上月末，Meta血裁600人团队，震惊全球，而AI大佬田渊栋官宣自己也被裁员。 田渊栋是Meta前AI研究总监，在Meta期间，田渊栋主导了多项重要研究成果，据其谷歌学术主页显 示，他的论文总引用数已超过18000次。 这位从顶尖人工智能研究部门离职的AI科学家，在被裁员后，包括 OpenAI、谷歌等在内的地球上最牛 的科技公司纷纷向他抛来橄榄枝，这可是真的"大神"。 这次AI大厂内部的人员精简，以及大佬的离职也引发了业界的一系列关注。 近日，田渊栋接受了"硅谷 101"栏目的访谈。除了聊到这次的裁员，还有AI行业正迎来的大趋势。 他提到，"随着自动化程度越来越高，总有一天大家都没有工作。" 因为AI，原本需要几百人甚至几千人做的事情，现在因为高度自动化和AI Agent 的应用，不再需要那 么多人。 "未来做AI的人会越来越少，而用AI作为工具去探索其他领域的人会越来越多。" 但于此同时，田渊栋表示人类的核心价值仍旧是AI无法取代的。 AI缺乏高层的human insights (洞察力)、human knowledge (人类知识) ，以及对问题的独到见解。 "在人类历史的长河中，有各种各样的科学家，他们 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes the importance of maintaining human individuality and independent thinking in the face of advancing AI technology, as highlighted by prominent figures like Ke Jie, Xu Yangsheng, and Mo Yan [1][2][4] - Ke Jie’s experience of being defeated by AlphaGo serves as a pivotal moment that illustrates the gap between human cognitive abilities and AI, leading him to pursue further education and personal growth [1][4] - The discussion around AI's impact on education stresses that universities should nurture unique human traits rather than producing standardized talents, reinforcing the value of critical thinking and creativity [2][3] Group 2 - Xu Yangsheng, president of the Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), warns against outsourcing critical thinking to AI, emphasizing that independent thought is essential for human innovation and progress [3] - Mo Yan, a Nobel laureate, acknowledges the inevitability of AI but points out its limitations in creativity and emotional depth, advocating for the uniqueness of human expression [3][4] - The collective insights from these leaders converge on the notion that human value lies not in competing with AI on computational strength but in preserving the distinct qualities that define humanity [4][5]

Group 1 - Two students developed an AI tool called "Interview Coder" to help users pass coding interviews, specifically for platforms like LeetCode [3][4] - The tool gained significant attention after the creators successfully used it to pass interviews at major tech companies, leading to a viral video with 5.6 million views [4][6] - The creators were expelled from Columbia University for violating academic integrity, but they secured $5.3 million in seed funding for their startup Cluely [6][10] Group 2 - Cluely's product is positioned as a real-time assistance tool for exams, meetings, and negotiations, which the creators do not consider cheating [6][10] - Another company, Mechanize, aims to automate all jobs using AI, while paradoxically hiring human trainers to teach AI how to replace humans [7][9] - The narratives of both companies highlight the evolving definition of human capability in the AI era and raise questions about the implications of technology on human value [10][12]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the rapid advancement of AI technology and its integration into everyday life, raising questions about the implications for human dignity and value in a technology-driven world [2][4]. Group 1: AI Capabilities and Human Interaction - AI is becoming increasingly intelligent, capable of "thinking" and making decisions, which allows it to assist humans in various tasks such as travel planning and academic research [2][3]. - The article highlights the romantic notion of a symbiotic relationship between humans and AI, where AI enhances human experiences while humans provide sensory and emotional context [3][4]. Group 2: Philosophical and Ethical Considerations - The text raises concerns about the potential for AI to redefine human values and the essence of humanity, suggesting that reliance on machines for decision-making could lead to a loss of human agency [4][8]. - It emphasizes the need for a clear distinction between human and machine capabilities to prevent machines from defining human value [4][8]. Group 3: Future of AI and Humanity - The article warns of a future where AI could become the intermediary between humans and the physical world, potentially leading to a reversal of roles where machines dictate human actions [8][12]. - It discusses the possibility of AI evolving to a point where it can independently shape reality, raising concerns about human control and the implications of such a shift [12][15]. Group 4: The Need for Alignment and Understanding - There is a call for the development of internal safeguards within AI systems to ensure alignment with human values and intentions, highlighting the importance of international cooperation in this endeavor [16]. - The article stresses the necessity for humans to evolve their understanding of intelligence in light of AI advancements, suggesting that this evolution is crucial for a mutually beneficial future [16][17].

【导读】 《人工智能时代与人类价值》是基辛格生前的最后一本著作。另外两位作者分别是谷歌前 CEO 埃里克·施密特，以及微软前首席研究和战略官克 雷格·蒙迪。三位作者以前所未有的深度和广度，审视了人工智能领域的最新进展，直面人工智能带来的关乎人类生存的最为紧迫的问题：人类与机器的区 别到底是什么？如果被迫与机器妥协，我们的底线是什么？ 在技术迅猛发展的今天，我们如何定位人类的价值所在？阅读本文也许你会有所收获。 投稿 | 中信出版集团 责编 | Echo Tang 出品丨AI 科技大本营（ID：rgznai100） 康德曾提出一种尊严概念，其核心是人类主体作为能够进行道德推理的自主行为者的固有价值，且这种主体不应被作为达到目的的手段。人工智能能否 满足这些要求？我们相信，尊严的定义将帮助人类回答其中的一些问题，并鼓励与人工智能实现包容性共存，同时避免过早与人工智能共同进化的武断 尝试。 为了保持对自身的理解，也为了确保在机器学习的过程中能够将适当的人类概念传递给机器，我们人类需要重新致力于此类界定工作，且不能局限于学 术范畴。发挥能动性、好奇心和自由，重新激发和锻炼我们对其他人、对自然世界、对宇宙、对神性可能的 ...