在全球产业链深度重塑的关键时刻，资源安全正成为大国博弈的新焦点。 作为高科技产业不可或缺的"工业维生素"，稀土材料的战略价值愈发凸显。 文 | 空纸 编辑 | 空纸 中国，凭借其对全球稀土精炼与加工的主导地位，逐步由资源供应国转变为规则制定者和技术控制者。而欧美国家则在对华依赖与地缘竞争的双重压力下， 不断寻求突围。在这一背景下，一场围绕稀土资源的博弈悄然上演。 前言 欧盟的"访华威胁"、美国的"资本救市"、中国的"精准反制"，背后是一场没有硝烟但极其深刻的全球供应链战争。 这场竞争的胜负，不仅关乎资源本身，更关乎未来产业竞争格局的重构。 战略资源成为反制武器 随着中美贸易摩擦的持续升级，中国对稀土出口的管理步步收紧，释放出强烈的战略信号。2025年4月正式实施的《稀土管理条例》，将稀土的开采、冶 炼、出口等环节纳入法治化轨道，要求出口产品必须明确最终用户与具体用途。 这一法规被视为中国在资源安全领域的系统化升级，彻底改变了西方对中国稀土"无限制供应"的幻想。 中国当前不仅是世界第一大稀土开采国，更掌握着全球92%的稀土精炼产能和超八成的深加工技术专利，形成了完整、高效且具有技术壁垒的产业链体系。 这种强大掌 ...

Group 1 - The U.S. is demanding South Korea to invest $400 billion and open its agricultural market, which includes allowing imports of U.S. beef, rice, apples, and blueberries [2][3] - South Korean farmers are expressing concerns about the potential collapse of local agriculture due to competition with U.S. products, leading to protests [3] - The South Korean government is under pressure from the U.S. regarding key industries such as steel, semiconductors, and automobiles, with threats of a 25% tariff if demands are not met [5] Group 2 - The South Korean administration, led by President Lee Jae-myung, is in a difficult position, facing internal dissent and external pressure from the U.S. [5] - There is speculation about the implications for South Korea if it complies with U.S. demands, potentially deepening its integration into the U.S.-led industrial chain [7] - The situation reflects the challenges faced by medium-sized countries caught between larger powers, with limited options for negotiation [7][9]

科技霸权的暗流：一场以稀土为名的全球博弈 科技霸权的角逐，远比单纯的经济利益更复杂，而这场无声的战争，正以稀土为舞台，上演着一出出精彩绝伦的戏剧。 美国近期对一家本土 稀土企业MP公司的巨额注资，便是这出大戏中最引人注目的一个场景。这家公司股价暴涨五成，背后是美国五角大楼斥资四亿美元的"战略 性"投资。这一举动，无疑将美国与中国在稀土领域的博弈推向了高潮。 表面上看，这是美国政府为了摆脱对中国稀土的依赖，保障其国防和高科技产业的战略安全。然而，细究之下，我们才能发现这场博弈的真 正意味。MP公司，虽然自诩为美国稀土行业的"独苗"，但其股东名单却令人啼笑皆非：中国盛和集团持有其8%的股份，稳居前三大股东之 列。这意味着，这家号称"本土"的企业，其命脉实际上掌握在中国手中。 MP公司所开采的稀土矿石，必须运回中国进行精加工才能变废为 宝，这就好比麦当劳向肯德基借用炸鸡秘方一样，令人尴尬。 四亿美元的巨额投资，美国政府的目的昭然若揭：通过增持股份，超越中国股东，夺回对MP公司的控制权，从而切断中国稀土精加工产业 链。未来，即便MP公司开采出再多的稀土矿石，也可能囤积在仓库里，不会再流向中国。这，正是美国试图扼杀中国 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a significant increase in the import of antimony oxide by the United States from Thailand and Mexico, which raises concerns about a potential smuggling network involving Chinese enterprises [1][7]. Group 1: Smuggling Operations - Between December 2024 and April 2025, the U.S. imported 3,834 tons of antimony oxide from Thailand and Mexico, surpassing the total of the previous three years [1][7]. - The smuggling operations involve disguising Chinese rare earth materials as other products, such as iron ore and zinc, to evade customs regulations [3][9]. - A Chinese metal chemical company's subsidiary in Thailand reportedly shipped 3,366 tons of antimony products to the U.S. within six months, marking a 27-fold increase year-on-year [5]. Group 2: Economic Implications - The surge in international rare earth prices, which have risen by 200% since 2024, has incentivized some Chinese companies to engage in smuggling for higher profits [11]. - Smuggling profits can reach 3-5 times that of normal trade, creating a vicious cycle that distorts international market prices and attracts more participants into illegal trading [11]. Group 3: Military Supply Chain Vulnerabilities - The smuggling case exposes critical vulnerabilities in the U.S. military supply chain, with a significant reliance on Chinese-produced materials for key weapon systems [12][15]. - Approximately 90% of global rare earth processing capacity is concentrated in China, and over 80% of the U.S. military's rare earth material needs are sourced from China [15]. Group 4: Regulatory Responses - In response to the smuggling issue, China initiated a special action in May 2025 to combat illegal activities related to rare earth exports, including enhanced customs inspections and data sharing with industry associations [19][21]. - New amendments to the Mineral Resources Law have increased penalties for rare earth smuggling, and several cases have already been prosecuted, involving significant quantities of metals [21]. Group 5: Strategic Implications - The ongoing rare earth competition reflects a broader struggle for control over global supply chains, with China leveraging its technological advantages to shape international trade rules [23]. - Efforts by the U.S. to rebuild its supply chain have been largely ineffective, with significant time required to establish independence from Chinese sources [17].

表面看中美摩擦是贸易战、科技战，但实质是全球化时代制造业产业链的主导权之争，随着中美竞争逐 渐加剧，美联储最近的一个动作暴露出美联储的真正目的。 尤其是美联储在中国的布局，非常狡诈，但是中方早已看清，那么美联储究竟想要干什么？中美博弈的 本质又是什么？ 中美矛盾的本质：制造业竞争 vs 资产控制权争夺 中美两国人民的核心利益并不冲突。美国消费者离不开中国的廉价商品，中国也需要美国的技术和市 场，这种互补性决定了两国 "斗而不破" 的基本状态。 真正的问题，出在金融层面。当中国通过制造业积累大量外汇储备，试图用人民币结算石油、矿石等战 略资源时，当中国推动数字货币跨境支付时，这些动作触碰了美元霸权的根基。而美元霸权的维护者， 正是美联储背后的资本集团。 美联储名头上是美国的中央银行，管着印美元的。但很多人不晓得，这美联储的底细，可没那么简单， 它跟华尔街那帮玩钱的大佬们，那是勾勾搭搭，关系深着呢。这帮人，算盘打得比猴都精。 他们手里攥着美元这个全世界都认的"硬通货"，就像捏着一把万能钥匙，能打开全球各地的"财富大 门"。 他们的心思，说穿了，就是用这把钥匙，去"收割"全世界的好苗子——可不是那些花里胡哨的票子， ...