医疗科普规范

Search documents
医疗科普莫成“流量生意”
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-08-20 02:56
Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of maintaining ethical standards in the development of medical science communication through short videos, highlighting both the benefits and the potential pitfalls of this medium [1][2][3]. Group 1: Current Landscape of Medical Science Communication - A significant portion of the population engages with health science content via short video platforms, with 92.1% of 1.074 billion online viewers having encountered such content [1]. - While short video medical science communication can enhance public health literacy, issues such as misinformation, commercialization, and unethical practices are prevalent [1][2]. Group 2: Regulatory Measures and Industry Standards - Recent regulations from multiple government bodies aim to ensure the authenticity and scientific validity of medical science communication on social media platforms [1][2]. - Platforms are encouraged to implement robust regulatory mechanisms, such as peer review systems and operational guidelines for medical accounts, to enhance content quality and accountability [2][3]. Group 3: Future Directions and Opportunities - The article suggests that promoting high-quality content creation should be balanced with strict regulation, advocating for initiatives like "AI pre-review + expert verification" and credit systems for quality creators [3]. - The ongoing implementation of the "Healthy China 2030" initiative aims to improve the quality of medical science communication, ultimately benefiting public health [3].
四部门出手!医疗科普不是“流量生意”
Xin Hua She· 2025-08-04 13:21
虚构病例、夸大效果,假科普、真带货……互联网健康科普乱象将迎来更大力度整治。 此前,国家卫生健康委新闻发言人胡强强在发布会上表示,有的"网红医生"把医疗科普当作牟利工具,还 有的通过夸大治疗效果、虚构病例、杜撰故事等手段误导公众、敛财牟利。 近日,中央网信办、国家卫生健康委等四部门联合印发《关于规范"自媒体"医疗科普行为的通知》,明确 要求"自媒体"账号对发布转发医疗科普信息的真实性、科学性负责,严禁无资质账号生产发布专业医疗科 普内容,严禁违规变相发布广告。 医疗科普不能是"流量生意",科学传播容不得"江湖忽悠"。 为医疗科普信息"立规矩",通知给出"硬答案"—— 给医疗科普戴上"紧箍咒",不是要给科学传播"刹车",而是为了让真知识跑得更远。通知同时要求:持续 加大中西医相关医疗科普知识供给力度,将更多权威、专业的健康知识,以多样亲民的形式传达公众。 生命至上!健康中国的大厦,容不得假科普的"砖"。 资质有了,内容源头也得"溯清"—— 引用转载专业医疗科普内容、引用医疗安全等旧闻旧事、结合医疗领域素材摆拍剧情、借助人工智能技术 生成合成医疗科普信息、分享传播真实健康经历的,需严格标注信息来源或生成合成内容标 ...
网信办出手!“自媒体”医疗科普资质认证趋严,AI生成内容需标注
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-08-01 12:29
Core Viewpoint - The rise of online medical popularization by doctors has led to the need for stricter regulations on qualifications and content dissemination to prevent misinformation and misuse of authority [1][2][3] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The National Internet Information Office, in collaboration with various health and regulatory bodies, issued a notification to standardize "self-media" medical popularization practices, focusing on account qualification certification and content source verification [1][2] - The notification emphasizes the importance of marking the source of medical popularization information and holding those who disseminate it accountable for its accuracy and scientific validity [3] Group 2: Issues with Current Practices - Some "internet celebrity doctors" exploit medical popularization for profit, misleading the public through exaggerated treatment claims and unauthorized medical advice [2][3] - Major platforms like Xiaohongshu, Bilibili, Weibo, and WeChat are enhancing their scrutiny of doctor accounts to ensure compliance with the new regulations [2] Group 3: Professional Standards - The notification categorizes medical personnel into various types, including physicians, nurses, and researchers, and mandates the verification of their qualifications through specific documentation [2][3] - A recent initiative in Shanghai established a list of prohibited behaviors for online health popularization, aiming to set standards and prevent misleading medical advice [3][4] Group 4: Importance of Professionalism - There is a growing recognition that many current popularization efforts lack professionalism and can mislead the public, highlighting the need for accurate and academically aligned information [4] - Medical popularization is increasingly becoming a criterion for career advancement in hospitals, although self-media contributions are not recognized in official evaluations [4]