特朗普刚刚上台的时候,他就推出了一个5000亿美元的AI计划,还取了一个星际之门的名字。OPEN AI给甲骨文3000亿美元的订单,就是属于星际之门中的一部分。 消息出来的那一天,甲骨文的市值直接涨了40%。今年以来,美股为何一直涨,核心原因就是AI股的强 势。 人类历史上最大的单体投资来了,英伟达宣布给OPEN AI投资1000亿美元。那黄仁勋到底在想什么呢? 到底只是因为钱太多,没地方花,还是有其他不为人知的考虑呢? OPEN AI是美国目前最领袖的AI ...
特朗普又赢了?美联储48小时变脸,鲍威尔暗示降息,中国如何应对
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-24 07:36
Core Viewpoint - The Federal Reserve's sudden shift from a hawkish stance to a dovish one, particularly in the context of interest rate cuts, has raised questions about the underlying factors influencing this change, including economic data and political pressure from the White House [1][3][5]. Economic Data - The July non-farm payroll data revealed only 73,000 new jobs, significantly below the expected 115,000, with the unemployment rate rising from 4% to 4.2% [5][10]. - The average new jobs over the past three months dropped to 35,000, indicating a near stagnation in the economy [10]. Political Pressure - President Trump has consistently applied pressure on the Federal Reserve, including public statements and the recent nomination of Stephen Moore, a known supporter, to the Board of Governors [7][8][15]. - The timing of Trump's actions, including the dismissal of the Labor Department's statistics chief, suggests a strategic move to create a scapegoat while increasing pressure on the Fed to lower interest rates [13][15]. Market Reaction - Following Powell's hints at a potential rate cut, major stock indices surged: the Dow Jones increased by 1.89%, Nasdaq by 1.88%, and S&P 500 by 1.52% [5][20]. - The probability of a rate cut jumped from 80% to 91.5%, indicating strong market expectations for a policy shift [5]. Implications for China - The Fed's potential rate cuts could lead to a narrowing of interest rate differentials between the U.S. and China, providing opportunities for capital inflow into Chinese markets [17][20]. - Chinese stock markets reacted positively, with significant gains in indices such as the Shanghai Composite and ChiNext, highlighting the attractiveness of Chinese equities to international investors [20][22]. Strategic Positioning - The Fed's policy shift reflects deeper structural issues within the U.S. economy, including a staggering national debt of $41 trillion and rising interest costs, which necessitate a move towards lower rates [28][31]. - China's resilience during this period, characterized by a robust manufacturing base and stable political environment, positions it favorably to capitalize on the changing global financial landscape [31][32][33].
美国参议院正式提交法案,要制裁中国,其中两项恐比关税还要猛
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-15 23:42
Group 1 - The U.S. Senate has submitted a bill targeting China, accusing it of aiding Russia's military actions, which could lead to severe financial sanctions [3][5] - The proposed sanctions include freezing Chinese assets in the U.S., which could devastate Chinese companies and individuals with assets in America [3][6] - Financial sanctions are more damaging than tariffs as they directly cut off funding flows, posing a greater threat to the economy [5] Group 2 - If China is excluded from the SWIFT system, it would severely impact cross-border transactions and international trade [6] - China holds over $750 billion in U.S. Treasury bonds, and selling these could devalue the dollar and exacerbate inflation in the U.S. [8] - China's control over 90% of global rare earth exports could significantly affect U.S. military production, particularly for advanced weaponry [10] Group 3 - China has advantages in technology sectors such as semiconductors and 5G, which could be leveraged as countermeasures against U.S. sanctions [11] - A financial war initiated by the U.S. could lead to mutual destruction, as seen in previous trade conflicts, and could accelerate the global de-dollarization trend [13] - The ongoing economic globalization suggests that cooperation between the U.S. and China is more beneficial than conflict, despite rising tensions [13][15]